[cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
Are you saying they don’t show up in the search box or they don’t show up as actual contacts? If the former it appears you have a problem with your directory settings, what are you using, UDS or LDAP? If the latter, you could bulk import them in IMP but I’m not sure why you’d want to do that. People generally use contacts as their personal list of folks they want to have listed for east of access. 500 contacts would make the contact list incredibly busy IMO and unwieldy for finding the people you actually want. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech | Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296 | Websitehttp://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email Supportmailto:supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request Support Phone. 410.252.8830 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abebe Amare Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:02 AM To: cisco voip Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
Hi Mathew The users can be searched from directory and add manually. The requirement was for all users to show up as contacts same as they appear in outlook address book. Yes I would also agree that having all users as contacts is not productive. Thanks for your pointers and support. Best regards Abebe On Sep 4, 2014 2:46 PM, Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote: Are you saying they don’t show up in the search box or they don’t show up as actual contacts? If the former it appears you have a problem with your directory settings, what are you using, UDS or LDAP? If the latter, you could bulk import them in IMP but I’m not sure why you’d want to do that. People generally use contacts as their personal list of folks they want to have listed for east of access. 500 contacts would make the contact list incredibly busy IMO and unwieldy for finding the people you actually want. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitter http://twitter.com/heliontech | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296 | Website http://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email Support supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request Support Phone. 410.252.8830 *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Abebe Amare *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:02 AM *To:* cisco voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
It should be noted that this is the way most IMP systems work. You definitely wouldn't want all possible Google contacts showing up in your list automatically :) Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Abebe Amare abu...@gmail.commailto:abu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mathew The users can be searched from directory and add manually. The requirement was for all users to show up as contacts same as they appear in outlook address book. Yes I would also agree that having all users as contacts is not productive. Thanks for your pointers and support. Best regards Abebe On Sep 4, 2014 2:46 PM, Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.commailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote: Are you saying they don’t show up in the search box or they don’t show up as actual contacts? If the former it appears you have a problem with your directory settings, what are you using, UDS or LDAP? If the latter, you could bulk import them in IMP but I’m not sure why you’d want to do that. People generally use contacts as their personal list of folks they want to have listed for east of access. 500 contacts would make the contact list incredibly busy IMO and unwieldy for finding the people you actually want. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech | Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296 | Websitehttp://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email Supportmailto:supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request Support Phone. 410.252.8830 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abebe Amare Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:02 AM To: cisco voip Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
There is a way to import contacts using an XML file, but I am not sure of any other auto populating methods. HTH, Nathan Richie From: Abebe Amare abu...@gmail.commailto:abu...@gmail.com Date: Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 3:01 To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
Hi Philip, Thanks for the colurful explanation. On Sep 4, 2014 3:07 PM, Walenta, Philip philip.wale...@polycom.com wrote: It should be noted that this is the way most IMP systems work. You definitely wouldn't want all possible Google contacts showing up in your list automatically :) Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Abebe Amare abu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mathew The users can be searched from directory and add manually. The requirement was for all users to show up as contacts same as they appear in outlook address book. Yes I would also agree that having all users as contacts is not productive. Thanks for your pointers and support. Best regards Abebe On Sep 4, 2014 2:46 PM, Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote: Are you saying they don’t show up in the search box or they don’t show up as actual contacts? If the former it appears you have a problem with your directory settings, what are you using, UDS or LDAP? If the latter, you could bulk import them in IMP but I’m not sure why you’d want to do that. People generally use contacts as their personal list of folks they want to have listed for east of access. 500 contacts would make the contact list incredibly busy IMO and unwieldy for finding the people you actually want. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitter http://twitter.com/heliontech | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296 | Website http://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email Support supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request Support Phone. 410.252.8830 *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Abebe Amare *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:02 AM *To:* cisco voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts
Hi Abebe, Yes there is a Feature request to include phone numbers for Contacts so that we can import them with a XML file and this has to be done per machine CSCup19115 - *Support to add Phone number field in the Contact XML file* But yes as Matthew mentioned adding 500 contacts to every list is way too much and I think it is not even supported to have so many contacts Regards Rajamani On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Abebe Amare abu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nathan The xml import method contains only username and full name without phone number and also you have to do that for every client. On Sep 4, 2014 3:01 PM, Nathan Richie nath...@boice.net wrote: There is a way to import contacts using an XML file, but I am not sure of any other auto populating methods. HTH, Nathan Richie From: Abebe Amare abu...@gmail.commailto:abu...@gmail.com Date: Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 3:01 To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows Contacts HI, I am having my first encounter with Jabber for windows and it does not show contacts unless manually added on the client. CUCM is LDAP integrated with AD for sync and authentication. Is there any config to be done on CUCM/CUPS side to have all the users in the domain (500) to show up as contacts? best regards, Abebe The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Device Pack install
All, A customer is requesting support for the 7800 Phones on their 9.1.2 Call Manager, I was looking at the device packs and found the one that enables support for the phones, but know that the customer may want support for the 8800 phones in the near future, so I may as well install the latest device pack, right? The latest device pack is significantly smaller than one that enables support for the 7800 phones and it does not specifically state that it enables support for the 7800 phones. Can I install the latest device pack for 9.1.2 and expect to get all of the features of the previous device packs? Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer CCNA, CCNA Voice 48325 Alpha Dr. Ste. 150 Wixom, MI 48393 p 248.468.0710 e tschlotte...@netechcorp.commailto:tschlotte...@netechcorp.com w netechcorp.comhttp://netechcorp.com/ [cid:image001.png@01CFC820.9A59AA70] [cid:image002.png@01CFC820.9A59AA70]https://www.linkedin.com/company/75843?trk=tyahtrkInfo=tarId%3A1397760375508%2Ctas%3Anetech%2Cidx%3A3-1-5 [cid:image003.png@01CFC820.9A59AA70] https://www.facebook.com/NetechCorporation [cid:image004.png@01CFC820.9A59AA70] https://twitter.com/netechcorp [cid:image005.png@01CFC820.9A59AA70] https://www.youtube.com/user/NetechCorporation ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP/SDL trace question re:transfer
TAC engineer with the SR also concluded it was CSCun15967 and pointed us to 9.1.2.12900.002 or 9.1.2.12035.001 Workaround with Unity Connection using supervised transfer seems to work fine in the meantime. Thanks again! Ed On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: We're going to try and address this by having unity supervise the transfer instead.. I wasn't aware we could set it to do that without injecting additional recordings into the mix. Thanks for the help everyone, I'll circle back around with final resolution if anything more interesting pops up. On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) ws...@cisco.com wrote: Historically this has happened because: * gateway attempts to setup audio but call signaling is not at a state that would allow transfer to complete * the attempt to setup audio sends OpenReceiveChannel to Unity port * Unity ignores because unity has already sent 2nd transfer and considers the call as transferred Still, goes back to call not being in a valid state for the transfer to complete and Unity trying to send transfer anyway. Address this specifically call signaling flow or use supervised transfer. -Wes On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote: Ed: Detailed CCM traces should suffice. If it indeed was a 12 second media exchange timeout, you should notice a missing SCCP or MGCP transaction after receiving the ISDN Call Proceeding event. I would check to make sure I see the OpenReceiveChannel, StartMediaTransmission, and OpenReceiveChannelACK on the SCCP call-leg followed by a MDCX with SDP to the MGCP gateway and a 200 response – all immediately after ISDN Call Proceeding comes in. If you notice one of these missing then it’s likely an MX timeout issue. I’ve recently seen an issue where StationD doesn’t ACK an OpenReceiveChannel signal, resulting in a MX timeout. Doubt it’s related to this problem though… my issue was related to CTI ports. - Dan *From:* Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com ealeather...