[c-nsp] rtr responder on 6500
We are setting up a testbed for IP SLA monitoring and I wanted to include our core 6500 switches into the test. For 2 of them this went without problem, on two others this doesn't work : I get the following error (after putting on debug) : RTR unable to set SO_STRICT_ADDR_BIND option I searched the Cisco website and also did a google search but this didn't give any results. Anyone an idea of what is going wrong here ? Both not-working routers have a SUP32, the working ones a SUP2 supervisor. Router1 s3223_rp-IPBASEK9-VM Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-SUP32-GE-3B : rtr responder not working Router2 s222_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE : rtr responder working Router3 s3223_rp-IPBASEK9-VM Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-SUP32-GE-3B : rtr responder not working Router4 s222_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE : rtr responder working Is it possible I need the ipservices version to do this ? Anyone a clue on what the error means ? The rtr responder command is accepted in all versions. Wim Holemans Netwerkdienst Universiteit Antwerpen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] rtr responder on 6500
Holemans Wim wrote: We are setting up a testbed for IP SLA monitoring and I wanted to include our core 6500 switches into the test. For 2 of them this went without problem, on two others this doesn't work : I get the following error (after putting on debug) : RTR unable to set SO_STRICT_ADDR_BIND option I searched the Cisco website and also did a google search but this didn't give any results. Anyone an idea of what is going wrong here ? Both not-working routers have a SUP32, the working ones a SUP2 supervisor. Router1 s3223_rp-IPBASEK9-VM Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-SUP32-GE-3B : rtr responder not working Router2 s222_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE : rtr responder working Router3 s3223_rp-IPBASEK9-VM Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-SUP32-GE-3B : rtr responder not working Router4 s222_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE : rtr responder working Is it possible I need the ipservices version to do this ? Anyone a clue on what the error means ? The rtr responder command is accepted in all versions. I think you need ipservices. Also, IIRC RTR has crash-bugs under SXF, and you are advised to not use it at all :o( ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] rtr responder on 6500
Holemans Wim wrote on Monday, October 20, 2008 3:50 PM: We are setting up a testbed for IP SLA monitoring and I wanted to include our core 6500 switches into the test. For 2 of them this went without problem, on two others this doesn't work : I get the following error (after putting on debug) : RTR unable to set SO_STRICT_ADDR_BIND option I searched the Cisco website and also did a google search but this didn't give any results. Anyone an idea of what is going wrong here ? Both not-working routers have a SUP32, the working ones a SUP2 supervisor. Router1 s3223_rp-IPBASEK9-VM Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-SUP32-GE-3B : rtr responder not working Router2 s222_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE : rtr responder working Router3 s3223_rp-IPBASEK9-VM Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-SUP32-GE-3B : rtr responder not working Router4 s222_rp-IPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.2(18)SXF6 WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE : rtr responder working Is it possible I need the ipservices version to do this ? Anyone a clue on what the error means ? The rtr responder command is accepted in all versions. Wim, this seems to be related to ION/Modular IOS (which you're running on R1 and R3) not supporting the SO_STRICT_ADDR_BIND which RTR responder uses.. looks like 12.2(33)SXH and later can be used.. oli ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
