Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

[Ki Wi]

Guys,
any comment? Ideally going spark is the best but the lack of voice
gateways/ direct sip trunk support seems to force us back to hybrid model?

Regards,
Ki Wi

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ki Wi  wrote:

> Hi James,
> you are right regarding the phone registration on Spark directly. However,
> for the voice gateway connectivity for voice countries, looks like we will
> have to go via Hybrid method. :(
>
> If that's the case + customer have MPLS today. I will prefer to have the
> voice traffic over MPLS. At least we can tell them that when using
> deskphone, quality is guarantee.
>
> Regards,
> Ki Wi
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, James Buchanan 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I don't believe that's the case. According to Cisco, you register the
>> phones directly to Spark. Check out
>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/unified-communications/hosted-collaboration-solution-hcs/datasheet-c78-736823.html#_Toc444123188
>> .
>>
>> This could eliminate the need for a UCM at all as well as voice gateways
>> if I understand it correctly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi James,
>>> It definitely make more sense. However, if this is to go to spark, I
>>> will need similar equipment upfront as well.
>>>
>>> First create a UCM cluster.
>>> Establish hybrid spark connectivity (this requires additional expressway
>>> C instance for host connector stuff on top of expressway C pair)
>>>
>>> Since I have 3 locations with voice gateways, it make sense to have 3
>>> expressway (C) at least? If not, I can imagine that when I'm in US
>>> calling someone US, the spark will connect to the UCM cluster located in
>>> SG via that only expressway located in SG. The voice quality will be very
>>> bad due to latency. The PSTN option directly via spark is very limited
>>> currently.
>>>
>>> The setup is more or less the same eventually. Most likely we might be
>>> able to save on CUWL license cost if those roaming users doesn't need a
>>> phone profile in CUCM?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, James Buchanan <
>>> james.buchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hello,

 I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more
 sense than implementing an on-premise system.

 James

 On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:

> Hi Group,
> I have this customer requirement where they have 3 locations
> (Singapore, US and UK) . Majority of their users will be on the move
> (around the world). Users have to connect to the phone system via 
> Internet.
>
> The intention is to have the UCM cluster in Singapore and have the
> expressway C/E pair in all the 3 locations mentioned. With the help of
> GeoDNS solution, the jabber shall be able to look for the nearest
> expressway to connect to. Optimize resource assignment (ie.
> CFB/xcoder) nearest to them shall be taken care of by configuring device
> mobility related profiles.
>
> Will this work? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
> clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
> often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ki Wi
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Ki Wi
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ki Wi
>



-- 
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCE 11.x and Jabber ?

[Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh)]

There might be a few limitations with Jabber such as Agent Greeting/Whisper 
announcement not being supported (due to CSCuq92831). Most of the functionality 
should be the same, but certain call flows might have to be looked at to ensure 
they are supported.

Regards,
Abhiram Kramadhati
Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU
CCIE Collaboration # 40065

From: cisco-voip 
> 
on behalf of Ed Leatherman 
>
Date: Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 3:42 AM
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" 
>
Cc: "cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)" 
>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCE 11.x and Jabber ?

Hi Jason!

No EM on jabber. Not sure about the UCCE question. We are starting to use it 
from some UCCX (10.6) applications with Finesse.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) 
> wrote:


Should a customer go with Jabber for use with Finesse/CAD in UCCE 11.x ? or 
stick with IP Communicator 8.6.4 ?  Is Jabber still Finesse only?

Remind me does Jabber does Extension Mobility login?

Hope all has been well here on Puck. Had a large R project last 2 years, then 
hiked the AT awhile.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No 38564
Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245 mobile







This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[Justin Steinberg]

make sure the codec is G711 and not G729

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Bill Talley  wrote:

> Isn't there a setting to play all matches? I don't recall for sure.  At
> least the caller could pick on or the other.
>
> Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.
> Please excude my typtos.
>
> > On Jun 6, 2016, at 3:38 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
> >
> > Correct, it is.  And neither use has any alternate names or extensions
> in their Unity setup.
> >
> > I am truly stumped!!!
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Bill Talley  wrote:
> >>
> >> I believe this is probably a speech enabled directory handler.
> >>
> >> Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.
> Please excude my typtos.
> >>
> >>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 1:13 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press
> 9, you can speak the name of the person you want to connect to.
> >>>
> >>> This oddity is happening:
> >>>
> >>> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then
> says "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
> >>>
> >>> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
> >>> Unity and UCM 8
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Dave
> >>> ___
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[Bill Talley]

Isn't there a setting to play all matches? I don't recall for sure.  At least 
the caller could pick on or the other.  

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
excude my typtos.

> On Jun 6, 2016, at 3:38 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
> 
> Correct, it is.  And neither use has any alternate names or extensions in 
> their Unity setup.
> 
> I am truly stumped!!!
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Bill Talley  wrote:
>> 
>> I believe this is probably a speech enabled directory handler.
>> 
>> Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
>> excude my typtos.
>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 1:13 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9, 
>>> you can speak the name of the person you want to connect to. 
>>> 
>>> This oddity is happening:  
>>> 
>>> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then says 
>>> "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
>>> 
>>> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
>>> Unity and UCM 8
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Dave
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[Ryan Huff]

David,

Here are my thoughts for what they be worth to ya ;)

- Make sure the name is in the search scope (located in directory handler 
basics page).

- Look at the voice recognition update schedule and see if you have any 
inactive periods. Maybe it was added and subsequently checked during an 
inactive period (Located in system settings > schedules)? . admittedly, a 
Hail Mary 

- Try ratcheting up the speech confidence threshold. The default should be 10 
... try something around 30 - 40 (Located in the directory handler basics page).
 
- Bounce the voice recognition transport services (Located in Unity Connection 
Serviceability > Service Management)

Hope this helps,

= Ryan =


Email: ryanh...@outlook.com
Spark: ryanh...@outlook.com
Twitter: @ryanthomashuff
LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff


From: cisco-voip  on behalf of David Zhars 

Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 4:38 PM
To: Bill Talley
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

Correct, it is.  And neither use has any alternate names or extensions in their 
Unity setup.

I am truly stumped!!!

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Bill Talley  wrote:
>
> I believe this is probably a speech enabled directory handler.
>
> Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
> excude my typtos.
>
>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 1:13 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
>>
>> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9, you 
>> can speak the name of the person you want to connect to.
>>
>> This oddity is happening:
>>
>> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then says 
>> "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
>>
>> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
>> Unity and UCM 8
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Dave
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[David Zhars]

Correct, it is.  And neither use has any alternate names or extensions in their 
Unity setup.

I am truly stumped!!!

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Bill Talley  wrote:
> 
> I believe this is probably a speech enabled directory handler.
> 
> Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
> excude my typtos.
> 
>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 1:13 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
>> 
>> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9, you 
>> can speak the name of the person you want to connect to. 
>> 
>> This oddity is happening:  
>> 
>> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then says 
>> "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
>> 
>> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
>> Unity and UCM 8
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Dave
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[Bill Talley]

I believe this is probably a speech enabled directory handler.

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
excude my typtos.

> On Jun 6, 2016, at 1:13 PM, David Zhars  wrote:
> 
> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9, you 
> can speak the name of the person you want to connect to. 
> 
> This oddity is happening:  
> 
> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then says 
> "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
> 
> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
> Unity and UCM 8
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[Brian Meade]

Does either user have any alternate names configured under their user in
Unity Connection?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:13 PM, David Zhars  wrote:

> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9,
> you can speak the name of the person you want to connect to.
>
> This oddity is happening:
>
> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then
> says "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
>
> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
> Unity and UCM 8
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[David Zhars]

Nothing there

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:19 PM,  wrote:

>
>
> Check contacts in Unity
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *David Zhars
> *Sent:* Monday, June 06, 2016 2:14 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects
>
>
>
> We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9,
> you can speak the name of the person you want to connect to.
>
> This oddity is happening:
>
> I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then
> says "transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
>
> I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
>
> Unity and UCM 8
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[David Zhars]

We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9,
you can speak the name of the person you want to connect to.

This oddity is happening:

I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then says
"transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.

I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
Unity and UCM 8

Thanks

Dave
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

[norm.nicholson]

Check contacts in Unity



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David 
Zhars
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 2:14 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

We have a greeting when people call the main number, and if you press 9, you 
can speak the name of the person you want to connect to.
This oddity is happening:
I speak "John Smith" who is extension 1305, and the system waits, then says 
"transferring to Jane Doe" who is extension 1306.
I can't seem to figure out where this is off...
Unity and UCM 8
Thanks
Dave
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCE 11.x and Jabber ?

[Ed Leatherman]

Hi Jason!

No EM on jabber. Not sure about the UCCE question. We are starting to use
it from some UCCX (10.6) applications with Finesse.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:

>
>
> Should a customer go with Jabber for use with Finesse/CAD in UCCE 11.x ?
> or stick with IP Communicator 8.6.4 ?  Is Jabber still Finesse only?
>
>
>
> Remind me does Jabber does Extension Mobility login?
>
>
>
> Hope all has been well here on Puck. Had a large R project last 2 years,
> then hiked the AT awhile.
>
>
>
> Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No 38564
>
> Consultant
>
> Dimension Data
>
> 904-338-3245 mobile
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
> "http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
> 
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] UCCE 11.x and Jabber ?

[Jason Aarons (AM)]

   Should a customer go with Jabber for use with Finesse/CAD in UCCE 11.x ? or 
stick with IP Communicator 8.6.4 ?  Is Jabber still Finesse only?

Remind me does Jabber does Extension Mobility login?

Hope all has been well here on Puck. Had a large R project last 2 years, then 
hiked the AT awhile.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No 38564
Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245 mobile

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

[Ki Wi]

Hi James,
you are right regarding the phone registration on Spark directly. However,
for the voice gateway connectivity for voice countries, looks like we will
have to go via Hybrid method. :(

If that's the case + customer have MPLS today. I will prefer to have the
voice traffic over MPLS. At least we can tell them that when using
deskphone, quality is guarantee.

Regards,
Ki Wi

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, James Buchanan 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I don't believe that's the case. According to Cisco, you register the
> phones directly to Spark. Check out
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/unified-communications/hosted-collaboration-solution-hcs/datasheet-c78-736823.html#_Toc444123188
> .
>
> This could eliminate the need for a UCM at all as well as voice gateways
> if I understand it correctly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:
>
>> Hi James,
>> It definitely make more sense. However, if this is to go to spark, I will
>> need similar equipment upfront as well.
>>
>> First create a UCM cluster.
>> Establish hybrid spark connectivity (this requires additional expressway
>> C instance for host connector stuff on top of expressway C pair)
>>
>> Since I have 3 locations with voice gateways, it make sense to have 3
>> expressway (C) at least? If not, I can imagine that when I'm in US
>> calling someone US, the spark will connect to the UCM cluster located in
>> SG via that only expressway located in SG. The voice quality will be very
>> bad due to latency. The PSTN option directly via spark is very limited
>> currently.
>>
>> The setup is more or less the same eventually. Most likely we might be
>> able to save on CUWL license cost if those roaming users doesn't need a
>> phone profile in CUCM?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, James Buchanan > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more
>>> sense than implementing an on-premise system.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Group,
 I have this customer requirement where they have 3 locations
 (Singapore, US and UK) . Majority of their users will be on the move
 (around the world). Users have to connect to the phone system via Internet.

 The intention is to have the UCM cluster in Singapore and have the
 expressway C/E pair in all the 3 locations mentioned. With the help of
 GeoDNS solution, the jabber shall be able to look for the nearest
 expressway to connect to. Optimize resource assignment (ie.
 CFB/xcoder) nearest to them shall be taken care of by configuring device
 mobility related profiles.

 Will this work? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
 clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
 often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?


 --
 Regards,
 Ki Wi

 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ki Wi
>>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

[James Buchanan]

Hello,

I don't believe that's the case. According to Cisco, you register the
phones directly to Spark. Check out
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/unified-communications/hosted-collaboration-solution-hcs/datasheet-c78-736823.html#_Toc444123188
.

This could eliminate the need for a UCM at all as well as voice gateways if
I understand it correctly.

Thanks,

James

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:

> Hi James,
> It definitely make more sense. However, if this is to go to spark, I will
> need similar equipment upfront as well.
>
> First create a UCM cluster.
> Establish hybrid spark connectivity (this requires additional expressway C
> instance for host connector stuff on top of expressway C pair)
>
> Since I have 3 locations with voice gateways, it make sense to have 3
> expressway (C) at least? If not, I can imagine that when I'm in US
> calling someone US, the spark will connect to the UCM cluster located in
> SG via that only expressway located in SG. The voice quality will be very
> bad due to latency. The PSTN option directly via spark is very limited
> currently.
>
> The setup is more or less the same eventually. Most likely we might be
> able to save on CUWL license cost if those roaming users doesn't need a
> phone profile in CUCM?
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, James Buchanan 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more sense
>> than implementing an on-premise system.
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Group,
>>> I have this customer requirement where they have 3 locations (Singapore,
>>> US and UK) . Majority of their users will be on the move (around the
>>> world). Users have to connect to the phone system via Internet.
>>>
>>> The intention is to have the UCM cluster in Singapore and have the
>>> expressway C/E pair in all the 3 locations mentioned. With the help of
>>> GeoDNS solution, the jabber shall be able to look for the nearest
>>> expressway to connect to. Optimize resource assignment (ie.
>>> CFB/xcoder) nearest to them shall be taken care of by configuring device
>>> mobility related profiles.
>>>
>>> Will this work? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
>>> clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
>>> often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Ki Wi
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ki Wi
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

[Ki Wi]

Hi James,
It definitely make more sense. However, if this is to go to spark, I will
need similar equipment upfront as well.

First create a UCM cluster.
Establish hybrid spark connectivity (this requires additional expressway C
instance for host connector stuff on top of expressway C pair)

Since I have 3 locations with voice gateways, it make sense to have 3
expressway (C) at least? If not, I can imagine that when I'm in US
calling someone US, the spark will connect to the UCM cluster located in
SG via that only expressway located in SG. The voice quality will be very
bad due to latency. The PSTN option directly via spark is very limited
currently.

The setup is more or less the same eventually. Most likely we might be able
to save on CUWL license cost if those roaming users doesn't need a phone
profile in CUCM?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, James Buchanan 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more sense
> than implementing an on-premise system.
>
> James
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:
>
>> Hi Group,
>> I have this customer requirement where they have 3 locations (Singapore,
>> US and UK) . Majority of their users will be on the move (around the
>> world). Users have to connect to the phone system via Internet.
>>
>> The intention is to have the UCM cluster in Singapore and have the
>> expressway C/E pair in all the 3 locations mentioned. With the help of
>> GeoDNS solution, the jabber shall be able to look for the nearest
>> expressway to connect to. Optimize resource assignment (ie.
>> CFB/xcoder) nearest to them shall be taken care of by configuring device
>> mobility related profiles.
>>
>> Will this work? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
>> clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
>> often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ki Wi
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

[James Buchanan]

Hello,

I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more sense
than implementing an on-premise system.

James

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi  wrote:

> Hi Group,
> I have this customer requirement where they have 3 locations (Singapore,
> US and UK) . Majority of their users will be on the move (around the
> world). Users have to connect to the phone system via Internet.
>
> The intention is to have the UCM cluster in Singapore and have the
> expressway C/E pair in all the 3 locations mentioned. With the help of
> GeoDNS solution, the jabber shall be able to look for the nearest
> expressway to connect to. Optimize resource assignment (ie.
> CFB/xcoder) nearest to them shall be taken care of by configuring device
> mobility related profiles.
>
> Will this work? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
> clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
> often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ki Wi
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

[Ki Wi]

Hi Group,
I have this customer requirement where they have 3 locations (Singapore, US
and UK) . Majority of their users will be on the move (around the world).
Users have to connect to the phone system via Internet.

The intention is to have the UCM cluster in Singapore and have the
expressway C/E pair in all the 3 locations mentioned. With the help of
GeoDNS solution, the jabber shall be able to look for the nearest
expressway to connect to. Optimize resource assignment (ie.
CFB/xcoder) nearest to them shall be taken care of by configuring device
mobility related profiles.

Will this work? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple
clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster
often + I don't see any benefits by doing so?


-- 
Regards,
Ki Wi
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip