Stus-List Re: Putting our C 36 up for sale

[Adam Hayden via CnC-List]

And that's Canadian.  So an even better deal.

Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada’s largest network.

From: Wade Glew via CnC-List 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 10:48:57 PM
To: Stus-List 
Cc: Wade Glew 
Subject: Stus-List Re: Putting our C 36 up for sale

That's a lot of boat for 28k.  Wish I lived in NS!
Wade
Oh Boy C 33 MKII

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, 19:56 Adam Hayden via CnC-List, 
mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote:
Hey listers

After some careful consideration we have decided to list State of Bliss for 
sale.  We are going to follow Edd's plan and move to the dark side.  We have 
done almost a full refurbishment over the past 5 years.

If you know if anyone that is looking for a great cruiser/Racer pass along the 
listing.   Great price at $28,000 cdn.


https://www.kijiji.ca/v-sailboat/new-glasgow-ns/great-sailboat-c-c36-for-sale/1588943549

Adam Hayden
C 36
Pictou NS

Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada’s largest network.
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: Putting our C 36 up for sale

[Adam Hayden via CnC-List]

Oh I thought Edd bought a powerboat.  My bad 



Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada’s largest network.

From: Joel Delamirande via CnC-List 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 10:29:33 PM
To: Stus-List 
Cc: Joel Delamirande 
Subject: Stus-List Re: Putting our C 36 up for sale

Nice boat are you buying an rv

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 5:57 PM Adam Hayden via CnC-List 
mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote:
Hey listers

After some careful consideration we have decided to list State of Bliss for 
sale.  We are going to follow Edd's plan and move to the dark side.  We have 
done almost a full refurbishment over the past 5 years.

If you know if anyone that is looking for a great cruiser/Racer pass along the 
listing.   Great price at $28,000 cdn.


https://www.kijiji.ca/v-sailboat/new-glasgow-ns/great-sailboat-c-c36-for-sale/1588943549

Adam Hayden
C 36
Pictou NS

Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada’s largest network.
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu
--
Joel Delamirande
[https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0Bzdvlj_zFQR9UUZyRjFCM0FGejZXeGd5WFVnVTZRb0Y0Q1lZ=download=0-m6CKM9KPXYGNJ4zhsVYBxQ]
www.jdroofing.ca

Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: Putting our C 36 up for sale

[Joel Delamirande via CnC-List]

Nice boat are you buying an rv

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 5:57 PM Adam Hayden via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Hey listers
>
> After some careful consideration we have decided to list State of Bliss
> for sale.  We are going to follow Edd's plan and move to the dark side.  We
> have done almost a full refurbishment over the past 5 years.
>
> If you know if anyone that is looking for a great cruiser/Racer pass along
> the listing.   Great price at $28,000 cdn.
>
>
>
> https://www.kijiji.ca/v-sailboat/new-glasgow-ns/great-sailboat-c-c36-for-sale/1588943549
>
> Adam Hayden
> C 36
> Pictou NS
>
> Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada’s largest network.
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu

-- 
Joel Delamirande
*www.jdroofing.ca *
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Putting our C 36 up for sale

[Adam Hayden via CnC-List]

Hey listers

After some careful consideration we have decided to list State of Bliss for 
sale.  We are going to follow Edd's plan and move to the dark side.  We have 
done almost a full refurbishment over the past 5 years.

If you know if anyone that is looking for a great cruiser/Racer pass along the 
listing.   Great price at $28,000 cdn.


https://www.kijiji.ca/v-sailboat/new-glasgow-ns/great-sailboat-c-c36-for-sale/1588943549

Adam Hayden
C 36
Pictou NS

Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada’s largest network.
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

[dwight veinot via CnC-List]

They were building lots of other designs too: 24’s, 25’s 26’s 27’s 29’s and
on. Busy little company really making quality boats.

