Re: Chaining compojure routes

[Alan Moore]

For more info on core/context 
see: https://github.com/weavejester/compojure/wiki/Nesting-routes

Alan

On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 2:40:30 PM UTC-8, JvJ wrote:
>
> I'm just starting to use ring/compojure to create web apps.
>
> One thing I would like to do is have an updatable collection of apps that 
> can be accessed based on the URL input.
>
> For example, if I have an app named "foo", then website.com/foo would 
> redirect to that app.
>
> So far, I have the following implementation:
>
> (def route-m
>   {"foo" (routes (GET "/foo" [] "Hello Foo!"))
>"bar" (routes
>   (GET "/bar/baz" [] "Hello Foo!")
>   (GET "/bar/quux" [] "Hello Quux!"))})
>
> (def test-r
>   (routes
>(GET "/hey"
> []
> "HEY!")
>(GET "/:app*" [app]
> (route-m app
>
>
> The issue with this method is the fact that the "sub-routes" need to have 
> the full path instead of just the sub-path.  For example, "foo" needs to 
> define its routes in terms of "foo/..." instead of just "/...".
>
> Is there any way around this?
>
> Thanks.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Chaining compojure routes

[JvJ]

I'm just starting to use ring/compojure to create web apps.

One thing I would like to do is have an updatable collection of apps that 
can be accessed based on the URL input.

For example, if I have an app named "foo", then website.com/foo would 
redirect to that app.

So far, I have the following implementation:

(def route-m
  {"foo" (routes (GET "/foo" [] "Hello Foo!"))
   "bar" (routes
  (GET "/bar/baz" [] "Hello Foo!")
  (GET "/bar/quux" [] "Hello Quux!"))})

(def test-r
  (routes
   (GET "/hey"
[]
"HEY!")
   (GET "/:app*" [app]
(route-m app


The issue with this method is the fact that the "sub-routes" need to have 
the full path instead of just the sub-path.  For example, "foo" needs to 
define its routes in terms of "foo/..." instead of just "/...".

Is there any way around this?

Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Chaining compojure routes

[Gregg Reynolds]

On Feb 12, 2016 4:40 PM, "JvJ"  wrote:
>
> I'm just starting to use ring/compojure to create web apps.
>
> One thing I would like to do is have an updatable collection of apps that
can be accessed based on the URL input.
>
> For example, if I have an app named "foo", then website.com/foo would
redirect to that app.
>
> So far, I have the following implementation:
>
> (def route-m
>   {"foo" (routes (GET "/foo" [] "Hello Foo!"))
>"bar" (routes
>   (GET "/bar/baz" [] "Hello Foo!")
>   (GET "/bar/quux" [] "Hello Quux!"))})
>
> (def test-r
>   (routes
>(GET "/hey"
> []
> "HEY!")
>(GET "/:app*" [app]
> (route-m app
>
>
> The issue with this method is the fact that the "sub-routes" need to have
the full path instead of just the sub-path.  For example, "foo" needs to
define its routes in terms of "foo/..." instead of just "/...".
>
> Is there any way around this?
>

core/context?

> Thanks.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.