I do not find it to be a joke, rather than being one of the best out there (if
not THE best).
I tried CLion just 2 weeks ago. It was a nice experience when it came to CMake,
but it’s C++ IntelliSense capabilities seem to be lacking. (Truth be told, I
did try with the experimental MSVC support, so I do plan to revisit CLion once
that is baked.) The thing I did not like about CLion is that it tries to cater
the click-click way of getting a build ready, but does not go all the way (nor
even half the way).
I tried getting a build ready of one „src/Main.cpp” and a „inc/Header.hpp” (I
believe this is the most common source file organization), but I failed to add
the „target_include_directories” statement through the UI. So, if CLion caters
those who wish to add source files through the UI, which even prompts for a
CMake variable to add the source file to, and even follows along the lines of
changing the CMake script when one relocates files through the UI… then why
can’t I set something as simple as an include directory through the UI???
I believe the problem CLion got caught in is that it is very hard (if not
impossible) to wrap a UI around a stateful, imperative language with also
letting the user edit the CMakeLists.txt file. VS had a much easier job with
MSBuild (an XML-based build system), but with CMake, it’s much harder. This was
one of the reasons I suggested roughly a year ago to create an IR for CMake (to
decouple generators from the front-end, and also facilitate IDE interop).
So all in all, I considered VS to be a nicer, more consistent overall
experience than the one in CLion. I have not tried Qt Creator yet (I know it
was among the first to adopt cmake-server), but will do soon, as I will also
revisit CLion once they call the MSVC experience baked.
ps.: I found it strange that CLion still seems to rely on Codeblock NMake
Makefiles for both executing a build AND also hooking the IntelliSense
experience into the IDE. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought CLion will be
the first to adopt cmake-server.
ps2.: Big brother VS is already at executing builds with Ninja by default.
ps3.: once this (link) issue is fixed in relation to the cmake-tools extension,
I’ll consider VS Code for serious work. It has other nice benefits that big
brother VS does not.
Feladó: Jean-Michaël Celerier
Elküldve: 2017. augusztus 18., péntek 15:37
Címzett: Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc
Másolatot kap: CMake Developers
Tárgy: Re: [cmake-developers] C++ IDE
> Visual Studio 2017 has the best C/C++ experience with CMake
IMHO, Visual Studio's CMake integration is a joke in comparison to QtCreator
and CLion.
---
Jean-Michaël Celerier
http://www.jcelerier.name
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via cmake-developers
wrote:
Impressed with VSCode?? If I saw this post anywhere else than the CMake mailing
list, I’d understand, but VSCode with CMake is horrible. The fact that in 2017
I have to set include directories, compiler definitions and target paths
manually to have proper IntelliSense (Code navigation and syntax higlight) is
absurd.
As far as I saw Visual Studio 2017 has the best C/C++ experience with CMake.
(Google: Visual Studio Open Folder support with CMake)
Feladó: Wesley Smith
Elküldve: 2017. augusztus 10., csütörtök 6:38
Címzett: Ivam Pretti
Másolatot kap: cmake-developers@cmake.org
Tárgy: Re: [cmake-developers] C++ IDE
I have been really impressed with VSCode.
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Ivam Pretti wrote:
Can you recomend an IDE to code in C/C++?
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various service
