Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM ver 8.x to 10.x licensing conversion

2015-03-12 Thread Erick
The other thing to keep in mind is CUCM sets the license type used by device/ 
owner assignment. CUCM currently doesn't use cuwl pro directly. 

Use the license count tool to plan. It will pull data from existing ccm and 
show you the breakdown in user license types for your 8.x setup and you can 
adjust.

Typically,

If you have the same owner for 2-10 devices it will use cuwl standard. 

1 phone is enhanced license type 

1 phone , SNR/remote destination profile , jabber csf device is enhanced plus 
license type with same owner on the 3 devices. 

That's from my experience ... 

What are you guys seeing -- heavy on enhanced plus or cuwl and loaning 
downward? Just curious now that's it's been awhile. 


Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 10, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Matthew Loraditch 
 mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote:
 
 A user being a CUWL user is based on the Owner User ID field alone. The user 
 could have 10 extension on 10 different phones. As long as the user is the 
 owner  of all those phones you are legit.
  
 From a completely technical standpoint the system calculates only on that 
 field and doesn’t care about anything else. You can have a dummy user own 10 
 phones and from an ELM/PLM standpoint be ok. Now that wouldn’t be licensing 
 legit and shouldn’t be done as anything but a temporary workaround.
  
 Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
 Network Engineer
 Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
 
 Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
  
 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
 Countryman, Edward
 Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:15 PM
 To: Cisco VOIP
 Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM ver 8.x to 10.x licensing conversion
  
 We are in the process of planning our upgrade from 8.6 to 10.5 which means we 
 need to plan for a conversion of our DLU’s to the new licensing model.
  
 Does anyone know if a CUWL user license has to have the same extension on all 
 of their devices? 
  
 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] CUE 8.6.5 notification to gmail...

2015-03-12 Thread Jonathan Charles
Telnet to smtp.gmail.com on 465 from that subnet works fine...


Jonathan

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote:

 Port 465 blocked?

 On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 We loaded the gmail settings and we keep getting...

 Test Result: Could not connect to SMTP host: smtp.gmail.com, port: 465

 We can ping GMAIL from the CUE:

 se-192-168-124-2# ping smtp.gmail.com
 PING gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com (74.125.193.109) 56(84) bytes of data.
 64 bytes from 74.125.193.109: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=12.5 ms
 64 bytes from ig-in-f109.1e100.net (74.125.193.109): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48
 time=12.4 ms
 64 bytes from ig-in-f109.1e100.net (74.125.193.109): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48
 time=12.4 ms
 64 bytes from ig-in-f109.1e100.net (74.125.193.109): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48
 time=12.3 ms
 64 bytes from ig-in-f109.1e100.net (74.125.193.109): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48
 time=12.3 ms

 --- gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com ping statistics ---
 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 71ms
 rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.329/12.411/12.550/0.124 ms, ipg/ewma
 17.804/12.477 ms
 se-192-168-124-2#

 We have also verified our credentials... any idea why we keep getting the
 error?



 Jonathan

 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] USB Tokens

2015-03-12 Thread Brian Meade
You can use the same tokens for as many clusters as you would like.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Reto Gassmann v...@mrga.ch wrote:

 hello Group

 We run a cucm 9.1(2) and have the Phones authenticated. To do that we used
 the two USB Tokens and the CTL Client.

 Now we set up a new Testserver and want to do some tests with certificat
 renwal and upgrades to 10.5. can I use the same two USB Tokens I used for
 the production system or do I have to order two new USB Tokens for the
 Testserver?

 Thanks for helping out
 Regards Reto

 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] USB Tokens

2015-03-12 Thread Brian Meade
I haven't tried this process but you should be able to at least use the
tokens again to put the cluster into non-secure mode and then run the new
mixed-mode commands to use the new method.

If you have tokens, I recommend using them since it's easier to recover
since you don't need to worry about backing up the certificates.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com
wrote:

 on this subject, is it possible to take a mixed mode v8 or v9 (signed by
 USB tokens) and upgrade to v10 and then use the new CLI command to update
 the CTL and move away from the need for the tokens?

 Is there anything to do other than run the CLI command to update the CTL ?
   Do I then no longer need the tokens?

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jason Burns burns.ja...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 You can use the same USB tokens for the two systems.

 I would recommend this because it makes it a bit easier to move phones
 around between the two systems.

 If both systems are under the same domain of control, and same level of
 trust, there is no problem using the tokens again.

 If one system has phones that should NEVER register to the other system
 for security reasons - then I would recommend using separate tokens.

 --
 Jason Burns

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Reto Gassmann v...@mrga.ch wrote:

 hello Group

 We run a cucm 9.1(2) and have the Phones authenticated. To do that we
 used the two USB Tokens and the CTL Client.

 Now we set up a new Testserver and want to do some tests with certificat
 renwal and upgrades to 10.5. can I use the same two USB Tokens I used for
 the production system or do I have to order two new USB Tokens for the
 Testserver?

 Thanks for helping out
 Regards Reto

 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] USB Tokens

2015-03-12 Thread Reto Gassmann
hello Group

We run a cucm 9.1(2) and have the Phones authenticated. To do that we used
the two USB Tokens and the CTL Client.

Now we set up a new Testserver and want to do some tests with certificat
renwal and upgrades to 10.5. can I use the same two USB Tokens I used for
the production system or do I have to order two new USB Tokens for the
Testserver?

Thanks for helping out
Regards Reto
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] USB Tokens

2015-03-12 Thread Justin Steinberg
on this subject, is it possible to take a mixed mode v8 or v9 (signed by
USB tokens) and upgrade to v10 and then use the new CLI command to update
the CTL and move away from the need for the tokens?

Is there anything to do other than run the CLI command to update the CTL ?
  Do I then no longer need the tokens?

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jason Burns burns.ja...@gmail.com wrote:

 You can use the same USB tokens for the two systems.

 I would recommend this because it makes it a bit easier to move phones
 around between the two systems.

 If both systems are under the same domain of control, and same level of
 trust, there is no problem using the tokens again.

 If one system has phones that should NEVER register to the other system
 for security reasons - then I would recommend using separate tokens.

 --
 Jason Burns

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Reto Gassmann v...@mrga.ch wrote:

 hello Group

 We run a cucm 9.1(2) and have the Phones authenticated. To do that we
 used the two USB Tokens and the CTL Client.

 Now we set up a new Testserver and want to do some tests with certificat
 renwal and upgrades to 10.5. can I use the same two USB Tokens I used for
 the production system or do I have to order two new USB Tokens for the
 Testserver?

 Thanks for helping out
 Regards Reto

 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip