Re: [ClojureScript] Why is each closure library namespace in a separate js file?
Thinking about the numbers a bit more. They might make sense: 413 files in batches of 6 (Chrome allows 6 connections per domain) where the average download takes 50ms. 413 / 6 * 50 = ~3400ms It also makes sense that ~100 files would take less than 1s to load. I guess we need to think about reducing the number of namespaces in our project. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
Re: [ClojureScript] Why is each closure library namespace in a separate js file?
We are loading 413 namespaces total. 134 are closure files. 27 are clojurescript. 124 are the namespaces of this project. The rest are dependencies. These 413 javascript files finish downloading after about 3 seconds. DOMContentLoaded then fires at 7 seconds. Many of these javascript files sit in Chrome's "stalled" state for multiple seconds. The "stalled" state is when the browser is waiting for a connection to come available, so it can make the request. The actual download (after leaving the stalled state) of any given file (except the very large ones) only takes a few milliseconds. I'm attaching some pictures from the network tab that illustrate what I'm talking about. It may be that chrome's timing is lying, and something isn't right with our local dev server. I'll look more into that. On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 7:45:23 AM UTC-7, David Nolen wrote: > Are you sure this isn't a web server configuration issue? We saw long load > times with browser REPL due to insufficient concurrency when serving > resources. After that was fixed, loading 100+ namespaces into a web browser > took less than 1 second during local dev. > > > David > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Justin Ratner wrote: > We have a fairly large project in which we require a good bit of closure > library functionality. While developing with :optimizations :none, hundreds > of closure library files are loaded when the page loads. This means that the > page takes 7-10 seconds to load. That doesn't seem like much, but when you > are refreshing the page many times while developing (I don't always trust > code-reload), it adds up. > > > > Most of the time is spent waiting for browser connections to open up, so the > next file can be downloaded. Most browsers can only download a handful of > files from one domain at once. > > > > Wouldn't it be better if the closure library was served in a single js file? > > > > -- > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
Re: [ClojureScript] Why is each closure library namespace in a separate js file?
Are you sure this isn't a web server configuration issue? We saw long load times with browser REPL due to insufficient concurrency when serving resources. After that was fixed, loading 100+ namespaces into a web browser took less than 1 second during local dev. David On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Justin Ratner wrote: > We have a fairly large project in which we require a good bit of closure > library functionality. While developing with :optimizations :none, hundreds > of closure library files are loaded when the page loads. This means that > the page takes 7-10 seconds to load. That doesn't seem like much, but when > you are refreshing the page many times while developing (I don't always > trust code-reload), it adds up. > > Most of the time is spent waiting for browser connections to open up, so > the next file can be downloaded. Most browsers can only download a handful > of files from one domain at once. > > Wouldn't it be better if the closure library was served in a single js > file? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
[ClojureScript] Why is each closure library namespace in a separate js file?
We have a fairly large project in which we require a good bit of closure library functionality. While developing with :optimizations :none, hundreds of closure library files are loaded when the page loads. This means that the page takes 7-10 seconds to load. That doesn't seem like much, but when you are refreshing the page many times while developing (I don't always trust code-reload), it adds up. Most of the time is spent waiting for browser connections to open up, so the next file can be downloaded. Most browsers can only download a handful of files from one domain at once. Wouldn't it be better if the closure library was served in a single js file? -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
