Variphy has the ability to report on devices that essentially makes 0 calls. Or any threshold too. Variphy would require data dump or Billing Application Server set up in CUCM to send it CDR. A portion of the report builder allows you to search on the phones not logged in or with no CDR data. They have free demonstration/evaluation and support if you are enrolled in an evaluation. I'm sure they can assist you to help get you what you are looking for.
https://www.variphy.com/products/free-trial Start Your Free Trial of Variphy Today | Variphy Cisco CDR ...<https://www.variphy.com/products/free-trial> www.variphy.com Start Your Free Trial of Variphy Today. Variphy is software for Cisco CDR Reporting and Call Analytics. Dan Schmitt customade...@hotmail.com<mailto:customade...@hotmail.com> ________________________________ From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net <cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 11:00 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 168, Issue 3 Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to cisco-voip@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net You can reach the person managing the list at cisco-voip-ow...@puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..." Today's Topics: 1. T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config (Lelio Fulgenzi) 2. Re: reporting on (not)used phones or desks (ci...@cips.nl) 3. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config (Lelio Fulgenzi) 4. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config (Evgeny Izetov) 5. Re: reporting on (not)used phones or desks (Charles Goldsmith) 6. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config (Lelio Fulgenzi) 7. Re: T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config (NateCCIE) 8. Re: Adding custom entries to the Unity directory? (Derek Andrew) 9. Skipping * on inbound external calls to Unity (Matthew Huff) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:29:29 +0000 From: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> To: "voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config Message-ID: <ytxpr01mb0640d04600f2b061f091fdfeac...@ytxpr01mb0640.canprd01.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" OK - Having a weird issue. I was pretty sure that the router config took precedence over CUCM (with respect to enabling ports). I've got four of the four ports configured on CUCM. So not sure why three are being configured on the router. Very strange! My startup looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! controller T1 0/0/3 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! <snip> ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager isdn bchan-number-order ascending no cdp enable <snip> voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 ! But after a reload, my running config looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-8,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/3 cablelength long 0db ! <snip> interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/2:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! <snip> ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/2:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 19249 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171002/34b78527/attachment-0001.bin> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 21:51:35 +0200 From: <ci...@cips.nl> To: "'voip puck'" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks Message-ID: <002601d33bb7$da9d6b40$8fd841c0$@cips.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This looks interesting, thank you for the link. I quickly looked at the solution and it seems a nice and complete product. However it still seems some work and maintenance to get this working. How will this work with phones not logged in and users logged in to phones via extension mobility? It looks like I have to enrich the data collected by this tool manually. Any experience whit this? Kr, Henk From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: maandag 2 oktober 2017 15:36 To: ci...@cips.nl Cc: voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks variphy.com <http://variphy.com> has a report that looks at CDR records and will give you a report on directory numbers that have not been used, but you would need to build a database of CDR records on Variphy or import them if you archived elsewhere. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:10 AM, <ci...@cips.nl <mailto:ci...@cips.nl> > wrote: Hi, We have around 450 desks in the office and between 250-275 are mainly used by sales employees and flexworkers who do not need a personal desk because they are not always in the office, every day. We are using extension mobility for almost all users, with mainly 7942 and 8841 phones. I?m looking for a solution to get some reporting details on the usage of the desks. We need to cut-down the number of desks and I want to see which desks are not used, preferably by floor. Are there any tools you use to get this visible? I was thinking of a phone report of phones which have not been used for a specific period of time, or maybe do something with extension mobility? Any thoughts anyone? Thanks. Henk _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171002/5cf993dd/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 20:02:19 +0000 From: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> To: "voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config Message-ID: <ytxpr01mb06406e0bb59e91542517fddeac...@ytxpr01mb0640.canprd01.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Well, apparently, CUCM enabling of ports overrides the router configuration. I did have all four ports configured. After deleting those two ports, the running now matches the startup. This is very weird. Is there a configuration command that says only download configuration for the ports I've enabled? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 2:29 PM To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config OK - Having a weird issue. I was pretty sure that the router config took precedence over CUCM (with respect to enabling ports). I've got four of the four ports configured on CUCM. So not sure why three are being configured on the router. Very strange! My startup looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! controller T1 0/0/3 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! <snip> ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager isdn bchan-number-order ascending no cdp enable <snip> voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 ! But after a reload, my running config looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-8,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/3 cablelength long 0db ! <snip> interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/2:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! <snip> ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/2:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171002/e0c94be9/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:24:45 -0400 From: Evgeny Izetov <eize...@gmail.com> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config Message-ID: <CAKLHLoVCBgTGiJnMiTTWj_H=rF_VbUcs0t=oygrg+zyfyr6...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I wonder if you only had enough DSPs for those 2 and 1/3 PRIs. On Oct 2, 2017 4:02 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <le...@uoguelph.ca> wrote: Well, apparently, CUCM enabling of ports overrides the router configuration. I did have all four ports configured. After deleting those two ports, the running now matches the startup. This is very weird. Is there a configuration command that says only download configuration for the ports I?ve enabled? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120> le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi *Sent:* Monday, October 02, 2017 2:29 PM *To:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) *Subject:* [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config OK ? Having a weird issue. I was pretty sure that the router config took precedence over CUCM (with respect to enabling ports). I?ve got four of the four ports configured on CUCM. So not sure why three are being configured on the router. Very strange! My startup looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! controller T1 0/0/3 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! <snip> ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager isdn bchan-number-order ascending no cdp enable <snip> voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 ! But after a reload, my running config looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-8,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/3 cablelength long 0db ! <snip> interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/2:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! <snip> ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/2:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120> le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171002/609da317/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:47:46 -0500 From: Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> To: ci...@cips.nl Cc: voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks Message-ID: <cagm7t+csfs4t9qsc4ok8gux7amkgsdmzep2f_km6t_kaswn...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This report works purely off of CDR data, so the report will only be as good as the data. Let's say you have the last 6 months of CDR data archived on an SFTP server. You can upload that into Variphy and let it process it and then run the report. It will tell you what phones have not been used in the last 6 months, including your extension mobility DN's. The report is easy to setup and they have good documentation for it. Request a demo from them, the product is very good for this plus other features. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:51 PM, <ci...@cips.nl> wrote: > This looks interesting, thank you for the link. > > > > I quickly looked at the solution and it seems a nice and complete product. > > However it still seems some work and maintenance to get this working. > > How will this work with phones not logged in and users logged in to phones > via extension mobility? > > It looks like I have to enrich the data collected by this tool manually. > > Any experience whit this? > > > > Kr, > > Henk > > > > *From:* Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] > *Sent:* maandag 2 oktober 2017 15:36 > *To:* ci...@cips.nl > *Cc:* voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks > > > > variphy.com has a report that looks at CDR records and will give you a > report on directory numbers that have not been used, but you would need to > build a database of CDR records on Variphy or import them if you archived > elsewhere. > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:10 AM, <ci...@cips.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have around 450 desks in the office and between 250-275 are mainly used > by sales employees and flexworkers who do not need a personal desk because > they are not always in the office, every day. > > We are using extension mobility for almost all users, with mainly 7942 and > 8841 phones. > > I?m looking for a solution to get some reporting details on the usage of > the desks. > > We need to cut-down the number of desks and I want to see which desks are > not used, preferably by floor. > > Are there any tools you use to get this visible? > > I was thinking of a phone report of phones which have not been used for a > specific period of time, or maybe do something with extension mobility? > > Any thoughts anyone? > > > > Thanks. > > Henk > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171002/521ffa0e/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 00:16:01 +0000 From: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> To: Evgeny Izetov <eize...@gmail.com> Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config Message-ID: <4048528a-474c-4440-8aa6-279240c9f...@uoguelph.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" That was definitely one issue. I was pretty sure I entered that command manually, but apparently not. So that's why the last one did not come up. Still very weird. I had always assumed that the router asked for the configuration for enabled ports only. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 2, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Evgeny Izetov <eize...@gmail.com<mailto:eize...@gmail.com>> wrote: I wonder if you only had enough DSPs for those 2 and 1/3 PRIs. On Oct 2, 2017 4:02 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Well, apparently, CUCM enabling of ports overrides the router configuration. I did have all four ports configured. After deleting those two ports, the running now matches the startup. This is very weird. Is there a configuration command that says only download configuration for the ports I?ve enabled? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354<tel:(519)%20824-4120> le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 2:29 PM To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) Subject: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config OK ? Having a weird issue. I was pretty sure that the router config took precedence over CUCM (with respect to enabling ports). I?ve got four of the four ports configured on CUCM. So not sure why three are being configured on the router. Very strange! My startup looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! controller T1 0/0/3 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! <snip> ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager isdn bchan-number-order ascending no cdp enable <snip> voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 ! But after a reload, my running config looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-8,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/3 cablelength long 0db ! <snip> interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/2:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! <snip> ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/2:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354<tel:(519)%20824-4120> le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171003/1775dfbf/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:19:10 -0600 From: NateCCIE <natec...@gmail.com> To: "'Lelio Fulgenzi'" <le...@uoguelph.ca>, "'Evgeny Izetov'" <eize...@gmail.com> Cc: "'Cisco VoIP Group'" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config Message-ID: <03ee01d33bdd$3cbfcb90$b63f62b0$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The router gets the whole config snip it CUCM thinks it needs via TFTP. If you don?t want cucm to configure the ports, then you don?t put a config on the ports in CUCM. I agree with Evgeny, it looks like the router is short DSPs for the PRIs. -Nate From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 6:16 PM To: Evgeny Izetov <eize...@gmail.com> Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config That was definitely one issue. I was pretty sure I entered that command manually, but apparently not. So that's why the last one did not come up. Still very weird. I had always assumed that the router asked for the configuration for enabled ports only. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 2, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Evgeny Izetov <eize...@gmail.com <mailto:eize...@gmail.com> > wrote: I wonder if you only had enough DSPs for those 2 and 1/3 PRIs. On Oct 2, 2017 4:02 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <le...@uoguelph.ca <mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> > wrote: Well, apparently, CUCM enabling of ports overrides the router configuration. I did have all four ports configured. After deleting those two ports, the running now matches the startup. This is very weird. Is there a configuration command that says only download configuration for the ports I?ve enabled? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <tel:(519)%20824-4120> le...@uoguelph.ca <mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> <http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> ] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 2:29 PM To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> ) Subject: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config OK ? Having a weird issue. I was pretty sure that the router config took precedence over CUCM (with respect to enabling ports). I?ve got four of the four ports configured on CUCM. So not sure why three are being configured on the router. Very strange! My startup looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! controller T1 0/0/3 shutdown cablelength long 0db ! <snip> ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager isdn bchan-number-order ascending no cdp enable <snip> voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 ! But after a reload, my running config looks something like this: controller T1 0/0/0 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/2 cablelength long 0db pri-group timeslots 1-8,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/3 cablelength long 0db ! <snip> interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/2:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-dms100 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! <snip> ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/1:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 ! voice-port 0/0/2:23 echo-cancel coverage 64 --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <tel:(519)%20824-4120> le...@uoguelph.ca <mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> <http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171002/9be4bca2/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:21:50 -0600 From: Derek Andrew <derek.and...@usask.ca> To: Ben Amick <bam...@humanarc.com> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Adding custom entries to the Unity directory? Message-ID: <CAAf7Uo=rjyjv5jko2qyk6kodjdcso1vrab8r2timhuum_tw...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Add the help desk name and phone number to Contacts>Contacts. Refresh the Tools>"Grammar Statistics" On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Ben Amick <bam...@humanarc.com> wrote: > Hey, running 9.1 here, I was recently asked if we could add our helpdesk > number into the search by name directory in Unity ? We do have a box in > there for helpdesk, but the actual line for our helpdesk extension is tied > to a call handler for the prompt. Is there any way we can add an entry into > the unity directory to allow this to be searched for? > > > > Ben Amick > > Unified Communications Analyst > > > > Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the > individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information > that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under > applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or > hard copy. Thank you > -- Copyright 2017 Derek Andrew (excluding quotations) +1 306 966 4808 Communication and Network Services Information and Communications Technology Infrastructure Services *University of Saskatchewan*Peterson 120; 54 Innovation Boulevard Saskatoon,Saskatchewan,Canada. S7N 2V3 Timezone GMT-6 Typed but not read. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171003/fe1ea574/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:52:58 +0000 From: Matthew Huff <mh...@ox.com> To: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: [cisco-voip] Skipping * on inbound external calls to Unity Message-ID: <9be90a1b6fde4cd8ad0f1c19c073b...@ox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If we have an externally available number to access Unity voicemail, is there anyway of changing it so that it doesn't prompt asking for phone number to dial? You can hit * to enter your extension and passcode, but only if you remember to hit *. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ------------------------------ End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 168, Issue 3 ******************************************
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
