Re: [c-nsp] IP Cef load sharing, quick question

2008-11-13 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 11:50 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote:
 GWIP was substituted for the ip of the 'gateway' or other end of that
 interface.
 
 Sorry, of course the IP would be in the route. I was just
 'obfusticating the output' for the list, as they say ;-)

That explains a lot. Overlooked that one. :-)

 As far as the GLBP goes, this solution isn't for any particular L4
 application it is just for all network traffic from any server on this
 switch to the rest of the network.

AFAIK, GLBP would require one L2 segment shared between the three links.
In that case you might not be able to take advantage of it at all. If
you have redundant paths, e.g. if the three destinations in the other
end of the links have L2 connectivity (for this VLAN) other than through
your gateway, then spanning tree or an equivalent might block all but
one link, thus rendering the load sharing part of GLBP less effective.

Making your gateway the STP root would mitigate this, but that might not
be desirable/possible.

I'd keep the ECMP with static routes and no L2 connectivity between the
links and then let CEF do the load-sharing, per destination.

Regards,
Peter


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] IP Cef load sharing, quick question

2008-11-07 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi there.

We have a Simple L3 switch (I think it's a 2960G) that we need to do some even 
simpler fault tolerance and load sharing on.

We were going to connect this switch to 3x switches upstream and then do 
something like this:

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/32 gwip
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/33 gwip
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/34 gwip

When we were testing we noticed some (well, quite a bit) of strangeness with 
traceroutes and the like (many multiple hops for the same, hop.. etc)

is there a better way to do what we're trying to achieve?

We were thinking about maybe doing VRRP on the 3 switches upstream but then we 
would only be using 1Gbps and the goal is to be able to use a little more 
than 1Gbps.

Normally we'd just let routing protocols handle all of this fun, but this isn't 
our 'regular' slice of equipment.

Any advice is swell,
-Drew




___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-18 Thread Dan Letkeman
My only options for the IP CEF command are as follows:

  original   Original algorithm
  tunnel Algorithm for use in tunnel only environments
  universal  Algorithm for use in most environments

I tried original, and it seems as if it load balances, but it doesn't
switch from modem to modem very fast.  But in any case there is a lot
less problems with this on.

I also found out that the content filter that is before the cisco
router is also doing NAT.  I'm assuming that's a problem as well
because now the router doesn't know what the source IP is anymore.

Any other ideas on how to make this work better?

Thanks,
Dan.

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Ben Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dan the reason your having issues is not MTU related, it's NAT related,
 because you have 3 ADSL lines each doing NAT against a different outside IP
 when you turn on per-packet load sharing you end up with flows to the same
 destination having different source IP addresses.

 Your only option is per-destination load balancing (ie the default), one way
 you can tweak this a little without breaking to much is to change the
 standard algorithm to include ports.

 Try adding ip cef load-sharing algorithm include-ports destination into
 your global config once you've removed your per-packet load sharing and see
 how you go.

 You are never going to get perfect load balancing in your scenario but if
 you have enough hosts on your LAN it should be sufficient enough, one way
 you can do per-packet is if you get another IP routed down all 3 adsl lines
 and put it on a loopback and NAT everything against that.

 Ben

 - Original Message - From: Dan Letkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 3:29 AM
 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing


 Still seem to have the same problem even with this:

 interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
 duplex auto
 speed auto


 interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip load-sharing per-packet
 duplex auto
 speed auto

 Dan.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:

 ip load-sharing per-packet

 I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it randomly
 picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the MTU?
 If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the pictures
 and pages don't load.

 Yep...try configuring ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 or so on the
 ingress interface from the LAN.


 Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Dan.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
  sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
  it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
  traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
  adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the 
  configuration
  to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
  before it will select the next ip route
 
  Here is my config:
 
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
   ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
   ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  ip http server
  ip classless
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
  !
 
  The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 
  192.168.10.11
 
  Thanks,
  Dan.
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-18 Thread Aamer Akhter (aakhter)
Dan,

Another option is to use the PfR NAT integration. The idea is that PfR will 
actively monitor the traffic and move subnet reachabilty around to try to even 
out the traffic. For existing NATed flows, PfR will preserve the stickiness on 
the established path.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6599/ps8787/white_paper_C11-458124.html


-- 
Aamer Akhter / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ent  Commercial Systems, cisco Systems

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Letkeman
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 12:06 PM
 To: Ben Steele; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing
 
 My only options for the IP CEF command are as follows:
 
   original   Original algorithm
   tunnel Algorithm for use in tunnel only environments
   universal  Algorithm for use in most environments
 
 I tried original, and it seems as if it load balances, but it doesn't
 switch from modem to modem very fast.  But in any case there is a lot
 less problems with this on.
 
 I also found out that the content filter that is before the cisco
 router is also doing NAT.  I'm assuming that's a problem as well
 because now the router doesn't know what the source IP is anymore.
 
 Any other ideas on how to make this work better?
 
 Thanks,
 Dan.
 
 On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Ben Steele
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Dan the reason your having issues is not MTU related, it's NAT
 related,
  because you have 3 ADSL lines each doing NAT against a different
 outside IP
  when you turn on per-packet load sharing you end up with flows to the
 same
  destination having different source IP addresses.
 
  Your only option is per-destination load balancing (ie the default),
 one way
  you can tweak this a little without breaking to much is to change the
  standard algorithm to include ports.
 
  Try adding ip cef load-sharing algorithm include-ports destination
 into
  your global config once you've removed your per-packet load sharing
 and see
  how you go.
 
  You are never going to get perfect load balancing in your scenario
 but if
  you have enough hosts on your LAN it should be sufficient enough, one
 way
  you can do per-packet is if you get another IP routed down all 3 adsl
 lines
  and put it on a loopback and NAT everything against that.
 
  Ben
 
  - Original Message - From: Dan Letkeman
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 3:29 AM
  Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing
 
 
  Still seem to have the same problem even with this:
 
  interface FastEthernet0/0
  ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
  ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 
 
  interface FastEthernet0/1
  ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
  ip load-sharing per-packet
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 
  Dan.
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 
  ip load-sharing per-packet
 
  I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it
 randomly
  picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the
 MTU?
  If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the
 pictures
  and pages don't load.
 
  Yep...try configuring ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 or so on the
  ingress interface from the LAN.
 
 
  Any ideas?
 
  Thanks,
  Dan.
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.
  
   On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
   Hello,
  
   I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup
 load
   sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the
 router
   it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when
 I do
   traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the
 same
   adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the 
   configuration
   to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some
 sorts
   before it will select the next ip route
  
   Here is my config:
  
   !
   interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
   !
   interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
   !
   ip http server
   ip classless
   ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
   ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
   !
  
   The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 
   192.168.10.11
  
   Thanks,
   Dan.
   ___
   cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
   https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
   archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
  
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-16 Thread Ben Steele
Dan the reason your having issues is not MTU related, it's NAT related, 
because you have 3 ADSL lines each doing NAT against a different outside IP 
when you turn on per-packet load sharing you end up with flows to the same 
destination having different source IP addresses.


Your only option is per-destination load balancing (ie the default), one way 
you can tweak this a little without breaking to much is to change the 
standard algorithm to include ports.


Try adding ip cef load-sharing algorithm include-ports destination into 
your global config once you've removed your per-packet load sharing and see 
how you go.


You are never going to get perfect load balancing in your scenario but if 
you have enough hosts on your LAN it should be sufficient enough, one way 
you can do per-packet is if you get another IP routed down all 3 adsl lines 
and put it on a loopback and NAT everything against that.


Ben

- Original Message - 
From: Dan Letkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 3:29 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing



Still seem to have the same problem even with this:

interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
duplex auto
speed auto


interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip load-sharing per-packet
duplex auto
speed auto

Dan.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:

ip load-sharing per-packet

I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it randomly
picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the MTU?
If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the pictures
and pages don't load.


Yep...try configuring ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 or so on the
ingress interface from the LAN.



Any ideas?

Thanks,
Dan.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 Hello,

 I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
 sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
 it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
 traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
 adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the 
 configuration

 to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
 before it will select the next ip route

 Here is my config:

 !
 interface FastEthernet0/0
  ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 !
 interface FastEthernet0/1
  ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 !
 ip http server
 ip classless
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
 !

 The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 
 192.168.10.11


 Thanks,
 Dan.
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-16 Thread Frank Bulk
There are a couple of companies that can help with this, too, though it's
not Cisco-related:
http://www.sharedband.com/
http://www.mushroomnetworks.com/
http://www.xrio.com/website/

Frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Steele
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 6:36 PM
To: Dan Letkeman; Rodney Dunn; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

Dan the reason your having issues is not MTU related, it's NAT related,
because you have 3 ADSL lines each doing NAT against a different outside IP
when you turn on per-packet load sharing you end up with flows to the same
destination having different source IP addresses.

Your only option is per-destination load balancing (ie the default), one way
you can tweak this a little without breaking to much is to change the
standard algorithm to include ports.

Try adding ip cef load-sharing algorithm include-ports destination into
your global config once you've removed your per-packet load sharing and see
how you go.

You are never going to get perfect load balancing in your scenario but if
you have enough hosts on your LAN it should be sufficient enough, one way
you can do per-packet is if you get another IP routed down all 3 adsl lines
and put it on a loopback and NAT everything against that.

Ben

- Original Message -
From: Dan Letkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 3:29 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing


 Still seem to have the same problem even with this:

 interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
 duplex auto
 speed auto


 interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip load-sharing per-packet
 duplex auto
 speed auto

 Dan.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 ip load-sharing per-packet

 I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it randomly
 picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the MTU?
 If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the pictures
 and pages don't load.

 Yep...try configuring ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 or so on the
 ingress interface from the LAN.


 Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Dan.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
  sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
  it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
  traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
  adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the
  configuration
  to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
  before it will select the next ip route
 
  Here is my config:
 
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
   ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
   ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  ip http server
  ip classless
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
  !
 
  The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and
  192.168.10.11
 
  Thanks,
  Dan.
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-15 Thread Dan Letkeman
Hello,

I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the configuration
to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
before it will select the next ip route

Here is my config:

!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
ip http server
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
!

The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 192.168.10.11

Thanks,
Dan.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-15 Thread Rodney Dunn
Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
 sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
 it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
 traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
 adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the configuration
 to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
 before it will select the next ip route
 
 Here is my config:
 
 !
 interface FastEthernet0/0
  ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 !
 interface FastEthernet0/1
  ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 !
 ip http server
 ip classless
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
 !
 
 The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 192.168.10.11
 
 Thanks,
 Dan.
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-15 Thread Dan Letkeman
ip load-sharing per-packet

I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it randomly
picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the MTU?
If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the pictures
and pages don't load.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Dan.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 Hello,

 I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
 sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
 it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
 traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
 adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the configuration
 to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
 before it will select the next ip route

 Here is my config:

 !
 interface FastEthernet0/0
  ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 !
 interface FastEthernet0/1
  ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
  duplex auto
  speed auto
 !
 ip http server
 ip classless
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
 !

 The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 192.168.10.11

 Thanks,
 Dan.
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-15 Thread Rodney Dunn
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 ip load-sharing per-packet
 
 I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it randomly
 picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the MTU?
 If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the pictures
 and pages don't load.

Yep...try configuring ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 or so on the
ingress interface from the LAN.

 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Dan.
 
 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
  sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
  it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
  traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
  adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the configuration
  to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
  before it will select the next ip route
 
  Here is my config:
 
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
   ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
   ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  ip http server
  ip classless
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
  !
 
  The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 192.168.10.11
 
  Thanks,
  Dan.
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-15 Thread Dan Letkeman
Still seem to have the same problem even with this:

interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
 duplex auto
 speed auto


interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip load-sharing per-packet
 duplex auto
 speed auto

Dan.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
 ip load-sharing per-packet

 I tried adding this to F0/1 and the trace route works now(it randomly
 picks either line), but there seems to be issues with maybe the MTU?
 If I try to browse websites i get page errors and some of the pictures
 and pages don't load.

 Yep...try configuring ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 or so on the
 ingress interface from the LAN.


 Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Dan.

 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try ip load-sharing per-packet on both egress interfaces.
 
  On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I have a 2621 router running 12.3(26) and I would like to setup load
  sharing to multiple adsl lines.  When I do a traceroute on the router
  it randomly picks a dsl line and seems to work fine.  But when I do
  traceroute tests from a workstation it always seems to take the same
  adsl line.  Is there something else I need to add to the configuration
  to make it pick random lines, or is there a timeout of some sorts
  before it will select the next ip route
 
  Here is my config:
 
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
   ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
   ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
   duplex auto
   speed auto
  !
  ip http server
  ip classless
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.11
  !
 
  The two adsl modem/routers I have are 192.168.10.10, and 192.168.10.11
 
  Thanks,
  Dan.
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ip cef load sharing

2008-08-15 Thread Jon Lewis

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Dan Letkeman wrote:


Still seem to have the same problem even with this:

interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
duplex auto
speed auto

interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip load-sharing per-packet
duplex auto
speed auto


You failed to mention whether these 2 DSL lines go to the same ISP and 
whether that ISP is setup to support your per-packet load sharing.


Also, as you're using private IPs and talking about web access, I assume 
there's NAT.  Where is the NAT being done?  If your output traffic through 
each DSL router is NAT'd by that DSL router to a different public IP, 
your setup is not going to work.


--
 Jon Lewis   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net|
_ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/