RE: [CMake] VS makefiles
Steven Van Ingelgem wrote: Hi, I was wondering why there are no VS makefiles? (run like nmake -f project.mak). You want the NMake Makefiles generator. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] RE: Adding Custom Build Types
Search the mailing list archives. This was discussed some weeks ago. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malhotra, Anupam Sent: 15 January 2008 06:37 To: cmake@cmake.org Subject: [CMake] Adding Custom Build Types Hi I have a requirement in which I need to have custom build types in my project. CMake provides the below mentioned build types by default: Debug Release RelWithDebInfo MinSizeRel Now In my project I don't want these build types. I want custom build types like MD, MT, MDd, MTd, ML etc (for Visual Studio 6 and Visual Studio 8 2005 both). These build types are required to set the appropriate runtime library. Is there any provision in CMake through which this can be achieved? This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] MSVC turn off RelWithDebInfo and MinSizeRel
Actually, I always use the command line. So I haven't tried it from the GUI. From: Jesse Corrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2007 20:06 To: Torsten Martinsen Cc: David Cole; cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] MSVC turn off RelWithDebInfo and MinSizeRel The force set seemed to work when running the cmake GUI on windows, but didn't seem to work when running the command line cmake.exe, which is the way I need to do the generation. Jesse On Dec 20, 2007 11:35 PM, Torsten Martinsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Cole mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will see if I can find / figure out what I did to make this work -- I know I've done it before to eliminate all but one config type... How about this in the CMakeLists.txt file instead? (Force it into the cache rather than using a simple set.) SET(CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES Debug;Release CACHE STRING limited configs FORCE) FWIW, this seems to work for me. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.orgmailto:CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] MSVC turn off RelWithDebInfo and MinSizeRel
Unfortunately, this does not work. I just tried adding SET(CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES Debug;RelWithDebInfo) at the top of my CMakeLists.txt, then deleted my build tree and ran cmake. The generated project files still contain Debug, Release, MinSizeRel and RelWithDebInfo. -Torsten From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: 20 December 2007 01:32 To: Jesse Corrington Cc: cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] MSVC turn off RelWithDebInfo and MinSizeRel SET(CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES Debug;Release) in your CMakeLists.txt. (Or just edit that value in CMakeSetup to change it in the cache.) If you do it with a simple set in the CMakeLists.txt then you will not see that reflected in the CMakeSetup GUI, but it will be in effect at generation time and you should end up with sln/vcproj files with just the two types. HTH, David On 12/19/07, Jesse Corrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyway to have CMake not generate these two configurations, and just generate the standard release and debug configurations instead? Thanks. This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Compilation speed with CMake/NMake combination, making it faster?
* We're using an NMake build tree, is NMake particularly slow? Do any of the other makes work more efficiently? Be aware that nmake builds are much slower than using devenv, as nmake starts a cl.exe process for every single file, whereas devenv calls cl.exe with several source files. This costs, due to the high process overhead on Windows. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] cmake 2.4.8 RC 4
Bill Hoffman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Torsten Martinsen wrote: Could we please get the patch for bug 3218 into this release? I am not sure. The last time I applied that patch or a similar one lots of tests failed and there was trouble so I had to undo it. I don't think it is stable enough for 2.4.8 which is meant to be a minor bug fix on 2.4.7. I can say that that fix should be in 2.6. Can you tell me what kind of tests failed? I have a team using the patched version, and we have found no problems so far. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] cross compiling
The CVS version does, yes. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josef Karthauser Sent: 30 November 2007 09:54 To: Jesse Corrington; Salvatore Iovene Cc: cmake@cmake.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [CMake] cross compiling Did I miss something? Does cmake support cross compiling now? This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Choosing between debug and release variants of third-party libraries
Bill Hoffman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The module FindQt4.cmake handles debug and release qtmain already. See Modules/FindQt4.cmake and Modules/UseQt4.cmake for more information. Indeed, that module *defines* QT_QTCORE_LIBRARY_RELEASE, QT_QTCORE_LIBRARY_DEBUG, etc. But that does not solve the problem of how to *use* those variables in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES() without getting the 'It is impossible to order the linker search path in such a way that libraries specified as full paths will be picked by the linker' error. Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Choosing between debug and release variants of third-party libraries
Philip Lowman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you can't do something like this?
FIND_LIBRARY(qtmain_release qtmain
PATHS C:/lang/qt/3.3.4r/lib NO_DEFAULT_PATH)
FIND_LIBRARY(qtmain_debug qtmain
PATHS C:/lang/qt/3.3.4/lib NO_DEFAULT_PATH)
# declare your targets.
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(foo release ${qtmain_release})
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(food debug ${qtmain_debug})
If something like that doesn't work I would file a bug for sure.
No, I cannot, because CMake still tells me
It is impossible to order the linker search path in such a way that
libraries specified as full paths will be picked by the linker.
Directories and libraries involved are:
Directory: c:/lang/Qt/3.3.4/lib contains:
Library: C:/lang/qt/3.3.4r/lib/qtmain.lib
Directory: c:/lang/qt/3.3.4/lib contains:
Library: C:/lang/qt/3.3.4r/lib/qtmain.lib
Directory: c:/lang/qt/3.3.4r/lib contains:
Library: C:/lang/qt/3.3.4/lib/qtmain.lib
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Choosing between debug and release variants of third-party libraries
Philip Lowman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Torsten Martinsen wrote: I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I cannot find the answer anywhere. Using VS 2003, given that I have a third-party library with debug and release variants: /path/to/lib/release/lib.lib /path/to/lib/debug/lib.lib how do I get CMake to link with the correct variant? Using an absolute path in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES() does not work, and I cannot use CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE at configure time. # TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES: Link a target to given libraries. TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(target library1 debug | optimized library2 ...) That's what I tried, but the third-party libraries are located outside my build tree, so I need to use absolute paths, which as I said does not work: It is impossible to order the linker search path in such a way that libraries specified as full paths will be picked by the linker. Directories and libraries involved are: Directory: c:/lang/Qt/3.3.4/lib contains: Library: c:\lang\qt\3.3.4r/lib/qtmain.lib Directory: c:/lang/qt/3.3.4r/lib contains: Library: C:\lang\Qt\3.3.4/lib/qtmain.lib -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] disabling the cache
Jesper Eskilson wrote: The first problem is that the Visual Studio generator fails to properly rerun CMake when CMakeLists.txt. It reruns CMake, but the modified projects files are not reloaded before continuing with the build. Unfortunately, there is no way of forcing Visual Studio to reload the project, and the automatic detection of whether the project file has changed only works sometimes. I find that an effective workaround is to invoke Alt-F T and then Alt-F J Enter :-) -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Adding a project to a solution.
Josef Karthauser wrote: Each project statement should map to a .sln file that contains any necessary .vcproj files. I've got that. However, the .sln file doesn't appear to reference the .vcproj files for objects specified in the target_link_libraries. I would expect these to get added too. That, unfortunately, doesn't happen with vanilla CMake 2.4.7. I have applied the patch from bug 3218: http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=3218, and that makes it work for me. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Native Pathsupport under Windows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to use under windows the buildin commands of the shell. But when I run these commands they doesn't work correctly, because the windows commands doen't like the slashes (/). It seems to me that they want to get backslashes (\). 1. Is there a possiblity to get backslashes instead of slashes as paths? FILE(TO_NATIVE_PATH ...) -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Adding .pdb files to CPack (Visual Studio 7 generator)
Torsten Martinsen wrote:
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Did you try using the LOCATION property of the TARGET stripping the
extension and using that?
Not until now, but: The LOCATION property expands to e.g.
C:/user/gh/ais/impl/build/cmake/vc7/ca/$(OutDir)/ca.exe, so that is
also no good.
For future reference, I ended up with this solution:
# First, build the full name of the EXE.
INSTALL(CODE SET(PDB_FULL_PATH
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/\${${project}_BUILD_NAME_\${CMAKE_INSTALL_CO
NFIG_NAME}}))
# Then, replace .exe with .pdb.
INSTALL(CODE STRING(REPLACE .exe .pdb PDB_FULL_PATH
\${PDB_FULL_PATH}))
# Finally, get it installed.
INSTALL(CODE FILE(INSTALL DESTINATION
\\${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/\${CMAKE_INSTALL_CONFIG_NAME}\ TYPE
EXECUTABLE FILES \${PDB_FULL_PATH}))
The trick is to postpone evaluation of the CPack variables until CPack
runs. Not pretty, but it works.
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Running unit test executable
Torsten Martinsen wrote: I am trying to get CMake to run my CppUnit tests automatically after building from within Visual Studio .NET 2003. Update: I tried with the latest snapshot (cmake version 2.5-20071009) as well as with the NMake configuration, but it still looks as if CMake ignores my ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(). -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Running unit test executable
I am trying to get CMake to run my CppUnit tests automatically after
building from within Visual Studio .NET 2003.
Looking at
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_generate_an_executable.2C_t
hen_use_the_executable_to_generate_a_file.3F,
I thought this would do the trick (the example is simplified and would
not actually compile, but never mind that):
PROJECT(tcsv)
SET(CPP_SOURCE
tcsvreader.cpp
tcsvwriter.cpp
tcsvreadermeta.cpp
)
ADD_EXECUTABLE(tcsv
${CPP_SOURCE})
GET_TARGET_PROPERTY(TEST_EXE tcsv LOCATION)
ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(
OUTPUT ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/phony.txt
COMMAND ${TEST_EXE}
DEPENDS tcsv)
Given this CMakeLists.txt, I would expect the generated .vcproj file to
have a Post-Build Event that runs tcvs.exe. No such event is generated,
however.
Any pointers?
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Compiling without linking
Baptiste Derongs wrote: The point is that I want a MakeFile that creates only the .o file, doesnt try to get binary. Next that same Makefile (and other ones) need the .o file to make other binaries. Instead of focussing on how to do this small step, you should probably explain what it is you are trying to do, i.e. why you think that you need to explicitly split up the steps of compiling and linking. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Compiling without linking
Baptiste Derongs wrote: Actually I have a file that contains a lot of functions, call this file global.c. Next I have multiple files, call them f1.c, f2.c, ... And each f*.c has to be compiled with global.c. Make a static library containing global.c, then link each application to it. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Building both make files and visual studio files.
Josef Karthauser wrote: Hello again, I'm wondering what the best way to going about producing make files and visual studio files at the same time is. I want to use nmake to build my tree, but want visual studio project files so that the developers can continue to with within the visual studio environment, which would call the make as an external build tool. I would recommend to set up CMake to generate .vcproj files, and use those both for the IDE and for command-line builds (using vcbuild.exe or devenv.exe). -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Confikgurations and Platforms in Visual Studio 8
Josef Karthauser wrote: I'm looking at cmake as a potential solution to some build problems I'm having. Am I right in thinking that cmake only allows for four hard-coded configuration labels, DEBUG/RELEASE/etc? Where should I look to add to these, as we've got more configurations than this. http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_can_I_extend_the_build_modes_wit h_a_custom_made_one_.3F Also, does cmake have an idea of platforms, or does it assume Win32? CMake does not assume anything about Win32 or any other platform. -Torsten ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Adding .pdb files to CPack (Visual Studio 7 generator)
In a macro, I succesfully use
INSTALL(
TARGETS ${project}
RUNTIME DESTINATION bin)
to add my .exe file to the list of files included by CPack. I also want
the .pdb file, so I tried
INSTALL(
FILES
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/${project}.pdb
RUNTIME DESTINATION bin)
This, unfortunately, gives the error
FILE INSTALL cannot find file
C:/user/gh/ais/impl/build/cmake/vc7/ca/$(OutDir)/ca.pdb to install.
Note that ${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR} expands to $(OutDir) instead of e.g.
Debug as I had hoped.
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] CPack
Hendrik Sattler wrote: Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I want to use the CPACK generator, but the tutorial http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Packaging_With_CPack is not quite good. Perhaps somebody knows a better site. When I run make with make package, then I get following error: CPack Error: Cannot find a sutable ZIP program - an I is missing in suitable ;) CPack Error: Cannot initialize the generator CMake-2.4.7 wants either WinZip or Info-Zip[1]. Since the latter is free, I use that. What is not immediately obvious is that 2.4.7 *requires* zip.exe to reside in c:/cygwin/bin. (Bad luck if you do not have a C: drive). -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Visual Studio reload projects
Manuel Klimek wrote: On 8/30/07, Torsten Martinsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I, too, use Emacs. However, do not be oblivious to the fact that an nmake build can take around five times longer than an IDE build. why do you use nmake and not msbuild if you do a command line build? msbuild uses the same mechanism the IDE uses, but without the IDE (it's a command line tool). It's basically an xml based make-replacement, and you can easily open your projects in the IDE if you need to, for example for debugging... Pardon me if I am wrong, but AFAICT MSBuild uses its own project file format, and not .vcproj files. This would make it pretty hard to use with CMake... Are you perhaps thinking of vcbuild? -Torsten ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Visual Studio reload projects
gga wrote: KSpam wrote: I agree that this is a Visual Studio issue; however, I am wondering if anyone knows a workaround. I am not a Windows developer, but I figured that someone on this list would have found a reasonable solution. Sure. Don't use Visual Studio. Stick to nmake and a good editor like emacs. You'll be a happier person in the long run. I, too, use Emacs. However, do not be oblivious to the fact that an nmake build can take around five times longer than an IDE build. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: RE: [CMake] Location of ui and moc generated files (qt)
Maik Keller mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Torsten. I just tested it, and it seems to work with
CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR. Would it be possible to provide me with
your implementation of the AIS_MOC macro as well?
Here it is:
# Run Qt MOC on a C++ header file.
# Arguments:
#1-N Names of headerfiles
MACRO(AIS_MOC)
FOREACH (it ${ARGN})
# Make .h filename absolute
GET_FILENAME_COMPONENT(infile ${it} ABSOLUTE)
# Build x_moc.cpp filename
GET_FILENAME_COMPONENT(outfile ${it} NAME_WE)
SET(outfile ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/${outfile}_moc.cpp)
# Run MOC
ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(OUTPUT ${outfile}
COMMAND ${QT_MOC_EXECUTABLE}
ARGS ${infile} -o ${outfile}
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}
DEPENDS ${infile}
COMMENT MOCing ${it})
LIST(APPEND CPP_SOURCE ${outfile})
LIST(APPEND AIS_MOC_SOURCES ${outfile})
ENDFOREACH(it)
ENDMACRO(AIS_MOC)
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Visual Studio solutions
I wrote: when I use the Visual Studio 7 .NET 2003 generator, CMake generates one .vcproj file for each library/application, and one .sln file that contains all the .vcproj files, with appropriate dependencies. So far so good. What I would like in addition is a .sln file for each application, so that a developer working on that application does not have to load the full solution file. Is this possible? Well, it turned out that the reason was simply that I did not have a PROJECT statement in each application's CMakeLists.txt (as Brandon pointed out). With the PROJECT statement, the desired number of .sln files is generated - however, the generated dependencies are not correct. Manuel Klimek let me know that he had implemented a patch to fix this (http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=3218). I have updated the patch for 2.4.7, and I am now deploying the patched version to my group. I hope this patch will be included in the next version. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Post Build Custom Copy Command
Prashanth Udupa wrote:
Since copy does not accept file names of the form
D:/SomeFolder/SomOtherFolder/ and only of the form
D:\SomeFolder\SomOtherFolder\,
the copy command is failing. How can I make this post build command
work?
Use
COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E copy
${MYLIBRARY_SOURCE_DIR}/lib/release/mylib.dll
${MYLIBRARY_SOURCE_DIR}/bin/release
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Get Windows Registry Key!!!! Doesn't work!!!
Berardino la Torre wrote: I'm trying to read an installation path from the windows registry: SET(FBXSDK_ROOT_PATH [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\FBX\\File SDK 2006.11.1;Install_Dir] CACHE PATH FBX) Where did you see documented that this is supposed to work? -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] Visual Studio solutions
Hi, when I use the Visual Studio 7 .NET 2003 generator, CMake generates one .vcproj file for each library/application, and one .sln file that contains all the .vcproj files, with appropriate dependencies. So far so good. What I would like in addition is a .sln file for each application, so that a developer working on that application does not have to load the full solution file. Is this possible? -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Visual Studio solutions
Sylvain Benner mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Torsten Martinsen a écrit : Hi, when I use the Visual Studio 7 .NET 2003 generator, CMake generates one .vcproj file for each library/application, and one .sln file that contains all the .vcproj files, with appropriate dependencies. So far so good. What I would like in addition is a .sln file for each application, so that a developer working on that application does not have to load the full solution file. Is this possible? Hello, As far as i know, CMake generates a global solution AND a solution per project (added with ADD_SUBDIRECTORY). Not for me, it doesn't. -Torsten This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] Visual Studio folders
On 7/24/07, Brandon Van Every wrote:
How can I emulate Add folder MSVS functionality with CMake? I want
to be
able to add a folder without adding another executable or anything
like
that.
Are you looking for something that shows up in the MSVS Solution
Explorer? Perhaps you want the SOURCE_GROUP command.
On a related note, is it possible to use variables as an argument to the
SOURCE_GROUP command? I.e. something like
SOURCE_GROUP(Generated Header Files
FILES
${UIC_HEADERS}
)
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
[CMake] VC7.1 project files and /TP
Hi,
I have a library that contains both C++ and C files. For various
reasons, the C files must be compiled as C++. In my CMakeLists.txt file
I have
IF(OPT_DEST_VISUALSTUDIO)
ADD_DEFINITIONS(-TP)
ENDIF(OPT_DEST_VISUALSTUDIO)
This works fine for NMake Makefiles output, but for Visual Studio 7
.NET 2003 the C files are always compiled with /TP (and in the project
file, Compile As is set to Compile as C Code (/TC). Looking at
cmLocalVisualStudio7Generator.cxx, it looks as if this is indeed
hardcoded:
if(strcmp(linkLanguage, C) == 0)
{
flags += /TC ;
}
if(strcmp(linkLanguage, CXX) == 0)
{
flags += /TP ;
}
I have also tried
SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(
${C_SOURCE}
PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -TP)
with the same (lack of) result. Any ideas?
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
RE: [CMake] VC7.1 project files and /TP
Bill Hoffman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES( ${C_SOURCE} PROPERTIES LANGUAGE CXX)
It should work in 2.4.7, but the docs for 2.4.7 have not been updated
to include this, but the code has it.
Thanks, that seems to work perfectly.
-Torsten
This e-mail and any files sent with it contain information that may be
privileged or confidential and is the property of the GateHouse Group. This
information is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy, disseminate, distribute, or use the message or any part thereof. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete all copies of this message. In accordance with GateHouse Security
Policy, e-mails sent or received may be monitored.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
