Stus-List Chainplates
Hi all, I'm about to start rebedding some of my deck hardware on my C 33 mkii (1986) and have moved onto the chainplates. Inside the boat, there is a tie rod that is connected to the hull and runs up to an aluminum block on the underside of the deck. The block is directly under the chainplate; the block and plate are connected by 4 bolts that go through the deck. It is my understanding that the tie rod has a head that is inside the block and that one can rotate the rod to tighten or loosen it and the head just turns on the aluminum. Here are my questions: The starboard tie rod moves slightly if I really pull on it. Can I tighten it up just by turning it? Also, the nuts holding the block to the chainplate are not very tight. Presumably they shouldn't be too tight or that could crush the deck. Does anyone know how much they should be tightened? Right now they are not even what I would call "snug". Thanks in advance, Mike Atacama 33mkii Toronto
Stus-List Chainplates
Hi all, I'm rebedding most of my deck hardware this spring and have come to my chainplates. I have a C 33 mkii (1986). Inside the boat, a tie rod runs from the hull up to an aluminum block on the underside of the deck. The chainplate is attached to the aluminum block by 4 bolts. The starboard side tie rod has a bit of movement if I really pull on it. My understanding is that the rod has a head on it that is free to rotate inside the aluminum block. So I should be able to just turn the tie rod to tighten it up a bit. Has anyone done this before? Do I need to first loosen the nuts holding the aluminum block to the chainplate?? Second, I noticed that the nuts on both sides aren't exactly tight. How tight should these nuts be? Presumably not too tight as that might compress the deck too much (??). Thanks in advance for any comments. Mike Atacama Toronto On Sun., Mar. 27, 2022, 1:05 p.m. Stu via CnC-List, wrote: > Spring is here and it will soon be sailing season (well for some > people). Don't forget to get your copy of the Spring Checklist - it is > a lot easier than trying to remember. > > http://cncphotoalbum.com/Spring_Checklist.pdf > > Stu >
Re: Stus-List Chainplates
I see your boat was built in '93 and probably by then C changed methods. Good to know. > On May 6, 2018 at 11:48 AM Brian Fry via CnC-List> wrote: > > I removed my chainplates this winter and was relieved to find no core > material. All solid. > Yes the flange prevents making an easy fix, you do have to remove the > chainplate to get at the material to be removed. On mine, the leaks were more > of an issue with the bolts, not the plate. Still haven't replaced the > chainplates, I am having stainless ones made. Also haven't concluded which > material to use for sealing. I may do butyl on one side and polysulfide on > the other to see which holds up best. > I will say butyl would not cause as much of an issues when removing them > the next time as the caulking did this time. > > > -- > Brian Fry > S/V La Neige > 1993 C 37/40XL > HdG Maryland > ___ > > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each > and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use > PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray > > ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Stus-List Chainplates
I removed my chainplates this winter and was relieved to find no core material. All solid. Yes the flange prevents making an easy fix, you do have to remove the chainplate to get at the material to be removed. On mine, the leaks were more of an issue with the bolts, not the plate. Still haven't replaced the chainplates, I am having stainless ones made. Also haven't concluded which material to use for sealing. I may do butyl on one side and polysulfide on the other to see which holds up best. I will say butyl would not cause as much of an issues when removing them the next time as the caulking did this time. -- Brian Fry S/V La Neige 1993 C 37/40XL HdG Maryland ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Stus-List chainplates
jim watts probably good to check with.believe he had shark before he moved up to current ccif early built shark he will know what to look for in your yachthinterholler sharks in early days used many different metals for chainplateseven aluminum...let us know how it goes.. ___ Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
Re: Stus-List chainplates
Jimmy, you're paying attention. I owned two 1966 Hinterhoeller Sharks, one of them here in salt water, plus our 29-2 (I think) and 35-3 (for sure) came with aluminum chainplates. I'm interested to see what it looks like in there. Jim Watts Paradigm Shift CC 35 Mk III Victoria, BC On 2 June 2015 at 12:41, jimmy kelly via CnC-List cnc-list@cnc-list.com wrote: jim watts probably good to check with.believe he had shark before he moved up to current ccif early built shark he will know what to look for in your yachthinterholler sharks in early days used many different metals for chainplateseven aluminum...let us know how it goes.. ___ Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com ___ Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com