Static purity analysis.
Haven't had time to look in deep but looks promising. +1 I'd love to have more static analysis in Clojure and sometimes it feels like it's underrated (by the community). Just thoughts. Keep up! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Static purity analysis.
Hey, I have had finally the time to prototype an idea I had for over a year: https://github.com/whilo/beichte It is only a first prototype, but the basic mechanics work fine, i.e. it is doing a deep recursive walk through your Clojure codebase (everything that is on the classpath or filesystem) and tracks down impure var accesses. I would like to get feedback of what you think about this and would like see integrated if this becomes a linter. I am thinking in the direction that you have to declare your vars as impure explicitly, either by adding a "!" at the end of the function name or by some metadata on vars (opt-out purity). This would allow you to go as far as Haskell does in regard to enforcing purity without using the type system and monads for it. This is not meant as a criticism of Haskell, rather as a disentanglement of purity from the type system. There will be a considerable effort needed in assigning purity to core classes and methods and maybe also beyond Clojure to core libraries, but maybe somebody has some ideas of how to ease this process(?). Best, Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: hello world question !!!
thanks for the answers and comments of John, James and others, the discussion has opened many aspect of web application development and it is is positive. about the IDE, i'm not using Netbeans with Scheme or LisP exclusively, in fact Netbeans was used in the office just to create web service in Java, this thing can be done by hand in command line too, Kawa Scheme also can do it itself : https://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/Servlets.html from the discussion i see now many solution to test ,I will install Leiningen, also i see in the doc of Immutant that it is possible to generate some war files : http://immutant.org/documentation/current/apidoc/guide-wildfly.html#h3386 i hope i could use Clojure for that because it seems a really fun and solid LisP dialect. I will post updates when i have a concrete usable solution. Regards, Damien On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 5:07:08 PM UTC+2, John M. Switlik wrote: > > James, > > Thanks. I saw a writeup mentioning Leiningen that I will go back to. > > It is not the 'toy' issue that concerns me. It is that all sorts of > browsers exist as well as a whole slew of different types of users. And, if > I am going to push something down to a remote device, I want to expect that > it would be handled in a nice manner. > > As for example projects, these are prime; but, they are supported by > working professionals. So, Clojure does have a lot to offer. > >http://base2s.com/work/ > > I am sure that I'll look back and see that it was easy. But, this seems > like an opportunity to step through the thing (that is, the hugely > complicated world of the muddy cloud) and see how things evolved. Those > little interpreters are up there as a lure in the meantime. > > Cheers, > John > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
