Re: Stus-List Landfall 42 sails

2017-06-29 Thread Russ & Melody via CnC-List

Hi Gary,

It's important to be really honest with yourself 
at this time, of sail contemplation.


For the question of: Do you want to sail fast? The answer is invariably: Yes!

But you will be lead astray if your sailmaker 
doesn't ask questions like, "Will the helmsman be 
adjusting for changes in apparent wind?" or maybe 
"Do you want the boat to be forgiving?"
Sailing fast is mostly dependant on the helmsman, 
for obvious reasons. So if you or your people 
don't sail with eyes glued to the tell-tales then 
get a soft entry jib and be faster much of the 
time. A fine entry is harsh sail if you're not paying attention.


Now be really honest... are you going to bash to 
weather a lot? If not then that high clew jib is 
a gem. For she is mostly self-tending on the jib 
lead when going from a reach to off the quarter. 
Just adjust the sheet, no need to tweak the car 
for max performance. Same with furling. That is 
why those tracks are so short.. set & forget.
Why do think the Yankee jib and stay s'l was 
invented?  Most sailors are inherently lazy.
Come to think of it, if you insist on sailing 
with that stays'l, you should have a high clew 
jib and won't spend much time as close-hauled anyhow.


I like the main with draft forward, lose foot and 
an outhaul car, even for a cruising boat. Good 
shape adjustment with all the strings (halyard, 
outhaul, cunningham & reef) and the ability to 
haul that sucker flat when you have to punch to 
weather just because... even with the motor on.
And it's the only way it will work if the 
sailmaker convinces you to sheet the stays'l inboard and go racing. :)

(BTW, not many sailmakers can cruise.)

Get a gennaker and sock for the light stuff. It's 
tons of fun and stuff it at 10 knots as a rule, until you dare.


Cheers, Russ
Sweet 35 mk-1





At 12:09 PM 29/06/2017, you wrote:

Hi All,

I am in the process of acquiring a new set of sails.

I've had North & Ullman give me quotes and they 
are within US$70 of each other for all three 
sails - furling headsail, furling staysail and 
main for their basic offers. The quoted prices 
are in the range of $6,600 for all three sails.


One of them offered an alternative at $8,200 
which had "better" material for the headsail and staysail options.


As I am a novice sailor I need some assistance please...

The original sail area according to 
Sailboatdata.com 
(http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=2144) 
is as follows:


Original
Main        318 ft2 / 29.5 m2
Foresail   391 ft2 / 36.3 m2
Â
I don't have details on the size of the original Staysail.

Here are the sail area values from the 2 vendors.

Vendor 1
Main        335 ft2 / 31.2 m2
Foresail   558 ft2 / 51.8 m2

Vendor 2
Main        335 ft2 / 31.1 m2
Foresail   466 ft2 / 43.3 m2

Although the area of the main from both vendors 
is similar to the original, the shape of the 
main is different to the original (not the 
current). The boom is shorter and mast (P) is longer than the original.


The original design has a VERY short foresail 
track which is well aft with the resultant 
foresail with a high clew as can be seen from 
the picture at the link. What worries me is that 
both vendors are offering a foresail which is 
significantly larger than the original. How 
would this impact on performance? Will I have 
the foresail partially furled most of the time?


The original staysail was a self-tacking, 
club-footed jib. The proposal from one vendors 
calls for a new track to be installed roughly 
midships and the other believes that I can sheet 
from an existing padeye. Both propose sheeting on the inside of the shrouds.


Both, in discussion, are advocating the headsail 
for reaching and the staysail for beating and heavy weather.


I should add that I intend cruising although a 
little performance certainly wouldn't go amiss :-).


Are there any Landfall 42 owners who could share 
the details of their sail configurations?


Thanks
Gary
___

This list is supported by the generous donations 
of our members. If you wish to make a 
contribution to offset our costs, please go 
to:  https://www.paypal.me/stumurray


All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Landfall 42 sails

2017-06-29 Thread Joe Della Barba via CnC-List
A4 if anyone needs one:

http://www.moyermarine.com/forums/showthread.php?p=107106=1#post107106

 

Joe Della Barba

j...@dellabarba.com  

 

Coquina

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Landfall 42 sails

2017-06-29 Thread Dave via CnC-List
Just bought a new main to year and in the interest of better performance chose 
a "full phrf" club racing sail.   I like it, but if I were to do it again I 
would have a slightly higher clew and maybe a bit shorter hoist.   The clew in 
particular is noticeable as the boom is now lower and within skull-cracking 
distance, it was not with the previous main.

Dave

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Gary Smith  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am in the process of acquiring a new set of sails.
> 
> I've had North & Ullman give me quotes and they are within US$70 of each 
> other for all three sails - furling headsail, furling staysail and main for 
> their basic offers. The quoted prices are in the range of $6,600 for all 
> three sails. 
> 
> One of them offered an alternative at $8,200 which had "better" material for 
> the headsail and staysail options.
> 
> As I am a novice sailor I need some assistance please...
> 
> The original sail area according to Sailboatdata.com 
> (http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=2144) is as follows:
> 
> Original
> Main318 ft2 / 29.5 m2 
> Foresail   391 ft2 / 36.3 m2 
>  
> I don't have details on the size of the original Staysail. 
> 
> Here are the sail area values from the 2 vendors.
> 
> Vendor 1
> Main335 ft2 / 31.2 m2 
> Foresail   558 ft2 / 51.8 m2 
> 
> Vendor 2
> Main335 ft2 / 31.1 m2 
> Foresail   466 ft2 / 43.3 m2 
> 
> Although the area of the main from both vendors is similar to the original, 
> the shape of the main is different to the original (not the current). The 
> boom is shorter and mast (P) is longer than the original.
> 
> The original design has a VERY short foresail track which is well aft with 
> the resultant foresail with a high clew as can be seen from the picture at 
> the link. What worries me is that both vendors are offering a foresail which 
> is significantly larger than the original. How would this impact on 
> performance? Will I have the foresail partially furled most of the time?
> 
> The original staysail was a self-tacking, club-footed jib. The proposal from 
> one vendors calls for a new track to be installed roughly midships and the 
> other believes that I can sheet from an existing padeye. Both propose 
> sheeting on the inside of the shrouds.
> 
> Both, in discussion, are advocating the headsail for reaching and the 
> staysail for beating and heavy weather.
> 
> I should add that I intend cruising although a little performance certainly 
> wouldn't go amiss :-).
> 
> Are there any Landfall 42 owners who could share the details of their sail 
> configurations?
> 
> Thanks
> Gary
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread Josh Muckley via CnC-List
The guy said he was using a DJI Mavic Pro to take the video.

Josh

On Jun 29, 2017 2:45 PM, "Tom Buscaglia via CnC-List" 
wrote:

> That is sweet!
>
> My son got me a Mavic Pro Drone for Christmas and I will have it with me
> at the Northwest RDV.  I'm getting better with it, but there is a lot to
> learn about how to fly and to film with them.  Then all the details on how
> to best edit the raw footage.  It's a lot.
>
> I am still working of flying, filming and sailing in heavy wind at the
> same time.  But, I am doing some pretty cool stuff, so far.
>
> I keep my stuff here, if anyone is interested!
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/37365243@N00/albums/72157684109966246
>
> Tom B
>
> Tom Buscaglia
> SV Alera
> 1990 C 37+/40
> Vashon Island WA
> (206) 463-9200
> www.sv-alera.com
>
>
>
> At 11:14 AM 6/29/2017, you wrote:
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:27:26 -0400
> From: Josh Muckley 
> To: "C List" 
> Subject: Stus-List Drone Video
> Message-ID:
>   gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing.  He searched
> our boat name and then tracked down our web page and email.  He shared the
> video and we put it on our facebook page, how cool!
>
>   https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/
>
> Josh Muckley
> S/V Sea Hawk
> 1989 C 37+
> Solomons, MD
>
> --
>
> Tom Buscaglia
> SV Alera
> 1990 C 37+/40
> Vashon Island WA
> (206) 463-9200
> www.sv-alera.com
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread RANDY via CnC-List
Very cool. A guy in our yacht club drone-filmed the start of a Wednesday night 
race a few weeks back. I've been pestering him for the video but it's not 
available yet. Will post once I get it. 

Cheers, 
Randy Stafford 
S/V Grenadine 
C 30-1 #7 
Ken Caryl, CO 
Commodore, Colorado Sail & Yacht Club ( http://csyc.org ) 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Muckley via CnC-List"  
To: "C List"  
Cc: "Josh Muckley"  
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 11:27:26 AM 
Subject: Stus-List Drone Video 

An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing. He searched our 
boat name and then tracked down our web page and email. He shared the video and 
we put it on our facebook page, how cool! 

https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/ 

Josh Muckley 
S/V Sea Hawk 
1989 C 37+ 
Solomons, MD 


-- 
When security matters. 
http://www.secure-my-email.com 




___ 

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to: 
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray 

All Contributions are greatly appreciated! 

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Landfall 42 sails

2017-06-29 Thread Charles Nelson via CnC-List
As one who spent about 85% of your 3 sail quote for 1 North 3Di 155% headsail, 
I am blown away that you can get 3 for what you were quoted !!!
 
Charlie Nelson
Water Phantom
1995 C 36 XL/kcb

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Gary Smith via CnC-List  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am in the process of acquiring a new set of sails.
> 
> I've had North & Ullman give me quotes and they are within US$70 of each 
> other for all three sails - furling headsail, furling staysail and main for 
> their basic offers. The quoted prices are in the range of $6,600 for all 
> three sails. 
> 
> One of them offered an alternative at $8,200 which had "better" material for 
> the headsail and staysail options.
> 
> As I am a novice sailor I need some assistance please...
> 
> The original sail area according to Sailboatdata.com 
> (http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=2144) is as follows:
> 
> Original
> Main318 ft2 / 29.5 m2 
> Foresail   391 ft2 / 36.3 m2 
>  
> I don't have details on the size of the original Staysail. 
> 
> Here are the sail area values from the 2 vendors.
> 
> Vendor 1
> Main335 ft2 / 31.2 m2 
> Foresail   558 ft2 / 51.8 m2 
> 
> Vendor 2
> Main335 ft2 / 31.1 m2 
> Foresail   466 ft2 / 43.3 m2 
> 
> Although the area of the main from both vendors is similar to the original, 
> the shape of the main is different to the original (not the current). The 
> boom is shorter and mast (P) is longer than the original.
> 
> The original design has a VERY short foresail track which is well aft with 
> the resultant foresail with a high clew as can be seen from the picture at 
> the link. What worries me is that both vendors are offering a foresail which 
> is significantly larger than the original. How would this impact on 
> performance? Will I have the foresail partially furled most of the time?
> 
> The original staysail was a self-tacking, club-footed jib. The proposal from 
> one vendors calls for a new track to be installed roughly midships and the 
> other believes that I can sheet from an existing padeye. Both propose 
> sheeting on the inside of the shrouds.
> 
> Both, in discussion, are advocating the headsail for reaching and the 
> staysail for beating and heavy weather.
> 
> I should add that I intend cruising although a little performance certainly 
> wouldn't go amiss :-).
> 
> Are there any Landfall 42 owners who could share the details of their sail 
> configurations?
> 
> Thanks
> Gary
> ___
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Landfall 42 sails

2017-06-29 Thread Joel Aronson via CnC-List
Gary,

I've been main sail shopping for my Hylas 44.  Better sailcloth pays off in
the long run.  I would not buy a base cross-cut sail.  I ended up with a
triradial main from Bacon Sails made with a high quality cloth from
Bainbridge.  It was 1/2 the price of a similar sail from North.  If I had
the money I would have gotten a HydraNet radial.

A larger gennie will help you a little in light air, but will be a bear if
the wind picks up.  It depends where you sail, how important an extra tenth
of a knot is to you etc.

Good luck!

Joel

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Gary Smith via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am in the process of acquiring a new set of sails.
>
> I've had North & Ullman give me quotes and they are within US$70 of each
> other for all three sails - furling headsail, furling staysail and main for
> their basic offers. The quoted prices are in the range of $6,600 for all
> three sails.
>
> One of them offered an alternative at $8,200 which had "better" material
> for the headsail and staysail options.
>
> As I am a novice sailor I need some assistance please...
>
> The original sail area according to Sailboatdata.com (
> http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=2144) is as follows:
>
> Original
> Main318 ft2 / 29.5 m2
> Foresail   391 ft2 / 36.3 m2
>
> I don't have details on the size of the original Staysail.
>
> Here are the sail area values from the 2 vendors.
>
> Vendor 1
> Main335 ft2 / 31.2 m2
> Foresail   558 ft2 / 51.8 m2
>
> Vendor 2
> Main335 ft2 / 31.1 m2
> Foresail   466 ft2 / 43.3 m2
>
> Although the area of the main from both vendors is similar to the
> original, the shape of the main is different to the original (not the
> current). The boom is shorter and mast (P) is longer than the original.
>
> The original design has a VERY short foresail track which is well aft with
> the resultant foresail with a high clew as can be seen from the picture at
> the link. What worries me is that both vendors are offering a foresail
> which is significantly larger than the original. How would this impact on
> performance? Will I have the foresail partially furled most of the time?
>
> The original staysail was a self-tacking, club-footed jib. The proposal
> from one vendors calls for a new track to be installed roughly midships and
> the other believes that I can sheet from an existing padeye. Both propose
> sheeting on the inside of the shrouds.
>
> Both, in discussion, are advocating the headsail for reaching and the
> staysail for beating and heavy weather.
>
> I should add that I intend cruising although a little performance
> certainly wouldn't go amiss :-).
>
> Are there any Landfall 42 owners who could share the details of their sail
> configurations?
>
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Stus-List Landfall 42 sails

2017-06-29 Thread Gary Smith via CnC-List
Hi All,

I am in the process of acquiring a new set of sails.

I've had North & Ullman give me quotes and they are within US$70 of each
other for all three sails - furling headsail, furling staysail and main for
their basic offers. The quoted prices are in the range of $6,600 for all
three sails.

One of them offered an alternative at $8,200 which had "better" material
for the headsail and staysail options.

As I am a novice sailor I need some assistance please...

The original sail area according to Sailboatdata.com (
http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=2144) is as follows:

Original
Main318 ft2 / 29.5 m2
Foresail   391 ft2 / 36.3 m2

I don't have details on the size of the original Staysail.

Here are the sail area values from the 2 vendors.

Vendor 1
Main335 ft2 / 31.2 m2
Foresail   558 ft2 / 51.8 m2

Vendor 2
Main335 ft2 / 31.1 m2
Foresail   466 ft2 / 43.3 m2

Although the area of the main from both vendors is similar to the original,
the shape of the main is different to the original (not the current). The
boom is shorter and mast (P) is longer than the original.

The original design has a VERY short foresail track which is well aft with
the resultant foresail with a high clew as can be seen from the picture at
the link. What worries me is that both vendors are offering a foresail
which is significantly larger than the original. How would this impact on
performance? Will I have the foresail partially furled most of the time?

The original staysail was a self-tacking, club-footed jib. The proposal
from one vendors calls for a new track to be installed roughly midships and
the other believes that I can sheet from an existing padeye. Both propose
sheeting on the inside of the shrouds.

Both, in discussion, are advocating the headsail for reaching and the
staysail for beating and heavy weather.

I should add that I intend cruising although a little performance certainly
wouldn't go amiss :-).

Are there any Landfall 42 owners who could share the details of their sail
configurations?

Thanks
Gary
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread Tom Buscaglia via CnC-List

That is sweet!

My son got me a Mavic Pro Drone for Christmas and I will have it with 
me at the Northwest RDV.  I'm getting better with it, but there is a 
lot to learn about how to fly and to film with them.  Then all the 
details on how to best edit the raw footage.  It's a lot.


I am still working of flying, filming and sailing in heavy wind at 
the same time.  But, I am doing some pretty cool stuff, so far.


I keep my stuff here, if anyone is interested! 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37365243@N00/albums/72157684109966246


Tom B

Tom Buscaglia
SV Alera
1990 C 37+/40
Vashon Island WA
(206) 463-9200
www.sv-alera.com



At 11:14 AM 6/29/2017, you wrote:


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:27:26 -0400
From: Josh Muckley 
To: "C List" 
Subject: Stus-List Drone Video
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing.  He searched
our boat name and then tracked down our web page and email.  He shared the
video and we put it on our facebook page, how cool!

 https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/

Josh Muckley
S/V Sea Hawk
1989 C 37+
Solomons, MD

--


Tom Buscaglia
SV Alera
1990 C 37+/40
Vashon Island WA
(206) 463-9200
www.sv-alera.com
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Paragon Transmission Repair

2017-06-29 Thread Dreuge via CnC-List
Hi,

Give the folks at Transmission Marine, Inc in Fort Lauderdale, FL a call.   
These folks specialize in Paragon repairs, rebuilds, and parts.  I have 
purchased  replacement paragon parts from them and found the prices very 
reasonable.I have also called them a few times and had pleasant chats on 
issues from types of transmission oils to basic transmission adjustments and 
rebuilds.The Paragon transmissions are pretty basic so you may be able to 
do the work yourself.

Recall that the LF38 use a combo Paragon transmission with a Walter V-drive.  
Are you sure that it is the Paragon that is leaking?  I was told by the folks 
at TMI to carefully align the prop shaft collar to the v-drive as a 
misalignment will cause undue wear on the V-drive shaft seal resulting in a 
leaking V-drive unit.

Also, below is a link to my write up on adjusting the Paragon. It does not 
discuss leaks but it does have photos of the Paragon internals.

http://svjohannarose.blogspot.com/2016/03/paragon-transmission-slippage.html

-
Paul E.
1981 C 38 Landfall 
S/V Johanna Rose
Fort Walton Beach, FL

http://svjohannarose.blogspot.com/

> On Jun 29, 2017, at 12:00 PM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote:
> 
> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 06:59:20 -0700
> From: "Frank" >
> To: "List Stus" >
> Subject: Stus-List Paragon Transmission Repair
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> The Paragon transmission in my C 38LF is leaking about 1/2 pint of oil in 
> four running hours.
> Doesn?t leak when not running.
> Does anyone know of a repair facility that works on the old Paragon 
> transmissions?
> The data plate on the transmission indicates: 9844 SAOD Z-7970.
> Thanks,
> 
> Frank Noragon
> S/V: Cool Change
> C 38LF, s/n: 001
> Rose City Yacht Club
> Portland, Oregon

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread Joel Aronson via CnC-List
Very cool!

The BoatPix helicopter got The Office one day.  Not free, but it was worth
it!

Joel

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:46 PM, James Bibb via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Beautiful Video
>
> James Bibb
> S/V Darwin’s Folly
> 1990 C 34/36R
>
>
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
> An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing.  He searched
> our boat name and then tracked down our web page and email.  He shared the
> video and we put it on our facebook page, how cool!
>
>  https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/
>
> Josh Muckley
> S/V Sea Hawk
> 1989 C 37+
> Solomons, MD
>
>
> --
> When security matters.
> http://www.secure-my-email.com
>
>
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread Edd Schillay via CnC-List
Josh,

Great video and such a beautiful boat! Those 37+ owners must be a really 
special breed. 

All the best,

Edd


Edd M. Schillay
Starship Enterprise
C 37+ | Sail No: NCC-1701-B
City Island, NY 
Starship Enterprise's Captain's Log 

> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List 
>> > wrote:
>> 
>> An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing.  He searched 
>> our boat name and then tracked down our web page and email.  He shared the 
>> video and we put it on our facebook page, how cool!
>> 
>>  https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/ 
>> 
>> 
>> Josh Muckley
>> S/V Sea Hawk
>> 1989 C 37+
>> Solomons, MD
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> When security matters.
>> http://www.secure-my-email.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread James Bibb via CnC-List
Beautiful Video

James Bibb
S/V Darwin’s Folly
1990 C 34/36R


> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List 
>  wrote:
> 
> An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing.  He searched our 
> boat name and then tracked down our web page and email.  He shared the video 
> and we put it on our facebook page, how cool!
> 
>  https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/ 
> 
> 
> Josh Muckley
> S/V Sea Hawk
> 1989 C 37+
> Solomons, MD
> 
> 
> -- 
> When security matters.
> http://www.secure-my-email.com 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish 
> to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Paragon Transmission Repair

2017-06-29 Thread svpegasus38 via CnC-List
Harbor marine in Everett wa  has a guy there that is an expert on the old 
paragon. (425) 259-3285 Not a lot to those old transmission as far as seals go. 
Can you see where it leaks at? Might just need a new shaft seal. The vee drive 
unit pops right off after removing a few bolts. 


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE DeviceDoug Mountjoy POYC Pegasus Lf38 Significant 
Other LF39 
 Original message From: Frank via CnC-List 
 Date: 6/29/17  06:59  (GMT-08:00) To: List Stus 
 Cc: Frank  Subject: Stus-List Paragon 
Transmission Repair 



The Paragon 
transmission in my C 38LF is leaking about 1/2 pint of oil in four running 
hours.
Doesn’t leak 
when not running.
Does anyone 
know of a repair facility that works on the old Paragon transmissions?
The data 
plate on the transmission indicates: 9844 SAOD Z-7970.
Thanks,

Frank 
Noragon
S/V: Cool Change
C 38LF, s/n: 001
Rose City Yacht 
Club
Portland, Oregon

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Stus-List Drone Video

2017-06-29 Thread Josh Muckley via CnC-List
An amateur drone pilot spotted us while we were out sailing.  He searched
our boat name and then tracked down our web page and email.  He shared the
video and we put it on our facebook page, how cool!

 https://www.facebook.com/cbcsailing/videos/700045376848423/

Josh Muckley
S/V Sea Hawk
1989 C 37+
Solomons, MD


-- 
When security matters.
http://www.secure-my-email.com
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Paragon Transmission Repair

2017-06-29 Thread ALAN BERGEN via CnC-List
Frank:

Call Norm Gustafson (c) (360) 823-6357.  If he can't do it, he may know
someone who can.

Alan

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Frank via CnC-List 
wrote:

> The Paragon transmission in my C 38LF is leaking about 1/2 pint of oil
> in four running hours.
> Doesn’t leak when not running.
> Does anyone know of a repair facility that works on the old Paragon
> transmissions?
> The data plate on the transmission indicates: 9844 SAOD Z-7970.
> Thanks,
>
> Frank Noragon
> S/V: Cool Change
> C 38LF, s/n: 001
> Rose City Yacht Club
> Portland, Oregon
>
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.
> paypal.me_stumurray=DwICAg=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN
> 0H8p7CSfnc_gI=9w3G7Cf8YfQnrjmtuNxwDJYr3JMv9f1pAfgAJ9xXYQQ=
> dGOIqID5astvnV9gmb6h8HiYppKB2-wbj3imcclmJAk=
> jJtIyr7StBmWrXKyLEIyM5zL7WTPtsXEabU31Hmgfuw=
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>


-- 
Alan Bergen
35 Mk III Thirsty
Rose City YC
Portland, OR
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Stus-List Paragon Transmission Repair

2017-06-29 Thread Frank via CnC-List
The Paragon transmission in my C 38LF is leaking about 1/2 pint of oil in 
four running hours.
Doesn’t leak when not running.
Does anyone know of a repair facility that works on the old Paragon 
transmissions?
The data plate on the transmission indicates: 9844 SAOD Z-7970.
Thanks,

Frank Noragon
S/V: Cool Change
C 38LF, s/n: 001
Rose City Yacht Club
Portland, Oregon

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List NMEA 2k wind instrument problem

2017-06-29 Thread Gary Russell via CnC-List
My chart plotter (B Zeus2) has a setup mode where is checks the network
and lists the devices it "sees" and shows their current status.  Perhaps,
the Garmin has the same capability.

Gary
S/V Kaylarah
'90 C 37+
East Greenwich, RI, USA

~~~_/)~~


On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Chris Hickey via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> I've got a NMEA 2k network aboard my C 30, including a Garmin GWS 10
> wind sensor at the top of the mast. Everything was working well at the end
> of last season, but when I launched and stepped my mast this spring I found
> that the wind speed/direction was not appearing on my instruments. The
> other components (depth, sea temp, speed) appear to be working fine. The
> mast cable attached to the network with a field installable connector and
> I've rechecked those connections and they look good. I've also tried a
> different tee connector to make sure that wasn't the problem, but still no
> luck.
>
> Are there any other tests or diagnostics I can run to determine the root
> of the problem without having to send someone up the mast? I'm guessing the
> possibilities are either a bad connection between the mast cable and wind
> sensor or a failure of the sensor itself, but I'm open to any tips or
> suggestions you might have!
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> SV Seeker - C 30
> Holyrood, NL
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Looking for used RF Headsail of 34

2017-06-29 Thread SEAN CONNER via CnC-List
Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses.  I was able to complete a 
trade with a fellow lister, but appreciate all the other info that was shared.  
  This is list is invaluable.. sending Stu more $$

Sean Conner

C 34 #134- LADYHAWKE

> On June 20, 2017 at 6:38 AM SEAN CONNER  wrote:
> 
> 
> Had a beautiful day sailing off the coast of NH the other day in 15kts, 
> but unfortunately we blew out our aging genoa.   Wondering if any 34 owners 
> have a good-very good Roller Furling genoa that you might be looking to sell. 
>   I'm looking for something between 130-155%.   I'm willing to pay up to $750 
> and have a couple of spinnakers (.6 and .75) that I might be willing to 
> trade.  Thanks for the consideration.
> 
> Sean Conner
> 
> C 34 #134, LADYHAWKE
> 
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List NMEA 2k wind instrument problem

2017-06-29 Thread SEAN CONNER via CnC-List
I've been working to trouble shoot a similar problem but with the wireless 
GWind on my NM2K network.  I believe I am getting a voltage drop to the 
network, but haven't been able to figure out how to fix it.  For example, I'll 
have only my house battery on and then I lose wind readings on the instrument.  
When I switch to BOTH batteries the wind speed readings resume.   As best as I 
can tell the voltage is dropping down to 11.7 volts when the reading stops.   
I've calcualted the load on the network per the NMEA 2000 specs and I think I 
am ok there.   


So maybe check your voltage on the network as well..  I've enclosed a link to 
my poor mans network diagram in case it might help anyone else. 


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9BpHJkI7AfnRjUzaWVvOHJ1MUE/view?usp=sharing


Sean Conner

C 34 #134 - LADYHAWKE


> 
> Message: 4Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:38:56 -0400
> From: Donald Sebastian 
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List NMEA 2k wind instrument problem
> Message-ID: <7f510942-7282-453e-ae25-3613e24d4...@me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Double check the installation instructions closely and follow each step 
> when it comes to setting up the control panel. When I set it up, wind was not 
> showing as well but everything else was, so I re climbed the mast several 
> times double checking every connection and found you just had to specify for 
> it to show in the panel.
> 
> I?ll glance at the control panel later and send you a picture of the 
> location to set it in the panel. It slightly confusing and I think something 
> they are aware of because there was special note in the instructions to 
> connect the wind sensor in a different method than the other sensors.
> 
> Donald
> 
> > > 
> > On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Chris Hickey via CnC-List 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > I've got a NMEA 2k network aboard my C 30, including a Garmin GWS 
> > 10 wind sensor at the top of the mast. Everything was working well at the 
> > end of last season, but when I launched and stepped my mast this spring I 
> > found that the wind speed/direction was not appearing on my instruments. 
> > The other components (depth, sea temp, speed) appear to be working fine. 
> > The mast cable attached to the network with a field installable connector 
> > and I've rechecked those connections and they look good. I've also tried a 
> > different tee connector to make sure that wasn't the problem, but still no 
> > luck.
> > 
> > Are there any other tests or diagnostics I can run to determine the 
> > root of the problem without having to send someone up the mast? I'm 
> > guessing the possibilities are either a bad connection between the mast 
> > cable and wind sensor or a failure of the sensor itself, but I'm open to 
> > any tips or suggestions you might have!
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> > SV Seeker - C 30
> > Holyrood, NL
> > 
> > > 
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!