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:41 PM Gary Nylander via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> In the case of the 30-1, from the numbers I have heard of, I don’t think
> there were skips. I have #593, and it was built in late 1980. From the ones
> numbered in the high 200’s which were built in 1974, that gives them six
> years to build 300 boats – 50 a year. One per week? Does not seem to be out
> of line.
>
>
>
> Gary
>
> St. Michaels Maryland
>
>
>
> *From:* cenelson via CnC-List 
> *Sent:* Friday, October 8, 2021 9:37 AM
> *To:* Stus-List 
> *Cc:* cenelson 
> *Subject:* Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers
>
>
>
> Has it been determined that C never skipped some hull numbers as
> different modifications to say a 30 Mk I were incorporated.
>
>
>
> In that case perhaps hull number 129 was followed by hull #200 which was
> the same ‘model’ but incorporated a new/improved something or other.
>
>
>
> Skipping numbers in a sequence is not unheard of in many industries.
>
>
>
> Charlie Nelson
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
> 
>
> On Friday, October 8, 2021, 9:03 AM, dwight veinot via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
> I think 351 C 35 MKI and MK II combined. Only 147 MKII’s and 204 MKl’s.
> And the marine carpenters did real nice teak work back in the mid 70’s and
> the hulls are thick solid polyester resin with glass fibre. No coring like
> balsa below the toe rail. Heavy and tough yet sleek looking and fast. No
> characteristic sword and dagger but unmistakable C quality.  I love the
> shear lines of my MKII and the extensive teak carpentry below decks.
> However, Considering the work required nowadays and the type of sailing I
> enjoy, I think I would trade my 35MKII for a good 30 MKI with diesel
> auxiliary power.
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:53 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
> I have a 1973 C 35 Mk I, so in 73 they were not on MK IIs yet. I am hull
> number 179. The number of boats they built seems inconceivable today and
> they weren’t cheap, we paid more for our USED 35 than we did for our house!
>
>
>
> Joe
>
> Coquina
>
>
>
> *From:* dwight veinot via CnC-List 
> *Sent:* Friday, October 8, 2021 5:37 AM
> *To:* Stus-List 
> *Cc:* dwight veinot 
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers
>
>
>
> I think you got it right. The C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my
> experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot
> of boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure
> if there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the
> C line and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you
> got a good one.
>
>
>
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu
>
> --
>
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --  https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> Thanks - Stu
>
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

[Gary Nylander via CnC-List]

In the case of the 30-1, from the numbers I have heard of, I don’t think there 
were skips. I have #593, and it was built in late 1980. From the ones numbered 
in the high 200’s which were built in 1974, that gives them six years to build 
300 boats – 50 a year. One per week? Does not seem to be out of line.

 

Gary

St. Michaels Maryland

 

From: cenelson via CnC-List  
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 9:37 AM
To: Stus-List 
Cc: cenelson 
Subject: Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

 

Has it been determined that C never skipped some hull numbers as different 
modifications to say a 30 Mk I were incorporated.

 

In that case perhaps hull number 129 was followed by hull #200 which was the 
same ‘model’ but incorporated a new/improved something or other.

 

Skipping numbers in a sequence is not unheard of in many industries.

 

Charlie Nelson

 




Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS 
 

On Friday, October 8, 2021, 9:03 AM, dwight veinot via CnC-List 
mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > wrote:

I think 351 C 35 MKI and MK II combined. Only 147 MKII’s and 204 MKl’s.  And 
the marine carpenters did real nice teak work back in the mid 70’s and the 
hulls are thick solid polyester resin with glass fibre. No coring like balsa 
below the toe rail. Heavy and tough yet sleek looking and fast. No 
characteristic sword and dagger but unmistakable C quality.  I love the shear 
lines of my MKII and the extensive teak carpentry below decks. However, 
Considering the work required nowadays and the type of sailing I enjoy, I think 
I would trade my 35MKII for a good 30 MKI with diesel auxiliary power. 

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:53 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List 
mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > wrote:

I have a 1973 C 35 Mk I, so in 73 they were not on MK IIs yet. I am hull 
number 179. The number of boats they built seems inconceivable today and they 
weren’t cheap, we paid more for our USED 35 than we did for our house!

 

Joe

Coquina

 

From: dwight veinot via CnC-List mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 5:37 AM
To: Stus-List mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> >
Cc: dwight veinot mailto:dwight...@gmail.com> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

 

I think you got it right. The C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my 
experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot of 
boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure if 
there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the C line 
and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you got a good 
one. 

 

Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

-- 

Sent from Gmail Mobile

Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --  https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  
 Thanks - Stu

Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: leeward layline

[Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List]

We always had the concept of a funnel with the narrow end at the mark, even if 
you are on a hot angle, if you get too far off the ruhmline  too close to the 
mark and the wind shifts, you are hosed.

