Re: [Cluster-devel] [ha-wg] [Pacemaker] [Linux-HA] [RFC] Organizing HA Summit 2015
On 2014-11-25T16:46:01, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote: Okay, okay, apparently we have got enough topics to discuss. I'll grumble a bit more about Brno, but let's get the organisation of that thing on track ... Sigh. Always so much work! I'm assuming arrival on the 3rd and departure on the 6th would be the plan? Personally I'm interested in talking about scaling - with pacemaker-remoted and/or a new messaging/membership layer. If we're going to talk about scaling, we should throw in our new docker support in the same discussion. Docker lends itself well to the pet vs cattle analogy. I see management of docker with pacemaker making quite a bit of sense now that we have the ability to scale into the cattle territory. While we're on that, I'd like to throw in a heretic thought and suggest that one might want to look at etcd and fleetd. Other design-y topics: - SBD Point taken. I have actually not forgotten this Andrew, and am reading your development. I probably just need to pull the code over ... - degraded mode - improved notifications - containerisation of services (cgroups, docker, virt) - resource-agents (upstream releases, handling of pull requests, testing) Yep, We definitely need to talk about the resource-agents. Agreed. User-facing topics could include recent features (ie. pacemaker-remoted, crm_resource --restart) and common deployment scenarios (eg. NFS) that people get wrong. Adding to the list, it would be a good idea to talk about Deployment integration testing, what's going on with the phd project and why it's important regardless if you're interested in what the project functionally does. OK. So QA is within scope as well. It seems the agenda will fill up quite nicely. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. -- Oscar Wilde
Re: [Cluster-devel] [ha-wg] [Pacemaker] [Linux-HA] [RFC] Organizing HA Summit 2015
On 11/26/2014 4:41 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2014-11-25T16:46:01, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote: Okay, okay, apparently we have got enough topics to discuss. I'll grumble a bit more about Brno, but let's get the organisation of that thing on track ... Sigh. Always so much work! I'm assuming arrival on the 3rd and departure on the 6th would be the plan? Yes that´s correct. Devconf starts the 6. Fabio Personally I'm interested in talking about scaling - with pacemaker-remoted and/or a new messaging/membership layer. If we're going to talk about scaling, we should throw in our new docker support in the same discussion. Docker lends itself well to the pet vs cattle analogy. I see management of docker with pacemaker making quite a bit of sense now that we have the ability to scale into the cattle territory. While we're on that, I'd like to throw in a heretic thought and suggest that one might want to look at etcd and fleetd. Other design-y topics: - SBD Point taken. I have actually not forgotten this Andrew, and am reading your development. I probably just need to pull the code over ... - degraded mode - improved notifications - containerisation of services (cgroups, docker, virt) - resource-agents (upstream releases, handling of pull requests, testing) Yep, We definitely need to talk about the resource-agents. Agreed. User-facing topics could include recent features (ie. pacemaker-remoted, crm_resource --restart) and common deployment scenarios (eg. NFS) that people get wrong. Adding to the list, it would be a good idea to talk about Deployment integration testing, what's going on with the phd project and why it's important regardless if you're interested in what the project functionally does. OK. So QA is within scope as well. It seems the agenda will fill up quite nicely. Regards, Lars
