[c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Andreas -- Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung Abteilung Netze Tel: 07071-2970342 Fax: 07071-295912 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
On 2/25/11 2:17 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Hello Andreas, In general performance of NAT64 is not really high. I remember on Cisco 2801 ~4Mbit was all I could get. I used one of the latest 12.4T release, 12.4(24)T as far as I remember. The smaller reasonable device to play with would be Cisco 1841 but it's also available on 870 and 880 platform. Of course for the production network I'd check how much traffic it's going to handle (and not only in number of TCP sessions that have to be translated but throughput itself, because NAT64 is process switched since 12.4(20)T, until that it was fast switched). Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
what about the option of doing a 6to4 relay; we do this with some low-end c2621xm routers and these work just fine -- Regards, Ge Moua Network Design Engineer University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS -- On 2/25/11 7:17 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Andreas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
Pitor- Please forgive my ignorance: I am attempting to get familiar with this myself on a 2811 running 12.4(24)T4 - but that's IP Base. I don't even have the option to assign an IPv6 address to an interface. Do you happen to know which flavor image I need? Regards, -Jeff Wojciechowski -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Piotr Wojciechowski Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 9:00 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device On 2/25/11 2:17 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_ trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Hello Andreas, In general performance of NAT64 is not really high. I remember on Cisco 2801 ~4Mbit was all I could get. I used one of the latest 12.4T release, 12.4(24)T as far as I remember. The smaller reasonable device to play with would be Cisco 1841 but it's also available on 870 and 880 platform. Of course for the production network I'd check how much traffic it's going to handle (and not only in number of TCP sessions that have to be translated but throughput itself, because NAT64 is process switched since 12.4(20)T, until that it was fast switched). Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety (including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our internal records. Midland Paper Company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, including any damage resulting from a computer virus. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
According to the Feature Navigator (which we know is not always accurate), IPv6 is supported in IPBASE only on 7200 and 7300 routers and Catalyst 3560/3750, CBS3k blade switches and 6500 Sup32 switches. On 2811 routers with 12.4T, IPv6 is available in IP Voice, SP Services, Advanced IP Services, Enterprise Services and Advanced Enterprise Services. Andras On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jeff Wojciechowski jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com wrote: Pitor- Please forgive my ignorance: I am attempting to get familiar with this myself on a 2811 running 12.4(24)T4 - but that's IP Base. I don't even have the option to assign an IPv6 address to an interface. Do you happen to know which flavor image I need? Regards, -Jeff Wojciechowski -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Piotr Wojciechowski Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 9:00 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device On 2/25/11 2:17 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_ trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Hello Andreas, In general performance of NAT64 is not really high. I remember on Cisco 2801 ~4Mbit was all I could get. I used one of the latest 12.4T release, 12.4(24)T as far as I remember. The smaller reasonable device to play with would be Cisco 1841 but it's also available on 870 and 880 platform. Of course for the production network I'd check how much traffic it's going to handle (and not only in number of TCP sessions that have to be translated but throughput itself, because NAT64 is process switched since 12.4(20)T, until that it was fast switched). Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety (including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our internal records. Midland Paper Company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, including any damage resulting from a computer virus. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device
Thanks! Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Tóth András [diosbej...@gmail.com] Received: Friday, 25 Feb 2011, 3:08pm To: Jeff Wojciechowski [jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com] CC: Piotr Wojciechowski [pe...@peper.eu.org]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device According to the Feature Navigator (which we know is not always accurate), IPv6 is supported in IPBASE only on 7200 and 7300 routers and Catalyst 3560/3750, CBS3k blade switches and 6500 Sup32 switches. On 2811 routers with 12.4T, IPv6 is available in IP Voice, SP Services, Advanced IP Services, Enterprise Services and Advanced Enterprise Services. Andras On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jeff Wojciechowski jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com wrote: Pitor- Please forgive my ignorance: I am attempting to get familiar with this myself on a 2811 running 12.4(24)T4 - but that's IP Base. I don't even have the option to assign an IPv6 address to an interface. Do you happen to know which flavor image I need? Regards, -Jeff Wojciechowski -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Piotr Wojciechowski Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 9:00 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Searching for cheap IPv6 NAT-PT Cisco-device On 2/25/11 2:17 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hello, I would like to connect IPv4-only devices like printers to an IPv6-only Network and I thought about doing this with NAT-PT on a cisco-device. To play around with NAT-PT and do some tests I need a cheap device. According to the cisco document Implementing NAT-PT for IPv6 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-nat_ trnsln_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html) I need IOS 12.4(2)T if I want to use all the available features. What is the cheapest cisco-device with at least two or better four fast ethernet ports running IOS 12.4(2)T to evaluate, if configuring NAT-PT is a solution for my problem ? greetings and thanks for help, Hello Andreas, In general performance of NAT64 is not really high. I remember on Cisco 2801 ~4Mbit was all I could get. I used one of the latest 12.4T release, 12.4(24)T as far as I remember. The smaller reasonable device to play with would be Cisco 1841 but it's also available on 870 and 880 platform. Of course for the production network I'd check how much traffic it's going to handle (and not only in number of TCP sessions that have to be translated but throughput itself, because NAT64 is process switched since 12.4(20)T, until that it was fast switched). Regards, -- Piotr Wojciechowski (CCIE #25543) | The trouble with being a god is http://ccieplayground.wordpress.com | that you've got no one to pray to JID: pe...@jabber.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety (including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our internal records. Midland Paper Company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, including any damage resulting from a computer virus. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety (including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our internal records. Midland Paper Company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, including any damage resulting from a computer virus
