Re: [clamav-users] [ext] Segfaults with database version 26908

2023-05-16 Thread Matthias Rieber

Hello,

On Tue, 16 May 2023, Ralf Hildebrandt via clamav-users wrote:


As far as I can tell this happens in

0x7fdfd44c377d 

We use version 0.103.8+dfsg-0+deb11u1 on debian bullseye.

Has anyone seen this, too?


I've seen this with 1.1.0-1 as well. Maybe they're related to the
"pattern issue" I posted a while ago


yes, it turns out that you can mitigate this issue when you whitelist 
this signature:


$ echo "Win.Downloader.LNKAgent-10001628-0" > /var/lib/clamav/bad_sig.ign2

Regards,
Matthias

___

Manage your clamav-users mailing list subscription / unsubscribe:
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat


[clamav-users] Segfaults with database version 26908

2023-05-16 Thread Matthias Rieber

Hello List,

since the update to version 26908 we observe a high amount of segfaults.

As far as I can tell this happens in

0x7fdfd44c377d 

We use version 0.103.8+dfsg-0+deb11u1 on debian bullseye.

Has anyone seen this, too?

Best regards,
Matthias
___

Manage your clamav-users mailing list subscription / unsubscribe:
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat