Re: NSPathControl
Oops, not any more. clickedPathComponentCell was deprecated in Yosemite. Instead, look at the URL property. Valid back to 10.5. On May 27, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Lee Ann Rucker lruc...@vmware.com wrote: On May 27, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Jens Alfke j...@mooseyard.com wrote: On May 27, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Raglan T. Tiger r...@crusaderrabbit.net wrote: I can setObjectValue: for the path; now I want to know what path component the users selects. I am using Pop Up style. It’s an NSControl. Wire up the target/action to your IBAction method, either in IB or programmatically. And then look at clickedPathComponentCell ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/jackbrindle%40me.com This email sent to jackbrin...@me.com ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [PSA] OSStatus.com -- Error code lookup
Pardon my thickness, but what is the purpose of the utf8 parameter anyway? Removing it from the query string appears to have no material impact on the results: http://www.osstatus.com/search/results?search=-43 b On 31 May 2015, at 5:58 am, Uli Kusterer witness.of.teacht...@gmx.net wrote: On 31 May 2015, at 13:24, Kevin Meaney k...@yvs.eu.com wrote: Thanks for this. It is a great resource. I just tried to embed a link to a search for all the CoreVideo error codes into a tweet, but twitter doesn’t like the tick mark as a character in a url. Can you change that? I had the same issue trying to link to an individual error code. You may have to go the Amazon route and write something like “ŸÉŠ” for the Unicode trick? Cheers, -- Uli Kusterer “The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...” http://zathras.de ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/ben%40zygoat.ca This email sent to b...@zygoat.ca -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician Zygoat Creative Technical Services http://www.zygoat.ca ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: How to get bold and plain fonts?
On 31 May 2015, at 4:43 pm, Roland King r...@rols.org wrote: So, TL;DR: how do I find the Font Family name(s) corresponding to an arbitrary list of NSFontDescriptors from a font collection? —Graham just looking at the docs for NSFontDescriptor I would guess [ fontDescriptor objectForKey:NSFontFamilyAttribute ] D’oh!!! As simple as that. Thanks… —Graham ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Looking at self = [super init].
No, it doesn't make a difference. In both cases the compiler will generate a test and branch to the method's epilogue. For the = case: if (self = [super init]) ... is equivalent to: if ((self = [super init]) != nil) ... is equivalent to: self = [super init]; if (self) ... is equivalent to: self = [super init]; if (self != nil) … They all: • Call the superclass' -init method. • Store the result in self. • Test if self is not equal to nil/zero. • Branch to method epilogue (or at least past {...}) if not. The == case that has been mentioned just omits the second step because self isn't modified by calling [super init]. And the equivalent statements for the other case (! / ==) do the same thing except that the test step is the inverse. In my opinion having a macro to replace the self = [super init] idiom saves you a couple of seconds of typing — once; it obfuscates behavior since you need to locate the macro to see what it does if you forget; and it is applicable only to subclasses where you're calling a superclass' -init method. It doesn't help for, e.g., -initWithCoder:, -initWithFrame:, etc., which then means you need to come up with a bunch of other macros to handle those cases or you're special-casing [super init]. Choosing to do an early return or not is up to you. Personally I prefer the if (self != nil) {...} case, even if the method is long so that I can see structure. To say more risks getting into a religious discussion that nobody wins. :) On May 30, 2015, at 3:20 PM, Alex Zavatone z...@mac.com wrote: Actually, i was typing by habit and included == instead of = by mistake. So, while you answered the question, you may have answered the wrong question. The question is not for if ( self == [super init]) It's if ( self = [super init]) How does that change your answer? On May 30, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Michael David Crawford wrote: While in principle machine code implementations of subroutines can return from several different places, in practice they don't. Rather the compiler's code generator emits a branch instruction to the end of the subroutine, there there is an epilog. There are many good reasons for returning from the middle in certain specific cases; what if the only epilog you need is an rts? Branching to the epilog could cause a cache miss. I expect the compiler developers know all about this but don't typically avail themselves of it because writing compilers is difficult. To be clear, the following source code: - (id) init { if ( self == [super init] ) return nil; // lots of code goes here return self; } ... is implemented as something like this, but in machine code: - (id) init { id result; if ( self == [super init] ){ result = nil; goto epilog; } // lots of code goes here result = self; epilog: return result; } Michael David Crawford, Consulting Software Engineer mdcrawf...@gmail.com http://www.warplife.com/mdc/ Available for Software Development in the Portland, Oregon Metropolitan Area. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote: On 30 May 2015, at 3:22 am, Alex Zavatone z...@mac.com wrote: // We don't care if this gets long. My take is that you're rewriting a well-recognised idiom to solve a non-existent problem. The well-recognised idiom makes it easy to verify it's correct. Hiding a different construct inside a macro obscures that, making it harder to verify the code. It's not wrong exactly, just harder to see at a glance that it's right. The non-existent problem you're trying to solve is that the gap between a pair of braces could get large. So what? Early returns can be another source of bugs, so structural purists would tell you that you shouldn't do that. Sometimes I think it's justified, but not usually worthwhile. Another religious issue is whether matching braces should line up or not. Personally I prefer that they do, at the cost of an extra line. Because you aren't doing that, your long distance between braces is bothering you, because you're losing track of where it started (I assume that's why it's bothering you). If you line up the braces that is much less of an issue. Source code is for humans, so it should be as readable as you can possibly make it. Macros often hinder that. Unaligned braces hinder that. Multiple statements per line hinder that. Factoring code helps, so I'd suggest that's the better way to solve this. (and it's also beneficial when it comes to making sure that -initWithCoder: and other initializers that don't correctly follow the designated initializer rule can get access to your common initialization. While this is rarely a problem, I did notice that the recent change to encourage the use of -initWithCoder: for unpacking NSViews from a nib breaks this long-standing rule and so a common
Re: How to get bold and plain fonts?
So, TL;DR: how do I find the Font Family name(s) corresponding to an arbitrary list of NSFontDescriptors from a font collection? —Graham just looking at the docs for NSFontDescriptor I would guess [ fontDescriptor objectForKey:NSFontFamilyAttribute ] ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [PSA] OSStatus.com -- Error code lookup
Hi Seth, Thanks for this. It is a great resource. I just tried to embed a link to a search for all the CoreVideo error codes into a tweet, but twitter doesn’t like the tick mark as a character in a url. Can you change that? Kevin On 31 May 2015, at 05:46, Michael David Crawford mdcrawf...@gmail.com wrote: May I Bear Your Firstborn? Michael David Crawford, Consulting Software Engineer mdcrawf...@gmail.com mailto:mdcrawf...@gmail.com http://www.warplife.com/mdc/ http://www.warplife.com/mdc/ Available for Software Development in the Portland, Oregon Metropolitan Area. On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Seth Willits sli...@araelium.com mailto:sli...@araelium.com wrote: I can't tell you how many times over the years I've been frustrated by having to manually search multiple frameworks' header files to look up what the symbol or description for an error code value was. (I know 'macerror' exists, but I have never had any luck with it. I consider it useless.) I finally got fed up, wrote some code, and made a website. So, here's v1. http://www.osstatus.com/ I hope someone besides me finds it useful. ;-) -- Seth Willits ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/mdcrawford%40gmail.com https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/mdcrawford%40gmail.com This email sent to mdcrawf...@gmail.com mailto:mdcrawf...@gmail.com ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com mailto:Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com http://lists.apple.com/ Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/ktam%40yvs.eu.com https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/ktam%40yvs.eu.com This email sent to k...@yvs.eu.com mailto:k...@yvs.eu.com ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [PSA] OSStatus.com -- Error code lookup
On 31 May 2015, at 13:24, Kevin Meaney k...@yvs.eu.com wrote: Thanks for this. It is a great resource. I just tried to embed a link to a search for all the CoreVideo error codes into a tweet, but twitter doesn’t like the tick mark as a character in a url. Can you change that? I had the same issue trying to link to an individual error code. You may have to go the Amazon route and write something like “ŸÉŠ” for the Unicode trick? Cheers, -- Uli Kusterer “The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...” http://zathras.de ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com