Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks (ci...@cips.nl)

[Dan Schmitt]

Variphy has the ability to report on devices that essentially makes 0 calls. Or 
any threshold too. Variphy would require data dump or Billing Application 
Server set up in CUCM to send it CDR.  A portion of the report builder allows 
you to search on the phones not logged in or with no CDR data. They have free 
demonstration/evaluation and support if you are enrolled in an evaluation. I'm 
sure they can assist you to help get you what you are looking for.


https://www.variphy.com/products/free-trial

Start Your Free Trial of Variphy Today | Variphy Cisco CDR 
...<https://www.variphy.com/products/free-trial>
www.variphy.com
Start Your Free Trial of Variphy Today. Variphy is software for Cisco CDR 
Reporting and Call Analytics.




Dan Schmitt

customade...@hotmail.com<mailto:customade...@hotmail.com>



From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of 
cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net <cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 11:00 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 168, Issue 3

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-ow...@puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config
  (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   2. Re: reporting on (not)used phones or desks (ci...@cips.nl)
   3. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config
  (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   4. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config
  (Evgeny Izetov)
   5. Re: reporting on (not)used phones or desks (Charles Goldsmith)
   6. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config
  (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   7. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config
  (NateCCIE)
   8. Re: Adding custom entries to the Unity directory? (Derek Andrew)
   9. Skipping * on inbound external calls to Unity (Matthew Huff)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:29:29 +
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca>
To: "voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)"
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching
startup config
Message-ID:

<ytxpr01mb0640d04600f2b061f091fdfeac...@ytxpr01mb0640.canprd01.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


OK - Having a weird issue. I was pretty sure that the router config took 
precedence over CUCM (with respect to enabling ports).

I've got four of  the four ports configured on CUCM. So not sure why three are 
being configured on the router.

Very strange!

My startup looks something like this:

controller T1 0/0/0
cablelength long 0db
pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp
!
controller T1 0/0/1
cablelength long 0db
pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp
!
controller T1 0/0/2
shutdown
cablelength long 0db
!
controller T1 0/0/3
shutdown
cablelength long 0db
!

!
interface Serial0/0/0:23
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-dms100
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0/0/1:23
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-dms100
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
isdn bchan-number-order ascending
no cdp enable

voice-port 0/0/0:23
echo-cancel coverage 64
!
voice-port 0/0/1:23
!



But after a reload, my running config looks something like this:

controller T1 0/0/0
cablelength long 0db
pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp
!
controller T1 0/0/1
cablelength long 0db
pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp
!
controller T1 0/0/2
cablelength long 0db
pri-group timeslots 1-8,24 service mgcp
!
controller T1 0/0/3
cablelength long 0db
!

interface Serial0/0/0:23
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-dms100
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0/0/1:23
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-dms100
isdn protocol-emulate network
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0/0/2:23
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-dms100
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
no cdp enable
!

!
voice-port 0/0/0:23
echo-cancel coverage 64
!
voice-port 0/0/1:23
echo-cancel coverage 64
!
voice-port 0/0/2:23
echo-cancel coverage 64

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
Univer

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

[Dan Schmitt]

Variphy Insight has the ability to remotely control endpoints. Furthermore you 
can perform Text Broadcast w Reply capabilities from the phones. Variphy will 
also allow you to run macros on those remote phones which will allow you to 
edit phone settings (delete ITL files, etc. in bulk remotely).

Dan 


> From: cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 144, Issue 27
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:00:04 -0400
> 
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
>   cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   cisco-voip-ow...@puck.nether.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>1. I need some feedback on the use of alternateenterprise
>   number mask (Barnett, Nick)
>2. Whisper Coaching for CCX (Matthew Loraditch)
>3. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
>   number mask (Scott Voll)
>4. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)
>5. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
>   number mask (Barnett, Nick)
>6. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
>   number mask (Ryan Ratliff (rratliff))
>7. CME 9.1 shared line (Jeremy Rogers (AM))
>8. Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Scott Voll)
>9. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Walenta, Philip)
>   10. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Stephen Welsh)
>   11. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Charles Goldsmith)
>   12. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Nick Britt)
>   13. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Mike King)
>   14. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Jason Aarons (AM))
>   15. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)
>   16. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Mike King)
>   17. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)
>   18. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Ryan Huff)
>   19. Caller ID (Lisa Notarianni)
>   20. Re: Caller ID (Matthew Loraditch)
>   21. Cisco hardware with built-in echo service (Sevana Oy)
>   22. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Terry Oakley)
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:35:26 +
> From: "Barnett, Nick" 
> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" 
> Subject: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate
>   enterprise number mask
> Message-ID:
>   <5258766449b0aeddde69c4833...@c1eml154.corp.alliance.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Here's the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field 
> offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field 
> offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials 
> to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to 
> trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or 
> bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ 
> for decades.
> 
> I'm aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with 
> non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I'll get there, I just 
> can't do it right now.
> 
> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 
> digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXX. This gives a 
> derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission 
> accomplished... I think.
> 
> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I'm slightly worried that 
> it could raise processor usage... but I'm mostly just worried about it 
> because it is "new" to me.
> 
> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:38 +
> From: Matthew Loraditch 
> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" 
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Whisper Coaching for CCX
> Message-ID:
>   
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I know this isn't built in..
> I read that Compliance Recording has it but am having problems confirming.
> Any other solutions?
> 
> 
> Matthew G. Loraditch -