Re: [CODE4LIB] Linux Laptop

2011-12-15 Thread Iván V . G .
After reading the many responses to your question I just have to add to  
points to all that's been said:
.- Regarding the hardware, I'm lately devoted to Dell, and (at least a few  
months ago) they have some models with Ubuntu you can buy (there are less  
configuration options, but you can get sure the hardware will work fine  
with Ubuntu). Take a look at their web.
.- Regarding the Linux distros, besides Ubuntu (I also think it's a good  
option, but I'd suggest their LTS versions to be even less worried about  
tweaking) and Linux Mint (pushing very hard to be the best Linux Distro),  
I would suggest Debian, always Debian. Maybe you'll need to tweak a little  
bit (only in the cases MJ Ray told in his mail), but you'll get  
bulletproof ultra-stability. In fact, it's my main option, the Linux I  
have in the machine I don't want any problems with.


Regards.

En Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:31:03 +0100, Chris Fitzpatrick cf...@stanford.edu  
escribió:
I just had a Howard Beale moment with Apple. I'm mad as hell and I'm not  
going to take it anymore.


I'm curious what people can suggest for linux laptop?
Any suggestions for distros and hardware?

thanks. b,chris.



--
..:: Iván V.G. ::..


[CODE4LIB] Final Code4Lib List of Participants

2011-12-15 Thread Elizabeth Duell

First, I would like to say thank you to all of you for your patience!

Below the starred line is the list of participants going to
Code4Lib.

At this time, we have over 400 registrations for the 250 spots
available.

Again, thank you for your patience,

Elizabeth

--

Elizabeth Duell
Orbis Cascade Alliance
edu...@uoregon.edu
(541) 346-1883

**
Legal Name:
Aaron Collier
Adam Chandler
Adam Wead
Alan Cornish
Alex Wade
Alexander Rolfe
Amanda Vizedom
Andrea Schurr
Andreas Orphanides
Andrew Darby
Andrew Kohler
Andrew Nagy
Andrew Pasterfield
Anjanette Young
Anna Headley
Annette Lagace
Annie Cain
Anoop Atre
Antonio Barrera
Becky Yoose
Benjamin Shum
Bernardo J Gomez
Bethany Nowviskie
Bill Kelm
Birkin James Diana
Bohyun Kim
Bradley D. Westbrook
Brian McBride
Calvin Mah
Camila Gabaldon-Winningham
Carmen Mitchell
Cary Gordon
Chad Nelson
Charles Morris
Charlotte McGlohon
Chela Weber
Chelsea Lobdell
Chick Markley
Christina Morris
Christopher Beer
Christopher J. Stockwell
Christopher Spalding
Corey A Harper
Cory Lown
Cynthia r Harper
Dan Suchy
Dan Coughlin
Daniel  Lovins
Daniel Brubaker Horst
Daniel Chudnov
Daniel Krech
David Brunton
David Bucknum
David Drexler
David Isaak
David K Uspal
David Lacy
David Walker
Declan J Fleming
Demian Katz
Dennis Schafroth
Derek Merleaux
Devon Smith
Dhanushka Samarakoon
Dileshni Jayasinghe
Doris Munson
Duncan Barth
Edward
Edward K Fugikawa
Edward Summers
Emily Lynema
Eric James
Eric Larson
Erik Hatcher
Erik Hetzner
ernesto valencia
Evviva Lajoie
Francis Kayiwa
Fujita Masae
Fumihiro Kato
Gabriel Farrell
Gantulga Lkhagva
Gary Thompson
Genevieve Williams
Godmar Back
Gowoon Park
Graham Triggs
Gregory McClellan
Gregory Michael Hagedon
Gregory Schrank
Hans Lauridsen
Heather Pitts
Hillel Arnold
HSI-YEN CHEN
Ian Walls
Ikki Ohmukai
Jacob Edward Reed
James Robinson
James Stuart
Jason Casden
jason clark
Jason Ronallo
Jason Stirnaman
Jay Luker
Jean Rainwater
Jennifer B. Bowen
Jennifer Turner
Jennifer Weintraub
Jeremy McWilliams
Jeremy Nelson
Jessie Keck
Jodi Schneider
Joel Richard
John Pillans
John Wynstra
Jon Stroop
Jonathan Gorman
Jonathan Rochkind
Jonathon Scott
Jørn Thøgersen
Joseph B. Atzberger
Joseph Montibello
Joshua Gomez
Justin Coyne
Kåre Fiedler Christiansen
Karen A. Coombs
Karen Estlund
Karl Eriksen
Katherine Zwaard
Kathryn Harnish
Keith Folsom
Kelley McGrath
Ken Varnum
Keri Thompson
Kevin Reiss
Kevin S. Clarke
Kirk Hess
Kosuke Tanabe
Kyle Banerjee
Larry Dean Farrell
Laura Smart
Lawrence Olliffe
Lisa Kurt
Mads Villadsen
Makoto
Mang Sun
Mao Tsunekawa
Margaret Heller
Margaret Mellinger
Mark A. Matienzo
Mark Baggett
Mark Dahl
Mark Feddersen
Mark Mounts
Mary Pickral
Masao Takaku
Matt Zumwalt
Matthew Connolly
Matthew Critchlow
Matthew Hamilton
Matthew Phillips
Matthew T Carlson
Michael B. Klein
Michael Doran
Michael Durbin
Michael Flakus
Michael Giarlo
Michael Graves
Michael Kreyche
Michael Lindsey
Michael North
Michael Poltorak Nielsen
Michelle Suranofsky
Mike Schultz
Mohammed Abuouda
Naomi Dushay
Nicholas N. Schiller
Patrick Berry
Paul Deschner
Peter Green
Peter Hornsby
Peter Murray
Ping Fu
Rachel Frick
Rajesh N Balekai
Raymond Schwartz
Richard Johnson
Robert C. Haye
Robert Fox
Robert Haschart
Robert Sandusky
Roberta L. Fox
Robin Chandler
Robin Dean
Robin Schaff
Ronald Peterson
Ryan Wick
Ryuji Yoshimoto
Sam Kome
Samuel Alan Meister
Sarah Johnston
Scot Colford
Scott Fisher
Scott Hanrath
Sean Crowe
Sean Hannan
Sean Purcell
Sepehr Mavedati
shahin ezzat sahebi
Shana L. McDanold
Shaun Ellis
Shawn Averkamp
Shawn M. Kiewel
Sheree Fu
Sibyl Schaefer
Simon Spero
Spencer David Lamm
Stephanie Collett
Stephanie Williams
Stephen Meyer
Stephen Westman
Susan Chesley Perry
Takanori Hayashi
Tamar Sadeh
Tammy Allgood Wolf
Tania Fersenheim
Terry Reese
Thomas Andrew Jackson
Thomas Johnson
Thomas Keays
Thomas W. Cox
Tim Daniels
Timothy A. Lepczyk
Timothy Clarke
Timothy J Shearer
Tom Burton-West
Tommy Ingulfsen
Wayne Schneider
Wendy Robertson
William Gunn
William Jordan
Yuka Egusa
Zinthia Briceño-Rosales


[CODE4LIB] Data Mining / Business Analytics in libraries

2011-12-15 Thread Cindy Harper
Are there any listservs, blogs, forums addressing data mining in
libraries?  I've taken some courses, and am now exploring software - I just
tried our RapidMiner, which integrates with R and Weka, and has facility
for data cleaning and storage. I'm interested to see if anyone is sharing
their experiences with Business Analytics type products in libraries.

Cindy Harper, Systems Librarian
Colgate University Libraries
char...@colgate.edu
315-228-7363


Re: [CODE4LIB] Linux Laptop

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas Bennett
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 11:31:03 you wrote:
 I just had a Howard Beale moment with Apple. I'm mad as hell and I'm not
  going to take it anymore.
 
 I'm curious what people can suggest for linux laptop?
 Any suggestions for distros and hardware?
 
 thanks. b,chris.
 

Short version - download distros and try different ones before you get a 
computer to see which distro you like.  imho

First I usually try to find a laptop with the clear screen, lots of ram (the 
more the better), and NVDIA graphics card.  I've run linux on several laptops: 
dell, sharp,alienware (pre dell ownership), and others.  Most of the others 
are ones I boot from a linux disk to repair or recover files from them for 
other people. For the NVDIA driver, I always download it from the NVDIA WEB 
site and have not had any problem with that as opposed to package versions.

I prefer Fedora having used redhat linux since version 0.98 about 1989.  I 
would suggest that you download ISO files and burn those to DVD to install and 
test on an old machine to see what you like.  Many you can download live 
editions and run straight from the disk.  I like

 http://distrowatch.com 

because they have most every distribution there, even the unheard of ones.

I love my MacBook and Fusion (vmware for mac).  This is the only platform, to 
my knowledge, that you can run every OS on.  Currently I have Windows 7, 
Fedora, GOS (Google Operating System, actually a linux dist), Android LIve, 
OpenSuse, React OS (a free Windows OS to run MS Windows programs),Koha, 
Solaris, and yesterday added Windows 8 developer edition.  Some of these, like 
Koha, were VMs I downloaded.  

You can get a VMWare player program and download distros to see if you like 
them also.

Thomas
 
-- 
==
Thomas McMillan Grant Bennett   Appalachian State University
Operations  Systems AnalystP O Box 32026
University LibraryBoone, North Carolina 28608
(828) 262 6587

Library Systems Help Desk: https://www.library.appstate.edu/help/
==


Re: [CODE4LIB] Data Mining / Business Analytics in libraries

2011-12-15 Thread Jason Stirnaman
Cindy, 
I asked this same question a few months ago[1].  
We've been working with our campus Enterprise Analytics group to help us 
prioritize what we to measure and develop a BI strategy. They use QlikView 
http://www.qlikview.com/ as their analysis tool of choice. 
I like the idea of possibly using the Metridoc project for harvesting and 
modeling the data. I'm not sure we have enough data or flux to warrant fully 
automating the harvesting. 

1. See thread 
http://www.mail-archive.com/code4lib@listserv.nd.edu/msg11280.html 

Jason

 On 12/15/2011 at 08:54 AM, in message 
 CANc3e05ARd9J_tq49=b_dy-tfvjxg+nidp6f7dxrmrhi7s7...@mail.gmail.com, Cindy 
 Harper char...@colgate.edu wrote:


Are there any listservs, blogs, forums addressing data mining in
libraries?  I've taken some courses, and am now exploring software - I just
tried our RapidMiner, which integrates with R and Weka, and has facility
for data cleaning and storage. I'm interested to see if anyone is sharing
their experiences with Business Analytics type products in libraries.

Cindy Harper, Systems Librarian
Colgate University Libraries
char...@colgate.edu
315-228-7363


Re: [CODE4LIB] Linux Laptop

2011-12-15 Thread Paul Cummins

On 12/15/2011 09:57 AM, Thomas Bennett wrote:

On Wednesday 14 December 2011 11:31:03 you wrote:

I just had a Howard Beale moment with Apple. I'm mad as hell and I'm not
  going to take it anymore.

I'm curious what people can suggest for linux laptop?
Any suggestions for distros and hardware?

thanks. b,chris.



Short version - download distros and try different ones before you get a
computer to see which distro you like.  imho

First I usually try to find a laptop with the clear screen, lots of ram (the
more the better), and NVDIA graphics card.  I've run linux on several laptops:
dell, sharp,alienware (pre dell ownership), and others.  Most of the others
are ones I boot from a linux disk to repair or recover files from them for
other people. For the NVDIA driver, I always download it from the NVDIA WEB
site and have not had any problem with that as opposed to package versions.

I prefer Fedora having used redhat linux since version 0.98 about 1989.  I
would suggest that you download ISO files and burn those to DVD to install and
test on an old machine to see what you like.  Many you can download live
editions and run straight from the disk.  I like

  http://distrowatch.com

because they have most every distribution there, even the unheard of ones.

I love my MacBook and Fusion (vmware for mac).  This is the only platform, to
my knowledge, that you can run every OS on.  Currently I have Windows 7,
Fedora, GOS (Google Operating System, actually a linux dist), Android LIve,
OpenSuse, React OS (a free Windows OS to run MS Windows programs),Koha,
Solaris, and yesterday added Windows 8 developer edition.  Some of these, like
Koha, were VMs I downloaded.

You can get a VMWare player program and download distros to see if you like
them also.

Thomas



  Finally, someone said something about Fedora. :)  I started using it 
a couple of years ago instead of a dual boot on my workstation.  I 
sysadmin a bunch of Redhat servers and I realized that Fedora is like a 
future version of what eventually will be on Redhat.
  It is a constant exercise to work with it and comprehend the 
direction they are trying to go with the init system for example.  Think 
of it like a treadmill.  You get something out of it.


  And I agree with the above, get a few 2G usb sticks and put a few 
live distros on and plug them in in the store.


  Distrowatch is frustrating because most of them say a variation on 
the same thing, Based on Ubuntu but made to be easy to use and 
reliable. or Based on Ubuntu and easy to install and use out of the box.


PaulC


Re: [CODE4LIB] Linux Laptop

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas Bennett
Then there is also, MINIX.  A year or two ago they received a large grant to 
continue work on that OS.  My understanding is that the main difference between 
MINIX and the others is that MINIX only loads modules when required instead of 
all on boot to minimize the memory footprint.  Also, if a module crashes it 
can be restarted and not crash the entire system.

http://www.minix3.org

Thomas




On Thursday 15 December 2011 10:35:45 you wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 09:57 AM, Thomas Bennett wrote:
  On Wednesday 14 December 2011 11:31:03 you wrote:
  I just had a Howard Beale moment with Apple. I'm mad as hell and I'm not
going to take it anymore.
 
  I'm curious what people can suggest for linux laptop?
  Any suggestions for distros and hardware?
 
  thanks. b,chris.
 
  Short version - download distros and try different ones before you get a
  computer to see which distro you like.  imho
 
  First I usually try to find a laptop with the clear screen, lots of ram
  (the more the better), and NVDIA graphics card.  I've run linux on
  several laptops: dell, sharp,alienware (pre dell ownership), and others. 
  Most of the others are ones I boot from a linux disk to repair or recover
  files from them for other people. For the NVDIA driver, I always download
  it from the NVDIA WEB site and have not had any problem with that as
  opposed to package versions.
 
  I prefer Fedora having used redhat linux since version 0.98 about 1989. 
  I would suggest that you download ISO files and burn those to DVD to
  install and test on an old machine to see what you like.  Many you can
  download live editions and run straight from the disk.  I like
 
http://distrowatch.com
 
  because they have most every distribution there, even the unheard of
  ones.
 
  I love my MacBook and Fusion (vmware for mac).  This is the only
  platform, to my knowledge, that you can run every OS on.  Currently I
  have Windows 7, Fedora, GOS (Google Operating System, actually a linux
  dist), Android LIve, OpenSuse, React OS (a free Windows OS to run MS
  Windows programs),Koha, Solaris, and yesterday added Windows 8 developer
  edition.  Some of these, like Koha, were VMs I downloaded.
 
  You can get a VMWare player program and download distros to see if you
  like them also.
 
  Thomas
 
Finally, someone said something about Fedora. :)  I started using it
 a couple of years ago instead of a dual boot on my workstation.  I
 sysadmin a bunch of Redhat servers and I realized that Fedora is like a
 future version of what eventually will be on Redhat.
It is a constant exercise to work with it and comprehend the
 direction they are trying to go with the init system for example.  Think
 of it like a treadmill.  You get something out of it.
 
And I agree with the above, get a few 2G usb sticks and put a few
 live distros on and plug them in in the store.
 
Distrowatch is frustrating because most of them say a variation on
 the same thing, Based on Ubuntu but made to be easy to use and
 reliable. or Based on Ubuntu and easy to install and use out of the box.
 
 PaulC
 

-- 
==
Thomas McMillan Grant Bennett   Appalachian State University
Operations  Systems AnalystP O Box 32026
University LibraryBoone, North Carolina 28608
(828) 262 6587

Library Systems Help Desk: https://www.library.appstate.edu/help/
==


Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: best practices for *simple* contributor IP/licensing management for open source?

2011-12-15 Thread BRIAN TINGLE
 
 Does something along those lines end up working legally, or is it worthless, 
 no better than just continuing to ignore the problem, so you might as well 
 just continue to ignore the problem? Or if it is potentially workable, does 
 anyone have examples of projects using such a system, ideally with some 
 evidence some lawyer has said it’s worthwhile, including a lawyer-vetted 
 digital contributor agreement?



I'm not sure the extent of this risk for most small projects, esp. if you don't 
think you will ever want to relicense it.

If I send you a pull request, and it is like a couple of characters different 
because there was a syntax error, or I add a couple of lines, and I don't 
bother to change the license and copyright statement, I don't think it is too 
unreasonable to accept the patch.  If I write dozens of files for a new module 
that is sort of unrelated to the original code and I don't include the 
project's copyright statement in the code, then I could see you saying hey, 
can you clarify if you are granting me the copyright, or maybe you want to slap 
a copyright notice on that yourself before you accept the contribution.

But maybe you could just make a statement in your README along the lines of If 
you send a pull request to this project or otherwise make a contribution of 
code you and your employer to grant a non-excluive royalty free perpetual 
redistribution license to Acme Inc and you represent that you have the rights 
to do so

Maybe you could argue that the act of submission of the modified code is an 
implicit grant of the code consistent with the terms of the license of the 
original code.

The cool thing about revision control, and accepting pull requests, is that it 
keeps a line by line record of who committed the code, so if there were a 
problem you might have a chance at extracting and re-writing the tainted 
contribution.

Of course, I am not a lawyer; you probably need to talk to your contracts and 
grants people or OGC.

   THIS EMAIL IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS
   AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
   IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
   ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
   LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
   CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
   SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
   INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
   CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
   ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
   POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Linux Laptop

2011-12-15 Thread Christian Pietsch
Hi Chris,

congratulations on your decision. I went from DOS and Windows to Linux
and Mac OS X, but after a few months I returned to Linux for good
(firing up Windows only to fill out the occasional MS Word form that
looks weird in LibreOffice). You have already received a lot of good
advice, so as well as adding my own 2 cents, I will try to take that
into account.


Which Linux?


My guess is that coming from Mac OS, Ubuntu will be the Linux
distribution you will feel most comfortable with. It is the most
popular Linux distro these days anyway, so you can hardly go wrong
with it. I have used it almost exclusively in recent years, and I find
it worth mentioning that the Ubuntu community is helpful and friendly
indeed. You will not often find arrogant BOFH responses in Ubuntu
forums because all Ubuntu contributors have signed a very reasonable
code of conduct http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct.

As others have mentioned, you might want to try some Linux
distributions and desktop environments in a virtual machine running on
top of Mac OS X. VirtualBox is a popular and free, and works just as
well the competition from VMware or Parallels.


Which hardware?
___

You may not need new hardware at all. Since the MacBook (Pro) is
considered by many the best laptop (hardware), you may want to use it
for Linux (and Windows, if you must) as well. The Ubuntu guide for
people switching from Mac OS X contains some dual boot advice:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SwitchingToUbuntu/FromMacOSX

I think it is fair to say that Linux runs on any laptop out there. If
you want to make sure that every single feature is supported on the
particular machine you have in mind, then take a look at the lists
Chris Fitzpatrick provided (quoted below), or this one:
http://tuxmobil.org/mylaptops.html
Specifically for Ubuntu Linux, you will find compatibility reports on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport/Machines/Laptops which is now
being replaced by this site: https://friendly.ubuntu.com/

I have installed Ubuntu on Asus EeePC netbooks, Dell laptops and
desktops, and Fujitsu servers. Of these, the Dell computers have
caused no trouble at all. I have also heard good things about Lenovo's
Thinkpads.

Enjoy!
Christian


On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:02:40PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
 It's worth Googling a bit.  There are places that sell laptops with
 Linux pre-installed (which bypasses the Windows surtax on new PCs).
 It was easy to find these but I can't vouch for any of them.
 
 http://mcelrath.org/laptops.html - Linux Laptop Resellers
 
 http://www.linux-laptop.net/ - Linux on Laptops
 
 http://www.linuxcertified.com/linux_laptops.html - Linux Laptop -
 Fully Supported  Configured High Performance Linux Laptops and
 Netbooks | LinuxCertified
 
 http://linuxpreloaded.com/ - Buy a Linux Computer

-- 
  Christian Pietsch http://purl.org/net/pietsch
  computational linguist, Bielefeld University, Germany


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: best practices for *simple* contributor IP/licensing management for open source?

2011-12-15 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
Thanks! I wasn't wanting to invent something new, I was just having 
trouble finding any light weight processes via googling, thus I figured 
I'd ask you all. I'll definitely spend some time checking out the DCO 
process. Hopefully the documents used in it are licensed (creative 
commons or something?) such that other projects can re-use em?


On 12/14/2011 9:56 PM, Dan Scott wrote:

Trying to post inline in GroupWise, apologies if it ends up looking
like crap...


I*m imagining something where each
contributor/accepted-pull-request-submitter basically just puts a
digital file in the repo, once, that says something like *All the

code

I*ve contributed to this repo in past or future, I have the legal
ability to release under license X, and I have done so.* And then I
guess in the License file, instead of saying *copyright Original
Author*, it would be like *copyright by various contributors, see

files

in ./contributors to see who.*


I wouldn't suggest imagining new things when it comes to legal issues
;)

I would suggest considering the Developer's Certificate of Originality
(DCO) process as adopted by the Linux project and others (including
Evergreen). When Evergreen was in the process of joining the Software
Freedom Conservancy, that process was considered acceptable practice
(IIRC, the Software Freedom Law Center did take a glance) - no doubt in
part because it is a well-established practice. And talk about
lightweight; using the git Signed-off-by tag indicates that you've read
the DCO and agree to its terms.

For a recent discussion and description of the DCO (in the context of
the Project Harmony discussions which were focused primarily on the much
heavier-weight CLA processes), see
http://lists.harmonyagreements.org/pipermail/harmony-drafting/2011-August/99.html
for example.



[CODE4LIB] Citation Style Language

2011-12-15 Thread Ellen K. Wilson
I'm attempting to create a .csl style file for the journal Polar Record. 
I've managed to get book, book chapter, and article looking right, but 
I'm stumped on thesis and not sure that there's a solution supported in 
CSL 1.0.


From the stylesheet:
Unpublished theses or dissertations must include the department and 
university in which they were accepted, for example (Smith, J.L.. 1990. 
 TITLE. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Cambridge: Scott 
Polar Research Institute).


I'm using Zotero to test out my citations (the professor for whom I'm 
developing this style uses Papers 2 for the Macintosh) and when I enter 
a thesis it doesn't have a field for department. I don't know if Papers 
does or not. As far as I can tell, CSL doesn't have a department field 
either. (http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification.html) The 
Zotero field for university seems to map to CSL's publisher field.


I could do an ugly fix and tell the professor to enter the department in 
the place field, but I'd like to avoid that if possible.


Can anyone offer some insight?

Thanks.

Ellen

--
Ellen Knowlton Wilson
Instructional Services Librarian
Room 250, University Library
University of South Alabama
5901 USA Drive North
Mobile, AL 36688
(251) 460-6045
ewil...@jaguar1.usouthal.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Kindle Lending Programs

2011-12-15 Thread Cheryl Kohen
Great article, thanks for sharing your experience!

-- 
Cheryl Kohen | Emerging Technology Librarian | Daytona State College

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Patrick Berry pbe...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 I was recently charged with re-vamping our Kindle lending program.  In the
 middle of this my 6 Kindles updated to the 3.3 firmware which threw a
 gigantic DRM wrench into my workflow.  So, if you are thinking about doing
 Kindles (not Fires by the way) you might want to give this a read:

 http://code4lib.org/node/426

 Questions, corrections, comments all welcome.

 Thanks,
 Pat



Re: [CODE4LIB] Any ideas for free pdf to excel conversion?

2011-12-15 Thread Christian Pietsch
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:19:43PM -0600, Jon Gorman wrote:
 pdftotext - some cut  paste / sed / regex - open in excel?
 
 You might need to fiddle with the pdftotext settings, but I've been
 pretty successful with that before doing something else.

This is how I use pdftotext for this purpose:
pdftotext -nopgbrk -layout input.pdf output.txt

For those who wonder what this is: pdftotext is a command-line tool
from the poppler-utils package (this is how it is called in Debian and
Ubuntu Linux; see http://poppler.freedesktop.org for source code).
The Windows version is here: http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/download.html

The resulting file, here called output.txt, contains plain text with
the formatting approximately left intact. Now you can (manually or
otherwise) save the tables from this file into files with .csv, .tsv
or .dat endings, and with any luck, R's read.table() function and
other statistics software as well as most spreadsheet software
will be able to open this file and make sense of it. Otherwise, you
will need to do some postprocessing/postediting.

Cheers,
Christian

-- 
  Christian Pietsch http://purl.org/net/pietsch


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[CODE4LIB] Registration open for DigCCurr Professional Institute 2012

2011-12-15 Thread Kam Woods
*** Please excuse cross postings ***
 
Registration Now Open

DigCCurr Professional Institute: Curation Practices for the Digital Object
Lifecycle
Supported by IMLS Grant Award #RE-05-08-0060-08 and the School of
Information and Library Science, UNC-Chapel Hill

May 20-25, 2012  January 7-8, 2013 (One price for two sessions)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Visit http://ils.unc.edu/digccurr/institute.html for more information.
 
REGISTRATION LINK:
http://cfx.research.unc.edu/res_classreg/browse_single.cfm?New=1event=612E21BE7477F79D361921C40901D94BE49885E1

The Institute consists of one five-day session in May 2012 and a two-day
follow-up session and a day-long symposium in January 2013. Each day of the
summer session will include lectures, discussion and hands-on lab
components. A course pack and a private, online discussion space will be
provided to supplement learning and application of the material. An opening
reception dinner on Sunday, Continental breakfast, break time snacks and
coffee, and a dinner on Thursday will also be included.

This institute is designed to foster skills, knowledge and
community-building among professionals responsible for the curation of
digital materials.

Registration:
 
* Regular registration : $950
* Late registration (after April 15, 2012): $1,050
* Summer Institute accommodations (includes 5 nights of a private room in a
4 room/2 bath dorm suite on the UNC campus, with kitchen, linens, and
internet access): $300*

*We highly recommend that you choose the on-campus accommodations but many
area hotels will be available. This fee covers accommodations for May 2012 only.

If you are a grant recipient working on a digital project, we recommend that
you check with your program officer to request approval to use available
grant funds to attend the institute.

Institute Instructors Include:

* From the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Dr. Cal Lee, Dr.
Richard Marciano, Dr. Helen Tibbo.
* Dr. Nancy McGovern, from the University of Michigan.
* Dr. Seamus Ross, from the University of Toronto.
* Dr. Carolyn Hank, McGill University.

Institute Components: (may be subject to some revisions and reorganization)

* Overview of digital curation definition, scope and main functions
* Where you see yourself in the digital curation landscape
* Digital curation program development
* Engendering Trust: Processes, Procedures and Forms of Evidence
* LAB - DRAMBORA in action

* Strategies for engaging data communities
* Characterizing, analyzing and evaluating the producer information environment
* Submission and transfer scenarios – push and pull (illustrative examples)
* Defining submission agreements and policies
* Strategies for writing policies that can be expressed as rules and rules
that can automatically executed
* LAB - Making requirements machine-actionable

* Importance of infrastructure independence
* Overview of digital preservation challenges and opportunities
* Managing in response to technological change
* Detaching Bits from their Physical Media: Considerations, Tools and Methods
* LAB - Curation of Unidentified Files

* Returning to First Principles: Core Professional Principles to Drive
Digital Curation
* Characterization of digital objects
* LAB - Assessing File Format Robustness
* Access and use considerations
* Access and user interface examples
* How and why to conduct research on digital collection needs
* LAB - Analyzing server logs and developing strategies based on what you find

* Overview and characterization of existing tools
* LAB - Evaluating set of software options to support a given digital
curation workflow
* Formulating your six-month action plan - task for each individual, with
instructors available to provide guidance
* Summary of action plans
* Clarifying roles and expectations for the next six months


January 7-8, 2013
Participants in the May event will return to Chapel Hill in Jan. 2013 to
discuss their experiences in implementing what they have learned in their
own work environments.  Participants will compare experiences, lessons
learned and strategies for continuing progress. Friday, January 4th will be
a public symposium, free to the Institute participants. (Accommodations for
January will be the responsibility of the attendee.)
 
Visit http://ils.unc.edu/digccurr/institute.html for more information.
For more information, contact Angela Murillo (amuri...@email.unc.edu) for
Institute questions or Wakefield Harper (whar...@email.unc.edu) for payment
or registration questions.

We look forward to seeing you there!   -Helen
 
 
Dr. Helen R. Tibbo, Alumni Distinguished Professor
President, 2010-2011  Fellow, Society of American Archivists
School of Information and Library Science
201 Manning Hall  CB#3360
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3360
Phone: (919) 962-8063
Fax: (919) 962-8071
ti...@email.unc.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Akerman, Laura
As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on Black 
Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that prevented her from 
getting to it until it was too late--

When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I love 
cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.   Wondering if I 
should gamble now...

Laura

Laura Akerman
Technology and Metadata Librarian
Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
(404) 727-6888
lib...@emory.edu

-Original Message-
From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting the system 
we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the conference as one of 
their key annual events, and plan to register the instant that tickets become 
available. I know that it sells out fast, but the folks who are there on the 
dot pretty much always get in. The alternative, of course is to present, 
although that can be rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I did this year.

If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently change, and 
waiting list requests often get filled.

Cary

--
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com



This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Kyle Banerjee
Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
horse's mouth answer for now.

Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that you're in
by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future conferences
would be the registration process as the current one only worked for people
who knew to expect a mad rush and were available during a very specific
window. Seems like a lottery or some other mechanism may have done a better
job of being fair and making the event accessible to a diverse group.

kyle


On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that prevented
 her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I love
 cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.   Wondering if
 I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting the
 system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the conference
 as one of their key annual events, and plan to register the instant that
 tickets become available. I know that it sells out fast, but the folks who
 are there on the dot pretty much always get in. The alternative, of course
 is to present, although that can be rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I
 did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently change,
 and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
 the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
 information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
 or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
 prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact
 the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
 original message (including attachments).




-- 
--
Kyle Banerjee
Digital Services Program Manager
Orbis Cascade Alliance
baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Cary Gordon
If you really, positively, absolutely have to be at Code4Lib, volunteer.

Cary

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Banerjee baner...@uoregon.edu wrote:
 Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
 horse's mouth answer for now.

 Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that you're in
 by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

 One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future conferences
 would be the registration process as the current one only worked for people
 who knew to expect a mad rush and were available during a very specific
 window. Seems like a lottery or some other mechanism may have done a better
 job of being fair and making the event accessible to a diverse group.

 kyle


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that prevented
 her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I love
 cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.   Wondering if
 I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting the
 system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the conference
 as one of their key annual events, and plan to register the instant that
 tickets become available. I know that it sells out fast, but the folks who
 are there on the dot pretty much always get in. The alternative, of course
 is to present, although that can be rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I
 did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently change,
 and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
 the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
 information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
 or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
 prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact
 the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
 original message (including attachments).




 --
 --
 Kyle Banerjee
 Digital Services Program Manager
 Orbis Cascade Alliance
 baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773



-- 
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Wilfred Drew
If there is this much interest why not pick bigger venues?  I have 
beenfollowing this conversation for weeks and wondered why that hadn't already 
happened.
-
Wilfred (Bill) Drew, M.S., B.S., A.S.
Assistant Professor
Librarian, Systems and Tech Services
Tompkins Cortland Community College  (TC3) Library: http://www.tc3.edu/library/
Dryden, N.Y. 13053-0139
E-mail: dr...@tc3.edu
Phone: 607-844-8222 ext.4406
AOL Instant Messenger:BillDrew4
Online Identity: http://claimID.com/billdrew
StrengthsQuest: Ideation, Input, Learner, Activator, Communication
http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill_Drew/

From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kyle Banerjee 
[baner...@uoregon.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:48 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
horse's mouth answer for now.

Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that you're in
by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future conferences
would be the registration process as the current one only worked for people
who knew to expect a mad rush and were available during a very specific
window. Seems like a lottery or some other mechanism may have done a better
job of being fair and making the event accessible to a diverse group.

kyle


On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that prevented
 her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I love
 cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.   Wondering if
 I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting the
 system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the conference
 as one of their key annual events, and plan to register the instant that
 tickets become available. I know that it sells out fast, but the folks who
 are there on the dot pretty much always get in. The alternative, of course
 is to present, although that can be rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I
 did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently change,
 and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.comhttp://chillco.com/

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
 the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
 information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
 or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
 prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact
 the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
 original message (including attachments).




--
--
Kyle Banerjee
Digital Services Program Manager
Orbis Cascade Alliance
baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Francis Kayiwa

On 12/15/11 5:01 PM, Wilfred Drew wrote:

If there is this much interest why not pick bigger venues?  I have 
beenfollowing this conversation for weeks and wondered why that hadn't already 
happened.


Bigger usually means more costly. Administrative, Space, Bandwidth etc.,

I have only been to a one of these before and the principal attraction 
for me was precisely that. A small conference where if I needed to 
corner someone I listened to a talk it only took gathering all my social 
skills I've accumulated over time and... who am I kidding. It was 
extremely easy because (in part perhaps) of the intimate setting.


Perhaps it has reached a point where regional ones will be the way to go 
as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. Plan to 
run your $local code4lib to make up for it.


;-)

./fxk


--
TFMotD: Archive::Tar (3p) - module for manipulations of tar archives


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Wick, Ryan
I'm confused, what type of volunteering guarantees you a spot?

I can think of being a part of the hosting committee (maybe?), sponsorship, or 
having a talk proposal accepted.

Ryan Wick

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary 
Gordon
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:59 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

If you really, positively, absolutely have to be at Code4Lib, volunteer.

Cary

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Banerjee baner...@uoregon.edu wrote:
 Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the 
 horse's mouth answer for now.

 Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that 
 you're in by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

 One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future 
 conferences would be the registration process as the current one only 
 worked for people who knew to expect a mad rush and were available 
 during a very specific window. Seems like a lottery or some other 
 mechanism may have done a better job of being fair and making the event 
 accessible to a diverse group.

 kyle


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on 
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that 
 prevented her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I 
 love cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.   
 Wondering if I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting 
 the system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the 
 conference as one of their key annual events, and plan to register 
 the instant that tickets become available. I know that it sells out 
 fast, but the folks who are there on the dot pretty much always get 
 in. The alternative, of course is to present, although that can be 
 rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently 
 change, and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use 
 of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
 privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the 
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
 distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) 
 is strictly prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender 
 by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original 
 message (including attachments).




 --
 --
 Kyle Banerjee
 Digital Services Program Manager
 Orbis Cascade Alliance
 baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773



--
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Kyle Banerjee
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa kay...@uic.edu wrote:

 On 12/15/11 5:01 PM, Wilfred Drew wrote:

 If there is this much interest why not pick bigger venues?  I have
 beenfollowing this conversation for weeks and wondered why that hadn't
 already happened.


 Bigger usually means more costly. Administrative, Space, Bandwidth etc.,



Correct. Cost on a per capita basis is significantly higher because the
number of places that have this kind of capacity is limited.

Although this is a community undertaking, the sponsoring
institution/organization has to absorb the financial risk. As the penalties
of guessing incorrectly are a function of size, it's not as simple as just
getting a venue that can handle 500 people.

kyle


-- 
--
Kyle Banerjee
Digital Services Program Manager
Orbis Cascade Alliance
baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Jonathan Rochkind

On 12/15/2011 6:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa wrote:


Perhaps it has reached a point where regional ones will be the way to 
go as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. 
Plan to run your $local code4lib to make up for it.


Yep, that'd be the party line. You know Code4Lib was started only, what, 
6 years ago, by a bunch of random coders who just said Hey, let's put 
on a conference, why not?  It's gotten harder to put on since then, but 
the first one was pretty seat of the pants (I understand, I wasn't 
there, although i was at the 2nd).


If you're unhappy that you can't get into code4lib, start your own that 
you can get into!


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Cary Gordon
Pretty much any volunteer position guarantees you a spot. It is up to
the organizers to figure out what they need help with.

Cary

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu wrote:
 I'm confused, what type of volunteering guarantees you a spot?

 I can think of being a part of the hosting committee (maybe?), sponsorship, 
 or having a talk proposal accepted.

 Ryan Wick

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary 
 Gordon
 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:59 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

 If you really, positively, absolutely have to be at Code4Lib, volunteer.

 Cary

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Banerjee baner...@uoregon.edu wrote:
 Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
 horse's mouth answer for now.

 Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that
 you're in by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

 One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future
 conferences would be the registration process as the current one only
 worked for people who knew to expect a mad rush and were available
 during a very specific window. Seems like a lottery or some other
 mechanism may have done a better job of being fair and making the event 
 accessible to a diverse group.

 kyle


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that
 prevented her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I
 love cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.
 Wondering if I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting
 the system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the
 conference as one of their key annual events, and plan to register
 the instant that tickets become available. I know that it sells out
 fast, but the folks who are there on the dot pretty much always get
 in. The alternative, of course is to present, although that can be
 rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently
 change, and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use
 of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments)
 is strictly prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender
 by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original
 message (including attachments).




 --
 --
 Kyle Banerjee
 Digital Services Program Manager
 Orbis Cascade Alliance
 baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773



 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com



-- 
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Jonathan Rochkind

On 12/15/2011 6:32 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:

Pretty much any volunteer position guarantees you a spot. It is up to
the organizers to figure out what they need help with.


I do not think this is true. Pretty sure Kyle just said as much for this 
year.  I don't think it's been true in past years either. But I think 
the old record for selling out was 4 days, not one hour, so anyone 
involved in volunteering probably just signed up the usual way and got 
in in the past.


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Ann Lally
Umm,  no volunteering does not guarantee attendance. Neither member of the
tshirt committee is attending and one is from the hosting institution.
Unless you mean volunteering for the actual conference.

Ann

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote:

 Pretty much any volunteer position guarantees you a spot. It is up to
 the organizers to figure out what they need help with.

 Cary

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu
 wrote:
  I'm confused, what type of volunteering guarantees you a spot?
 
  I can think of being a part of the hosting committee (maybe?),
 sponsorship, or having a talk proposal accepted.
 
  Ryan Wick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
 Cary Gordon
  Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:59 PM
  To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
  Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration
 
  If you really, positively, absolutely have to be at Code4Lib, volunteer.
 
  Cary
 
  On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Banerjee baner...@uoregon.edu
 wrote:
  Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
  horse's mouth answer for now.
 
  Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that
  you're in by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.
 
  One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future
  conferences would be the registration process as the current one only
  worked for people who knew to expect a mad rush and were available
  during a very specific window. Seems like a lottery or some other
  mechanism may have done a better job of being fair and making the event
 accessible to a diverse group.
 
  kyle
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu
 wrote:
 
  As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
  Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that
  prevented her from getting to it until it was too late--
 
  When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?
 
  Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I
  love cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.
  Wondering if I should gamble now...
 
  Laura
 
  Laura Akerman
  Technology and Metadata Librarian
  Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
  Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
  (404) 727-6888
  lib...@emory.edu
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
  Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
  Subject: Re: conference voting and registration
 
  While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting
  the system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the
  conference as one of their key annual events, and plan to register
  the instant that tickets become available. I know that it sells out
  fast, but the folks who are there on the dot pretty much always get
  in. The alternative, of course is to present, although that can be
  rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I did this year.
 
  If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently
  change, and waiting list requests often get filled.
 
  Cary
 
  --
  Cary Gordon
  The Cherry Hill Company
  http://chillco.com
 
  
 
  This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use
  of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
  privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
  distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments)
  is strictly prohibited.
 
  If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender
  by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original
  message (including attachments).
 
 
 
 
  --
  --
  Kyle Banerjee
  Digital Services Program Manager
  Orbis Cascade Alliance
  baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773
 
 
 
  --
  Cary Gordon
  The Cherry Hill Company
  http://chillco.com



 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com



Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Jennifer Ward
On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

 On 12/15/2011 6:32 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
 Pretty much any volunteer position guarantees you a spot. It is up to
 the organizers to figure out what they need help with.
 
 I do not think this is true. Pretty sure Kyle just said as much for this 
 year.  I don't think it's been true in past years either. But I think the old 
 record for selling out was 4 days, not one hour, so anyone involved in 
 volunteering probably just signed up the usual way and got in in the past.

'tis true. Several of us from the sponsoring library didn't get in and we're 
all doing some work w/ the event planning.

--Jennifer


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Kam Woods
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 6:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa wrote:
 as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. Plan to run
 your $local code4lib to make up for it.
...
 If you're unhappy that you can't get into code4lib, start your own that you
 can get into!

This seems like a great idea. Is it legit to use the code4lib name,
logo, wiki, and existing web resources to organize and run local
events?

Kam


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Wick, Ryan
Sure. You can see what other local/regional groups have done before:  
http://code4lib.org/local

Also: http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/Main_Page#Local_.2F_Regional_Groups


Ryan Wick

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kam 
Woods
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:29 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 6:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa wrote:
 as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. Plan 
 to run your $local code4lib to make up for it.
...
 If you're unhappy that you can't get into code4lib, start your own 
 that you can get into!

This seems like a great idea. Is it legit to use the code4lib name, logo, wiki, 
and existing web resources to organize and run local events?

Kam


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Michael J. Giarlo
Cary,

I don't remember this ever being the case.  Can someone confirm this
practice for this or any other year?  (There are dozens of volunteers
-- surely they didn't all get guaranteed spots, just for putting their
names on a wiki?)

AFAIK, there are two ways to get into a code4lib conference: 1) give a
talk/pre-conf, or 2) register.

-Mike


On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 18:32, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote:
 Pretty much any volunteer position guarantees you a spot. It is up to
 the organizers to figure out what they need help with.

 Cary

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu wrote:
 I'm confused, what type of volunteering guarantees you a spot?

 I can think of being a part of the hosting committee (maybe?), sponsorship, 
 or having a talk proposal accepted.

 Ryan Wick

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary 
 Gordon
 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:59 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

 If you really, positively, absolutely have to be at Code4Lib, volunteer.

 Cary

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Banerjee baner...@uoregon.edu wrote:
 Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
 horse's mouth answer for now.

 Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that
 you're in by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

 One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future
 conferences would be the registration process as the current one only
 worked for people who knew to expect a mad rush and were available
 during a very specific window. Seems like a lottery or some other
 mechanism may have done a better job of being fair and making the event 
 accessible to a diverse group.

 kyle


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that
 prevented her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I
 love cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.
 Wondering if I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting
 the system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the
 conference as one of their key annual events, and plan to register
 the instant that tickets become available. I know that it sells out
 fast, but the folks who are there on the dot pretty much always get
 in. The alternative, of course is to present, although that can be
 rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently
 change, and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use
 of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments)
 is strictly prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender
 by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original
 message (including attachments).




 --
 --
 Kyle Banerjee
 Digital Services Program Manager
 Orbis Cascade Alliance
 baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773



 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com



 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Kam Woods
Thanks! I don't see a group for south/southeast US yet. Something
maybe I can help with. Also (related), we have have various people who
are code4lib veterans coming to CurateGear in Chapel Hill on Jan 6 -
registration is inexpensive and still open for anyone who wants to
participate (especially those nearby).

http://cfx.research.unc.edu/res_classreg/browse_single.cfm?New=1event=0BF752F1B4AAAFBDA9ADD3FBB8F60650B71FD2AB

\shamelessplug

Kam

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu wrote:
 Sure. You can see what other local/regional groups have done before:  
 http://code4lib.org/local

 Also: http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/Main_Page#Local_.2F_Regional_Groups


 Ryan Wick

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kam 
 Woods
 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:29 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 6:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa wrote:
 as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. Plan
 to run your $local code4lib to make up for it.
 ...
 If you're unhappy that you can't get into code4lib, start your own
 that you can get into!

 This seems like a great idea. Is it legit to use the code4lib name, logo, 
 wiki, and existing web resources to organize and run local events?

 Kam


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Nick Ruest
*jumps in a little late*

It's totally cool to use the name and localize it. We've run a couple of really 
successful c4l north's up here in Canadaland. 

It provides a great opportunity to expose folks to the community, network 
(natch as adr would say), and provide a venue for professional development.

Confidence building, and hanging out really amazing with like minded people at 
its best!

-nruest

On 2011-12-15, at 20:09, Kam Woods kamwo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks! I don't see a group for south/southeast US yet. Something
 maybe I can help with. Also (related), we have have various people who
 are code4lib veterans coming to CurateGear in Chapel Hill on Jan 6 -
 registration is inexpensive and still open for anyone who wants to
 participate (especially those nearby).
 
 http://cfx.research.unc.edu/res_classreg/browse_single.cfm?New=1event=0BF752F1B4AAAFBDA9ADD3FBB8F60650B71FD2AB
 
 \shamelessplug
 
 Kam
 
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu wrote:
 Sure. You can see what other local/regional groups have done before:  
 http://code4lib.org/local
 
 Also: http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/Main_Page#Local_.2F_Regional_Groups
 
 
 Ryan Wick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kam 
 Woods
 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:29 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration
 
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 6:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa wrote:
 as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. Plan
 to run your $local code4lib to make up for it.
 ...
 If you're unhappy that you can't get into code4lib, start your own
 that you can get into!
 
 This seems like a great idea. Is it legit to use the code4lib name, logo, 
 wiki, and existing web resources to organize and run local events?
 
 Kam


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Cary Gordon
I seem to recall a statement to that effect that folks who volunteered
time -- not just put their names on a wiki -- from the organizing
committee some months ago.

I don't think that it would be fair to expect that someone would spend
half a day at a registration table and not allow to buy a ticket.

Cary

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Michael J. Giarlo
leftw...@alumni.rutgers.edu wrote:
 Cary,

 I don't remember this ever being the case.  Can someone confirm this
 practice for this or any other year?  (There are dozens of volunteers
 -- surely they didn't all get guaranteed spots, just for putting their
 names on a wiki?)

 AFAIK, there are two ways to get into a code4lib conference: 1) give a
 talk/pre-conf, or 2) register.

 -Mike


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 18:32, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote:
 Pretty much any volunteer position guarantees you a spot. It is up to
 the organizers to figure out what they need help with.

 Cary

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu 
 wrote:
 I'm confused, what type of volunteering guarantees you a spot?

 I can think of being a part of the hosting committee (maybe?), sponsorship, 
 or having a talk proposal accepted.

 Ryan Wick

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of 
 Cary Gordon
 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:59 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

 If you really, positively, absolutely have to be at Code4Lib, volunteer.

 Cary

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Banerjee baner...@uoregon.edu wrote:
 Elizabeth is out, so I'll have to substitute for a straight from the
 horse's mouth answer for now.

 Everyone who's in has been informed, so if you haven't heard that
 you're in by now, no news is unfortunately bad news.

 One topic that would probably be worth discussing for future
 conferences would be the registration process as the current one only
 worked for people who knew to expect a mad rush and were available
 during a very specific window. Seems like a lottery or some other
 mechanism may have done a better job of being fair and making the event 
 accessible to a diverse group.

 kyle


 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Akerman, Laura lib...@emory.edu wrote:

 As someone who's never been to Code4Lib, really wants to go, tried on
 Black Wednesday but unfortunately had meetings all morning that
 prevented her from getting to it until it was too late--

 When do wait list people usually find out they're in, if they get in?

 Plane reservations get more expensive as time goes on, and much as I
 love cross-country driving, February's not the best time for it.
 Wondering if I should gamble now...

 Laura

 Laura Akerman
 Technology and Metadata Librarian
 Room 128, Robert W. Woodruff Library
 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322
 (404) 727-6888
 lib...@emory.edu

 -Original Message-
 From: Cary Gordon [mailto:listu...@chillco.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:32 PM
 Subject: Re: conference voting and registration

 While I understand your frustration, I have come around to accepting
 the system we have. Many of the folks who attend every year hold the
 conference as one of their key annual events, and plan to register
 the instant that tickets become available. I know that it sells out
 fast, but the folks who are there on the dot pretty much always get
 in. The alternative, of course is to present, although that can be
 rolling the dice, or volunteer, which I did this year.

 If you are on the waiting list, bear in mind that plans frequently
 change, and waiting list requests often get filled.

 Cary

 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com

 

 This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use
 of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments)
 is strictly prohibited.

 If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender
 by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original
 message (including attachments).




 --
 --
 Kyle Banerjee
 Digital Services Program Manager
 Orbis Cascade Alliance
 baner...@uoregon.edu / 503.877.9773



 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com



 --
 Cary Gordon
 The Cherry Hill Company
 http://chillco.com



-- 
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com


Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

2011-12-15 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
The appalachia group turned into a southeast group at one point, but
it was never successful getting enough interest to have a local meetup
in appalachia or the southeast.  I have an interest in a regional
southeast code4lib so I'd be glad to help out if someone else takes
the lead...

Thanks for reminding me about CurateGear! I've been approved for it by
mpow but haven't filled out any paperwork yet (registration, etc.)

Kevin


On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Kam Woods kamwo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks! I don't see a group for south/southeast US yet. Something
 maybe I can help with. Also (related), we have have various people who
 are code4lib veterans coming to CurateGear in Chapel Hill on Jan 6 -
 registration is inexpensive and still open for anyone who wants to
 participate (especially those nearby).

 http://cfx.research.unc.edu/res_classreg/browse_single.cfm?New=1event=0BF752F1B4AAAFBDA9ADD3FBB8F60650B71FD2AB

 \shamelessplug

 Kam

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Wick, Ryan ryan.w...@oregonstate.edu wrote:
 Sure. You can see what other local/regional groups have done before:  
 http://code4lib.org/local

 Also: http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/Main_Page#Local_.2F_Regional_Groups


 Ryan Wick

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kam 
 Woods
 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:29 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] conference voting and registration

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 6:07 PM, Francis Kayiwa wrote:
 as more and more people get left out. I say if you get left out. Plan
 to run your $local code4lib to make up for it.
 ...
 If you're unhappy that you can't get into code4lib, start your own
 that you can get into!

 This seems like a great idea. Is it legit to use the code4lib name, logo, 
 wiki, and existing web resources to organize and run local events?

 Kam