[cmake-developers] Random hang of building process: deedlock in cmake.
Hi all! Today I caught again a hang of local building process. I used debugger and strace in steps to catch a bug. so: $ pstree ... | | └─gbs───sh───depanneur─┬─sh───sudo───build─┬─perl │ │ │ └─su───rpmbuild───sh───cmake───gmake ... $ ps ax | grep gmake ... 1105 ?Z 0:00 [gmake] defunct ... $ ps ax | grep cmake ... 760 ?S 0:01 /usr/bin/cmake ... ... $ sudo strace -p 760 [sudo] password for vitalii.chernookyi: Process 760 attached - interrupt to quit select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL^C unfinished ... Process 760 detached $ ls -l /proc/760/fd/3 lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] $ ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep 'pipe:\[1670438\]' lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] l-wx-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:42 /proc/760/fd/4 - pipe:[1670438] $ sudo gdb -p 760 ... 0x60138543 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x60138543 in ?? () #1 0x6004a4ce in ?? () #2 0x6004e2fe in ?? () #3 0x60040309 in ?? () #4 0x600039ee in ?? () #5 0x600d9584 in ?? () #6 0x60003f41 in ?? () #7 0x7fff61dc5e88 in ?? () #8 0x in ?? () (gdb) quit ... $ So we caught a deedlock. Do anyone have any idea how to fix it? -- *Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development* GlobalLogic P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136* M *+380.98.7920568* S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] [Dev] Random hang of building process: deedlock in cmake.
Alexander, Yes - you are right. It's just excellent illustration why I hate pipes. So CMake guys can remove this crap from their code and use socketpair() or like instead. \\wbr On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Kanevskiy, Alexander alexander.kanevs...@intel.com wrote: On 11/07/14 12:15 , Vitaly Chernooky vitalii.chernoo...@globallogic.com wrote: This looks like old “good” bug in qemu that sometimes re-appear in certain combination of host environment and sources you’re building: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/955379 Hi all! Today I caught again a hang of local building process. I used debugger and strace in steps to catch a bug. so: $ pstree ... | | └─gbs───sh───depanneur─┬─sh───sudo───build─┬─perl │ │ │ └─su───rpmbuild───sh───cmake───gmake ... $ ps ax | grep gmake ... 1105 ?Z 0:00 [gmake] defunct ... $ ps ax | grep cmake ... 760 ?S 0:01 /usr/bin/cmake ... ... $ sudo strace -p 760 [sudo] password for vitalii.chernookyi: Process 760 attached - interrupt to quit select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL^C unfinished ... Process 760 detached $ ls -l /proc/760/fd/3 lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] $ ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep 'pipe:\[1670438\]' lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] l-wx-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:42 /proc/760/fd/4 - pipe:[1670438] $ sudo gdb -p 760 ... 0x60138543 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x60138543 in ?? () #1 0x6004a4ce in ?? () #2 0x6004e2fe in ?? () #3 0x60040309 in ?? () #4 0x600039ee in ?? () #5 0x600d9584 in ?? () #6 0x60003f41 in ?? () #7 0x7fff61dc5e88 in ?? () #8 0x in ?? () (gdb) quit ... $ So we caught a deedlock. Do anyone have any idea how to fix it? -- Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development GlobalLogic P +380.44.4929695 ext.1136 M +380.98.7920568 S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- Best regards, Alexander Kanevskiy. - Intel Finland Oy Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- *Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development* GlobalLogic P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136* M *+380.98.7920568* S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] [Dev] Random hang of building process: deedlock in cmake.
Also it will be good if every body from us will vote for that bug on launchpad. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Vitaly Chernooky vitalii.chernoo...@globallogic.com wrote: Alexander, Yes - you are right. It's just excellent illustration why I hate pipes. So CMake guys can remove this crap from their code and use socketpair() or like instead. \\wbr On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Kanevskiy, Alexander alexander.kanevs...@intel.com wrote: On 11/07/14 12:15 , Vitaly Chernooky vitalii.chernoo...@globallogic.com wrote: This looks like old “good” bug in qemu that sometimes re-appear in certain combination of host environment and sources you’re building: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/955379 Hi all! Today I caught again a hang of local building process. I used debugger and strace in steps to catch a bug. so: $ pstree ... | | └─gbs───sh───depanneur─┬─sh───sudo───build─┬─perl │ │ │ └─su───rpmbuild───sh───cmake───gmake ... $ ps ax | grep gmake ... 1105 ?Z 0:00 [gmake] defunct ... $ ps ax | grep cmake ... 760 ?S 0:01 /usr/bin/cmake ... ... $ sudo strace -p 760 [sudo] password for vitalii.chernookyi: Process 760 attached - interrupt to quit select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL^C unfinished ... Process 760 detached $ ls -l /proc/760/fd/3 lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] $ ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep 'pipe:\[1670438\]' lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] l-wx-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:42 /proc/760/fd/4 - pipe:[1670438] $ sudo gdb -p 760 ... 0x60138543 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x60138543 in ?? () #1 0x6004a4ce in ?? () #2 0x6004e2fe in ?? () #3 0x60040309 in ?? () #4 0x600039ee in ?? () #5 0x600d9584 in ?? () #6 0x60003f41 in ?? () #7 0x7fff61dc5e88 in ?? () #8 0x in ?? () (gdb) quit ... $ So we caught a deedlock. Do anyone have any idea how to fix it? -- Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development GlobalLogic P +380.44.4929695 ext.1136 M +380.98.7920568 S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- Best regards, Alexander Kanevskiy. - Intel Finland Oy Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- *Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development* GlobalLogic P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136 %2B380.44.4929695%20ext.1136* M *+380.98.7920568 %2B380.98.7920568* S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- *Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development* GlobalLogic P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136* M *+380.98.7920568* S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] [Dev] Random hang of building process: deedlock in cmake.
Ilya, do you still interested in build logs? I've collected them. \\wbr On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Ilya Palachev i.palac...@samsung.com wrote: Hi, Vitaly. Maybe your backtrace information will be somehow more useful if you download and unrpm debuginfo and debugsource rpm packages from the repository that you use as default repository in your ~/.gbs.conf If you use native gdb (not in chroot) these RPMs should be unrpm'ed inside root (/) directory, so that new files will appear in directories /usr/lib/debug and /usr/src/debug. I have already noticed cmake's hanging in our build system for many times about 2 yours ago. Maybe it's specific for our environment. Also the output log of cmake will be useful. Does cmake hangs during the search of some libraries? Best regards, Ilya Palachev -- *From:* Vitaly Chernooky vitalii.chernoo...@globallogic.com vitalii.chernoo...@globallogic.com *Sent:* Friday, July 11, 2014 1:15PM *To:* cmake-developers@cmake.org, d...@lists.tizen.org d...@lists.tizen.org d...@lists.tizen.org *Cc:* Andrii Anisov andrii.ani...@globallogic.com andrii.ani...@globallogic.com *Subject:* [Dev] Random hang of building process: deedlock in cmake. Hi all! Today I caught again a hang of local building process. I used debugger and strace in steps to catch a bug. so: $ pstree ... | | └─gbs───sh───depanneur─┬─sh───sudo───build─┬─perl │ │ │ └─su───rpmbuild───sh───cmake───gmake ... $ ps ax | grep gmake ... 1105 ?Z 0:00 [gmake] defunct ... $ ps ax | grep cmake ... 760 ?S 0:01 /usr/bin/cmake ... ... $ sudo strace -p 760 [sudo] password for vitalii.chernookyi: Process 760 attached - interrupt to quit select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL^C unfinished ... Process 760 detached $ ls -l /proc/760/fd/3 lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] $ ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep 'pipe:\[1670438\]' lr-x-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:41 /proc/760/fd/3 - pipe:[1670438] l-wx-- 1 vitalii.chernookyi tizendev 64 Jul 11 11:42 /proc/760/fd/4 - pipe:[1670438] $ sudo gdb -p 760 ... 0x60138543 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x60138543 in ?? () #1 0x6004a4ce in ?? () #2 0x6004e2fe in ?? () #3 0x60040309 in ?? () #4 0x600039ee in ?? () #5 0x600d9584 in ?? () #6 0x60003f41 in ?? () #7 0x7fff61dc5e88 in ?? () #8 0x in ?? () (gdb) quit ... $ So we caught a deedlock. Do anyone have any idea how to fix it? -- *Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development* GlobalLogic P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136 %2B380.44.4929695%20ext.1136* M *+380.98.7920568 %2B380.98.7920568* S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt ___ Dev mailing listDev@lists.tizen.orghttps://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev -- *Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development* GlobalLogic P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136* M *+380.98.7920568* S cvv_2k www.globallogic.com http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
[cmake-developers] [CMake 0015017]: Changing compiler/library versions, Finding Packages, and etc.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15017 == Reported By:rhl Assigned To: == Project:CMake Issue ID: 15017 Category: (No Category) Reproducibility:always Severity: feature Priority: normal Status: new == Date Submitted: 2014-07-11 18:24 EDT Last Modified: 2014-07-11 18:24 EDT == Summary:Changing compiler/library versions, Finding Packages, and etc. Description: Hi, I really enjoy using CMake, it takes a lot of redundancy and hassle out of build systems. Thank you to all developers involved :) I am writing to request the developers to consider making a high level change to the way that the compilers are chosen and changed as well as packages are added. It would be great if there was a way (say within ccmake) to selectively choose which of the many compilers on a system are available, and, when adding packages via find_package, if some list of the available FindXXX.cmake scripts could be made conveniently available. Regularly I am on a system with many compiler choices ( a modern os/x machine with homebrew will have clang by default, but gcc installed on the side potentially, or gcc symlinked to clang) and possibly many library versions. It would be great to be able to selectively choose when running cmake or ccmake which of these libraries/compilers I want to compile/link with based on what cmake is able to find when inspecting the system. On linux with the environment-modules or like program, many many different compilers can be available, many flavors of gcc, icc, clang, etc.. I find it a hassle to have to modify the CMakeLists.txt each time i need to change the compiler and add/remove specific compiler flags. I'm sure you are all busy and i'm not sure if anyone else is interested in this, or some variant of this idea.. At any rate, thanks again for all your hard work. == Issue History Date ModifiedUsername FieldChange == 2014-07-11 18:24 rhlNew Issue == -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
[CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028
I have a very large project that is built with CMake, and I'm trying to make it work a little nicer with CMake 3. Right now we, we see everal warnigns that policy CMP0028 is not set. Using cmake_policy(SET CMP0028 OLD) does not seem to take effect. It's set at the same, top level, place where other policies are set and these do take effect. Likewise, setting the policy to NEW does not make CMake produce the fatal error like the documentation says it should. What am I missing here? Regards, Pierre Andersson-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028
On 07/11/2014 11:00 AM, pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com wrote: I have a very large project that is built with CMake, and I'm trying to make it work a little nicer with CMake 3. Right now we, we see everal warnigns that policy CMP0028 is not set. Using cmake_policy(SET CMP0028 OLD) does not seem to take effect. It's set at the same, top level, place where other policies are set and these do take effect. Likewise, setting the policy to NEW does not make CMake produce the fatal error like the documentation says it should. What am I missing here? With a minimal test case the policy seems to work for me in 3.0. What might reset the policy after it was set is: - A call to cmake_minimum_required() - A call to cmake_policy(VERSION) Nils -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028
Thanks for the response. None of those are called in the CMakeLists.txt file that the warning is issued for, they are both called in a file above that one in the build tree but said file also sets the CML0028 policy afterwards. Is it possible that a call to cmake_minimum_required resets the policies even for CMakeLists.txt that are not below it in the build system tree? Regards, Pierre Andersson From: Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com To: pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com, cmake@cmake.org Date: 2014-07-11 11:31 Subject:Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028 On 07/11/2014 11:00 AM, pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com wrote: I have a very large project that is built with CMake, and I'm trying to make it work a little nicer with CMake 3. Right now we, we see everal warnigns that policy CMP0028 is not set. Using cmake_policy(SET CMP0028 OLD) does not seem to take effect. It's set at the same, top level, place where other policies are set and these do take effect. Likewise, setting the policy to NEW does not make CMake produce the fatal error like the documentation says it should. What am I missing here? With a minimal test case the policy seems to work for me in 3.0. What might reset the policy after it was set is: - A call to cmake_minimum_required() - A call to cmake_policy(VERSION) Nils -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028
On 07/11/2014 01:33 PM, pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com wrote: Thanks for the response. None of those are called in the CMakeLists.txt file that the warning is issued for, they are both called in a file above that one in the build tree but said file also sets the CML0028 policy afterwards. Is it possible that a call to cmake_minimum_required resets the policies even for CMakeLists.txt that are not below it in the build system tree? You can not change policies for the parent; only for the current and subdirectories. It might help if you could create a minimal, selfcontained test case to reproduce and debug the issue. Nils -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Mastering CMake book
Hello, just wondering how up to date is the Mastering CMakebook. Does it cover all 3.0 changes ? Greetings, Petar -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028
Then it is odd that it does not work, the warning is given during generation time and I have tested to print the status of the 0028 policy at all points where the projects that get the warning has their add_library/add_executable command called, as well as at the end of their respective CMakeLists.txt files and it remains in the state OLD throughout. At which point is the state of the policy stored when it comes to generation time? I can see that it works when I construct a minimal example, so knowing when it's state is 'used' would greaty help in solving the issue or creating a minimal example that showcases the problem. Regards, Pierre Andersson From: Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com To: pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com Cc: cmake@cmake.org Date: 2014-07-11 14:32 Subject:Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028 On 07/11/2014 01:33 PM, pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com wrote: Thanks for the response. None of those are called in the CMakeLists.txt file that the warning is issued for, they are both called in a file above that one in the build tree but said file also sets the CML0028 policy afterwards. Is it possible that a call to cmake_minimum_required resets the policies even for CMakeLists.txt that are not below it in the build system tree? You can not change policies for the parent; only for the current and subdirectories. It might help if you could create a minimal, selfcontained test case to reproduce and debug the issue. Nils -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Setting Policy CMP0028
On 07/11/2014 03:33 PM, pierre.anders...@se.atlascopco.com wrote: Then it is odd that it does not work, the warning is given during generation time and I have tested to print the status of the 0028 policy at all points where the projects that get the warning has their add_library/add_executable command called, as well as at the end of their respective CMakeLists.txt files and it remains in the state OLD throughout. At which point is the state of the policy stored when it comes to generation time? I can see that it works when I construct a minimal example, so knowing when it's state is 'used' would greaty help in solving the issue or creating a minimal example that showcases the problem. Given that the warning is at generation time I think it should be the state of the policy at the end of the CMakeLists.txt that defines the target (add_library/add_executable). Nils -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Mastering CMake book
The latest edition of Mastering CMake is 6th edition (September 13, 2013), covering versions of CMake up to and including 2.8.12. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Petar Petrov pip...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, just wondering how up to date is the Mastering CMakebook. Does it cover all 3.0 changes ? Greetings, Petar -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Changing the the current generator in CMake GUI
Shouldn't there be a way to change the current generator in the CMake GUI ? It seems like I can only do this if I choose a new Where to build the binaries path. But what if I just want to change the current generator to something else using the current outpath path ? -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Changing the the current generator in CMake GUI
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Edward Diener eldlistmaili...@tropicsoft.com wrote: Shouldn't there be a way to change the current generator in the CMake GUI ? It seems like I can only do this if I choose a new Where to build the binaries path. But what if I just want to change the current generator to something else using the current outpath path ? You can also do this if you reset the cache in cmake-gui. John -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Changing the the current generator in CMake GUI
On 7/11/2014 10:33 AM, Edward Diener wrote: Shouldn't there be a way to change the current generator in the CMake GUI ? It seems like I can only do this if I choose a new Where to build the binaries path. But what if I just want to change the current generator to something else using the current outpath path ? No, once the generator is set and you have run cmake once, you need to create a new build tree or wipe out the one you created the first time. CMake stores a bunch of information about the compiler in the cache and other files in the build tree. It does not know how to change all that without a clean tree. -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Vary SUFFIX by build for SHARED MODULE?
All, greetings and thank you!
I have a requirement to produce (on Windows, using Visual Studio) a plugin
(DLL) whose suffix varies by build. For example, foo.plugin (for Release) and
foo.pluginD (for Debug). I expect to use:
add_library(foo MODULE ${Sources})
and am hoping for a SUFFIX_DEBUG, SUFFIX_RELEASE-type variable to specify, like:
set(SUFFIX .plugin)
set(SUFFIX_DEBUG .pluginD)
Any help will be appreciated!
Thanks,
Phil
Philip A. Tessier
[cid:image001.jpg@01CF9CFA.188BB5C0]
Tri-Service Research Laboratory (TSRL)
4141 Petroleum Road, Ste 2115E
JBSA Fort Sam Houston TX 78234-2644
210-867-6775 mobile
210-539-8273 office
philip.tess...@tasc.commailto:philip.tess...@tasc.com
philip.a.tessier@mail.milmailto:philip.a.tessier@mail.mil
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attachments or files transmitted
with it (collectively, the Message) are intended only for the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and/or prohibited from
disclosure by law or contract. If you are not the intended recipient: (a)
please do not read, copy or retransmit the Message; (b) permanently delete
and/or destroy all electronic and hard copies of the Message; (c) notify us by
return email; and (d) you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of the Message is strictly prohibited.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Re: [CMake] Vary SUFFIX by build for SHARED MODULE?
#-- Set the Debug and Release names for the libraries
SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES( ${targetName}
PROPERTIES
DEBUG_POSTFIX ${DEBUG_EXTENSION} )
Mike Jackson
On Jul 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Tessier, Philip A (TASC)
philip.tess...@tasc.com wrote:
All, greetings and thank you!
I have a requirement to produce (on Windows, using Visual Studio) a “plugin”
(DLL) whose suffix varies by build. For example, foo.plugin (for Release) and
foo.pluginD (for Debug). I expect to use:
add_library(foo MODULE ${Sources})
and am hoping for a SUFFIX_DEBUG, SUFFIX_RELEASE-type variable to specify,
like:
set(SUFFIX “.plugin”)
set(SUFFIX_DEBUG “.pluginD”)
Any help will be appreciated!
Thanks,
Phil
Philip A. Tessier
image001.jpg
Tri-Service Research Laboratory (TSRL)
4141 Petroleum Road, Ste 2115E
JBSA Fort Sam Houston TX 78234-2644
210-867-6775 mobile
210-539-8273 office
philip.tess...@tasc.com
philip.a.tessier@mail.mil
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attachments or files transmitted
with it (collectively, the Message) are intended only for the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and/or prohibited
from disclosure by law or contract. If you are not the intended recipient:
(a) please do not read, copy or retransmit the Message; (b) permanently
delete and/or destroy all electronic and hard copies of the Message; (c)
notify us by return email; and (d) you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of the Message is strictly prohibited.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.0.0-1357-g2eadd12
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, master has been updated via 2eadd127e9d5cad03f6a596bb01dfc682734f7b6 (commit) from c9b5e341875e7d51d94c06e3d264f020b288d26c (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log - http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=2eadd127e9d5cad03f6a596bb01dfc682734f7b6 commit 2eadd127e9d5cad03f6a596bb01dfc682734f7b6 Author: Kitware Robot kwro...@kitware.com AuthorDate: Sat Jul 12 00:01:18 2014 -0400 Commit: Kitware Robot kwro...@kitware.com CommitDate: Sat Jul 12 00:01:18 2014 -0400 CMake Nightly Date Stamp diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake index 7bf43cb..609af5d 100644 --- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake +++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # CMake version number components. set(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 3) set(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 0) -set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20140711) +set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20140712) #set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1) --- Summary of changes: Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) hooks/post-receive -- CMake ___ Cmake-commits mailing list Cmake-commits@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-commits
