Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd party conference phones

[Nick Thompson]

Revolabs FLX2 - http://www.revolabs.com/flx2

Revolabs is the OEM for the 8831 conference phone as well.


On Apr 9, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Ed Leatherman 
mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello

I've had a few requests for "Wireless" conference phones lately for some medium 
sized rooms. In these cases the executive wants to get any cables etc off the 
table, so a wired base station w/ cordless module for the table fits the bill 
as much as a WiFi device would. And because "Wireless"!

I'm curious what other people might be using, I see that polycom has the 
SoundStation2W that uses a POTS line. I've also had some folks using a Jabra 
Speak510 paired with some of the bluetooth capable Cisco Phones, but this only 
works well in small rooms.

Thanks!



--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd party conference phones

[Nick Thompson]

I just checked with a customer who has a bunch of the FLX2’s deployed and he is 
seeing the same behavior.  He also tested with the standard SIP device and 
advanced SIP device with no change.  He was going to call Revo and see if there 
is something he is missing or if it is just a limitation of the device firmware.

Nick

> On Apr 28, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Ed Leatherman  wrote:
> 
> Circling around on this thread,
> 
> So we're trying out revolabs FLX2. 
> 
> They are pretty easy to use and have some nice features. The unit reminds you 
> to put everything back on the charging station after a call is over, which is 
> an interesting touch. 
> 
> Main concern for me right now is that you cannot invoke an ad hoc conference 
> that uses a cm controlled conference bridge (that I can tell) from the unit. 
> The conference function can merely join the two line appearances that the 
> unit has. 
> 
> We're still going to try it out in one of our rooms where the executive 
> absolutely had to have "wireless" but I don't see widely deploying it 
> elsewhere; people use the ad hoc bridges an aweful lot.
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Nick Thompson  wrote:
> 
> Revolabs FLX2 - http://www.revolabs.com/flx2 
> 
> Revolabs is the OEM for the 8831 conference phone as well.
> 
> 
>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Ed Leatherman  wrote:
>> 
>> Hello
>> 
>> I've had a few requests for "Wireless" conference phones lately for some 
>> medium sized rooms. In these cases the executive wants to get any cables etc 
>> off the table, so a wired base station w/ cordless module for the table fits 
>> the bill as much as a WiFi device would. And because "Wireless"!
>> 
>> I'm curious what other people might be using, I see that polycom has the 
>> SoundStation2W that uses a POTS line. I've also had some folks using a Jabra 
>> Speak510 paired with some of the bluetooth capable Cisco Phones, but this 
>> only works well in small rooms.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ed Leatherman
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ed Leatherman

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] MS Lync RCC with Jabber

[Nick Thompson]

Your best bet would be CUCI-Lync, which will add soft phone functionality to 
your existing client without the need for Jabber.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/unified-communications/uc-integration-tm-microsoft-lync/index.html


On Jan 27, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Reto Gassmann mailto:v...@mrga.ch>> 
wrote:

I am just looking for a quick solution to rollout Jabber as a softphone to 
replace some hardware IP phones.
We now use Lync as IM&P Client (no enterprise voice) with RCC to IP phones.

Regards Reto

Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015 schrieb Josh Warcop :
Jabber is a CTI application and RCC controls phones. Your use case would be 
somewhat skewed in this instance since Jabber has all and more of the call 
control features built in. I would think you would want to remove RCC and have 
Jabber do all of the call control. Having both seems like it would complicate 
the user experience.

From: Reto Gassmann
Sent: ‎1/‎22/‎2015 3:28 PM
To: 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] MS Lync RCC with Jabber

Hello Group

We have a CUCM and IM&P 9.1 and Lync and use RCC with our 796x Phones. Now we 
want to roll out Jabber as phone only to replace some of the old 7960 phones.
Can I use RCC with Lync to control the Jabber (Phone only)? Has any one done 
this before?

Thanks Reto



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Auto-Create Conference Call

[Nick Thompson]

This is doable, and works well, with Informacast and their conference call 
plugin.

http://www.singlewire.com/plugins.html

/nick

On Feb 12, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Gary Parker 
mailto:g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk>> wrote:

Evening all, I’ve been given a requirement by a new group of users who will 
shortly be moving onto our campus. FYI, we’re running CUCM 8.6.2 and also have 
CUP and CUC available.

A new medical centre is opening shortly and they have a requirement for users 
to be able to dial a well known number (in this case , common across all 
NHS sites I believe) and have this call answered by an emergency medical 
responder *and* local security at the same time. The emergency medical 
responder would provide medical assistance while security co-ordinate 
attendance by emergency medical services if necessary.

It seems that they want to be able to dial a number that, in turn dials two 
other numbers and automatically brings up a conference call. I have no idea if 
this is possible, let alone how to do it so any and all suggestions would be 
appreciated!


---
/-Gary Parker--f--\
| Unified Communications Service Manager  |
n   Loughborough University IT Services   |
| Tel: +441509635635  Mob: +447989172258  o
| http://delphium.lboro.ac.uk/pubkey.txt  |
\r--d-/

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Strange routing behavior cucm 10.5 and int'l pattern

[Nick Thompson]

Use 9.011![0-9#] and pre-dot trailing pound if you want a single route pattern.

On Feb 13, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Brian Meade 
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:

If your route pattern is 9.011!#, users have to dial the # at the end to match 
and your discard should be pre-dot trailing hash.  Usually you'll have 2 RPs 
for international (9.011! and 9.011!#).

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Try this one on;

Was working fine ...

Standard Int'l route pattern 9.011!# Discard set to PreDot (again, this was 
working ... no issue on gateway ... etc)

So today it stops working, just rings busy. I debug the ISDN and it shows 
called party as the last 7 digits. I go over to DNA and use an int'l pattern 
with the css I was using and it blocks pattern for unallocation.

I create a new test partition with a new 9.011!# pattern in it and a new css 
with only the new partition in it. I go back over to DNA and try the int'l 
pattern with the new test css and it blocks for unallocated.

Now I scratch my head, so I take off the octothorpe on the pattern (9.011!) and 
BOOM, DNA routes and everything is happy. I move to production and it works 
just fine without the octothorpe.

What does this sound like? Do you think I may have competing patterns somewhere 
in the dial plan?

Thanks,

Ryan

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip