[clamav-users] clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Hello all, Since yesterday, 10:26:52 CST, I've gotten 30 if these in the mail log: "Timeout reading from clamd daemon at /var/spool/MIMEDefang/clamd.sock" Before that I can't remember when I've seen this message - perhaps years. This is on a low volume server with < 3500 total connection attempts per day. Has anyone else been seeing this? -- Mike G. ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
[clamav-users] 0.98 Outdated
On a fresh install ClamAV update process started at Thu Sep 19 15:10:21 2013 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.98 Recommended version: 0.97.8 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq -- Mike G. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] 0.98 Outdated
Shawn Webb wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Mike Grau m.g...@kcc.state.ks.us wrote: Mike, That is expected. Freshclam simply checks if the version number reported by DNS is the same as the version number it itself is. If the check doesn't match, Freshclam simply reports that the version is outdated, no matter if the version number in DNS is less than the installed version. Once you see the updated DNS record, the warning will go away. In short, you can ignore the warning. I see, thanks. Am getting the new DNS record now: text = 0.98:55:17872:1379622036:1:63:40978:226 -- Mike ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Help to download ClamAV 0.97.6 tar.gz source code
Rick Macdougall wrote: On 01/10/2012 10:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote: This is correct. The link takes you to the latest release for your detected platform. I'm guessing that you are using a 64bit windows machine to do the download? Tom This makes getting source code unnecessarily complicated; lots of folks do not use a browser on their production server. Please remove the offending web code immediately. Agreed. Bit of a PITA if you ask me. +1 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Help to download ClamAV 0.97.6 tar.gz source code
Benny Pedersen wrote: Mike Grau skrev den 01-10-2012 16:53: +1 I mean that I also agree that the stupid web code ought to be removed. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] daily.cvd update issue.
On 07/19/2011 03:02 PM the voices made Dennis Peterson write: I suggest that you rely on our twitter feed for real time info (twitter.com/clamav) In my opinion, if twitter is a requirement for using ClamAV then this project is doomed. I don't see our 'business' endorsing our NOC playing with twitter as part of the job. I hope they don't read this list as I've just removed a lot of McAfee for Linux and replaced it with ClamAV instances in our production DC and I don't want to have to talk to them about twitter. +1 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] simplest replacement for ancient amavis-perl
So, basically, all I need is a replacement for a perl script that throws a wad of text at clamscan and then either passes it on for normal delivery or stashes it away in a quarantine directory, with a note passed on to a local admin address in the latter case. I'd also recommend MIMEDefang. I'm not the author, just some user. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] No announcement of 0.83 on clamav-announce ML
Piggy-backing: Maybe they could stick a broom up their bum and sweep the floor at the same time, too. Dayum, guy - this stuff is free. Get off your butt and build your own binaries - hell, it takes maybe 10 minutes, is repeatable, and you get all the credit. Don't even suggest they put my Solaris source builds in limbo until all the weenies have their little rpm's all bundled up, ribboned, bowed, and ready for a point and click install. This is not rocket science - rocket science is loud and makes smoke trails. Y'all are giving Unix a bad name. dp I'll second that. ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
