Re: [c-nsp] npe-g2 CsCsk65796
Eugene, I did a little digging on this and it appears there are a couple of gotchas with this one. a) Does the boot image you have have the fix for it? dir bootflash: If not, we need to get one that does. b) What code did you upgrade from? From talking with DE, unlcear exactly what in the code it is, but just upgrading to the image with the fix may not resolve it as the problem was carried over. Can you reload it once more on the upgraded image and verify if it comes back? Rodney gotOn Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, Can you post a 'sh int' and 'sh controller' for the interface? And 'sh ver' from the box? Rodney On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, Eugene Vedistchev wrote: I wonder if someone else upgraded to 12.2SB train to fix CSCsk65796 ? Bug Details NPE-G2: all rx frames counted as overruns on built-in gige. We have upgraded software to 12.2.31SB13 on two routers, reloaded them and stuck with this bug again. Bug Toolkit provided workaround to powercycle routers. I cannot justify for me, do powercycle with new software get rid this bug for us, or we encounter another bug or physical failure ? Eugene Vedistchev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] npe-g2 CsCsk65796
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:17:48AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, I did a little digging on this and it appears there are a couple of gotchas with this one. a) Does the boot image you have have the fix for it? dir bootflash: If not, we need to get one that does. b) What code did you upgrade from? From talking with DE, unlcear exactly what in the code it is, but just upgrading to the image with the fix may not resolve it as the problem was carried over. Can you reload it once more on the upgraded image and verify if it comes back? I'm asking for more clarification but I think they are implying a hard power cycle not a remote reload via the CLI. Rodney gotOn Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, Can you post a 'sh int' and 'sh controller' for the interface? And 'sh ver' from the box? Rodney On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, Eugene Vedistchev wrote: I wonder if someone else upgraded to 12.2SB train to fix CSCsk65796 ? Bug Details NPE-G2: all rx frames counted as overruns on built-in gige. We have upgraded software to 12.2.31SB13 on two routers, reloaded them and stuck with this bug again. Bug Toolkit provided workaround to powercycle routers. I cannot justify for me, do powercycle with new software get rid this bug for us, or we encounter another bug or physical failure ? Eugene Vedistchev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] npe-g2 CsCsk65796
Yep...a hard power cycle is needed. Rodney On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:12:19AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:17:48AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, I did a little digging on this and it appears there are a couple of gotchas with this one. a) Does the boot image you have have the fix for it? dir bootflash: If not, we need to get one that does. b) What code did you upgrade from? From talking with DE, unlcear exactly what in the code it is, but just upgrading to the image with the fix may not resolve it as the problem was carried over. Can you reload it once more on the upgraded image and verify if it comes back? I'm asking for more clarification but I think they are implying a hard power cycle not a remote reload via the CLI. Rodney gotOn Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, Can you post a 'sh int' and 'sh controller' for the interface? And 'sh ver' from the box? Rodney On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, Eugene Vedistchev wrote: I wonder if someone else upgraded to 12.2SB train to fix CSCsk65796 ? Bug Details NPE-G2: all rx frames counted as overruns on built-in gige. We have upgraded software to 12.2.31SB13 on two routers, reloaded them and stuck with this bug again. Bug Toolkit provided workaround to powercycle routers. I cannot justify for me, do powercycle with new software get rid this bug for us, or we encounter another bug or physical failure ? Eugene Vedistchev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] npe-g2 CsCsk65796
Hello, we haven't upgraded boot image to fixed release. we upgraded from 12.2.31SB6 code yes, powercycle did the trick. br, Eugene Rodney Dunn wrote: Yep...a hard power cycle is needed. Rodney On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:12:19AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:17:48AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, I did a little digging on this and it appears there are a couple of gotchas with this one. a) Does the boot image you have have the fix for it? dir bootflash: If not, we need to get one that does. b) What code did you upgrade from? From talking with DE, unlcear exactly what in the code it is, but just upgrading to the image with the fix may not resolve it as the problem was carried over. Can you reload it once more on the upgraded image and verify if it comes back? I'm asking for more clarification but I think they are implying a hard power cycle not a remote reload via the CLI. Rodney gotOn Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: Eugene, Can you post a 'sh int' and 'sh controller' for the interface? And 'sh ver' from the box? Rodney On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, Eugene Vedistchev wrote: I wonder if someone else upgraded to 12.2SB train to fix CSCsk65796 ? Bug Details NPE-G2: all rx frames counted as overruns on built-in gige. We have upgraded software to 12.2.31SB13 on two routers, reloaded them and stuck with this bug again. Bug Toolkit provided workaround to powercycle routers. I cannot justify for me, do powercycle with new software get rid this bug for us, or we encounter another bug or physical failure ? Eugene Vedistchev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] npe-g2 CsCsk65796
Eugene, Can you post a 'sh int' and 'sh controller' for the interface? And 'sh ver' from the box? Rodney On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, Eugene Vedistchev wrote: I wonder if someone else upgraded to 12.2SB train to fix CSCsk65796 ? Bug Details NPE-G2: all rx frames counted as overruns on built-in gige. We have upgraded software to 12.2.31SB13 on two routers, reloaded them and stuck with this bug again. Bug Toolkit provided workaround to powercycle routers. I cannot justify for me, do powercycle with new software get rid this bug for us, or we encounter another bug or physical failure ? Eugene Vedistchev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
