[cisco-voip] CUCM 9 to 11.5 BAT fields

[Dana Tong]

Hi all,

I have an annoying issue with BAT v11.5.

I have exported phones and UDP etc from CUCM version 9 to version 11.5.

BAT reports “FORWARD ALL VOICE MAIL” is not a supported field.

However, when I insert the devices (specific details) based on a template and 
then export all details on V11.5 those field headings are exactly the same 
(when comparing the version 9.1 export and the 11.5 export).

Has anyone encountered this issue and can suggest a fix? I’d like to re-insert 
the configuration with the correct values as there are many people who forward 
to other destinations (instead of voicemail).

Cheers
Dana



[cid:image001.png@01D2B918.E8104620]
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to PG_User application user?

[Bantz John F]

We use a more basic approach.  We use Enghouse EICC for our contact center with 
call manager 10.1.  We also use Enghouse QMS for call recording.  Each need 
devices associated to an application user so they can communicate through the 
TSP.  We have made sure that any phones we need associated to one of our 
application users ends in the letters CCA (call center agent).  We do something 
similar with device profiles for Extension Mobility users too, that way we can 
do a search for a device or profile that ends in CCA and find them quickly.  
That has been a big help as we have discovered the "unassociated all" button in 
CUCM 10.1.  it isn't an automated method, but it is a quick way to find and 
associate users to your application users.  I do wish there was an easy way to 
backup an application users and associated devices and route-points.

John Bantz
Telecommunications / Global User Services 
Deere & Company 
6400 NW 86th Street, Johnston, Iowa, 50131
Office (515) 267-4628
Cell (515) 314-6478

CONFIDENTIALITY. This electronic mail and any files transmitted with it may 
contain information proprietary to Deere & Company, or one of its subsidiaries 
or affiliates, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to whom they are addressed, shall be maintained in confidence and not disclosed 
to third parties without the written consent of the sender. If you are not the 
intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the electronic mail 
to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this electronic 
mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying 
of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
electronic mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return mail.

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Stephen Welsh
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 3:28 PM
To: Nick Barnett 
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to 
PG_User application user?

Hi Nick,

You can also use a SQLUpdate AXL call and submit an SQL statement that updates 
the ‘applicationuserdevicemap'

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO
UnifiedFX

> On 18 Apr 2017, at 21:16, Nick Barnett  wrote:
> 
> We have automation that builds devices, EM_Profiles, DNs, and just about 
> everything else... except for the manual add of the controlled devices to the 
> pg user application user for UCCE. We also use Nice for recording and there 
> is a nice app user that needs these associations as well.
> 
> I have figured out how to do this by using a getAppUser AXL call, parsing the 
> returned data, inserting my NEW device/profile where appropriate (into a new 
> tag) and then submitting the information back as an updateAppUser. I think 
> this this the only method we have available to automating this portion.
> 
> It kind of worries me to do it this way because I can see how the database 
> may see it as disassociating all devices from the PG User and then 
> re-associating all devices. Depending on processor utilization etc, I can 
> also see where they may be a short period of time where the PG user has no 
> associated devices.
> 
> Are my worries substantiated by any fact? Does anyone else do this? Are there 
> better ways to accomplish this task?
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to PG_User application user?

[Stephen Welsh]

Hi Nick,

You can also use a SQLUpdate AXL call and submit an SQL statement that updates 
the ‘applicationuserdevicemap'

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO
UnifiedFX

> On 18 Apr 2017, at 21:16, Nick Barnett  wrote:
> 
> We have automation that builds devices, EM_Profiles, DNs, and just about 
> everything else... except for the manual add of the controlled devices to the 
> pg user application user for UCCE. We also use Nice for recording and there 
> is a nice app user that needs these associations as well.
> 
> I have figured out how to do this by using a getAppUser AXL call, parsing the 
> returned data, inserting my NEW device/profile where appropriate (into a new 
> tag) and then submitting the information back as an updateAppUser. I think 
> this this the only method we have available to automating this portion.
> 
> It kind of worries me to do it this way because I can see how the database 
> may see it as disassociating all devices from the PG User and then 
> re-associating all devices. Depending on processor utilization etc, I can 
> also see where they may be a short period of time where the PG user has no 
> associated devices.
> 
> Are my worries substantiated by any fact? Does anyone else do this? Are there 
> better ways to accomplish this task?
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to PG_User application user?

[NateCCIE]

You can do a simple SQL insert.  This is a base Query I have used to add all 
hard phones to an app user, that aren’t already associated to the user (for 
apps like phoneview)

 

Add all phones to an app user:

 

INSERT INTO ApplicationUserDeviceMap

(fkdevice, fkApplicationUser,tkuserassociation)

SELECT device.pkid, 'be93a493-3b9b-d0f4-d360-fafb54babb70', '1' from device 
where Device.pkid NOT IN (SELECT fkDevice FROM ApplicationUserDeviceMap AS MAP  
WHERE MAP.fkApplicationUser = 'be93a493-3b9b-d0f4-d360-fafb54babb70') and  
tkclass = '1' and name like 'SEP%'



 

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick 
Barnett
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 2:17 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to PG_User 
application user?

 

We have automation that builds devices, EM_Profiles, DNs, and just about 
everything else... except for the manual add of the controlled devices to the 
pg user application user for UCCE. We also use Nice for recording and there is 
a nice app user that needs these associations as well.

 

I have figured out how to do this by using a getAppUser AXL call, parsing the 
returned data, inserting my NEW device/profile where appropriate (into a new 
tag) and then submitting the information back as an updateAppUser. I think this 
this the only method we have available to automating this portion.

 

It kind of worries me to do it this way because I can see how the database may 
see it as disassociating all devices from the PG User and then re-associating 
all devices. Depending on processor utilization etc, I can also see where they 
may be a short period of time where the PG user has no associated devices.

 

Are my worries substantiated by any fact? Does anyone else do this? Are there 
better ways to accomplish this task?

 

Thanks,

Nick

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to PG_User application user?

[Nick Barnett]

We have automation that builds devices, EM_Profiles, DNs, and just about
everything else... except for the manual add of the controlled devices to
the pg user application user for UCCE. We also use Nice for recording and
there is a nice app user that needs these associations as well.

I have figured out how to do this by using a getAppUser AXL call, parsing
the returned data, inserting my NEW device/profile where appropriate (into
a new tag) and then submitting the information back as an updateAppUser. I
think this this the only method we have available to automating this
portion.

It kind of worries me to do it this way because I can see how the database
may see it as disassociating all devices from the PG User and then
re-associating all devices. Depending on processor utilization etc, I can
also see where they may be a short period of time where the PG user has no
associated devices.

Are my worries substantiated by any fact? Does anyone else do this? Are
there better ways to accomplish this task?

Thanks,
Nick
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Brian Meade]

I found the support forums version of that article was a little more
updated last time I did an LDS integration-
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/63136/how-configure-unified-communication-manager-directory-integration-multi-forest


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)  wrote:

> Start with http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-
> unified-communications/unified-communications-
> manager-version-80/111979-ucm-multi-forest-00.html
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Apr 18, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <
> ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Could you please give me more details about for about the LDS solution.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
>
> Senior Network Engineer
>
> *From:* bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com 
> ] *On Behalf Of *Brian Meade
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 18, 2017 5:40 PM
> *To:* Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question
>
> You have to front-end the multiple domains with an LDS instance or use SSO
> instead.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <
> ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gents,
>
> I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2
> different LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call
> manager to integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to
> provision and authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can
> add 2 LDAP directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I
> can find only 1 possibility is there ???
>
> So any clues ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
>
> Senior Network Engineer
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)]

Start with 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-80/111979-ucm-multi-forest-00.html

-Ryan

On Apr 18, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:

Hi Brian,

Could you please give me more details about for about the LDS solution.






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] 
On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 5:40 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

You have to front-end the multiple domains with an LDS instance or use SSO 
instead.

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Hi Gents,

I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2 different 
LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call manager to 
integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to provision and 
authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can add 2 LDAP 
directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I can find only 1 
possibility is there ???

So any clues ?






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman]

Hi Brian,

Could you please give me more details about for about the LDS solution.






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 5:40 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

You have to front-end the multiple domains with an LDS instance or use SSO 
instead.

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Hi Gents,

I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2 different 
LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call manager to 
integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to provision and 
authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can add 2 LDAP 
directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I can find only 1 
possibility is there ???

So any clues ?






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] openldap for ucm/cuc

[Tim Frazee]

anyone using openldap or apacheDS for directories instead of the de-facto
active directory?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Brian Meade]

You have to front-end the multiple domains with an LDS instance or use SSO
instead.

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <
ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com> wrote:

> Hi Gents,
>
>
>
> I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2
> different LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call
> manager to integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to
> provision and authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can
> add 2 LDAP directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I
> can find only 1 possibility is there ???
>
>
>
> So any clues ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
>
> Senior Network Engineer
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] cool stuff - video-to-usb capture feed into WebEx, Spark, Jabber, etc.

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

I wanted to share this in the event that it could be useful to others.

I was thinking about how to integrate standard A/V solutions with computer 
based conferencing solutions answering two questions: (i) how can we continue 
to use existing investments in A/V solutions around campus with computer based 
conferencing solutions, and (ii) what are the alternatives to expensive room 
based conferencing solutions.

The answer was fairly simple in the end : a driverless video-to-usb capture 
device. And to be honest, quite impressive. The hardest part was selecting the 
device to test with. I ended up selecting the Inogeni HDMI-to-USB3 device. 
Based this on price as well as I like to support local - Quebec being more 
local than any other source region. ;)

Some important points I had to consider:


* It had to be driverless - otherwise it may not work with all software

* Support had to be great and quick - the Inogeni engineers quickly 
identified and resolve a Spark problem

* It had to be as close to line rate as possible - most of the 
expensive solutions had only 1-3 frames of delay

* It had to off-load CPU - this was when downscaling/upscaling was 
happening

* Knowledge of the web conferencing world - wide array of apps and 
tools, from Facebook to Jabber

While investigating, though, I found some very interesting devices out there 
that (could potentially) solve this problem in interesting ways. Some devices 
are more complex than others, but give more features. Some support multiple 
feeds. One, quite interesting, only outputs 720p low frame rate for web 
broadcasting to save bandwidth. Which was weird in my opinion considering 
bandwidth availability and that it maxes out at this rate and is not user 
selectable.

Some interesting links:

https://inogeni.com/

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/ca/products/blackmagicwebpresenter

https://www.epiphan.com/products/

My next step is to integrate audio mixing into things. I will have to choose 
between sending audio through cam-corder to ensure audio/video frame matching 
-or- through an RCA-to-USB audio device and select it separately.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

<>___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman]

Noted, Many thanks Ryan.






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 2:46 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

No, Directory Sync will not import active directory passwords into the 
communications manager Informix schema.

That is the point of active directory authentication, it's simply issuing a 
bind request to the directory server which yields a positive or negative return 
value.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 18, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Hi Ryan,

The two different domains are under the one forest.

But let me ask something else, If I used only the LDAP integration without LDAP 
authentication, so call manager will fetch users accounts from the LDAP but in 
this case the authentication will occur against CUCM users (which actually were 
fetched from the LDAP), my question in this case when the accounts are being 
fetched from LDAP they will be fetched with their current domain passwords, 
right?





Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:32 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

Hi Ahmed,

You're on the right track, you can sync multiple forests/directories but you 
can only bind against one schema.

Might be time to look outside of AD for authentication (SSO).

Thanks,

Ryan



Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Hi Gents,

I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2 different 
LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call manager to 
integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to provision and 
authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can add 2 LDAP 
directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I can find only 1 
possibility is there ???

So any clues ?






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Ryan Huff]

No, Directory Sync will not import active directory passwords into the 
communications manager Informix schema.

That is the point of active directory authentication, it's simply issuing a 
bind request to the directory server which yields a positive or negative return 
value.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 18, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:

Hi Ryan,

The two different domains are under the one forest.

But let me ask something else, If I used only the LDAP integration without LDAP 
authentication, so call manager will fetch users accounts from the LDAP but in 
this case the authentication will occur against CUCM users (which actually were 
fetched from the LDAP), my question in this case when the accounts are being 
fetched from LDAP they will be fetched with their current domain passwords, 
right?





Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:32 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

Hi Ahmed,

You're on the right track, you can sync multiple forests/directories but you 
can only bind against one schema.

Might be time to look outside of AD for authentication (SSO).

Thanks,

Ryan



Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Hi Gents,

I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2 different 
LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call manager to 
integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to provision and 
authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can add 2 LDAP 
directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I can find only 1 
possibility is there ???

So any clues ?






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman]

Hi Ryan,

The two different domains are under the one forest.

But let me ask something else, If I used only the LDAP integration without LDAP 
authentication, so call manager will fetch users accounts from the LDAP but in 
this case the authentication will occur against CUCM users (which actually were 
fetched from the LDAP), my question in this case when the accounts are being 
fetched from LDAP they will be fetched with their current domain passwords, 
right?





Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:32 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

Hi Ahmed,

You're on the right track, you can sync multiple forests/directories but you 
can only bind against one schema.

Might be time to look outside of AD for authentication (SSO).

Thanks,

Ryan



Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Hi Gents,

I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2 different 
LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call manager to 
integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to provision and 
authenticate end users’ account? I do understand that we can add 2 LDAP 
directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I can find only 1 
possibility is there ???

So any clues ?






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

[Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman]

Hi Gents,

I have CUCM 11.5 and end users belong to 2 different domains with 2 different 
LDAP systems, here is my question; is it possible for the call manager to 
integrate with two different LDAP systems in the same time to provision and 
authenticate end users' account? I do understand that we can add 2 LDAP 
directories in CUCM but when it comes to LDAP authentication I can find only 1 
possibility is there ???

So any clues ?






Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip