[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14611823#comment-14611823 ]
Mateusz Moneta edited comment on CASSANDRA-9299 at 7/2/15 12:15 PM: -------------------------------------------------------------------- [~iamaleksey] Thanks for reply but it's strange because before 2.1.6 we were receiving reports with few thousands of tombstones and after there are none. was (Author: nihn): Thanks for reply but it's strange because before 2.1.6 we were receiving reports with few thousands of tombstones and after there are none. > Fix counting of tombstones towards TombstoneOverwhelmingException > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-9299 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9299 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko > Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko > Fix For: 2.0.15, 2.1.6 > > Attachments: 9299-2.0.txt, 9299-2.1.txt, 9299-trunk.txt > > > CASSANDRA-6042 introduced warning on too many tombstones scanned, then > CASSANDRA-6117 introduced a hard TombstoneOverwhelmingException condition. > However, at least {{SliceQuerFilter.collectReducedColumn()}} seems to have > the logic wrong. Cells that are covered by a range tombstone or a partition > high level deletion, still count towards {{ColumnCounter}}'s {{ignored}} > register. > Thus it's possible to have an otherwise healthy (though large) dropped > partition read cause an exception that shouldn't be there. > The only things that should count towards the exception are cell tombstones > and range tombstones (CASSANDRA-8527), but never ever live cells shadowed by > any kind of tombstone. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)