Well, it's not actually a bug since X will automaticly remove bans that
are covered by more restrictive bans. Example:
I ban *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And after that I set ban *!*@*, *!*@* implies that *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] are banned, so X removes thease bans from the
banlist.
The same phenomena will occur with ircu, u set /mode #chan +b
*!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And then u do /mode #chan +b *!*@*.ca, u will see *** Nickname sets
mode: +b-b *!*@*.ca *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This feature is implemented for cleaning banlists.
Math
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
De la part de Hidden
Envoyé : 1 mai, 2002 18:09
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [Coder-Com] bug with the unban cmd
OUTsider,
/msg X unban #chan Hidden was suppose to remove only the bans matching
the
nick Hidden (*!*@*) but it didnt.
Coders, There is a bug here.
[18:01] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* ban #test-chan *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[18:01] -X- Added ban *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] to #test-chan at level 75
[18:01] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* ban #test-chan *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[18:01] -X- Added ban *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] to #test-chan at level 75
[18:01] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* ban #test-chan *!*@*
[18:01] *** X sets mode: -b *!*@213.149.174.63
[18:01] *** X sets mode: +b *!*@*
(Script/18:01:44) * X Banned: '*!*@*' matching -=(Gunnis Gaia gun-jupe
Hidden mad-boy X)=-
[18:01] -X- Added ban *!*@* to #test-chan at level 75
[18:01] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* unban #test-chan hidden
[18:01] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* lbanlist #test-chan *
[18:01] -X- Removed 1 bans that matched [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[18:01] -X- *** Ban List for channel #test-chan ***
[18:01] -X- No Match!
it says clearly: [18:01] -X- Removed 1 bans that matched
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it says it removed 1 ban, but where are the *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
*!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bans gone ?
Thats indeed a bug, and when it'll be fixed, I think the unban issue
with
*!*@* can be forgotten. That cmd SHOULD remove only bans matching
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (*!*@*) and not the 2 others (*!*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
the other)
chill
Hidden
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Maassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:56 PM
Subject: [Coder-Com] Re: [coder-com] *!*@* ban abusability
>>Hidden:
> Easy to remove the *!*@* ban OUTsider,
> In my case, I could: /msg X unban #chan Hidden
> X will then check wich bans are matching me and will remove *!*@* and
other
> bans matching me if there are any, but X will not remove ALL bans as
if
you
> were doing /msg X unban #chan *!*@*
I asked you how to remove the *!*@* ban ONLY with preserving the other
present bans. In the current state X is in thats IMPOSSIBLE without also
removing the other bans present in the list. Get my point ?
And a ban in X on level 20 at *!*@* prevents everyone in the channel to
get
ops, so they would be forced to remove all X bans to be able to remove
the
single annoyance.
>>TGS:
>Second off. a 101+ can easily remove the ban suspend the user and thus
a
solution to the problem
Sorry but suspend/unsuspend requires level 200+
>As for the problem of it being globally abused. If chans are caught
doing
that they should just have X revoked from the channel.
Cservice doesn't care much, you don't either, otherwise you wouldn't put
the
responsibility of commands usage within a channel on the 400+ users.
Cservice is NOT responsible of whats going on in a channel, true, but
cservice and the network is associated to provide the enviroment a
channel
can use and is thus responsible for the options provided through
services
delivered by cservice to a channel. They decide the options present to a
channel and this feature can put quite a load on the network if
continuesly
abused in this way.
>>éL NìçóS
>...but I don't get how someone is able to flood a channel where has
been
put a ban on *!*@*...
not if you issue a ban on *!*@*, but if you issue a kick on *!*@*, then
X
will kick everyone from the channel, since most clients use the
autorejoin
after kick feature in the clients they will automatically rejoin after
the
kick, perhaps this makes it more understandable.
>>Run:
> I use it to clean the ban list.
true, but thats regarding unban, if you issue a unban on *!*@* then you
will
indeed remove all bans present in the channel + all bans present in X's
banlist, but do you also need it for BAN/KICK as well ?
>>Daave
Yes, it is also a channel trust issue, agreed, but yes, you can create
floods with it, just read some of the above and you get the picture as
well.
>>Amarande
>1. If a chanop abuses the channel they are opped on this way, by
flooding
or permitting others to flood the channel in this manner, a 400+ op can
and
should put an end to this by removing the offender's ac
