Re: == is not transitive?

2012-10-06 Thread Jean Niklas L'orange


On Friday, October 5, 2012 7:17:50 PM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Transitivity means that for all x, 
> y, and z, (Fxy & Fyz) => Fxz. But there are values of x, y, and z for 
> which that does not hold. 
>

Yeah, sorry. What I meant was that == is only commutative if you pass it 
two arguments as of right now.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Re: == is not transitive?

2012-10-05 Thread Ben Wolfson
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Jean Niklas L'orange
 wrote:
>
> On Friday, October 5, 2012 2:39:05 AM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
>>
>> user> [(== 0 0.0) (== 0.0 0.0M) (== 0.0M 0)]
>> [true true false]
>
> When passing two arguments to ==, == will be transitive.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Transitivity means that for all x,
y, and z, (Fxy & Fyz) => Fxz. But there are values of x, y, and z for
which that does not hold.

-- 
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks,
which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family
and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks
for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


Re: == is not transitive?

2012-10-05 Thread Patrick Houk
I was bitten by this a year ago and posted here:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/9091ad790fc96b24

My workaround is to call BigDecimal#stripTrailingZeros before passing
it to code that might compare it to some other number.

user> (== 1 (.stripTrailingZeros 1.0M))
true

However, there is an edge case:

user> (== 0 (.stripTrailingZeros 0.0M))
false

Which is due to this Java bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6480539

So I use a function like the following instead of bigdec to parse
BigDecimals.

(defn parse-stripped-bigdec [^String value-str]
  ;; Note that bigdec uses reflection (at least in Clojure 1.2.1)
  (let [n (java.math.BigDecimal. value-str)]
(if (zero? n) 0M (.stripTrailingZeros n

Be aware that stripping the zeros changes how the BigDecimal is
formatted by #toString.

user> (str (parse-stripped-bigdec "10"))
"1E+1"

So, I have a special case for BigDecimal that calls #toPlainString in
the places where I do not want exponential format.

user> (.toPlainString (parse-stripped-bigdec "10"))
"10"

I hope that helps.
- Pat

On Oct 4, 8:39 pm, Ben Wolfson  wrote:
> user> [(== 0 0.0) (== 0.0 0.0M) (== 0.0M 0)]
> [true true false]
> user> [(== 0 0.0 0.0M) (== 0 0.0M 0.0) (== 0.0 0 0.0M) (== 0.0 0.0M 0)
> (== 0.0M 0.0 0) (== 0.0M 0 0.0)]
> [true false false false true false]
>
> --
> Ben Wolfson
> "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks,
> which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family
> and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks
> for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


Re: == is not transitive?

2012-10-05 Thread Ben Smith-Mannschott
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Jean Niklas L'orange
 wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, October 5, 2012 2:39:05 AM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
>>
>> user> [(== 0 0.0) (== 0.0 0.0M) (== 0.0M 0)]
>> [true true false]
>
>
> When passing two arguments to ==, == will be transitive.
>
>>
>> user> [(== 0 0.0 0.0M) (== 0 0.0M 0.0) (== 0.0 0 0.0M) (== 0.0 0.0M 0)
>> (== 0.0M 0.0 0) (== 0.0M 0 0.0)]
>> [true false false false true false]
>
>
> This is more of a problem with number equality, not the transitivity of ==.
> (== x1 x2 x3 ... xn) can be rewritten as (and (== x1 x2) (== x2 x3) ... (==
> xn-1 xn)).
>
> So if you compare (== x y z), then if x = y, then the result of (== x z) and
> (== y z) should be equivalent, considering the numbers are, well, numbers.
>
> I believe the issue lies within the bigdec-parsing, which seems to have two
> zeroes: (== 0M 0.0M) returns false, and their hashcode (0 and 1,
> respectively) are different.

Yea, I think this is the peculiar definition of BigDecimal.equals()
biting us here.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/math/BigDecimal.html

# Note: care should be exercised if BigDecimals are to be used as keys in a
# SortedMap or elements in a SortedSet, as BigDecimal's natural ordering is
# inconsistent with equals. See Comparable, SortedMap or SortedSet for more
# information.

equals():
# Compares this BigDecimal with the specified Object for equality. Unlike
# compareTo, this method considers two BigDecimals equal only if they are
# equal in *value* and *scale* (thus 2.0 is not equal to 2.00 when compared by
# this method)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en


Re: == is not transitive?

2012-10-05 Thread Jean Niklas L'orange


On Friday, October 5, 2012 2:39:05 AM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
>
> user> [(== 0 0.0) (== 0.0 0.0M) (== 0.0M 0)] 
> [true true false] 
>

When passing two arguments to ==, == will be transitive.
 

> user> [(== 0 0.0 0.0M) (== 0 0.0M 0.0) (== 0.0 0 0.0M) (== 0.0 0.0M 0) 
> (== 0.0M 0.0 0) (== 0.0M 0 0.0)] 
> [true false false false true false] 
>

This is more of a problem with number equality, not the transitivity of ==. 
(== x1 x2 x3 ... xn) can be rewritten as (and (== x1 x2) (== x2 x3) ... (== 
xn-1 xn)). 

So if you compare (== x y z), then if x = y, then the result of (== x z) 
and (== y z) should be equivalent, considering the numbers are, well, 
numbers.

I believe the issue lies within the bigdec-parsing, which seems to have two 
zeroes: (== 0M 0.0M) returns false, and their hashcode (0 and 1, 
respectively) are different.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Re: == is not transitive?

2012-10-04 Thread JvJ
The only reason for this that I can think of is incomplete rules for 
casting numbers.

On Thursday, 4 October 2012 20:39:05 UTC-4, Ben wrote:
>
> user> [(== 0 0.0) (== 0.0 0.0M) (== 0.0M 0)] 
> [true true false] 
> user> [(== 0 0.0 0.0M) (== 0 0.0M 0.0) (== 0.0 0 0.0M) (== 0.0 0.0M 0) 
> (== 0.0M 0.0 0) (== 0.0M 0 0.0)] 
> [true false false false true false] 
>
> -- 
> Ben Wolfson 
> "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, 
> which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family 
> and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks 
> for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry] 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

== is not transitive?

2012-10-04 Thread Ben Wolfson
user> [(== 0 0.0) (== 0.0 0.0M) (== 0.0M 0)]
[true true false]
user> [(== 0 0.0 0.0M) (== 0 0.0M 0.0) (== 0.0 0 0.0M) (== 0.0 0.0M 0)
(== 0.0M 0.0 0) (== 0.0M 0 0.0)]
[true false false false true false]

-- 
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks,
which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family
and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks
for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en