Re: Clojure is not a serious language
Check out the comment left by Blue Phil. Priceless. On Jan 31, 6:40 am, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote: Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely hillarious: http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Clojure is not a serious language
On Jan 30, 8:40 pm, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote: Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely hillarious: http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ Hey, I have to admit, I was scared when I saw you show up here, but now I think I understand what you were doing in c.l.l.: providing a bit of dada and contradiction to folks like that blogger ;-) They certainly need it! Will you accept my apologies for my snap judgment? My commentary: real programmers create their own languages to suit the occasion. If they don't have time for that, they work in an existing language, whichever suits the task best. mfh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Clojure is not a serious language
Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely hillarious: http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Clojure is not a serious language
Agreed :) On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote: Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely hillarious: http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
