Re: test.check, quickcheck concurrency
On 3/28/14, 9:48 PM, Brian Craft wrote: > Re: John Hughes' talk at clojure/west, at the end he did a fairly > incredible demo of testing concurrency. It doesn't look like this was > implemented in test.check (or I'm not finding it). Are there any plans? > from my understanding his approach is using quickcheck to generate histories and then check those histories for linearizability. maybe some combination of test.check and https://github.com/aphyr/knossos could do that. -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: test.check, quickcheck concurrency
Hi Brian, clojure.test.check does not currently ship with any concurrency support. That being said, I've been working an implementation on Erlang's PULSE, which I hope to have usable in the next couple months [1][2]. John's talk touches on using state machines to test concurrent code, which is something I'd like to attack eventually, but don't have any concrete plans at the moment. Reid [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clojure-dev/GhG-PbKW_ew [2] http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/finding-race-conditions.pdf On Friday, March 28, 2014 11:48:20 PM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote: > > Re: John Hughes' talk at clojure/west, at the end he did a fairly > incredible demo of testing concurrency. It doesn't look like this was > implemented in test.check (or I'm not finding it). Are there any plans? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
test.check, quickcheck concurrency
Re: John Hughes' talk at clojure/west, at the end he did a fairly incredible demo of testing concurrency. It doesn't look like this was implemented in test.check (or I'm not finding it). Are there any plans? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
