Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH V10 17/19] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number

2018-11-19 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:11:40PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:53:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments
> > there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio,
> > because this bio may be splitted or advanced.
> > 
> > So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't
> > cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is 
> > figured
> > out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since
> > bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting").
> > 
> > Cc: Dave Chinner 
> > Cc: Kent Overstreet 
> > Fixes: 7f60dcaaf91 ("block: blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments()")
> 
> From what I can tell, the problem was originally introduced by
> 76d8137a3113 ("blk-merge: recaculate segment if it isn't less than max 
> segments")
> 
> Is that right?

Indeed, will update it in next version.

Thanks,
Ming



Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH V10 17/19] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number

2018-11-16 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:53:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments
> there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio,
> because this bio may be splitted or advanced.
> 
> So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't
> cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is figured
> out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since
> bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting").

Looks good, but shouldn't this go to the beginning of the series?

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 



Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH V10 17/19] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number

2018-11-15 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:53:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments
> there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio,
> because this bio may be splitted or advanced.
> 
> So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't
> cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is figured
> out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since
> bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting").
> 
> Cc: Dave Chinner 
> Cc: Kent Overstreet 
> Fixes: 7f60dcaaf91 ("block: blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments()")

>From what I can tell, the problem was originally introduced by
76d8137a3113 ("blk-merge: recaculate segment if it isn't less than max 
segments")

Is that right?

> Cc: Mike Snitzer 
> Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
> Cc: Alexander Viro 
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Shaohua Li 
> Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-er...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: David Sterba 
> Cc: linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong 
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Gao Xiang 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig 
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o 
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Coly Li 
> Cc: linux-bca...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh 
> Cc: Bob Peterson 
> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei 
> ---
>  block/blk-merge.c | 8 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index cb9f49bcfd36..153a659fde74 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -429,13 +429,7 @@ void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
>  
>  void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  {
> - unsigned short seg_cnt;
> -
> - /* estimate segment number by bi_vcnt for non-cloned bio */
> - if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED))
> - seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
> - else
> - seg_cnt = bio->bi_vcnt;
> + unsigned short seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
>  
>   if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE, >queue_flags) &&
>   (seg_cnt < queue_max_segments(q)))
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 



[Cluster-devel] [PATCH V10 17/19] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number

2018-11-15 Thread Ming Lei
It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments
there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio,
because this bio may be splitted or advanced.

So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't
cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is figured
out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since
bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting").

Cc: Dave Chinner 
Cc: Kent Overstreet 
Fixes: 7f60dcaaf91 ("block: blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments()")
Cc: Mike Snitzer 
Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
Cc: Alexander Viro 
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shaohua Li 
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-er...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: David Sterba 
Cc: linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Darrick J. Wong 
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gao Xiang 
Cc: Christoph Hellwig 
Cc: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Coly Li 
Cc: linux-bca...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boaz Harrosh 
Cc: Bob Peterson 
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei 
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 8 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index cb9f49bcfd36..153a659fde74 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -429,13 +429,7 @@ void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
 
 void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 {
-   unsigned short seg_cnt;
-
-   /* estimate segment number by bi_vcnt for non-cloned bio */
-   if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED))
-   seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
-   else
-   seg_cnt = bio->bi_vcnt;
+   unsigned short seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
 
if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE, >queue_flags) &&
(seg_cnt < queue_max_segments(q)))
-- 
2.9.5