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:36 AM *To:* Daniel Pagan *Cc:* Sreekanth Narayanan; Mike Nickolich; Cisco VOIP *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP/SDL trace question re:transfer Dan, I'm not seeing a MXTimeout, however the Cannot Complete Transfer is 12 seconds after the ISDN Proceeding. Any special trace settings necessary to see that message? 22:58:38.411 |AppInfo |In Message -- PriCallProceedingMsg -- Protocol= PriNi2Protocol .. 22:58:50.310 |AppInfo |StationD:(0331221) DisplayNotify timeOutValue=15 notify='Cannot Complete Transfer' content='Cannot Complete Transfer' ver=12. On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote: Ed: As a test, are you able to recreate the issue when PSTN leg doesn’t answer for 12 seconds after the transfer attempt? I ask because, based on the timestamps below, it seems the media exchange timer might be expiring. If you still have SDL traces, you can search for “MXTimeout”. If you find one, you should be able to backtrack 12 seconds and find the ISDN Call Proceeding message that triggers CUCM’s attempt at connecting media between the two call-legs. - Dan *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Sreekanth Narayanan *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:22 AM *To:* Ed Leatherman *Cc:* Mike Nickolich; Cisco VOIP *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP/SDL trace question re:transfer Hi Ed, If the Unity is sending the 2nd transfer command as soon as the initial call setup begins, it looks more like a blind transfer. The other transfer type 'Supervise Transfer' is the consult transfer. Have you tried to do blind transfers from SCCP phones? As per the RTS description, it's the responsibility of the CUCM to handle the call if the target of the transfer is busy or doesn't answer. - Release to Switch—Unity Connection puts the caller on hold, dials the extension, and releases the call to the phone system. When the line is busy or is not answered, the phone system—not Unity Connection—forwards the call to the user or handler greeting. This transfer type allows Unity Connection to process incoming calls more quickly. Use Release to Switch only when call forwarding is enabled on the phone system. Thanks Sreekanth On 1 September 2014 19:29, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sreekanth, The problem is inconsistent, but definitely more than say 20%. Load on our systems doesn't appear to be an issue, we did testing late at night/after hours and regular call volume is very low then. We were able to duplicate the issue just with cell phones as the target, so it seems the problem is not just the answering service not picking up; not had a problem where direct calls weren't answered promptly. In looking through the trace files, it seems
Re: [cisco-voip] Device Pack install
Devpacks are always cumulative so going with the latest one is fine. The DX650 and Cius firmware was removed from the devpacks recently which is why the file size has gone down. -Ryan On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Tommy Schlotterer tschlotte...@netechcorp.commailto:tschlotte...@netechcorp.com wrote: All, A customer is requesting support for the 7800 Phones on their 9.1.2 Call Manager, I was looking at the device packs and found the one that enables support for the phones, but know that the customer may want support for the 8800 phones in the near future, so I may as well install the latest device pack, right? The latest device pack is significantly smaller than one that enables support for the 7800 phones and it does not specifically state that it enables support for the 7800 phones. Can I install the latest device pack for 9.1.2 and expect to get all of the features of the previous device packs? Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer CCNA, CCNA Voice 48325 Alpha Dr. Ste. 150 Wixom, MI 48393 p 248.468.0710 e tschlotte...@netechcorp.commailto:tschlotte...@netechcorp.com w netechcorp.comhttp://netechcorp.com/ image001.png image002.pnghttps://www.linkedin.com/company/75843?trk=tyahtrkInfo=tarId%3A1397760375508%2Ctas%3Anetech%2Cidx%3A3-1-5 image003.pnghttps://www.facebook.com/NetechCorporation image004.pnghttps://twitter.com/netechcorp image005.pnghttps://www.youtube.com/user/NetechCorporation ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] C240M3 16 drives for CUCM/UCCE
C240M3 TRC setup 8 drives raid 5 group 1 8 drives raid 5 group 2 Seems like an odd setup to have the hypervisor running on a Raid 5 array. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/virtual/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers_chapter_010.html Do you install Virtual Machines to both Raid5 arrays, or just ESXi on one and the VMs on the other? Customer asked me why Cisco would have ESXi installed on a 1.93TB raid 5 array vs having two drives in Raid 1 mirror. I told them I would ask around. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] ASA Phone Proxy and two clusters?
Can you run ASA Phone Proxy with two separate clusters? I was thinking it supported only 1 cluster per ASA. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] C240M3 16 drives for CUCM/UCCE
Personally, I wouldn't leave a system in that format, it's a waste of space. Cisco's docs seem to change because at one point, the docwiki specified that it could be built in either a raid 5 or raid 10 (for the app storage), but that has been updated. I'd personally setup a mirror with the first two for ESXI and then a raid 10 with the remainder drives. You get more IOPS out of it and should have plenty of space. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: C240M3 TRC setup 8 drives raid 5 group 1 8 drives raid 5 group 2 Seems like an odd setup to have the hypervisor running on a Raid 5 array. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/virtual/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers_chapter_010.html Do you install Virtual Machines to both Raid5 arrays, or just ESXi on one and the VMs on the other? Customer asked me why Cisco would have ESXi installed on a 1.93TB raid 5 array vs having two drives in Raid 1 mirror. I told them I would ask around. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
They just are spending the time to go back and test it. Do you really need to re-test MGCP with each new version of CallManager? What changed with the MGCP Draft 0.1 , or are they re-writing MGCP with each new version of Callmanager? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hughes, Scott GRE-MG Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:02 AM To: Anthony Holloway Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com%3cmailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.com%3cmailto:grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net%3cmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net%3cmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] C240M3 16 drives for CUCM/UCCE
We have had customers have more than a single drive failure in a Raid5 set with all your vms running. It was pretty. So perhaps 2 drives raid 1 for ESXi and ISOs, 7 drives raid 5 for vms, 7 drives raid 5 for vms But yeah the existing layout seems odd….but I do what it says…but I’m not sure where the contact center bu gets these setups from. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245 From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:16 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM) Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] C240M3 16 drives for CUCM/UCCE Personally, I wouldn't leave a system in that format, it's a waste of space. Cisco's docs seem to change because at one point, the docwiki specified that it could be built in either a raid 5 or raid 10 (for the app storage), but that has been updated. I'd personally setup a mirror with the first two for ESXI and then a raid 10 with the remainder drives. You get more IOPS out of it and should have plenty of space. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.commailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: C240M3 TRC setup 8 drives raid 5 group 1 8 drives raid 5 group 2 Seems like an odd setup to have the hypervisor running on a Raid 5 array. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/virtual/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers_chapter_010.html Do you install Virtual Machines to both Raid5 arrays, or just ESXi on one and the VMs on the other? Customer asked me why Cisco would have ESXi installed on a 1.93TB raid 5 array vs having two drives in Raid 1 mirror. I told them I would ask around. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245tel:%2B1-904-338-3245 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] C240M3 16 drives for CUCM/UCCE
We used SD flash disks for esxi (mirrored) and 2 raid 5 sets for the vms. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:31 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: We have had customers have more than a single drive failure in a Raid5 set with all your vms running. It was pretty. So perhaps 2 drives raid 1 for ESXi and ISOs, 7 drives raid 5 for vms, 7 drives raid 5 for vms But yeah the existing layout seems odd….but I do what it says…but I’m not sure where the contact center bu gets these setups from. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245 From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:16 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM) Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] C240M3 16 drives for CUCM/UCCE Personally, I wouldn't leave a system in that format, it's a waste of space. Cisco's docs seem to change because at one point, the docwiki specified that it could be built in either a raid 5 or raid 10 (for the app storage), but that has been updated. I'd personally setup a mirror with the first two for ESXI and then a raid 10 with the remainder drives. You get more IOPS out of it and should have plenty of space. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: C240M3 TRC setup 8 drives raid 5 group 1 8 drives raid 5 group 2 Seems like an odd setup to have the hypervisor running on a Raid 5 array. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/virtual/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers/CUCM_BK_CF3D71B4_00_cucm_virtual_servers_chapter_010.html Do you install Virtual Machines to both Raid5 arrays, or just ESXi on one and the VMs on the other? Customer asked me why Cisco would have ESXi installed on a 1.93TB raid 5 array vs having two drives in Raid 1 mirror. I told them I would ask around. Jason Aarons Consultant Dimension Data +1-904-338-3245 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
