Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-21 Thread Conkel, Joshua
Actually, I just installed a 10G LR fiber optic module in each of them in order 
to connect to the 5Ks.

I was sure to add the spanning-tree port type edge trunk command on the Nexus 
so I didn't risk ISSU support.

The way I see it, we should be able to keep this working by making sure no 
hosts go beyond the MTU limit on the smallest switch, since frames don't 
magically consolidate themselves. :)

The iSCSI jumbos have their own switch linked separately in a stack for the 
jumbo support.

Thanks!
- Original Message -
From:Andrew Jones andrew.jo...@alphawest.com.au
To:Conkel, Joshua conk...@wems-llc.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent:9/21/2012 8:39 PM
Subject:RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?



Im assuming your 3560 has gigabit ports to connet the 5ks?

Then you can do jumbo frames on those interfaces, as per the following from 
cisco.com 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configuration_example09186a008010edab.shtml#c3

You will need to reboot the switch for this to take effect.

Andrew Jones


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Conkel, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our 
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document that I 
used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access Design with 
Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual 
PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our distribution 
switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process and to provide 
L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 routing modules)

Now on to our issue:
The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 1500. 
Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 9000. 
After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able to set 
the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting TAC, they 
have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be applied at the 
system level, not per interface.

So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but this 
is the content I gave to TAC as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-21 Thread Conkel, Joshua
Haha. For our datacenter migration, we are traveling over about two miles of 
singlemode fiber with the 10G links. (5 patches total!)

I know it's not best practice, but we are doing this to avoid having to 
readdress servers during the live transition. Once the transition is complete, 
the Nexus will get a pair of distribution switches of it's own and we will move 
the existing server subnet routes. We are so small internally that turning off 
route summarization won't kill us (about 30 routed subnets total).

The main focus is being able to migrate all of our VMs to the new storage and 
hosts with zero downtime. Unfortunately for me, business direction doesn't mesh 
with best practices if it's not the easiest/cheapest/quickest option. :)
- Original Message -
From:Andrew Jones andrew.jo...@alphawest.com.au
To:Conkel, Joshua conk...@wems-llc.com
Cc:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent:9/21/2012 8:53 PM
Subject:RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?



Also, why LR optics? Unless you need to distance, SR optics are 1/4 the price. 
Or if you are patching into the same rack, twinax cables even cheaper.

Ive generally placed 5k in a central location near core / aggregation switches, 
then distributed the 2k over the data hall with multimode fibre. Allowing you 
to use cheap twinax for uplink and cheap fet-10g over multimode for FEX.

Cheers,

Alphawest


-Original Message-
From: Conkel, Joshua [mailto:conk...@wems-llc.com]
Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2012 10:47 AM
To: Andrew Jones
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

Actually, I just installed a 10G LR fiber optic module in each of them in order 
to connect to the 5Ks.

I was sure to add the spanning-tree port type edge trunk command on the Nexus 
so I didn't risk ISSU support.

The way I see it, we should be able to keep this working by making sure no 
hosts go beyond the MTU limit on the smallest switch, since frames don't 
magically consolidate themselves. :)

The iSCSI jumbos have their own switch linked separately in a stack for the 
jumbo support.

Thanks!
- Original Message -
From:Andrew Jones andrew.jo...@alphawest.com.au To:Conkel, Joshua 
conk...@wems-llc.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent:9/21/2012 8:39 PM
Subject:RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?



Im assuming your 3560 has gigabit ports to connet the 5ks?

Then you can do jumbo frames on those interfaces, as per the following from 
cisco.com 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configuration_example09186a008010edab.shtml#c3

You will need to reboot the switch for this to take effect.

Andrew Jones


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Conkel, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our 
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document that I 
used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access Design with 
Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual 
PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our distribution 
switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process and to provide 
L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 routing modules)

Now on to our issue:
The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 1500. 
Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 9000. 
After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able to set 
the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting TAC, they 
have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be applied at the 
system level, not per interface.

So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but this 
is the content I gave to TAC as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-21 Thread Andrew Jones
Also, why LR optics? Unless you need to distance, SR optics are 1/4 the price. 
Or if you are patching into the same rack, twinax cables even cheaper.

Ive generally placed 5k in a central location near core / aggregation switches, 
then distributed the 2k over the data hall with multimode fibre. Allowing you 
to use cheap twinax for uplink and cheap fet-10g over multimode for FEX.

Cheers,

Alphawest


-Original Message-
From: Conkel, Joshua [mailto:conk...@wems-llc.com] 
Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2012 10:47 AM
To: Andrew Jones
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

Actually, I just installed a 10G LR fiber optic module in each of them in order 
to connect to the 5Ks.

I was sure to add the spanning-tree port type edge trunk command on the Nexus 
so I didn't risk ISSU support.

The way I see it, we should be able to keep this working by making sure no 
hosts go beyond the MTU limit on the smallest switch, since frames don't 
magically consolidate themselves. :)

The iSCSI jumbos have their own switch linked separately in a stack for the 
jumbo support.

Thanks!
- Original Message -
From:Andrew Jones andrew.jo...@alphawest.com.au To:Conkel, Joshua 
conk...@wems-llc.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent:9/21/2012 8:39 PM
Subject:RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?



Im assuming your 3560 has gigabit ports to connet the 5ks?

Then you can do jumbo frames on those interfaces, as per the following from 
cisco.com 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configuration_example09186a008010edab.shtml#c3

You will need to reboot the switch for this to take effect.

Andrew Jones


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Conkel, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our 
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document that I 
used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access Design with 
Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual 
PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our distribution 
switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process and to provide 
L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 routing modules)

Now on to our issue:
The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 1500. 
Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 9000. 
After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able to set 
the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting TAC, they 
have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be applied at the 
system level, not per interface.

So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but this 
is the content I gave to TAC as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-21 Thread Andrew Jones
Im assuming your 3560 has gigabit ports to connet the 5ks?

Then you can do jumbo frames on those interfaces, as per the following from 
cisco.com 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configuration_example09186a008010edab.shtml#c3
 

You will need to reboot the switch for this to take effect.

Andrew Jones


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Conkel, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our 
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document that I 
used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access Design with 
Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual 
PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our distribution 
switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process and to provide 
L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 routing modules)
 
Now on to our issue:
The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 1500. 
Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 9000. 
After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able to set 
the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting TAC, they 
have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be applied at the 
system level, not per interface.
 
So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but this 
is the content I gave to TAC as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-21 Thread Andrew Jones
PMTUD should take care of the rest... 

Andrew Jones


-Original Message-
From: Conkel, Joshua [mailto:conk...@wems-llc.com] 
Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2012 10:47 AM
To: Andrew Jones
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

Actually, I just installed a 10G LR fiber optic module in each of them in order 
to connect to the 5Ks.

I was sure to add the spanning-tree port type edge trunk command on the Nexus 
so I didn't risk ISSU support.

The way I see it, we should be able to keep this working by making sure no 
hosts go beyond the MTU limit on the smallest switch, since frames don't 
magically consolidate themselves. :)

The iSCSI jumbos have their own switch linked separately in a stack for the 
jumbo support.

Thanks!
- Original Message -
From:Andrew Jones andrew.jo...@alphawest.com.au To:Conkel, Joshua 
conk...@wems-llc.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent:9/21/2012 8:39 PM
Subject:RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?



Im assuming your 3560 has gigabit ports to connet the 5ks?

Then you can do jumbo frames on those interfaces, as per the following from 
cisco.com 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configuration_example09186a008010edab.shtml#c3

You will need to reboot the switch for this to take effect.

Andrew Jones


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Conkel, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 12:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our 
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document that I 
used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access Design with 
Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual 
PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our distribution 
switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process and to provide 
L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 routing modules)

Now on to our issue:
The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 1500. 
Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 9000. 
After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able to set 
the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting TAC, they 
have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be applied at the 
system level, not per interface.

So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but this 
is the content I gave to TAC as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-20 Thread Lars Christensen
Hi Joshua,

You can't set a per interface MTU on the Nexus 5500-series switches. However, 
you can do it on per Class of Service. 

So in order to do increased MTU for your iSCSI traffic, you should create a 
policy-map identifying your iSCSI traffic, place the traffic in a separate 
queue with increased MTU.

This is the way to go forward.


Lars Christensen
CCIE #20292



Den 20/09/2012 kl. 04.56 skrev Conkel, Joshua conk...@wems-llc.com:

 We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
 data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
 configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for 
 our migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document 
 that I used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access 
 Design with Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders 
 and Virtual PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our 
 distribution switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process 
 and to provide L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 
 routing modules)
 
 Now on to our issue:
 The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
 network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 
 1500. Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 
 9000. After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able 
 to set the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting 
 TAC, they have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be 
 applied at the system level, not per interface.
 
 So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
 4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but 
 this is the content I gave to TAC as well.
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-20 Thread Reuben Farrelly
I'd like to further clarify this - as I think the subtleties here 
between layer 2 and layer 3 MTU may be giving a misleading picture.


The Layer 2 MTU (AKA frame size) is set globally, in the same way as on 
a Catalyst floor switch such as a 3560/3750 is done.


This is performed by something like this in the config:

-

policy-map type network-qos enable-jumbo-frames
  class type network-qos class-default
mtu 9216

system qos
  service-policy type network-qos enable-jumbo-frames

--

However the Layer 3 MTU is customisable, per VLAN interface:

---

SWT01(config)# int vlan 22
SWT01(config-if)# mtu ?
  64-9216  MTU size in bytes

SWT01(config-if)#

interface Vlan22
  no shutdown
  mtu 9216

-

In the majority of cases you will probably want to have a high layer 2 
MTU globally, and then perhaps be more careful with your layer 3 MTU 
settings at your layer 3 boundaries (the default is almost always 1500 
so unless you specifically modify it, that's what it'll be, regardless 
of your layer 2 MTU).  If you aren't doing any Layer 3 switching on the 
device then the layer 3 MTU setting obviously won't be necessary on there.


The config above is from a 5548UP running 5.2(1)N1 (that has the L3 
daughter card).


I'm not aware of any negative side effects on this platform from setting 
the layer 2 MTU to a high value globally.  Things most certainly break 
badly when the L2 MTU is set too small, but not usually when it's too big.


Reuben


On 20/09/2012 4:01 PM, Lars Christensen wrote:

Hi Joshua,

You can't set a per interface MTU on the Nexus 5500-series switches.
However, you can do it on per Class of Service.

So in order to do increased MTU for your iSCSI traffic, you should
create a policy-map identifying your iSCSI traffic, place the traffic
in a separate queue with increased MTU.

This is the way to go forward.


Lars Christensen CCIE #20292

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-20 Thread Phil Mayers

On 09/20/2012 07:20 AM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:


policy-map type network-qos enable-jumbo-frames
   class type network-qos class-default
 mtu 9216

system qos
   service-policy type network-qos enable-jumbo-frames



Interesting.

Does anyone know the rationale behind this way of setting the MTU on ths 
platform? It seems a bit peculiar, and as you note, a too-high L2 MTU is 
seldom harmful, so you would think per-interface (or even per-device) 
would suffice.


FWIW N7k seems to work normally i.e. set physical interface  SVI MTU 
in the interface config.

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-19 Thread Conkel, Joshua
We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our 
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the 
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our 
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The document that I 
used as prep work for the actual deployment was Data Center Access Design with 
Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual 
PortChannels. I planned on being able to hook the Nexus up to our distribution 
switches and standalone iSCSI network for the migration process and to provide 
L3 services (because of the limitations with using the L3 routing modules)
 
Now on to our issue:
The document states that you can configure per-interface MTU size. Our data 
network distribution switches are 3560s and run the standard MTU size of 1500. 
Our iSCSI network, on the other hand, use jumbo frames with a MTU of 9000. 
After trying the steps outlined in the document, I have only been able to set 
the MTU globally on the Nexus to jumbo or non-jumbo. After contacting TAC, they 
have initially confirmed that the MTU qos policy can only be applied at the 
system level, not per interface.
 
So, any ideas other than not converging our networks and buying a standalone 
4900 or 3750x series pair for our iSCSI network? Sorry if it's wordy, but this 
is the content I gave to TAC as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/