Re: [c-nsp] Multiple VRFs over site-to-site VPN? Possible?

2011-02-03 Thread John Kougoulos


I believe that you can use ASA for the IPsec part and create GRE tunnels 
between the PE and CE (one for each VRF). You would need though something 
like ISR on both ends or switches that support GRE in hardware, so 
3560/3750 should change.


Regards,
John

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Kell wrote:


Ran across a new requirement where we would like to extend our campus standard 
multi-VRF
routed building out to a remote site over the public Internet.

Absent the ideal MPLS or multiple-vlan Metro-E, can you do this site-to-site 
over a pair
of ASAs?

Ideally it would be something along the lines of:

VRF A vlan 123--
VRF B vlan 456--(terminating on --- Site ASA  Campus ASA  Campus PE 
(VRF A/B/C)
VRF C vlan 789--  3560/3750 CE)

Perhaps in simpler terms, bringing the 3 VRF vlans across the wire onto similar 
VRF
vlans on the campus side.

On-campus we just run a dot1Q trunk with a vlan for each VRF from CE to PE.

Can you trunk them into the ASA and do separate tunnels over the public IP 
endpoints,
dropping them on separate vlans on the other end?

Without meshing the routing / crossing the streams with respect to the VRFs?


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Multiple VRFs over site-to-site VPN? Possible?

2011-02-03 Thread Pavel Skovajsa
I have seen a similar idea,  using MPLS inside DMVPN - see Ivan's blog
http://blog.ioshints.info/2011/02/end-to-end-qos-marking-in-mplsvpn-over.html

http://blog.ioshints.info/2011/02/end-to-end-qos-marking-in-mplsvpn-over.htmlBut
you would need ISR for this, DMVPN (and MPLS) is not possible on ASA.

-pavel

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:

 Ran across a new requirement where we would like to extend our campus
 standard multi-VRF
 routed building out to a remote site over the public Internet.

 Absent the ideal MPLS or multiple-vlan Metro-E, can you do this
 site-to-site over a pair
 of ASAs?

 Ideally it would be something along the lines of:

 VRF A vlan 123--
 VRF B vlan 456--(terminating on --- Site ASA  Campus ASA 
 Campus PE (VRF A/B/C)
 VRF C vlan 789--  3560/3750 CE)

 Perhaps in simpler terms, bringing the 3 VRF vlans across the wire onto
 similar VRF
 vlans on the campus side.

 On-campus we just run a dot1Q trunk with a vlan for each VRF from CE to PE.

 Can you trunk them into the ASA and do separate tunnels over the public IP
 endpoints,
 dropping them on separate vlans on the other end?

 Without meshing the routing / crossing the streams with respect to the
 VRFs?

 Jeff

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Multiple VRFs over site-to-site VPN? Possible?

2011-02-03 Thread Ge Moua
If there were ISR on both end then I'd just do vrf-aware IPSec and plumb 
L2TPv3 inside of this to transport the vlan; of course this doesn't 
answer the original question of doing this with ASA


--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer

University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--


On 02/03/2011 04:26 AM, John Kougoulos wrote:


I believe that you can use ASA for the IPsec part and create GRE 
tunnels between the PE and CE (one for each VRF). You would need 
though something like ISR on both ends or switches that support GRE in 
hardware, so 3560/3750 should change.


Regards,
John

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Kell wrote:

Ran across a new requirement where we would like to extend our campus 
standard multi-VRF

routed building out to a remote site over the public Internet.

Absent the ideal MPLS or multiple-vlan Metro-E, can you do this 
site-to-site over a pair

of ASAs?

Ideally it would be something along the lines of:

VRF A vlan 123--
VRF B vlan 456--(terminating on --- Site ASA  Campus ASA  
Campus PE (VRF A/B/C)

VRF C vlan 789--  3560/3750 CE)

Perhaps in simpler terms, bringing the 3 VRF vlans across the wire 
onto similar VRF

vlans on the campus side.

On-campus we just run a dot1Q trunk with a vlan for each VRF from CE 
to PE.


Can you trunk them into the ASA and do separate tunnels over the 
public IP endpoints,

dropping them on separate vlans on the other end?

Without meshing the routing / crossing the streams with respect to 
the VRFs?



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Multiple VRFs over site-to-site VPN? Possible?

2011-02-03 Thread John Kougoulos


Hello,

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Ge Moua wrote:

If there were ISR on both end then I'd just do vrf-aware IPSec and plumb 
L2TPv3 inside of this to transport the vlan; of course this doesn't answer 
the original question of doing this with ASA




I believe that you can use ASA for the IPsec part and create GRE tunnels 
between the PE and CE (one for each VRF). You would need though something 
like ISR on both ends or switches that support GRE in hardware, so 
3560/3750 should change.




I agree with you, it's just another option. GRE would give the ability to 
use eg 65xx as PE and also use eg ip tcp adjust-mss on the Tunnel 
interface, I don't know how this is handled with L2TPv3.


Of course I've assumed that the CE routes the VLANs on each VRF at the 
remote site...


Regards,
John
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Multiple VRFs over site-to-site VPN? Possible?

2011-02-01 Thread Ge Moua
we are doing a similar setup with l2tpv3 inside vrf-aware ipsec (on 
IOS); my preference would be to do this w EoMPLS/Atom (again on IOS) 
which also maintains the vlan/mpls vrf integrity; of course this doesn't 
answer your question about do this on the asa; i'd be interested too in 
knowing how you'd solve this with an ASA setup (as a mental exercise).


--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer

University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--


On 2/1/11 5:20 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:

Ran across a new requirement where we would like to extend our campus standard 
multi-VRF
routed building out to a remote site over the public Internet.

Absent the ideal MPLS or multiple-vlan Metro-E, can you do this site-to-site 
over a pair
of ASAs?

Ideally it would be something along the lines of:

VRF A vlan 123--
VRF B vlan 456--(terminating on ---  Site ASA   Campus ASA   Campus 
PE (VRF A/B/C)
VRF C vlan 789--   3560/3750 CE)

Perhaps in simpler terms, bringing the 3 VRF vlans across the wire onto similar 
VRF
vlans on the campus side.

On-campus we just run a dot1Q trunk with a vlan for each VRF from CE to PE.

Can you trunk them into the ASA and do separate tunnels over the public IP 
endpoints,
dropping them on separate vlans on the other end?

Without meshing the routing / crossing the streams with respect to the VRFs?

Jeff

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/