Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[Kent Roberts]

You can create multiple lists, and add different groups to them with different 
trunks….  To accomplish the same goal


> On Mar 10, 2022, at 6:58 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:
> 
> 
> For some reason this irks me.  
> 
> I like to create special test patterns to test all my gateways.  
> 
> I had to create individual groups and lists to accomplish this.  
> 
> Because, as you say, they disappear when assigned to a specific pattern 
> directly.  :(
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Mar 10, 2022, at 10:58 AM, russon81 via cisco-voip 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do 
>> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
>> the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to 
>> ith...@uoguelph.ca
>> 
>> 
>> I think if you have the SIP trunk assigned to a route pattern, it won't show 
>> up as an option in the route groups.  You can definitely assign them to a RG 
>> though.  Try creating the RG, point your pattern to that, then you should be 
>> able to assign the trunk to the RG.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
>> 
>> 
>>  Original message 
>> From: Matthew Huff 
>> Date: 3/10/22 7:46 AM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: NateCCIE 
>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES
>> 
>> That was my initial thought as well, but I could  only see how to setup a 
>> route group with H.323/QSIG,MGCP, etc, not SIP.
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> I’ll look again.
>> 
>>  
>> Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC
>> 
>>  
>> Office: 914-460-4039
>> 
>> mh...@ox.com  | www.ox.com 
>> ...
>> 
>>  
>> From: NateCCIE  
>> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:29 AM
>> To: Matthew Huff 
>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES
>> 
>>  
>> Split it to two different trunks and add them both to a route group that is 
>> configured for round robin to the route list.
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Huff > > wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want 
>> to be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have 
>> the router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip 
>> options keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call 
>> is made to CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the 
>> CUBE returns 503  Service unavailable and CUCM doesn’t try CUBE2. What am I 
>> missing?
>> 
>>  
>> Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC
>> 
>>  
>> Office: 914-460-4039
>> 
>> mh...@ox.com  | www.ox.com 
>> ...
>> 
>>  
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

For some reason this irks me.

I like to create special test patterns to test all my gateways.

I had to create individual groups and lists to accomplish this.

Because, as you say, they disappear when assigned to a specific pattern 
directly.  :(

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 10, 2022, at 10:58 AM, russon81 via cisco-voip 
 wrote:



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to ith...@uoguelph.ca


I think if you have the SIP trunk assigned to a route pattern, it won't show up 
as an option in the route groups.  You can definitely assign them to a RG 
though.  Try creating the RG, point your pattern to that, then you should be 
able to assign the trunk to the RG.



Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device


 Original message 
From: Matthew Huff 
Date: 3/10/22 7:46 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: NateCCIE 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

That was my initial thought as well, but I could  only see how to setup a route 
group with H.323/QSIG,MGCP, etc, not SIP.


I’ll look again.

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

From: NateCCIE 
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:29 AM
To: Matthew Huff 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

Split it to two different trunks and add them both to a route group that is 
configured for round robin to the route list.




On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>> 
wrote:

We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want to 
be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have the 
router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made to 
CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE returns 503 
 Service unavailable and CUCM doesn’t try CUBE2. What am I missing?

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound CLI based on location

[Scott Shaw]

You could use a combination of Geolocation fields and a LUA script or if
you are connecting to a CUBE you could use SIP manipulations there.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:10 PM James Dust 
wrote:

> Good evening all,
>
>
>
> I am using CUCM 12.5, and all of our users are signing into their desk
> phones with extension mobility. When the users dial outbound we are sending
> a standard CLI, which is set via a calling party transform mask.
>
>
>
> I now have a need to send a different outbound CLI, based on what location
> the end user is working from (two different sites, two separate CLI’s)
>
>
>
> Is this possible?
>
>
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> James
>
> *Consider the environment - Think before you print*
>
> The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and
> may not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any
> attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
> confirm this.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be
> sent by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not
> constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where
> applicable), can be found at this URL
> http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[Matthew Huff]

Just figured that out. D’oh.

Looks to be easy now.

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

From: russon81 
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:54 AM
To: Matthew Huff ; NateCCIE 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

I think if you have the SIP trunk assigned to a route pattern, it won't show up 
as an option in the route groups.  You can definitely assign them to a RG 
though.  Try creating the RG, point your pattern to that, then you should be 
able to assign the trunk to the RG.



Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device


 Original message 
From: Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>>
Date: 3/10/22 7:46 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: NateCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

That was my initial thought as well, but I could  only see how to setup a route 
group with H.323/QSIG,MGCP, etc, not SIP.


I’ll look again.

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

From: NateCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:29 AM
To: Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

Split it to two different trunks and add them both to a route group that is 
configured for round robin to the route list.



On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>> 
wrote:

We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want to 
be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have the 
router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made to 
CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE returns 503 
 Service unavailable and CUCM doesn’t try CUBE2. What am I missing?

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[russon81 via cisco-voip]

I think if you have the SIP trunk assigned to a route pattern, it won't show up 
as an option in the route groups.  You can definitely assign them to a RG 
though.  Try creating the RG, point your pattern to that, then you should be 
able to assign the trunk to the RG.Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
 Original message From: Matthew Huff  Date: 
3/10/22  7:46 AM  (GMT-08:00) To: NateCCIE  Cc: 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy 
with multiple CUBES 

That was my initial thought as well, but I could  only see how to setup a route 
group with H.323/QSIG,MGCP, etc, not SIP.
 
 
I’ll look again.
 

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC
 
Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

 


From: NateCCIE  
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:29 AM
To: Matthew Huff 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES


 
Split it to two different trunks and add them both to a route group that is 
configured for round robin to the route list.


 


 





On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Huff  wrote:




 
We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want to 
be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have the 
router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
keep-alive
 configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made to CUBE1 and 
the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE returns 503  Service 
unavailable and CUCM doesn’t try CUBE2. What am I missing?
 
Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC
 
Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...
 
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip







___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[Matthew Huff]

That was my initial thought as well, but I could  only see how to setup a route 
group with H.323/QSIG,MGCP, etc, not SIP.


I’ll look again.

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

From: NateCCIE 
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:29 AM
To: Matthew Huff 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

Split it to two different trunks and add them both to a route group that is 
configured for round robin to the route list.




On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>> 
wrote:

We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want to 
be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have the 
router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made to 
CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE returns 503 
 Service unavailable and CUCM doesn’t try CUBE2. What am I missing?

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[Johnson, Tim]

I have the same setup, but I'm not sure we've run into that scenario. From 
Google, it looks like you could adjust the Route Plan settings under Service 
Parameters (Call Manager) to continue routing on user busy flag. The 
description of the option speaks to intracluster routing, but from a few forum 
posts, it sounds like it applies to regular SIP trunk routing also.

That said, with it sending back a 503, I'm not sure this is going to help. 
Curious what you figure out though.

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Matthew Huff
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:12 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [External] [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want to 
be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have the 
router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made to 
CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE returns 503 
 Service unavailable and CUCM doesn't try CUBE2. What am I missing?

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[NateCCIE]

Split it to two different trunks and add them both to a route group that is 
configured for round robin to the route list.



> On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Huff  wrote:
> 
> 
> We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want 
> to be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have 
> the router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
> keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made 
> to CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE 
> returns 503  Service unavailable and CUCM doesn’t try CUBE2. What am I 
> missing?
>  
> Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC
>  
> Office: 914-460-4039
> mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
> ...
>  
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM SIP trunk redundancy with multiple CUBES

[Matthew Huff]

We have two cisco ISR 4331 Cube gateways in two different locations. I want to 
be able to route calls to both devices (preferably round-robin). I have the 
router pattern going to a trunk with both cubes defined (with sip options 
keep-alive configured). The issue we are having is that if the call is made to 
CUBE1 and the associated outbound dial-peer in in busyout, the CUBE returns 503 
 Service unavailable and CUCM doesn't try CUBE2. What am I missing?

Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC

Office: 914-460-4039
mh...@ox.com | www.ox.com
...

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip