Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android
Cool, Thanks. That looks like at the very least a quick and cheap solution. Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC Office: 914-460-4039 mh...@ox.com<mailto:mh...@ox.com> | www.ox.com<http://www.ox.com> ... From: Josh Nordquist Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 11:27 AM To: Matthew Huff Cc: Johnson, Tim ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android We don't have an IM server so I'm assuming it isn't needed and you only need an expressway for remote access. We used the mobile clients internally on wifi networks before COVID and added that later. On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:12 AM Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>> wrote: Thanks, another issue with the jabber client is what you mention. The lack of additional lines. We need something that works more like a softphone and less like an IM client. With the jabber phone only config, do you still need an IM server, or just the MRA? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android
We don't have an IM server so I'm assuming it isn't needed and you only need an expressway for remote access. We used the mobile clients internally on wifi networks before COVID and added that later. On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:12 AM Matthew Huff wrote: > Thanks, another issue with the jabber client is what you mention. The lack > of additional lines. We need something that works more like a softphone and > less like an IM client. > > With the jabber phone only config, do you still need an IM server, or just > the MRA? > > > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android
Thanks, another issue with the jabber client is what you mention. The lack of additional lines. We need something that works more like a softphone and less like an IM client. With the jabber phone only config, do you still need an IM server, or just the MRA? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android
We run android and ios phone only jabber clients over expressway MRA and have had a pretty positive experience on it. It runs very similar to phone only jabber on windows with the major missed feature for us being the lack of additional lines available on the jabber for mobile. On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:01 AM Johnson, Tim wrote: > Pretty sure you can run Jabber in phone-only mode these days. Not sure on > the limitations of it though. > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of > Matthew Huff > Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:56 AM > To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > Subject: [External] [cisco-voip] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for > iPhone and Android > > We are looking for a solution for softphones that are compatible with > expressway for both iPhones and android. Jabber is not an option due to > Finra & SEC compliance (no instant messaging). Specifically we are looking > for a voice app only with no collaboration/presence features. Any > suggestions? > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android
Last I tried it still required an IM presence server would entail a large infrastructure cost because even if we disable IM, FINRA would require us to still have archiving done in case it got turned back on. ... -Original Message- From: Johnson, Tim Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 11:00 AM To: Matthew Huff ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [External] [cisco-voip] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android Pretty sure you can run Jabber in phone-only mode these days. Not sure on the limitations of it though. -Original Message- From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Matthew Huff Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:56 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [External] [cisco-voip] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android We are looking for a solution for softphones that are compatible with expressway for both iPhones and android. Jabber is not an option due to Finra & SEC compliance (no instant messaging). Specifically we are looking for a voice app only with no collaboration/presence features. Any suggestions? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android
Pretty sure you can run Jabber in phone-only mode these days. Not sure on the limitations of it though. -Original Message- From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Matthew Huff Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:56 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [External] [cisco-voip] Non-jabber based Cisco softphones for iPhone and Android We are looking for a solution for softphones that are compatible with expressway for both iPhones and android. Jabber is not an option due to Finra & SEC compliance (no instant messaging). Specifically we are looking for a voice app only with no collaboration/presence features. Any suggestions? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
