Re: I tripped out
You might be interested in https://github.com/guv/clojure.options/ -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: I tripped out
atkaaz, you can do this: (fn [ {:keys [arg1 arg2 arg3]}] ...) On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:03 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I agree, I'm not sure what he means xD If you ask me, I'd rather have each arg be identified by a keyword instead of by order like: (somefn :arg1 somestr :arg3 100 :arg2 (+ 1 2)) or all those in a map I'll probably still do that for me, so that any function will take params like this. There's probably a way this can be done but it's not good enough for me, was it with :keys and :as map ? On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Alex Fowler alex.murat...@gmail.comwrote: Tell us more about it. On Sunday, May 5, 2013 11:54:32 AM UTC+4, JvJ wrote: Is anyone else tripped out when they realize that when you write args for a function you're basically just destructuring an arg vector? It trips me out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: I tripped out
yes, thank you, that is what I was referring to + the :or and :as like: (defn somefn [req1 req2 ;required params { :keys [a b c d e] ;optional params :or {a 1 ;optional params with preset default values other than the nil default ; b takes nil if not specified on call c 3 ; c is 3 when not specified on call d 0 ; d is 0 --//-- ; e takes nil if not specified on call } :as mapOfParamsSpecifiedOnCall }] (println req1 req2 mapOfParamsSpecifiedOnCall a b c d e) ) ;= (somefn 9 10 :b 2 :d 4) ;9 10 {:b 2, :d 4} 1 2 3 4 nil ;nil this may be good for most people, but not for me. I've tried implementing something for me but I have it only half way done (and I haven't looked at in in a few months) it's here [1] but u won't like how it looks xD meanwhile I realized what OP was saying with destructuring the arg vector. [1] https://github.com/DeMLinkS/demlinks/blob/7064df0491ea2b565f6edf18708a599af8b37a33/src/util/funxions.clj On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Pierre-Yves Ritschard p...@spootnik.orgwrote: atkaaz, you can do this: (fn [ {:keys [arg1 arg2 arg3]}] ...) On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:03 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I agree, I'm not sure what he means xD If you ask me, I'd rather have each arg be identified by a keyword instead of by order like: (somefn :arg1 somestr :arg3 100 :arg2 (+ 1 2)) or all those in a map I'll probably still do that for me, so that any function will take params like this. There's probably a way this can be done but it's not good enough for me, was it with :keys and :as map ? On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Alex Fowler alex.murat...@gmail.comwrote: Tell us more about it. On Sunday, May 5, 2013 11:54:32 AM UTC+4, JvJ wrote: Is anyone else tripped out when they realize that when you write args for a function you're basically just destructuring an arg vector? It trips me out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: I tripped out
I agree, I'm not sure what he means xD If you ask me, I'd rather have each arg be identified by a keyword instead of by order like: (somefn :arg1 somestr :arg3 100 :arg2 (+ 1 2)) or all those in a map I'll probably still do that for me, so that any function will take params like this. There's probably a way this can be done but it's not good enough for me, was it with :keys and :as map ? On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Alex Fowler alex.murat...@gmail.comwrote: Tell us more about it. On Sunday, May 5, 2013 11:54:32 AM UTC+4, JvJ wrote: Is anyone else tripped out when they realize that when you write args for a function you're basically just destructuring an arg vector? It trips me out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
I tripped out
Is anyone else tripped out when they realize that when you write args for a function you're basically just destructuring an arg vector? It trips me out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: I tripped out
We write all these s-exps, but in the end it's just convenient ways to control electricity, and we are Magneto. On Sunday, May 5, 2013, JvJ wrote: Is anyone else tripped out when they realize that when you write args for a function you're basically just destructuring an arg vector? It trips me out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: I tripped out
Yeah. It seems like the logical extension of this would be to allow (fn args expr) to be equivalent to (fn [ args] expr)...but I'm not sure how useful that would actually be. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: I tripped out
Tell us more about it. On Sunday, May 5, 2013 11:54:32 AM UTC+4, JvJ wrote: Is anyone else tripped out when they realize that when you write args for a function you're basically just destructuring an arg vector? It trips me out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.