Re: [Cluster-devel] Heads-up: retiring gfs_controld
On 16/02/13 16:35, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: On 02/15/2013 02:18 PM, Andrew Price wrote: Hi, Now that Fedora 16 has EOL'd we have little reason to keep gfs_controld and gfs_control in gfs2-utils. They're currently disabled by default but can be enabled with configure option --enable-gfs_controld which adds additional dependencies on corosynclib, clusterlib (discontinued) and openaislib (discontinued). My intention is to remove gfs_control* from gfs2-utils.git before the next release unless there are any good reasons to keep them around. Andy Just make sure it is clear from which exact kernel version it is possible to operate without gfs_control*. so that maintainers will not try to backport to linux 1.0. Fabio I'd have to get confirmation on this but it looks like this commit obsoleted gfs_controld: commit e0c2a9aa1e68455dc3439e95d85cabcaff073666 Author: David Teigland Date: Mon Jan 9 17:18:05 2012 -0500 GFS2: dlm based recovery coordination This new method of managing recovery is an alternative to the previous approach of using the userland gfs_controld. [...] Which was released in: $ git describe --contains e0c2a9aa1e68455dc3439e95d85cabcaff073666 v3.3-rc1~77^2~4 So a little while after linux 1.0 :) Andy
Re: [Cluster-devel] Heads-up: retiring gfs_controld
On 02/15/2013 02:18 PM, Andrew Price wrote: > Hi, > > Now that Fedora 16 has EOL'd we have little reason to keep gfs_controld > and gfs_control in gfs2-utils. They're currently disabled by default but > can be enabled with configure option --enable-gfs_controld which adds > additional dependencies on corosynclib, clusterlib (discontinued) and > openaislib (discontinued). > > My intention is to remove gfs_control* from gfs2-utils.git before the > next release unless there are any good reasons to keep them around. > > Andy > Just make sure it is clear from which exact kernel version it is possible to operate without gfs_control*. so that maintainers will not try to backport to linux 1.0. Fabio
[Cluster-devel] Heads-up: retiring gfs_controld
Hi, Now that Fedora 16 has EOL'd we have little reason to keep gfs_controld and gfs_control in gfs2-utils. They're currently disabled by default but can be enabled with configure option --enable-gfs_controld which adds additional dependencies on corosynclib, clusterlib (discontinued) and openaislib (discontinued). My intention is to remove gfs_control* from gfs2-utils.git before the next release unless there are any good reasons to keep them around. Andy
