Re: [ClojureScript] ANN: The REPL, a weekly Clojure/Script newsletter

2016-07-26 Thread Colin Fleming
Thanks for The REPL, I've been enjoying it very much. I like that it also
has information related to Clojure but not Clojure-specific, such as JVM
performance posts. Nice work!

Cheers,
Colin

On 27 July 2016 at 09:20, Daniel Compton 
wrote:

> Hi folks
>
> I’ve started a weekly Clojure and ClojureScript newsletter called The
> REPL. It covers what’s new (and old) in Clojure, as well as related topics
> (Lisp, JVM, e.t.c.).
>
> You can sign up at http://therepl.net, and see a copy of the latest issue
> here
> 
> .
>
> Thanks, Daniel.
> --
> —
> Daniel
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.


Re: [ClojureScript] Proper integration of cljs.test and cljs.spec

2016-07-26 Thread David Nolen
cljs.spec is not stable or in sync with Clojure 1.9.0-alpha10 clojure.spec
yet. Working on that. Until then you should only experiment with what's
there and avoid attempting anything serious.

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:40 AM,  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm little bit puzzled and didn't find a proper way how to integrate
> clojure.spec with clojure.test yet. My env is ...
>
>  - testing via doo in node
>  - got some cljs.test tests, run by run-tests macro from cljs.test
>  - wrote sample function spec
>
> ...
>
> (s/def ::path
>   (s/with-gen (s/and string? #(string/starts-with? % "/"))
>   #(gen/fmap (fn [s] (let [i (rand-int 1024)]
>(if (odd? i) (str "/" s) s)))
>  (gen/string
>
> (s/def ::method #{"GET" "POST" "DELETE"})
> (s/def ::role #{"*" "owner" "admin" "member"})
> (s/def ::endpoint (s/keys :req-un [::path ::method ::role]))
> (s/def ::endpoints (s/* ::endpoint))
> (s/def ::variables (s/nilable (s/map-of string? string?)))
>
> (s/def ::ret-path (s/and string? #"^/(GET|POST|DELETE)/"))
> (s/def ::ret-paths (s/* ::ret-path))
>
> (s/fdef endpoints->paths
>   :args (s/cat :endpoints ::endpoints :role ::role :variables ::variables)
>   :ret ::ret-paths
>   :fn #(<= (count (:ret %)) (count (-> % :args :endpoints
>
> ... I can check it manually via ...
>
> (cljs.spec.test/check-fn endpoints->paths (s/spec
> 'auth.util.endpoint/endpoints->paths))
>
> ... and it works. I tried to integrate it with cljs.test and it fails.
> When I tried to run-all-tests (cljs.spec.test), I can see that the function
> spec was executed / tested, but testing didn't fail when there was an error
> in spec / function.
>
> 
> ...
> Testing auth.util.endpoint-test
>
> Ran 6 tests containing 23 assertions.
> 0 failures, 0 errors.
> Checking #'auth.util.endpoint/endpoints->paths
> {:result {:cljs.spec/problems {[] {:pred string?, :val 1, :via
> [:auth.util.endpoint/ret-paths :auth.util.endpoint/ret-paths
> :auth.util.endpoint/ret-path :auth.util.endpoint/ret-path], :in [0]}},
> :failed-on :ret}, :seed 1469520712557, :failing-size 0, :num-tests 1, :fail
> [("admin" {})], :shrunk {:total-nodes-visited 2, :depth 1, :result
> {:cljs.spec/problems {[] {:pred string?, :val 1, :via
> [:auth.util.endpoint/ret-paths :auth.util.endpoint/ret-paths
> :auth.util.endpoint/ret-path :auth.util.endpoint/ret-path], :in [0]}},
> :failed-on :ret}, :smallest [("owner" nil)]}}
> 
>
> ... cljs.test tests are executed, failures / errors counted properly.
> cljs.spec tests are executed, but no proper failures / errors counters and
> testing itself didn't fail. Tried to integrate them in a way that I was
> checking output of check-fn in deftest body, testing failed properly, but
> no info why the test failed because of simple boolean test in is.
>
> I'm probably overlooking something. What is the proper way to:
>
>  - test in node via doo
>  - execute cljs.test tests
>  - execute all cljs.spec tests
>  - fail testing if cljs.spec tests failed and display why (explain) and
> correct number of failures / errors
>
> Many thanks,
> Robert
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.