ANN: double-check, a Clojure/ClojureScript-portable fork of simple-check
Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a generative/property-based testing library for Clojure that implements (and improves upon IMO) the shrinking of failing test cases seen in e.g. quickcheck in the Haskell and Erlang lands. simple-check has totally changed how I do certain kinds of testing. From the beginning, I've wanted to use it when testing ClojureScript libraries and apps as well, since most of my ClojureScript code is portable to Clojure, or made that way with cljx[2]. The result is double-check, a fork of simple-check that provides the same API and generator semantics for Clojure and ClojureScript: https://github.com/cemerick/double-check double-check will fast-follow the development of simple-check, aiming to provide nothing more than a portable API; there should never be anything novel or interesting in double-check, except for the recasting of the simple-check codebase into a portable form. Naturally, double-check adds support/integration for clojurescript.test[3] where simple-check supports/integrates clojure.test. I've discovered (and reported and/or fixed) a number of issues in ClojureScript itself solely by making simple-check's own tests portable, and running them on ClojureScript. I suspect you'll have the same experience with your own Clojure/ClojureScript projects once you apply double-check to them. Cheers, - Chas [1] https://github.com/reiddraper/simple-check [2] https://github.com/lynaghk/cljx [3] https://github.com/cemerick/clojurescript.test -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: ANN: double-check, a Clojure/ClojureScript-portable fork of simple-check
Did you try out test.generative? If so, how does simple check contrast to test.generative? On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:31:19 AM UTC-8, Chas Emerick wrote: simple-check is planning on remaining Clojure-only, at least for the foreseeable future. This non-fork fork is the best alternative Reid and I could come up with to enable people to use it on both Clojure and ClojureScript. Hopefully double-check will be unnecessary at some point. :-) - Chas On Thu 21 Nov 2013 02:01:02 PM EST, Max Penet wrote: Looks good! I am wondering though, why not merging your work on the parent project instead of creating a new one (with a new name etc), you seemed to be on your way of doing just this? On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:38:16 PM UTC+1, Chas Emerick wrote: Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a generative/property-based testing library for Clojure that implements (and improves upon IMO) the shrinking of failing test cases seen in e.g. quickcheck in the Haskell and Erlang lands. simple-check has totally changed how I do certain kinds of testing. From the beginning, I've wanted to use it when testing ClojureScript libraries and apps as well, since most of my ClojureScript code is portable to Clojure, or made that way with cljx[2]. The result is double-check, a fork of simple-check that provides the same API and generator semantics for Clojure and ClojureScript: https://github.com/cemerick/double-checkhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONwhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-checkamp;sa=Damp;sntz=1amp;usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw double-check will fast-follow the development of simple-check, aiming to provide nothing more than a portable API; there should never be anything novel or interesting in double-check, except for the recasting of the simple-check codebase into a portable form. Naturally, double-check adds support/integration for clojurescript.test[3] where simple-check supports/integrates clojure.test. I've discovered (and reported and/or fixed) a number of issues in ClojureScript itself solely by making simple-check's own tests portable, and running them on ClojureScript. I suspect you'll have the same experience with your own Clojure/ClojureScript projects once you apply double-check to them. Cheers, - Chas [1] https://github.com/reiddraper/simple-checkhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xwhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-checkamp;sa=Damp;sntz=1amp;usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw [2] https://github.com/lynaghk/cljxhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljxsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljxsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljxamp;sa=Damp;sntz=1amp;usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ [3] https://github.com/cemerick/clojurescript.testhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.testsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.testsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dghttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.testamp;sa=Damp;sntz=1amp;usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.comjavascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You
Re: ANN: double-check, a Clojure/ClojureScript-portable fork of simple-check
Looks good! I am wondering though, why not merging your work on the parent project instead of creating a new one (with a new name etc), you seemed to be on your way of doing just this? On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:38:16 PM UTC+1, Chas Emerick wrote: Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a generative/property-based testing library for Clojure that implements (and improves upon IMO) the shrinking of failing test cases seen in e.g. quickcheck in the Haskell and Erlang lands. simple-check has totally changed how I do certain kinds of testing. From the beginning, I've wanted to use it when testing ClojureScript libraries and apps as well, since most of my ClojureScript code is portable to Clojure, or made that way with cljx[2]. The result is double-check, a fork of simple-check that provides the same API and generator semantics for Clojure and ClojureScript: https://github.com/cemerick/double-checkhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw double-check will fast-follow the development of simple-check, aiming to provide nothing more than a portable API; there should never be anything novel or interesting in double-check, except for the recasting of the simple-check codebase into a portable form. Naturally, double-check adds support/integration for clojurescript.test[3] where simple-check supports/integrates clojure.test. I've discovered (and reported and/or fixed) a number of issues in ClojureScript itself solely by making simple-check's own tests portable, and running them on ClojureScript. I suspect you'll have the same experience with your own Clojure/ClojureScript projects once you apply double-check to them. Cheers, - Chas [1] https://github.com/reiddraper/simple-checkhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw [2] https://github.com/lynaghk/cljxhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljxsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ [3] https://github.com/cemerick/clojurescript.testhttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.testsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: ANN: double-check, a Clojure/ClojureScript-portable fork of simple-check
simple-check is planning on remaining Clojure-only, at least for the foreseeable future. This non-fork fork is the best alternative Reid and I could come up with to enable people to use it on both Clojure and ClojureScript. Hopefully double-check will be unnecessary at some point. :-) - Chas On Thu 21 Nov 2013 02:01:02 PM EST, Max Penet wrote: Looks good! I am wondering though, why not merging your work on the parent project instead of creating a new one (with a new name etc), you seemed to be on your way of doing just this? On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:38:16 PM UTC+1, Chas Emerick wrote: Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a generative/property-based testing library for Clojure that implements (and improves upon IMO) the shrinking of failing test cases seen in e.g. quickcheck in the Haskell and Erlang lands. simple-check has totally changed how I do certain kinds of testing. From the beginning, I've wanted to use it when testing ClojureScript libraries and apps as well, since most of my ClojureScript code is portable to Clojure, or made that way with cljx[2]. The result is double-check, a fork of simple-check that provides the same API and generator semantics for Clojure and ClojureScript: https://github.com/cemerick/double-check https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw double-check will fast-follow the development of simple-check, aiming to provide nothing more than a portable API; there should never be anything novel or interesting in double-check, except for the recasting of the simple-check codebase into a portable form. Naturally, double-check adds support/integration for clojurescript.test[3] where simple-check supports/integrates clojure.test. I've discovered (and reported and/or fixed) a number of issues in ClojureScript itself solely by making simple-check's own tests portable, and running them on ClojureScript. I suspect you'll have the same experience with your own Clojure/ClojureScript projects once you apply double-check to them. Cheers, - Chas [1] https://github.com/reiddraper/simple-check https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-checksa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw [2] https://github.com/lynaghk/cljx https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljxsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ [3] https://github.com/cemerick/clojurescript.test https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.testsa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
