Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
Hi, Unfortunately changing the system is not an option. If anyone has any ideas within the parameters of the problem... Thanks Ovidiu On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 PM Benjamin Turner wrote: > LOL Nates’s the man! > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > -- > *From:* cisco-voip on behalf of > NateCCIE > *Sent:* Friday, May 24, 2019 3:46:16 PM > *To:* Ovidiu Popa > *Cc:* cisco-voip > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE > > Friends don’t let friends use MGCP. You can still use PRI and use SIP > between the GW and CUCM. > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 24, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Ovidiu Popa wrote: > > Hi Tommy > > Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. > > Thanks, > Ovidiu > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:15 PM Schlotterer, Tommy < > tschlotte...@presidio.com> wrote: > >> You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: >> >> >> >> voice class sip-profiles 100 >> >> rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 >> >> rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" >> "\u01\1" >> >> rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip: >> 44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" >> >> rule 4 request INVITE sip-header Diversion remove >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Tommy >> >> >> >> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Ovidiu >> Popa >> *Sent:* Friday, May 24, 2019 2:53 PM >> *To:* cisco-voip >> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE >> >> >> >> *EXTERNAL EMAIL* >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello everyone >> >> >> >> Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the >> information in the ISDN Facility IE ? >> >> >> >> We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following >> issue : >> >> - The operator enables the failover >> >> - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B >> >> - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party >> Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that >> was initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. >> >> >> >> According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for >> supplementary services not for routing calls. >> >> >> >> 11.2.2.1 Facility >> The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. >> For the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control >> supplementary services. >> >> >> >> So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? >> >> >> >> Thanks for any assistance. >> >> >> >> Ovidiu >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration >> Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com >> 20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604 >> D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | tschlotte...@presidio.com >> >> >> >> >> *This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of >> the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, >> confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please >> notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and >> attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the >> taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or >> attached to this message is prohibited.* >> >> ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
LOL Nates’s the man! Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: cisco-voip on behalf of NateCCIE Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 3:46:16 PM To: Ovidiu Popa Cc: cisco-voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE Friends don’t let friends use MGCP. You can still use PRI and use SIP between the GW and CUCM. Sent from my iPhone On May 24, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Ovidiu Popa mailto:ovi.p...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Tommy Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. Thanks, Ovidiu On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:15 PM Schlotterer, Tommy mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com>> wrote: You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: voice class sip-profiles 100 rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip: 44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 4 request INVITE sip-header Diversion remove Thanks Tommy From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Ovidiu Popa Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 2:53 PM To: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello everyone Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the information in the ISDN Facility IE ? We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following issue : - The operator enables the failover - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that was initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for supplementary services not for routing calls. 11.2.2.1 Facility The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. For the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control supplementary services. So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? Thanks for any assistance. Ovidiu Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com<http://presidio.com> 20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604 D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | tschlotte...@presidio.com<mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com> This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
MGCP For EVER! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of NateCCIE Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 3:46 PM To: Ovidiu Popa Cc: cisco-voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE Friends don’t let friends use MGCP. You can still use PRI and use SIP between the GW and CUCM. Sent from my iPhone On May 24, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Ovidiu Popa mailto:ovi.p...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Tommy Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. Thanks, Ovidiu On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:15 PM Schlotterer, Tommy mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com>> wrote: You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: voice class sip-profiles 100 rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip: 44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 4 request INVITE sip-header Diversion remove Thanks Tommy From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Ovidiu Popa Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 2:53 PM To: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello everyone Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the information in the ISDN Facility IE ? We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following issue : - The operator enables the failover - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that was initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for supplementary services not for routing calls. 11.2.2.1 Facility The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. For the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control supplementary services. So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? Thanks for any assistance. Ovidiu Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com<http://presidio.com> 20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604 D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | tschlotte...@presidio.com<mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com> This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
Friends don’t let friends use MGCP. You can still use PRI and use SIP between the GW and CUCM. Sent from my iPhone > On May 24, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Ovidiu Popa wrote: > > Hi Tommy > > Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. > > Thanks, > Ovidiu > >> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:15 PM Schlotterer, Tommy >> wrote: >> You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: >> >> >> >> voice class sip-profiles 100 >> >> rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 >> >> rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" >> >> rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip: 44085551234(.*)" >> "\u01\1" >> >> rule 4 request INVITE sip-header Diversion remove >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Tommy >> >> >> >> From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Ovidiu >> Popa >> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 2:53 PM >> To: cisco-voip >> Subject: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE >> >> >> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL >> >> >> >> Hello everyone >> >> >> >> Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the >> information in the ISDN Facility IE ? >> >> >> >> We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following >> issue : >> >> - The operator enables the failover >> >> - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B >> >> - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party >> Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that was >> initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. >> >> >> >> According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for >> supplementary services not for routing calls. >> >> >> >> 11.2.2.1 Facility >> The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. For >> the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control supplementary >> services. >> >> >> >> So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? >> >> >> >> Thanks for any assistance. >> >> >> >> Ovidiu >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration >> Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com >> 20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604 >> D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | tschlotte...@presidio.com >> >> >> >> >> This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the >> intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, >> confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please >> notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and >> attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the >> taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or >> attached to this message is prohibited. >> > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
Hi Tommy Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. Thanks, Ovidiu On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:15 PM Schlotterer, Tommy < tschlotte...@presidio.com> wrote: > You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: > > > > voice class sip-profiles 100 > > rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 > > rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" > > rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip: > 44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" > > rule 4 request INVITE sip-header Diversion remove > > > > Thanks > > > Tommy > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Ovidiu > Popa > *Sent:* Friday, May 24, 2019 2:53 PM > *To:* cisco-voip > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE > > > > *EXTERNAL EMAIL* > > > > > > Hello everyone > > > > Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the > information in the ISDN Facility IE ? > > > > We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following > issue : > > - The operator enables the failover > > - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B > > - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party > Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that > was initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. > > > > According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for > supplementary services not for routing calls. > > > > 11.2.2.1 Facility > The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. > For the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control > supplementary services. > > > > So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? > > > > Thanks for any assistance. > > > > Ovidiu > > > > > > > Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration > Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com > 20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604 > D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | tschlotte...@presidio.com > > > > > *This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of > the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, > confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please > notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and > attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the > taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or > attached to this message is prohibited.* > > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: voice class sip-profiles 100 rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip: 44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 4 request INVITE sip-header Diversion remove Thanks Tommy From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Ovidiu Popa Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 2:53 PM To: cisco-voip Subject: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello everyone Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the information in the ISDN Facility IE ? We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following issue : - The operator enables the failover - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that was initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for supplementary services not for routing calls. 11.2.2.1 Facility The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. For the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control supplementary services. So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? Thanks for any assistance. Ovidiu Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com<http://presidio.com> 20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604 D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | tschlotte...@presidio.com<mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com> This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE
Hello everyone Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the information in the ISDN Facility IE ? We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following issue : - The operator enables the failover - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B - All calls received on site B have the same value in the Called Party Number field - the unique number identifying the site B. The number that was initially dialed on site A is now placed in the facility IE. According to ETS 300 196-1 the Facility Element is used only for supplementary services not for routing calls. 11.2.2.1 Facility The purpose of the Facility information element is to carry components. For the purposes of this ETS these components are used to control supplementary services. So my question is: can CUCM route calls based on the Facility IE ? Thanks for any assistance. Ovidiu ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
