[CODE4LIB] test of mr. serials

[Eric Lease Morgan]

This is at test, and hopefully the only test of the Mr. Serials Process against 
my Code4Lib mailing list archive. Delete me. —Eric

[CODE4LIB] Test message, please disregard

[Will Martin]

I am debugging my listserv subscription.  This is a test message.  
Please disregard.


Will Martin

[CODE4LIB] test message

[Eric Lease Morgan]

  This is a test message. 
  This is only a test of the Emergency Test Messaging Service.
  This is only a message.
  In case of a real emergency you would be instructed to
  Contact your nearest Code4Lib subscriber.
  This is only test message.

—
Eric “Test Message” Morgan

Re: [CODE4LIB] test

[Andromeda Yelton]

I would not want to be a bore
by beating this dead horse some more
and rhyming couplets are a chore
so code4lib, I do implore
in lieu of internet furore
let's revert to threads of yore
or patching bugs, or hacking core
or gitignoring .DS_Store
or begging zoia more, more, @more
or beering at the liquor store --

Aw, screw it. This is fun. --ay


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Pernotto wrote:

> I've never seen this before
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Michel, Jason 
> wrote:
>
> > Schofield - I was gonna say that! I'll just show myself to the door.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Michael Schofield  > >wrote:
> >
> > > Quoth the raven, "Nevermore!"
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Andreas Orphanides
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM
> > > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test
> > >
> > > A vacuum nature does abhor.
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf <
> pschlu...@earthlink.net
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is a test.  Please ignore.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jason Paul Michel
> > User Experience Librarian
> > Miami University Libraries
> > 513.529.3935
> > miche...@muohio.edu
> > @jpmichel <https://twitter.com/jpmichel>
> >
>

Re: [CODE4LIB] test

[Mark Pernotto]

I've never seen this before


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Michel, Jason  wrote:

> Schofield - I was gonna say that! I'll just show myself to the door.
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Michael Schofield  >wrote:
>
> > Quoth the raven, "Nevermore!"
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> > Andreas Orphanides
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM
> > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test
> >
> > A vacuum nature does abhor.
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf  > >wrote:
> >
> > > This is a test.  Please ignore.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jason Paul Michel
> User Experience Librarian
> Miami University Libraries
> 513.529.3935
> miche...@muohio.edu
> @jpmichel <https://twitter.com/jpmichel>
>

Re: [CODE4LIB] test

[Michel, Jason]

Schofield - I was gonna say that! I'll just show myself to the door.


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Michael Schofield wrote:

> Quoth the raven, "Nevermore!"
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Orphanides
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test
>
> A vacuum nature does abhor.
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf  >wrote:
>
> > This is a test.  Please ignore.
> >
>



-- 
Jason Paul Michel
User Experience Librarian
Miami University Libraries
513.529.3935
miche...@muohio.edu
@jpmichel <https://twitter.com/jpmichel>

Re: [CODE4LIB] test

[Michael Schofield]

Quoth the raven, "Nevermore!"

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Andreas 
Orphanides
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test

A vacuum nature does abhor.

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf wrote:

> This is a test.  Please ignore.
>

Re: [CODE4LIB] test

[Andreas Orphanides]

A vacuum nature does abhor.

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf wrote:

> This is a test.  Please ignore.
>

[CODE4LIB] test

[Peter Schlumpf]

This is a test.  Please ignore.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Test dataset for evaluation of automatic classification of research documents according to FAST and DDC

[Nathan Tallman]

Not sure if this is what you want, but the FAST dataset is available online
from OCLC.  http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/fast/download.htm

Nathan

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Arash.Joorabchi wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am working on developing a software system designed to analyze the
> content of research documents (e.g., research papers, articles, etc.)
> archived in scientific repositories (e.g., http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
>   , http://arxiv.org/ ) and automatically
> classify them according to FAST and DDC. In order to objectively qualify
> the performance of the system, a collection of research documents which
> have been manually classified according to the DDC and been assigned
> FAST subject heading would be required. I was wondering if anyone is
> aware of such dataset existing online.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Arash
>

Re: [CODE4LIB] Test dataset for evaluation of automatic classification of research documents according to FAST and DDC

[Rene Wiermer]

You might want to check out the BASE system from Bielefeld, Germany 
(http://www.base-search.net), which have access to a lot of OA sources, and 
implemented an  classification system (metadata+fulltext) for DDC themselves on 
a semi-automatic generated training corpus across all disciplines (might also 
be useful as a benchmark). They reported last year, that ~1,4% of their OA 
metadata had manually assigned subject classification on it . 

Regards,
Rene
Am 29.06.2012 um 15:29 schrieb Arash.Joorabchi:

> Hi all,
> 
> 
> 
> I am working on developing a software system designed to analyze the
> content of research documents (e.g., research papers, articles, etc.)
> archived in scientific repositories (e.g., http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
>   , http://arxiv.org/ ) and automatically
> classify them according to FAST and DDC. In order to objectively qualify
> the performance of the system, a collection of research documents which
> have been manually classified according to the DDC and been assigned
> FAST subject heading would be required. I was wondering if anyone is
> aware of such dataset existing online.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Arash

[CODE4LIB] Test dataset for evaluation of automatic classification of research documents according to FAST and DDC

[Arash.Joorabchi]

Hi all,

 

I am working on developing a software system designed to analyze the
content of research documents (e.g., research papers, articles, etc.)
archived in scientific repositories (e.g., http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
  , http://arxiv.org/ ) and automatically
classify them according to FAST and DDC. In order to objectively qualify
the performance of the system, a collection of research documents which
have been manually classified according to the DDC and been assigned
FAST subject heading would be required. I was wondering if anyone is
aware of such dataset existing online.

 

Regards,

Arash

[CODE4LIB] Test

[LeVan,Ralph]

The Code4lib list server has a bug.  When I send an email to the list,
it gets forwarded to the members of the list with my email address in
the FROM header.  Email to OCLC goes through Postini and Postini clearly
recognizes that an email originating from ND.EDU is not email from OCLC
and rejects it.  This means not only that other OCLC employees never see
my posts, but also the list server counts those rejected emails and
after some threshold the members who reject those emails get
unsubscribed from the list.

 

I've whined about this in the past.  I've also raised it as an issue
within OCLC and our email folks are going to work with the LSoft folks
(the maker of the list server) to solve the problem.  As a first step,
I'm sending this message to the list.  There will probably be a few
more.  I beg your patience.

 

Ralph