gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'clojure@googlegroups.com'); Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com'); For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? BTW, typehinting value in '(let [value (aget data depth)]' binding gives an error Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer so I think since this value considered primitive then I actually can hint the fields to be primitive arrays. Nonetheless, it does not look like that problem is in the field array: wrapping aget form with (int) does not help. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 17:46:14 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
Just tested it, swapping body of stackPop with (aget data depth) has the same effect as swapping it with zero, i.e. it fixes the error, unfortunately, not in the correct way. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 22:46:53 UTC+4 пользователь Vladimir Matveev написал: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? BTW, typehinting value in '(let [value (aget data depth)]' binding gives an error Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer so I think since this value considered primitive then I actually can hint the fields to be primitive arrays. Nonetheless, it does not look like that problem is in the field array: wrapping aget form with (int) does not help. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 17:46:14 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
On 18/12/12 18:46, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? it is at least mentioned here in an example...look at line 6 http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/definterface Jim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
Oops, looking over gvec.clj it looks like I'm wrong about type-hinting fields. However you may need to type-hint the primitive array with a string instead of the symbol shorthand allowed by Clojure. Try the following: ^{:tag [I :unsynchronized-mutable true} David On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Vladimir Matveev dpx.infin...@gmail.comwrote: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? BTW, typehinting value in '(let [value (aget data depth)]' binding gives an error Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer so I think since this value considered primitive then I actually can hint the fields to be primitive arrays. Nonetheless, it does not look like that problem is in the field array: wrapping aget form with (int) does not help. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 17:46:14 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
It is definterface example, I have arrays only in deftype. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 23:16:09 UTC+4 пользователь Jim foo.bar написал: On 18/12/12 18:46, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? it is at least mentioned here in an example...look at line 6 http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/definterface Jim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
Thanks, but it seems that I have found the source of problem, though I do not know why compiler message is so uninformative and misleading. The following code does not work (fails with CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: test/Test2Impl, method: fail signature: ()V) Expecting to find integer on stack): (definterface Test2 (^void fail [])) (deftype Test2Impl [^{:unsynchronized-mutable true :tag int} x] Test2 (fail [this] (set! x (dec x The following code _does_ work: (definterface Test2 (^void fail [])) (deftype Test2Impl [^{:unsynchronized-mutable true :tag int} x] Test2 (fail [this] (set! x (int (dec x) Note that I have wrapped (dec x) into (int). This compiles and works flawlessy. In fact it is fine that there is an error here because (dec) is defined only on objects and longs, so supplying int to it does not work as intended. Even my first example in this message will work if you replace :tag int with :tag long. However, error message is absolutely misleading and seems to be a consequence of an error in the compiler... вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 23:18:28 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: Oops, looking over gvec.clj it looks like I'm wrong about type-hinting fields. However you may need to type-hint the primitive array with a string instead of the symbol shorthand allowed by Clojure. Try the following: ^{:tag [I :unsynchronized-mutable true} David On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Vladimir Matveev dpx.in...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? BTW, typehinting value in '(let [value (aget data depth)]' binding gives an error Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer so I think since this value considered primitive then I actually can hint the fields to be primitive arrays. Nonetheless, it does not look like that problem is in the field array: wrapping aget form with (int) does not help. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 17:46:14 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.comjavascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
Ah right, sorry to mislead. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Vladimir Matveev dpx.infin...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks, but it seems that I have found the source of problem, though I do not know why compiler message is so uninformative and misleading. The following code does not work (fails with CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: test/Test2Impl, method: fail signature: ()V) Expecting to find integer on stack): (definterface Test2 (^void fail [])) (deftype Test2Impl [^{:unsynchronized-mutable true :tag int} x] Test2 (fail [this] (set! x (dec x The following code _does_ work: (definterface Test2 (^void fail [])) (deftype Test2Impl [^{:unsynchronized-mutable true :tag int} x] Test2 (fail [this] (set! x (int (dec x) Note that I have wrapped (dec x) into (int). This compiles and works flawlessy. In fact it is fine that there is an error here because (dec) is defined only on objects and longs, so supplying int to it does not work as intended. Even my first example in this message will work if you replace :tag int with :tag long. However, error message is absolutely misleading and seems to be a consequence of an error in the compiler... вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 23:18:28 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: Oops, looking over gvec.clj it looks like I'm wrong about type-hinting fields. However you may need to type-hint the primitive array with a string instead of the symbol shorthand allowed by Clojure. Try the following: ^{:tag [I :unsynchronized-mutable true} David On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Vladimir Matveev dpx.in...@gmail.comwrote: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? BTW, typehinting value in '(let [value (aget data depth)]' binding gives an error Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer so I think since this value considered primitive then I actually can hint the fields to be primitive arrays. Nonetheless, it does not look like that problem is in the field array: wrapping aget form with (int) does not help. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 17:46:14 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribe@**googlegrou**ps.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group**/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to
Re: gen-interface and deftype with types, compilation problem
No, you shouldn't worry about that) In fact it was useful to me to learn that Clojure does not support array type hints everywhere. It may be possible that I will have to change some of my code because of this. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 23:30:39 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: Ah right, sorry to mislead. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Vladimir Matveev dpx.in...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Thanks, but it seems that I have found the source of problem, though I do not know why compiler message is so uninformative and misleading. The following code does not work (fails with CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: test/Test2Impl, method: fail signature: ()V) Expecting to find integer on stack): (definterface Test2 (^void fail [])) (deftype Test2Impl [^{:unsynchronized-mutable true :tag int} x] Test2 (fail [this] (set! x (dec x The following code _does_ work: (definterface Test2 (^void fail [])) (deftype Test2Impl [^{:unsynchronized-mutable true :tag int} x] Test2 (fail [this] (set! x (int (dec x) Note that I have wrapped (dec x) into (int). This compiles and works flawlessy. In fact it is fine that there is an error here because (dec) is defined only on objects and longs, so supplying int to it does not work as intended. Even my first example in this message will work if you replace :tag int with :tag long. However, error message is absolutely misleading and seems to be a consequence of an error in the compiler... вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 23:18:28 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: Oops, looking over gvec.clj it looks like I'm wrong about type-hinting fields. However you may need to type-hint the primitive array with a string instead of the symbol shorthand allowed by Clojure. Try the following: ^{:tag [I :unsynchronized-mutable true} David On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Vladimir Matveev dpx.in...@gmail.comwrote: Well, it is news for me since it is not documented anywhere. Why is this so? BTW, typehinting value in '(let [value (aget data depth)]' binding gives an error Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer so I think since this value considered primitive then I actually can hint the fields to be primitive arrays. Nonetheless, it does not look like that problem is in the field array: wrapping aget form with (int) does not help. вторник, 18 декабря 2012 г., 17:46:14 UTC+4 пользователь David Nolen написал: I don't think you can type hint a field as a primitive array. On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Vladimir Matveev wrote: Hello, Consider the following code (gen-interface :name IntStack :methods [[stackPeek [] int] [stackPush [int] void] [stackPop [] int] [stackDepth [] int]]) (deftype IntStackImpl [^{:tag ints :unsynchronized-mutable true} data ^{:tag int :unsynchronized-mutable true} depth] IntStack (stackPeek [this] (aget data depth)) (stackPush [this value] (when (= (inc depth) (alength data)) (let [data-length (alength data) new-data (int-array (* data-length 2))] (System/arraycopy data 0 new-data 0 data-length) (set! data new-data))) (set! depth (inc depth)) (aset data depth value)) (stackPop [this] (if ( depth 0) (let [value (aget data depth)] (set! depth (dec depth)) value) (throw (IllegalStateException. Stack is already empty! (stackDepth [this] depth)) This is very simple stack implementation over plain java array. It does not compile with the following message: CompilerException java.lang.VerifyError: (class: clojure/data/xml/IntStackImpl, method: stackPop signature: ()I) Expecting to find integer on stack However, when I replace the body of stackPop with, say, plain zero literal 0, the method seems to pass the compilation, because then I'm getting similar error on stackPush method instead. Placing type hints inside stackPop method does not work (in fact, it is even an error to place them, say, on value local binding). What am I doing wrong here? How to make the class compile? Cheers, Vladimir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribe@**googlegrou**ps.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group**/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To