[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions

2020-02-18 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7433#issuecomment-587970268
 
 
   > Looks good other than one small tidy up.
   
   Done


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions

2020-02-18 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7433#issuecomment-587814433
 
 
   Hey @ashb. Are you ok with how it is ?


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions

2020-02-17 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7433#issuecomment-587228520
 
 
   > We should make sure this works for pyenv, but at a code level this LGTM
   
   Confirmed it works fr both pyenv and virtualenv.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions

2020-02-17 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7433#issuecomment-587074147
 
 
   > I'm a little bit lost in two-in-one refactor in this PR (moving things to 
functions, and also renaming some env vars) but looks okay from what I can tell
   
   I could not resist the temptation to rename some of the variables and make 
them shorter. Since they are all internal and done automatically I think doing 
it while separating out functions might be a good idea.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions

2020-02-16 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7433#issuecomment-586743769
 
 
   And @ashb -> that's the next step to make the breeze scripts simpler/better 
testable
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions

2020-02-16 Thread GitBox
potiuk commented on issue #7433: [AIRFLOW-6820] split breeze into functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7433#issuecomment-586732529
 
 
   Hey @dimberman  -> this is part of the #6500 -> I split it into smaller 
pieces as you suggested. First was #7430 - already approved by Ash. Now this 
one which introduces functions to breeze and makes it much easier to read. The 
next one will be to move the build logic from ./hooks/build script to _utils.sh 
and that will be it.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services