Re: [cisco-voip] Request for information

2015-04-06 Thread Ryan Huff
So you are looking for something that displays the ipPhone, Telephone, Mobile, 
Fax ... etc  fields in a web browser? If CUCM is integrated with your AD server 
via LDAP, you can use CUCM to display the telephone number.

If you want access to the larger pool of AD attributes then you'll need to 
create a custom application for that, as I'm not aware of any off hand. 

I imagine SharePoint would have some synergies. If you white box something, 
ASP.NET would be the native language but you could make something in PHP as 
well fairly easy.

Unicast me off-list if you want to engage me for a custom solution.

Thanks,

Ryan Huff


From: terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca
To: bmead...@vt.edu
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; ryanh...@outlook.com
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:03:27 -0600
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Request for information

Thanks.  I may have mislead all of you by not providing a clear statement.  I 
am looking for a phonebook service that would pull the data from MS Exchange 
instead of the Call Manager.   If anyone has that functionality or knows of a 
company that is doing that, that would be helpful. Thanks though to Ryan as his 
application is very good. Terry   From: bmead...@gmail.com 
[mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: April 6, 2015 9:22 AM
To: Terry Oakley
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; ryan huff
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Request for information Ryan Huff on this list 
created a web front-end for the corporate directory- 
http://ryanthomashuff.com/2015/01/new-web-gui-for-call-manager-corporate-directory/
 On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Terry Oakley terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca 
wrote:We are moving to CUCM 10.x and Exchange 2013 (for our voicemail).   As a 
post-secondary education institution we get very good pricing on Microsoft 
products so will continue to use Exchange as our voicemail solution.The 
information I am looking for is about an online phonebook solution.   With all 
of the data for the users in Active Directory because of the VM requirement,  
we can certainly get that information via the phones corporate directory option 
but we would also like to publicize a simple online phonebook that we can 
access via our Intranet.It would be useful to be able to include 
information that is not always in Active Directory such as department/college 
main numbers, FAX numbers etc.   Does anyone have a simple and cost effective 
solution that they are currently using that would also require minimal 
maintenance?   I can visualize us using the AD side and adding in the 
department numbers, FAX numbers and so on but if there is a solution that some 
of you are using that information would be much appreciated. Thanks Terry Terry 
OakleyTelecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology ServicesRed Deer 
College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5work (403) 
342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034 
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
  ___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-04-06 Thread Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh)
Hi Justin,

Allow me till Wednesday, I will have some confirmation on the exact dates 
although I can confirm that it right around the corner. BTW, I can help you get 
the cop file for your customer immediately because it is being given out on a 
per-customer basis – so the support can be given for your customer now if 
needed and you don’t have to wait for the announcement of the support.

Regards,
Abhiram Kramadhati
Technical Solutions Manager, CBABU
CCIE Voice # 40065

From: Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.commailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, 6 April 2015 6:27 am
To: akramadh akram...@cisco.commailto:akram...@cisco.com
Cc: Josh Warcop j...@warcop.commailto:j...@warcop.com, Lelio Fulgenzi 
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca, voip puck 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

Abhiram,

Is there any update on the COP file for official support for Finesse and CAD on 
the same CCX cluster?The design guide still says not supported for running 
both CAD  Finesse.

Justin

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) 
akram...@cisco.commailto:akram...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi all,

The support for mixed-mode is expected to be announced in the coming ways. It 
will be starting with 10.6 and the support can be claimed by installing a COP 
file. The details will come out soon, but in summary it will be in 10.6. Also, 
there will be a white-paper released regarding the migration plan and best 
practices. Some of the things that come to my mind straight away are:

  *   Voice is supported on mixed mode – you can have some teams on either CAD 
or Finesse handling calls
  *   Chat and email agents have to be migrated completely onto Finesse
  *   CAD supervisors only to monitor CAD teams and so on for Finesse
  *   1 team = 1 type of agent desktop

There are some limitations too and they will be in the document which will be 
published. However, if you can think about any scenario you would like to 
discuss and get some feedback – please feel free to reach out to me. Or you can 
put it out here in the forum, Ryan or myself can brainstorm with you.

[http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/assets/email-signature-tool/logo_02.png?ct=1420440421812]

Abhiram Kramadhati
Technical Solutions Manager
Customer Solutions Success team, CBABU
akram...@cisco.commailto:akram...@cisco.com

CCIE Voice - 40065


Cisco Systems Australia Pty Limited
The Forum
201 Pacific Highway
2065
St Leonards
Australia
Cisco.comhttp://www.cisco.com/web/AU/



[http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif] Think before you 
print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of 
the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others 
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to 
receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete 
all copies of this message.

Please click 
herehttp://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html for 
Company Registration Information.


From: Josh Warcop j...@warcop.commailto:j...@warcop.com
Date: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 6:19 am
To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca, voip puck 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

Both can be activated but it is a requirement that a team be on CAD or Finesse. 
Essentially giving a 'Team' based migration approach from CAD to Finesse.

From: Lelio Fulgenzimailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
Sent: 1/19/2015 2:04 PM
To: voip puckmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

Thanks for everyone's help on this, especially the Cisco folk who are going 
back to check for docs and publishing dates, etc.

I'm glad I posted this and started the conversation.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354tel:519-824-4120%20Ext%2056354

le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Mike mik...@msn.commailto:mik...@msn.com
To: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgmailto:wo...@justfamily.org
Cc: Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com, 
Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca, Kevin 
Przybylowski kev...@advancedtsg.commailto:kev...@advancedtsg.com, voip 
puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 1:25:41 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...


I can find out tomorrow. I was told it was supported in 10.6 only let me dig 
around.



From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-04-06 Thread Anthony Holloway
*Thanks for your question. The support for co-residence of CAD and Finesse
will be available in UCCX 10.6. We are currently in the controlled-release
phase - what this means is that the support for the mixed mode is only
being given out to a few customers whose migration plan is reviewed by
internal teams and a COP file is provided for that customer only. This is
to ensure that any feedback is incorporated before the official support is
announced. The supported will be announced soon and the COP file which
provides the support will be available for all customers in version 10.6.*

Source:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12443556/ask-expert-finesse-uccx-next-generation-agent-desktop-and-transitioning-cad#comment-10335836

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:21 AM Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote:

 I've got it running for one customer.  Not sure where we got the file from
 though.  File name is ciscouccx.1061.MixedMode.7.cop.sgn.  I'm guessing
 they haven't released it publicly yet as I don't see it on CCO.

 On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Abhiram,

 Is there any update on the COP file for official support for Finesse and
 CAD on the same CCX cluster?The design guide still says not supported
 for running both CAD  Finesse.

 Justin

 On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) 
 akram...@cisco.com wrote:

  Hi all,

  The support for mixed-mode is expected to be announced in the coming
 ways. It will be starting with 10.6 and the support can be claimed by
 installing a COP file. The details will come out soon, but in summary it
 will be in 10.6. Also, there will be a white-paper released regarding the
 migration plan and best practices. Some of the things that come to my mind
 straight away are:

- Voice is supported on mixed mode – you can have some teams on
either CAD or Finesse handling calls
- Chat and email agents have to be migrated completely onto Finesse
- CAD supervisors only to monitor CAD teams and so on for Finesse
- 1 team = 1 type of agent desktop

 There are some limitations too and they will be in the document which
 will be published. However, if you can think about any scenario you would
 like to discuss and get some feedback – please feel free to reach out to
 me. Or you can put it out here in the forum, Ryan or myself can brainstorm
 with you.

   *Abhiram Kramadhati*
 Technical Solutions Manager
 Customer Solutions Success team, CBABU
 akram...@cisco.com

 CCIE Voice - 40065

 *Cisco Systems Australia Pty Limited*
 The Forum
 201 Pacific Highway
 2065
 St Leonards
 Australia
 Cisco.com http://www.cisco.com/web/AU/
Think before you print.

 This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
 use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
 by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
 authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by
 reply email and delete all copies of this message.

 Please click here
 http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
 for Company Registration Information.

   From: Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com
 Date: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 6:19 am
 To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca, voip puck 
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

   Both can be activated but it is a requirement that a team be on CAD
 or Finesse. Essentially giving a 'Team' based migration approach from CAD
 to Finesse.
  --
 From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca
 Sent: 1/19/2015 2:04 PM
 To: voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

   Thanks for everyone's help on this, especially the Cisco folk who are
 going back to check for docs and publishing dates, etc.

 I'm glad I posted this and started the conversation.


 ---
 Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
 Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
 Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
 University of Guelph

 519-824-4120 Ext 56354

 le...@uoguelph.ca
 www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
 Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
 Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

 --
  *From: *Mike mik...@msn.com
 *To: *Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 *Cc: *Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com, Lelio
 Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca, Kevin Przybylowski 
 kev...@advancedtsg.com, voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 *Sent: *Monday, January 19, 2015 1:25:41 PM
 *Subject: *RE: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

  I can find out tomorrow. I was told it was supported in 10.6 only let
 me dig around.



 *From:* Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org
 wo...@justfamily.org]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 19, 2015 1:15 PM
 *To:* Mike
 *Cc:* Anthony Holloway; Lelio Fulgenzi; Kevin Przybylowski; voip puck
 *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...



 Mike, this has been 

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-04-06 Thread Justin Steinberg
Thanks for that link Anthony.   It just seems like the support for mixed
mode is really taking a long time.  This was a feature in all of the
marketing slides for 10.6 and it is now April with no publicly released COP.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote:

 *Thanks for your question. The support for co-residence of CAD and
 Finesse will be available in UCCX 10.6. We are currently in the
 controlled-release phase - what this means is that the support for the
 mixed mode is only being given out to a few customers whose migration plan
 is reviewed by internal teams and a COP file is provided for that customer
 only. This is to ensure that any feedback is incorporated before the
 official support is announced. The supported will be announced soon and the
 COP file which provides the support will be available for all customers in
 version 10.6.*

 Source:
 https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12443556/ask-expert-finesse-uccx-next-generation-agent-desktop-and-transitioning-cad#comment-10335836

 On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:21 AM Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote:

 I've got it running for one customer.  Not sure where we got the file
 from though.  File name is ciscouccx.1061.MixedMode.7.cop.sgn.  I'm
 guessing they haven't released it publicly yet as I don't see it on CCO.

 On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Abhiram,

 Is there any update on the COP file for official support for Finesse and
 CAD on the same CCX cluster?The design guide still says not supported
 for running both CAD  Finesse.

 Justin

 On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) 
 akram...@cisco.com wrote:

  Hi all,

  The support for mixed-mode is expected to be announced in the coming
 ways. It will be starting with 10.6 and the support can be claimed by
 installing a COP file. The details will come out soon, but in summary it
 will be in 10.6. Also, there will be a white-paper released regarding the
 migration plan and best practices. Some of the things that come to my mind
 straight away are:

- Voice is supported on mixed mode – you can have some teams on
either CAD or Finesse handling calls
- Chat and email agents have to be migrated completely onto Finesse
- CAD supervisors only to monitor CAD teams and so on for Finesse
- 1 team = 1 type of agent desktop

 There are some limitations too and they will be in the document which
 will be published. However, if you can think about any scenario you would
 like to discuss and get some feedback – please feel free to reach out to
 me. Or you can put it out here in the forum, Ryan or myself can brainstorm
 with you.

   *Abhiram Kramadhati*
 Technical Solutions Manager
 Customer Solutions Success team, CBABU
 akram...@cisco.com

 CCIE Voice - 40065

 *Cisco Systems Australia Pty Limited*
 The Forum
 201 Pacific Highway
 2065
 St Leonards
 Australia
 Cisco.com http://www.cisco.com/web/AU/
Think before you print.

 This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
 sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
 disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
 recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
 sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

 Please click here
 http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
 for Company Registration Information.

   From: Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com
 Date: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 6:19 am
 To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca, voip puck 
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

   Both can be activated but it is a requirement that a team be on CAD
 or Finesse. Essentially giving a 'Team' based migration approach from CAD
 to Finesse.
  --
 From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca
 Sent: 1/19/2015 2:04 PM
 To: voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

   Thanks for everyone's help on this, especially the Cisco folk who
 are going back to check for docs and publishing dates, etc.

 I'm glad I posted this and started the conversation.


 ---
 Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
 Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
 Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
 University of Guelph

 519-824-4120 Ext 56354

 le...@uoguelph.ca
 www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
 Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
 Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

 --
  *From: *Mike mik...@msn.com
 *To: *Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 *Cc: *Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com, Lelio
 Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca, Kevin Przybylowski 
 kev...@advancedtsg.com, voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 *Sent: *Monday, January 19, 2015 1:25:41 PM
 *Subject: *RE: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

  I can find out tomorrow. I was told it was supported in 

Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade

2015-04-06 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
The first place to look is MGCP packets being lost.  Search for “Retry” in the 
ccm traces similar to:
CCM|MGCPHandler TransId: 1476004 Timeout. Retry#1

That example is from a case in 2008 so what you see may not look exactly the 
same.  This type of message is an indicator that CCM is resending an MGCP 
message that wasn’t Ack’d by the gateway.  After 3 or so of those CCM will 
unregister the gateway and any phones talking to it will get Temp Fail.

Aside from lost messages it could be a RSIP or something that is gateway 
initiated causing the reset.

-Ryan

On Apr 5, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) 
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.commailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote:

Nothing has changed with MGCP for a long time…Cisco just doesn’t test older IOS.

Pull normal debugs and traces, RTMT alerts, etc.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin 
Przybylowski
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:10 PM
To: Lisa Notarianni; Ryan Huff; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade


Are the mgcp gateways on a supported IOS for 10.5?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lisa 
Notarianni
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade

2 PRIs one each Communication Media Module– MGCP gateways. 2 Call Managers set 
up as redundant.

Cisco TAC looked at RTMT  with me today.  They want us to set up packet 
captures and try to duplicate the problem tomorrow.  I am just wondering if 
this is an upgrade issue that anyone else may be experiencing since we had no 
problems before the upgrade.



From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 4:52 PM
To: Lisa Notarianni; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade


Lisa,

SIP or TDM/PRI?

Have you gandered into RTMT and taken a look at any active / recent alerts?

Thanks,

Ryan


 Original Message 
From: Lisa Notarianni 
lisa.notaria...@scranton.edumailto:lisa.notaria...@scranton.edu
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 04:48 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade
A few weeks ago we upgraded Call Manager and Unity Connection from 8.6.2 to 
10.5.1.

We have experienced 2 intermittent outbound calling issues:


1.   “Temp Fail” shows on phone display and only option on phone button is 
“End Call”

2.   Outbound callers dial a number and hear nothing but notice the phone 
display says “Connected”.  Caller cannot hear anything.  Person they called 
cannot hear anything.
***These issues are only intermittent.***

We had no issues before the upgrade.

Is anyone experiencing the similar issues?

Thank you in advance.





itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade

2015-04-06 Thread Daniel Pagan
Adding to Ryan’s suggestion re: ACKs - I took a snip of some internal 
documentation I wrote re: MGCP debugs that might help. The MGCP transaction ID, 
in a CCM SDL trace or MGCP packet debug output, would look similar to this: 
http://i.imgur.com/O1YGnUO.png. Just showing the transaction ID matching 
between the MGCP command and 200 response. The observed event and Line package 
/hd (off-hook) highlighted can be ignored.

It might also be helpful to debug MGCP packets on the voice router… just make 
sure to disable console logging before leaving something like that running and 
increase the buffer size so you capture a failure. Seeing a missing 200 MGCP 
response in SDL traces doesn’t mean the router didn’t send one, and same the 
other way around where seeing an MGCP command sent from CUCM doesn’t mean it 
arrived at the router. In any case MGCP debugs off the router would come in 
handy in tandem with CCM traces.

Hope this helps.

- Dan


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Ratliff (rratliff)
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:37 AM
To: Jason Aarons (AM)
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade

The first place to look is MGCP packets being lost.  Search for “Retry” in the 
ccm traces similar to:
CCM|MGCPHandler TransId: 1476004 Timeout. Retry#1

That example is from a case in 2008 so what you see may not look exactly the 
same.  This type of message is an indicator that CCM is resending an MGCP 
message that wasn’t Ack’d by the gateway.  After 3 or so of those CCM will 
unregister the gateway and any phones talking to it will get Temp Fail.

Aside from lost messages it could be a RSIP or something that is gateway 
initiated causing the reset.

-Ryan

On Apr 5, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) 
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.commailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote:

Nothing has changed with MGCP for a long time…Cisco just doesn’t test older IOS.

Pull normal debugs and traces, RTMT alerts, etc.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin 
Przybylowski
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:10 PM
To: Lisa Notarianni; Ryan Huff; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade


Are the mgcp gateways on a supported IOS for 10.5?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lisa 
Notarianni
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade

2 PRIs one each Communication Media Module– MGCP gateways. 2 Call Managers set 
up as redundant.

Cisco TAC looked at RTMT  with me today.  They want us to set up packet 
captures and try to duplicate the problem tomorrow.  I am just wondering if 
this is an upgrade issue that anyone else may be experiencing since we had no 
problems before the upgrade.



From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 4:52 PM
To: Lisa Notarianni; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade

Lisa,
SIP or TDM/PRI?
Have you gandered into RTMT and taken a look at any active / recent alerts?
Thanks,
Ryan


 Original Message 
From: Lisa Notarianni 
lisa.notaria...@scranton.edumailto:lisa.notaria...@scranton.edu
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 04:48 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Temp Fail since upgrade
A few weeks ago we upgraded Call Manager and Unity Connection from 8.6.2 to 
10.5.1.

We have experienced 2 intermittent outbound calling issues:


1.   “Temp Fail” shows on phone display and only option on phone button is 
“End Call”

2.   Outbound callers dial a number and hear nothing but notice the phone 
display says “Connected”.  Caller cannot hear anything.  Person they called 
cannot hear anything.
***These issues are only intermittent.***

We had no issues before the upgrade.

Is anyone experiencing the similar issues?

Thank you in advance.





itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Request for information

2015-04-06 Thread Brian Meade
Ryan Huff on this list created a web front-end for the corporate directory-
http://ryanthomashuff.com/2015/01/new-web-gui-for-call-manager-corporate-directory/

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Terry Oakley terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca
wrote:

 We are moving to CUCM 10.x and Exchange 2013 (for our voicemail).   As a
 post-secondary education institution we get very good pricing on Microsoft
 products so will continue to use Exchange as our voicemail solution.



 The information I am looking for is about an online phonebook solution.
 With all of the data for the users in Active Directory because of the VM
 requirement,  we can certainly get that information via the phones
 corporate directory option but we would also like to publicize a simple
 online phonebook that we can access via our Intranet.It would be useful
 to be able to include information that is not always in Active Directory
 such as department/college main numbers, FAX numbers etc.   Does anyone
 have a simple and cost effective solution that they are currently using
 that would also require minimal maintenance?   I can visualize us using the
 AD side and adding in the department numbers, FAX numbers and so on but if
 there is a solution that some of you are using that information would be
 much appreciated.



 Thanks



 Terry



 *Terry Oakley*

 Telecommunications Coordinator *| *Information Technology Services

 *Red Deer College **|*100 College Blvd. *|* Box 5005 *| *Red Deer *|* Alberta
 *| *T4N 5H5

 work (403) 342-*3521   **| * FAX (403) 343-4034



 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Request for information

2015-04-06 Thread Terry Oakley
Thanks.  I may have mislead all of you by not providing a clear statement.  I 
am looking for a phonebook service that would pull the data from MS Exchange 
instead of the Call Manager.   If anyone has that functionality or knows of a 
company that is doing that, that would be helpful.

Thanks though to Ryan as his application is very good.

Terry



From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: April 6, 2015 9:22 AM
To: Terry Oakley
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; ryan huff
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Request for information

Ryan Huff on this list created a web front-end for the corporate directory- 
http://ryanthomashuff.com/2015/01/new-web-gui-for-call-manager-corporate-directory/

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Terry Oakley 
terry.oak...@rdc.ab.camailto:terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca wrote:
We are moving to CUCM 10.x and Exchange 2013 (for our voicemail).   As a 
post-secondary education institution we get very good pricing on Microsoft 
products so will continue to use Exchange as our voicemail solution.

The information I am looking for is about an online phonebook solution.   With 
all of the data for the users in Active Directory because of the VM 
requirement,  we can certainly get that information via the phones corporate 
directory option but we would also like to publicize a simple online phonebook 
that we can access via our Intranet.It would be useful to be able to 
include information that is not always in Active Directory such as 
department/college main numbers, FAX numbers etc.   Does anyone have a simple 
and cost effective solution that they are currently using that would also 
require minimal maintenance?   I can visualize us using the AD side and adding 
in the department numbers, FAX numbers and so on but if there is a solution 
that some of you are using that information would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Terry

Terry Oakley
Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services
Red Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034tel:%28403%29%20343-4034


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip