[cisco-voip] SIP Session Refresh During CUCM Upgrade

2014-08-12 Thread Daniel Pagan
Folks:

Wondering if anyone else has observed an issue where a CUCM node fails to send 
a SIP session refresh while an upgrade is in progress? I noticed this behavior 
when running through a mock upgrade for a customer. While upgrading the 
Publisher node, a call was active where the SIP dialog was established between 
the Publisher and CUBE. The active call dropped and looking at CCM traces 
showed no refresh was sent at half the Session Expires value.

I lowered the Session Expires timer to recreate the issue in a shorter 
timeframe (SE of 240 seconds) and failed to see a refresh from CUCM after 120 
seconds - the call again disconnected once the SE expired. Forcing the SIP 
dialog to source from the Subscriber node results in no issues and SIP refresh 
requests are sent as expected. Back to the Publisher, another call was placed 
after the upgrade completed and the issue cannot be recreated. With the Pub out 
the way, the subscriber's upgrade was started and the issue can now be 
recreated there as well. Basically, it seems the CM node in process of 
upgrading isn't sending a reINVITE at half the SE value.

If this is expected behavior, I can make sure the customer's Session Expires 
value is temporarily increased during the upgrade window, but I can't seem to 
locate any documentation stating this is a known or expected caveat. This is 
going from 8.6.2.24090-1 to 8.6.2.25131-1 and I've yet to test this using other 
upgrade paths, but I plan on testing this once more once time permits in order 
to set proper expectations w/ the customer.

Thanks!

- Dan


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] CUCM 9+ and SIP trunk provider w/o CUBE

2014-08-12 Thread Robert Blayzor
I am planning on replacing an again CallManager deployment with SCCP phones 
with a new CUCM 10.x and SIP phones.

Our service provider can provide all of our trunking and PSTN connectivity via 
a direct SIP trunk, so I no longer need a PSTN gateway or PRI card, etc.  (or 
at least I should not).

We will be peering SIP from the CUCM to our providers SBC, so the question begs 
to ask on our side is a CUBE absolutely required to make this work?  Pros/Cons? 
 I'd rather not have to add a CUBE in if I don't have to.

Since the phones are native SIP as is the CallManager I'm trying to understand 
why a CUBE is required? (or is it not?)

TIA

-Robert



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] Possible to force SIP refer transfer from IP phone

2014-08-12 Thread Justin Steinberg
I have a unique requirement between a new 10.5 CUCM and a third party
dialer/ACD.

CUCM is integrated to PSTN via SIP trunk to 2911 PRI gateway.   CUCM is
also integrated via SIP trunk to the dialer/ACD via SIP trunk directly
between CUCM and the dialer/ACD.

CUCM takes inbound call to IP phone. User needs to be able to transfer the
external caller to the dialer/ACD.  However we need the initial invite sent
to the dialer to have the Calling Party Number set to the external PSTN
user, so the dialer can properly do a database lookup of the external party
and match the caller ID.

When we do this transfer via IP phone, it always starts off as a warm
transfer so the dialer/ACD gets the internal IP phone number for the DB
lookup.

Is there anyway for a IP phone (or jabber) to utilize SIP refer to complete
the transfer so the dialer/ACD sees the external party number as caller ID
on the transferred leg?

As a secondary option, I have considered possibly delaying the actual
transfer to the dialer/ACD to give the IP phone user enough time to
complete the supervised transfer. But not sure if unity connection call
handler is the best way or if there is another way, perhaps in CUCM
dialplan.

Thanks

Justin
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9+ and SIP trunk provider w/o CUBE

2014-08-12 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
If your provider is acting as a SIP registrar you will certainly need a CUBE, 
and to be honest I'd recommend it anyway just so you don't have to allow UCM 
and phones direct connectivity outside your network.  

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab10/collab10/trunks.html#pgfId-1363704

 When connecting to a service provider's IP PSTN network, Cisco strongly 
 recommends the use of the Cisco Unified Border Element as an enterprise edge 
 Session Border Controller to provide a controlled demarcation and security 
 point between your enterprise and the service provider's network. 

-Ryan

On Aug 12, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Robert Blayzor rblayzor.b...@inoc.net wrote:

I am planning on replacing an again CallManager deployment with SCCP phones 
with a new CUCM 10.x and SIP phones.

Our service provider can provide all of our trunking and PSTN connectivity via 
a direct SIP trunk, so I no longer need a PSTN gateway or PRI card, etc.  (or 
at least I should not).

We will be peering SIP from the CUCM to our providers SBC, so the question begs 
to ask on our side is a CUBE absolutely required to make this work?  Pros/Cons? 
 I'd rather not have to add a CUBE in if I don't have to.

Since the phones are native SIP as is the CallManager I'm trying to understand 
why a CUBE is required? (or is it not?)

TIA

-Robert



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Possible to force SIP refer transfer from IP phone

2014-08-12 Thread Brian Meade
Justin,

Since these phones do not support blind transfer, it won't be possible to
do something like that.

Can you add a delay before checking the number so that it checks the
connected number after the transfer is completed?

Brian


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I have a unique requirement between a new 10.5 CUCM and a third party
 dialer/ACD.

 CUCM is integrated to PSTN via SIP trunk to 2911 PRI gateway.   CUCM is
 also integrated via SIP trunk to the dialer/ACD via SIP trunk directly
 between CUCM and the dialer/ACD.

 CUCM takes inbound call to IP phone. User needs to be able to transfer the
 external caller to the dialer/ACD.  However we need the initial invite sent
 to the dialer to have the Calling Party Number set to the external PSTN
 user, so the dialer can properly do a database lookup of the external party
 and match the caller ID.

 When we do this transfer via IP phone, it always starts off as a warm
 transfer so the dialer/ACD gets the internal IP phone number for the DB
 lookup.

 Is there anyway for a IP phone (or jabber) to utilize SIP refer to
 complete the transfer so the dialer/ACD sees the external party number as
 caller ID on the transferred leg?

 As a secondary option, I have considered possibly delaying the actual
 transfer to the dialer/ACD to give the IP phone user enough time to
 complete the supervised transfer. But not sure if unity connection call
 handler is the best way or if there is another way, perhaps in CUCM
 dialplan.

 Thanks

 Justin

 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9+ and SIP trunk provider w/o CUBE

2014-08-12 Thread Nathan Richie
I agree with Ryan on this one.  If you do not have the CUBE, your provider
will have basically have full IP connectivity into your network.

Regards,

Nathan Richie
CCIE No. 27910
Consulting Engineer
boice.net
700 Pearl Street/New Albany/ IN/ 47150
(502)271-2139 ­Single Number Reach
(502)271-2100 ­24x7x365 Emergency Assistance


On 8/12/14, 21:47, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote:

If your provider is acting as a SIP registrar you will certainly need a
CUBE, and to be honest I'd recommend it anyway just so you don't have to
allow UCM and phones direct connectivity outside your network.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab10/coll
ab10/trunks.html#pgfId-1363704

 When connecting to a service provider's IP PSTN network, Cisco strongly
recommends the use of the Cisco Unified Border Element as an enterprise
edge Session Border Controller to provide a controlled demarcation and
security point between your enterprise and the service provider's
network. 

-Ryan

On Aug 12, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Robert Blayzor rblayzor.b...@inoc.net
wrote:

I am planning on replacing an again CallManager deployment with SCCP
phones with a new CUCM 10.x and SIP phones.

Our service provider can provide all of our trunking and PSTN
connectivity via a direct SIP trunk, so I no longer need a PSTN gateway
or PRI card, etc.  (or at least I should not).

We will be peering SIP from the CUCM to our providers SBC, so the
question begs to ask on our side is a CUBE absolutely required to make
this work?  Pros/Cons?  I'd rather not have to add a CUBE in if I don't
have to.

Since the phones are native SIP as is the CallManager I'm trying to
understand why a CUBE is required? (or is it not?)

TIA

-Robert



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this 
material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy 
the material/information.

 


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip