Re: [Coder-Com] Fireball's info
At 1:26 PM -0800 28/03/02, BobsKC wrote: >Every once in a while.. even after 9 years here, I forget that I >should never send anything to this list unless I'm prepared to >suffer insults and comments about my technical idiocy ... This >current round of graciousness by list members displaying their >appreciation for someone trying to share information whether it be >germane or worthless, won't be forgotten soon. > >Bob 9 years? not too sure what you were doing for the other 3 years, but here's an email from 6 years ago that you might remember... >Received: (from majordom@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.7.5/jared) >id WAA19202 for cservice-out; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:20:15 -0400 >Received: from sun.revealed.net (sun.revealed.net [205.243.76.6]) by >puck.nether.net (8.7.5/jared) with ESMTP id WAA19196 for ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:20:13 -0400 >Received: from [205.243.76.229] by sun.revealed.net (post.office MTA v1.9.3 > ID# 0-13301) with SMTP id AAA28272 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > Tue, 6 Aug 1996 21:16:21 -0500 >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [Cservice] Cservice channel ops >Date: Tue, 06 Aug 96 21:19:16 -0500 >From: "Robert Arbuckle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Mailer: E-Mail Connection v2.5.03 >Message-ID: <19960807021619.AAA28272@[205.243.76.229]> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >X-UIDL: 9ea840c21074724f26f8ef24b3184f97 >Status: U > >-- [ From: bobskc * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- > >Hello all, > >I was talking with Kev recently about security issues relative to pvt msgs >and he suggested I write in regard to policy for receiving ops on the >cservice channel. I >have been helping there for some time now and often late at night or midday >when few if any active ops are present. This open invitation to cause >problems for the channel is often accepted by those who know they cannot be >kicked/banned. > >Again, I do not know how long I need to be around before trust sets in but >it has been at least a couple of months of regular service and another >couple months of very part time help and a lot of learning time. I have my >own channel and am very good with people but helping "naked" is a tough >proposition. (Unless your name is NudeDude of course). :-> > >Not looking for any other status unless the Admins feel I am ready for it, >just would like to be in control of my enviornment. (I have be op'd once in >a while on a temporary basis but most helpers are unsure about doing this). > > >Thank you for your time and consideration. > >Bob Laters, -- ___ | | ___ ___| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_-http://www.theducks.org/ 4496760@ICQ "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
Re: [Coder-Com] umode +x
At 8:49 AM +1300 17/12/02, Isomer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there any plans to implement a -x feature, or at least make it an *optional* feature? I've noticed that on some of the servers that +x is automatically set, which is quite frustrating. - -x is racy, and kinda pointless, the servers that set +x automatically have been fixed. Plus, CService doesn't want you to be able to -x for the same reason there's no deauth command in X. -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ ._ _ _ http://www.chatsystems.com/~lgm | |/ . || ' ' | |_|\_. ||_|_|_| Undernet Channel Service <___' Undernet IRC Operator
[Coder-Com] Re: [Unet-Opers] user registration
At 4:13 PM +0100 29/01/03, Carlo Wood wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:33:37AM +0100, Eriksson, Peter wrote: it with matlab probably. I will confirm that with a collegue and also ask him for some ideas to make it impossible. (he is a Ph.D in pattern recognition). That sounds cool :). Tell us more after you spoke with him! Indeed it does. In my non IRC work, I am a sysadmin for an electrical engineering department at a University, so I've had to play with Matlab a LOT.. getting it to recognise those letters is certainly not very difficult with some of it's toolboxes.. blur + contrast + sharpen + compared against known character shapes.. and hey presto. But any input from your PhD friend would certainly be appreciated, I'm sure.. maybe something like those colour blind tests ;) Overall, I think this is a great concept for stopping mass registrations, however there is another issue.. as I'm sure some of you know, an almost identical process is used by Yahoo! in their user account creation form. I've had a look thru the USPTO.gov website, and they _don't seem_ to have a patent on it, but it's something to keep in mind. -- ___ | | ___ ___| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_- <___||_|\___./\_\ \___|<___||__/_/ /__/\___/|_|_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=- http://www.theducks.org/ 4496760@ICQ "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
Re: [Coder-Com] query window
At 4:21 PM +0100 09/02/03, Sofie Van Tendeloo wrote: Ever thought about a command that you could use to send a message to all your query windows? /amsg and /ame are sending to your current channels but not to your current query windows Greet and Hugs Sofie Those are client commands, not server ones. Whilst in theory the server does keep a track of the people you have talked to most recently, what you have requested is not a practical or useful addition to the server. Best to take it up with the author of your client. -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ ._ _ _ | |/ . || ' ' | |_|\_. ||_|_|_| Undernet Channel Service <___' Undernet IRC Operator
Re: [Coder-Com] Fwd: [Cservice] accessability enquiry
At 4:14 AM -0500 29/03/03, stoney` wrote: Hi, Can someone work with this person and perhaps figure out what's going on. Thanks, Py (stoney`) Hmm all I can think of is our ISUPPORT numeric is breaking microsoft's client, pretty much everything else is standard. -- ___ | | ___ ___| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_- <___||_|\___./\_\ \___|<___||__/_/ /__/\___/|_|_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=- http://www.theducks.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
Re: [Coder-com] make ircd-ircu listening on localhost 127.0.0.1
Also, won't running ircd behind stunnel mean all the clients have
127.0.0.1 as their client IP? This may not be a problem depending on
how you're going to be using it, but it sounds like something to watch
out for.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please send follow-up questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 02:12 +0200, franck34 wrote:
>> Can you give me the line and place regarding the "vhost relation" you
>> are speaking ?
>
> It should be easy to find in the example.conf; just search for "port {"
> and start reading. (You'll probably have to back up in the example.conf
> to see all that we've written about it.) That said, it appears the
> documentation for the port block begins at line 674 in example.conf.
> --
> Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ___
> Coder-com mailing list
> Coder-com@undernet.org
> http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
>
>
___
Coder-com mailing list
Coder-com@undernet.org
http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
Re: [Coder-Com] Virtual host +x
Because then people hammer the server you are on, inconveniancing more people than just yourself. We are looking at perhaps a common masked IP for all users, but at the stage it is not decided yet :) At 4:04 AM +0200 04/09/01, -= Ivan aka AiRMaFiA =- wrote: >`lo all, > I was wondering why undernet does not use the +x mode . As >everyone may knows it can lessen personal attacks too. What are the >disadvantages pls ? ( I hope this wasn`t asked before :) > > > > >PS: If some say cause of the bans and that when you connect to the server >again you`ve got another virtual host so you can evade bans I think it`s >wrong . I was admin on ChatNet and as far as I know it gives only one VH to >a single IP. > >*** Connecting to eu.chatnet.org (6667) >-Frogn.NO.EU.ChatNet.Org- *** Looking up your hostname... >-Frogn.NO.EU.ChatNet.Org- *** Checking Ident... >...etc etc >AiRMaFiA is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Plain and Simple [Masked Host: >212.56.155.51698] >AiRMaFiA on @#Eassyde #nuthouse >AiRMaFiA using Frogn.NO.EU.ChatNet.Org ChatNet Norway, Frogn >AiRMaFiA has been idle 17secs, signed on Tue Sep 04 03:47:14 >airmafia End of /WHOIS list. >. > >*** Connecting to 65.193.26.84 (6667) >-OklahomaCity.OK.US.ChatNet.Org- *** Looking up your hostname... >-OklahomaCity.OK.US.ChatNet.Org- *** Checking Ident... >...etc >AiRMaFiA is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Plain and Simple [Masked Host: >212.56.155.51698] >AiRMaFiA on @#Eassyde #nuthouse >AiRMaFiA using OklahomaCity.OK.US.ChatNet.Org Jai Hind >AiRMaFiA has been idle 16secs, signed on Tue Sep 04 03:51:10 >airmafia End of /WHOIS list. > > >Regards >Ivan Degiorgio >Aka AiRMaFiA >[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ | | ___ ___| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_-http://www.theducks.org/ 4496760@ICQ "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
[Coder-Com] re: status command
So just do a mass remuser. If you were legitimately added, we wouldn't do anything if you did. At 12:40 AM -0500 10/09/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I Agree there, > >In the past I have had turkish channels adding me as 450 + in there >channels without my concent , and then when there is trouble there they >say "Well simba is 450 here" and I look quite foolish. > >Would be nice to have some acceptence like stoney said > >Simba -- ___ | | ___ ___| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_-http://www.theducks.org/ 4496760@ICQ "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
Re: [Coder-Com] I have a great sugestion for X
>Alright hello all coders on Undernet. I thought of a really good idea you >might want to use for X bot. but I dont know if I am talkin to the right >people here. So if you guys/girls are the people that are incharge of coding >X then I have a great suggestion for you. If you guys are the right people >then can you please email me back. I simply dont want other people to gain >credit for my idea. If you submit an idea to this list, and it eventually used, you will get no credit. The only way you will get into our credits, is by actually writing a patch to do what you want, and even then, only if it accepted by X's coders. People submit ideas all the time. Also note, if you're submitting a patch for the express purpose of trying to get your name in lights.. don't bother. For a copy of X's source code, have a look at http://gnuworld.sourceforge.net/ -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ ._ _ _ http://cservice.undernet.org/~lgm | |/ . || ' ' | |_|\_. ||_|_|_| Undernet Channel Service Co-Ordinator <___' Undernet IRC Operator
Re: [Coder-Com] Error on site:
At 12:41 PM +0100 14/12/02, TeDDyBeeR wrote: Hello dear reader, I get an error when i setup the website as the setuppage tell me: Your apache server has PHP 4.2.3 Lots of changes in 4.2 oblige us to update a lot of things. Fortunately, you can solve this problem by activating a now by default desactivated feature Go edit your php.ini file and find the line defining register_globals, set its value to On and then restart your apache (/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart) .. then reload this page :) I have done this what me is told, but still he gives this error I have used Apache 1.3.27 instead of the site say's (1.3.26) and i have downloaded the PHP version 4.2.3 i have follow the setup page to configure and setup this. What shout i doto solve this problem : if you wane see the error : http://212.58.167.136:8084/live please reply answers to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] not to the mail addy where it's comming from :) regards, Michael Spies The Netherlands That is not our website. Someone is trying to trick you. The official CService website is at http://cservice.undernet.org/live -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ ._ _ _ http://www.chatsystems.com/~lgm | |/ . || ' ' | |_|\_. ||_|_|_| Undernet Channel Service <___' Undernet IRC Operator
Re: [Coder-Com] the infamous net rider
At 8:10 AM -0500 15/03/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi. throughout the years occasionally there is talk of net riding, and the infamous, super hero sounding, net rider. this email is simply a request for a bit of background information and/or history on what exactly net riding is. because i've always been interested but have never actually known what it is. i'd also be interested to know how undernet prevent net riding. thanks. Heh :) Net Riding is getting ops in a channel by connecting to a split server where no-one is on the channel so the server gives you ops.. when the server rejoins, if you keep ops, you are a "net rider" Undernet prevents this in a number of ways, mainly thru the use of channel timestamps. When a channel is created (ie joined when empty), it is given a timestamp, when a server rejoins the network, it renegotiates with it's new peer the timestamp of each channel.. the op list belonging to the instance of the channel with the oldest timestamp overrules. Other networks have only recently aadopted timestamp techniques, meaning that it used to be necessary to make clients de-op other clients receiving ops from servers. Undernet also hides interserver links including which servers are connected, thus preventing people from finding split servers and possibily exploiting server bugs and doing something which might "hack" the timestamp protocol and keeping ops or otherwise disrupting the network when it rejoins, though this is very unlikely given the maturity of Undernet's code, with the current codebase started about 7 years ago. -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ ._ _ _ http://www.chatsystems.com/~lgm | |/ . || ' ' | |_|\_. ||_|_|_| Undernet Channel Service <___' Undernet IRC Operator
