Re: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

2014-02-28 Thread Nadaleen F Tempelman-Kluit
Ronan-
That's exactly what we do here at NYU Libraries and it works really well.
We have observers in another room taking notes in real time as the tests
are in progress in another part of the library, using GoToMeeting.
Let me know if you want more details.


On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Ronan McHugh r...@kb.dk wrote:

 Steve Krug recommends GoToMeeting in his book (Rocket Surgery Made Easy).
 They've got a 30 day free trial so we're going to try it out next week on
 some of our colleagues to see if it's worth the price. Basically what we
 want is the ability to capture the screen and sound and to play this live
 for the developers in another room, so that we can all observe together. I
 looked at Silverback, but I think getting users to do a usability test on
 an unfamiliar device (i.e. a Mac) can only lead to problems and confusion.
 I'll let you know how we get on.

 Cheers,

 Ronan McHugh
 Software Developer
 Royal Library of Denmark




-- 
Nadaleen Tempelman-Kluit
Head, User Experience (UX) Department
Bobst Library, New York University
n...@nyu.edu
(212) 998-2469
Sign up to help us test our interfaces  get an iTunes gift card!
https://library.nyu.edu/ux/


Re: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

2014-02-28 Thread Matt Connolly
We use this approach as well here at Cornell. Our usability group has tried a 
variety of techniques, including using Morae and writing detailed reports for 
clients, but having clients observe live from a remote location seems to engage 
them more. It's become a popular means of testing. One note, though: this 
method gets called discount usability testing, but we found that label to be 
very inaccurate! We call it raw usability instead, which I think better 
describes the unprocessed flow of information from tester to client.

By the way, we also use Macs for most of our testing, and I don't think that 
it's led to inordinate amounts of confusion. I would recommend running tests in 
Firefox or Chrome, though, and not Safari. And on a laptop, definitely plug in 
a mouse so that testers don't have to rely on the trackpad!

— Matt



Matt Connolly
Application Developer, CUL-IT
Cornell University Library
218 Olin Library | Ithaca, NY  14853
(607) 256-4209

On Feb 28, 2014, at 6:06 AM, Nadaleen F Tempelman-Kluit n...@nyu.edu wrote:

 Ronan-
 That's exactly what we do here at NYU Libraries and it works really well.
 We have observers in another room taking notes in real time as the tests
 are in progress in another part of the library, using GoToMeeting.
 Let me know if you want more details.
 
 
 On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Ronan McHugh r...@kb.dk wrote:
 
 Steve Krug recommends GoToMeeting in his book (Rocket Surgery Made Easy).
 They've got a 30 day free trial so we're going to try it out next week on
 some of our colleagues to see if it's worth the price. Basically what we
 want is the ability to capture the screen and sound and to play this live
 for the developers in another room, so that we can all observe together. I
 looked at Silverback, but I think getting users to do a usability test on
 an unfamiliar device (i.e. a Mac) can only lead to problems and confusion.
 I'll let you know how we get on.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ronan McHugh
 Software Developer
 Royal Library of Denmark
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Nadaleen Tempelman-Kluit
 Head, User Experience (UX) Department
 Bobst Library, New York University
 n...@nyu.edu
 (212) 998-2469
 Sign up to help us test our interfaces  get an iTunes gift card!
 https://library.nyu.edu/ux/


Re: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

2014-02-27 Thread Sean Hannan
I¹ve used Silverback  Camtasia. Silverback is pretty dead simple and nice
and cheap. Camtasia needs a bit more configuration, but it works just as
well.

The one issue that I did not expect to run into using Silverback is how
many users (students, especially, oddly enough) were unfamiliar with using
a Mac. It made usability testing a bit tricky, since they were
apprehensive about even using the trackpad. ³How do I go back?² ³You press
the back button, just as you would in Firefox on a PC.² That kind of
thing. I definitely didn¹t expect that.

-Sean

‹
Sean Hannan
Senior Web Developer
Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University

On 2/27/14, 1:06 PM, Mary E. Hanlin mhan...@reynolds.edu wrote:

Hi All,

Sorry if this has been discussed before. (I'm new to the list.)  But, has
anyone conducted usability studies using screencast software?  If so,
what software works well? (Morae is too pricey; I'm thinking along the
lines of Camtasia, Silverback, etc.)

Also, do you have any anecdotal advice regarding what worked and what
didn't?  Thanks in advance.

Mary Hanlin
Electronic Resources and Web Librarian
Reynolds Community College
Richmond, VA
Phone:804.523.5323
Email: mhan...@reynolds.edumailto:mhan...@reynolds.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

2014-02-27 Thread Junior Tidal
Hi Mary, 

I haven't used it for screen casting usability testing (yet), but I was going 
to use Quicktime packaged with OS X. It can be used for screen recording.

Best,

Junior Tidal
Assistant Professor
Web Services and Multimedia Librarian
New York City College of Technology, CUNY 
300 Jay Street, Rm A434
Brooklyn, NY 11201
718.260.5481
 
http://library.citytech.cuny.edu


 Mary E. Hanlin mhan...@reynolds.edu 2/27/2014 1:06 PM 
Hi All,

Sorry if this has been discussed before. (I'm new to the list.)  But, has 
anyone conducted usability studies using screencast software?  If so, what 
software works well? (Morae is too pricey; I'm thinking along the lines of 
Camtasia, Silverback, etc.)

Also, do you have any anecdotal advice regarding what worked and what didn't?  
Thanks in advance.

Mary Hanlin
Electronic Resources and Web Librarian
Reynolds Community College
Richmond, VA
Phone:804.523.5323
Email: mhan...@reynolds.edumailto:mhan...@reynolds.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

2014-02-27 Thread Ahniwa Ferrari
I've used both Camtasia and SnagIt and I like both well enough. SnagIt is
cheap and dead simple for the screen capturing process; not a lot of bells
and whistles but I don't need / want those. I've also used a lot of video
editing tools (since SnagIt doesn't have much itself) and these days mostly
just use Windows Movie Maker or equivalent free tool.


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Junior Tidal jti...@citytech.cuny.eduwrote:

 Hi Mary,

 I haven't used it for screen casting usability testing (yet), but I was
 going to use Quicktime packaged with OS X. It can be used for screen
 recording.

 Best,

 Junior Tidal
 Assistant Professor
 Web Services and Multimedia Librarian
 New York City College of Technology, CUNY
 300 Jay Street, Rm A434
 Brooklyn, NY 11201
 718.260.5481

 http://library.citytech.cuny.edu


  Mary E. Hanlin mhan...@reynolds.edu 2/27/2014 1:06 PM 
 Hi All,

 Sorry if this has been discussed before. (I'm new to the list.)  But, has
 anyone conducted usability studies using screencast software?  If so, what
 software works well? (Morae is too pricey; I'm thinking along the lines of
 Camtasia, Silverback, etc.)

 Also, do you have any anecdotal advice regarding what worked and what
 didn't?  Thanks in advance.

 Mary Hanlin
 Electronic Resources and Web Librarian
 Reynolds Community College
 Richmond, VA
 Phone:804.523.5323
 Email: mhan...@reynolds.edumailto:mhan...@reynolds.edu



Re: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

2014-02-27 Thread McCanna, Terran
It really depends on what you want to do and how complicated you want to get.

I've used Camtasia, SnagIt, and Adobe Captivate, and they're all good for what 
they do, but my personal favorite and go-to program is Captivate. The learning 
curve is a little higher, but it's very powerful. It separates out the recorded 
elements (screen, mouse, typing, etc.) into different tracks so that you can 
tweak the timing on each one separately, you can configure it to automatically 
add in different things (sounds for typing and clicking, pop-up label boxes, 
highlight boxes, etc. - each of which you can modify or delete individually), 
it allows you to add individual voiceover recordings and adjust your screen 
timing to go along with your voiceover (so that you don't have to record your 
voiceover at the same time as you're concentrating on the screen recording), 
you can build quizzes into it, you can make it branch depending on answers, 
easily add title slides between sections of video, easily import graphics, 
etc 

You can also use it to make a quick  dirty screen capture without any 
configuration and upload it directly to YouTube without having to mess around 
with conversions when you want to, but if that's all you need, then it would be 
overkill. 


Terran McCanna 
PINES Program Manager 
Georgia Public Library Service 
1800 Century Place, Suite 150 
Atlanta, GA 30345 
404-235-7138 
tmcca...@georgialibraries.org 

- Original Message -
From: Mary E. Hanlin mhan...@reynolds.edu
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:06:14 PM
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Screencasting Usability Studies

Hi All,

Sorry if this has been discussed before. (I'm new to the list.)  But, has 
anyone conducted usability studies using screencast software?  If so, what 
software works well? (Morae is too pricey; I'm thinking along the lines of 
Camtasia, Silverback, etc.)

Also, do you have any anecdotal advice regarding what worked and what didn't?  
Thanks in advance.

Mary Hanlin
Electronic Resources and Web Librarian
Reynolds Community College
Richmond, VA
Phone:804.523.5323
Email: mhan...@reynolds.edumailto:mhan...@reynolds.edu