Joe
Coquina
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: leeward layline

[Jeff Nelson via CnC-List]

I'll be interested in your geometry review.  Seems to me both of those 
(certainly the latter) would put you directly
upwind of the mark.  Which in most cases would not be the layline, 
unless you are going dead down wind.
I would think that if your course was 10 deg and TWA was 180, Then the 
layline would be when the mark bearing
was (170-TWA) Mod(360) or 190 - TWA as you're able to sail 10 deg off 
dead down wind and therefore gybing through 20 deg.

Food for thought.

I'm assuming when you say masthead is pointing at the mark, you mean the 
back end of the pointer, as I would
imagine the arrow is pointing somewhere aft indicating your apparent 
wind which should be forward of your stern

a bit

Cheers,
   Jeff Nelson
   Muir Caileag
   C 30 - 549
   Armdale Yacht club

On 2021-10-08 12:15 p.m., Bob Mann via CnC-List wrote:
I still need to review the geometry, but I believe that when the 
bearing to the mark is equal to 180-TWA, one has reached the downwind 
layline.  I also found that when the masthead is pointing at the mark, 
that also indicates the layline has been reached.

Bob
On 10/06/2021 11:17 AM Jeff Nelson via CnC-List 
 wrote:

Hmmm...Interesting question.

So, Ed's answer was pretty good, I'll add a few thoughts here:

AW isn't an ideal guide, True wind is what is needed so that you can 
keep the angle to true wind to be constant on

either Gybe, assuming you know what the best angle is.
If you can find polar's for your boat, they will give you an idea of 
ideal.
As Ed mentioned, VMG is your friend in determining what the best 
angle is (especially if no polars are available).
You can experiment in different wind speeds to find a reasonably good 
angle for windspeed and VMG.


Here's a good article to get you thinking:
http://www.oceansail.co.uk/Articles/VMGArticle.php

Hope this helps.
Jeff Nelson
Muir Caileag
C 30 549
Armdale Yacht Club

On 2021-10-06 12:02 p.m., Bob Mann via CnC-List wrote:
I'm fairly new to flying a spinnaker.  I did it last weekend in a 
race and I believe I overstood the mark as we were sailing 110 AW 
before the gybe and 85 AW heading directly to the mark.

How does one determine when to gybe?
Bob

Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --https://www.paypal.me/stumurray   Thanks - Stu



 
	Virus-free. www.avast.com 
 



Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help 
with the costs involved. If you want to show your support to the list 
- use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray 
Thanks - Stu 


Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --https://www.paypal.me/stumurray   Thanks - Stu



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: leeward layline

[Bob Mann via CnC-List]

I still need to review the geometry, but I believe that when the bearing to the 
mark is equal to 180-TWA, one has reached the downwind layline.  I also found 
that when the masthead is pointing at the mark, that also indicates the layline 
has been reached.

Bob

> On 10/06/2021 11:17 AM Jeff Nelson via CnC-List  
> wrote:
>  
>  
> Hmmm...Interesting question.
> 
> So, Ed's answer was pretty good, I'll add a few thoughts here:
> 
> AW isn't an ideal guide, True wind is what is needed so that you can keep 
> the angle to true wind to be constant on
> either Gybe, assuming you know what the best angle is.
> If you can find polar's for your boat, they will give you an idea of 
> ideal.
> As Ed mentioned, VMG is your friend in determining what the best angle is 
> (especially if no polars are available).
> You can experiment in different wind speeds to find a reasonably good 
> angle for windspeed and VMG.
> 
> Here's a good article to get you thinking:
> http://www.oceansail.co.uk/Articles/VMGArticle.php
> 
> Hope this helps.
> Jeff Nelson
> Muir Caileag
> C 30 549
> Armdale Yacht Club
> 
> On 2021-10-06 12:02 p.m., Bob Mann via CnC-List wrote:
> 
> > > I'm fairly new to flying a spinnaker.  I did it last 
> weekend in a race and I believe I overstood the mark as we were sailing 110 
> AW before the gybe and 85 AW heading directly to the mark.
> >  
> > How does one determine when to gybe?
> >  
> > Bob
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to 
> > help with the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list 
> > - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  
> > Thanks - Stu
> > 
> > > 
>  
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient
> Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help 
> with the costs involved. If you want to show your support to the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray Thanks - Stu
> 
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

[cenelson via CnC-List]

Has it been determined that C never skipped some hull numbers as different 
modifications to say a 30 Mk I were incorporated.
In that case perhaps hull number 129 was followed by hull #200 which was the 
same ‘model’ but incorporated a new/improved something or other.
Skipping numbers in a sequence is not unheard of in many industries.
Charlie Nelson




Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS


On Friday, October 8, 2021, 9:03 AM, dwight veinot via CnC-List 
 wrote:

I think 351 C 35 MKI and MK II combined. Only 147 MKII’s and 204 MKl’s.  And 
the marine carpenters did real nice teak work back in the mid 70’s and the 
hulls are thick solid polyester resin with glass fibre. No coring like balsa 
below the toe rail. Heavy and tough yet sleek looking and fast. No 
characteristic sword and dagger but unmistakable C quality.  I love the shear 
lines of my MKII and the extensive teak carpentry below decks. However, 
Considering the work required nowadays and the type of sailing I enjoy, I think 
I would trade my 35MKII for a good 30 MKI with diesel auxiliary power. On Fri, 
Oct 8, 2021 at 8:53 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List  
wrote:


I have a 1973 C 35 Mk I, so in 73 they were not on MK IIs yet. I am hull 
number 179. The number of boats they built seems inconceivable today and they 
weren’t cheap, we paid more for our USED 35 than we did for our house!

 

Joe

Coquina

 

From: dwight veinot via CnC-List 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 5:37 AM
To: Stus-List 
Cc: dwight veinot 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

 

I think you got it right. The C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my 
experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot of 
boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure if 
there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the C line 
and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you got a good 
one. 

 
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu
-- 
Sent from Gmail MobileThanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the 
list to help with the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the 
list - use PayPal to send contribution --  https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  
Thanks - Stu


Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

[dwight veinot via CnC-List]

I think 351 C 35 MKI and MK II combined. Only 147 MKII’s and 204 MKl’s.
And the marine carpenters did real nice teak work back in the mid 70’s and
the hulls are thick solid polyester resin with glass fibre. No coring like
balsa below the toe rail. Heavy and tough yet sleek looking and fast. No
characteristic sword and dagger but unmistakable C quality.  I love the
shear lines of my MKII and the extensive teak carpentry below decks.
However, Considering the work required nowadays and the type of sailing I
enjoy, I think I would trade my 35MKII for a good 30 MKI with diesel
auxiliary power.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:53 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> I have a 1973 C 35 Mk I, so in 73 they were not on MK IIs yet. I am hull
> number 179. The number of boats they built seems inconceivable today and
> they weren’t cheap, we paid more for our USED 35 than we did for our house!
>
>
>
> Joe
>
> Coquina
>
>
>
> *From:* dwight veinot via CnC-List 
> *Sent:* Friday, October 8, 2021 5:37 AM
> *To:* Stus-List 
> *Cc:* dwight veinot 
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers
>
>
>
> I think you got it right. The C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my
> experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot
> of boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure
> if there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the
> C line and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you
> got a good one.
>
>
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

[Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List]

I have a 1973 C 35 Mk I, so in 73 they were not on MK IIs yet. I am hull 
number 179. The number of boats they built seems inconceivable today and they 
weren’t cheap, we paid more for our USED 35 than we did for our house!

Joe
Coquina

From: dwight veinot via CnC-List 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 5:37 AM
To: Stus-List 
Cc: dwight veinot 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

I think you got it right. The C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my 
experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot of 
boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure if 
there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the C line 
and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you got a good 
one.

Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers

[dwight veinot via CnC-List]

I think you got it right. The C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my
experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot
of boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure
if there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the
C line and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you
got a good one.

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:14 PM andrew_m--- via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Hi! I’m the proud owner of a C 30 mk1 with HIN CCY302810474. I’m trying
> to work out what hull number I have. From what I’ve googled the “0474”
> tells me she was built in April of 1974, the “CCY30” tells me she’s a C
> 30 mk1, and the “281” says she’s hull number 281 ??? April 1974 seems a
> little early in the production run to have made 280 boats. Can anyone help
> me decode the HIN?
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu