[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-12167) Review JMX metrics test coverage

2016-08-08 Thread Philip Thompson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411987#comment-15411987
 ] 

Philip Thompson commented on CASSANDRA-12167:
-

Seems reasonable then

> Review JMX metrics test coverage
> 
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12167
> Project: Cassandra
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Witschey
>Assignee: DS Test Eng
>  Labels: dtest
>
> I just deleted the dtest that was meant to smoke test JMX metrics:
> https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest/pull/1085
> The idea was that you'd read JMX metrics, run stress, then make sure the 
> metrics went up, down, or stayed the same, as appropriate. This kind of 
> coverage would be good to have.
> I don't think we have it anywhere in the dtests, and it probably isn't 
> appropriate in unit tests. We should check there's no coverage in the unit 
> tests, and add some coverage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-12167) Review JMX metrics test coverage

2016-08-08 Thread Jim Witschey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411981#comment-15411981
 ] 

Jim Witschey commented on CASSANDRA-12167:
--

Sounds right -- but, I think that the documentation on these was fleshed out 
much better, which could make it more doable for TE. Thoughts?

> Review JMX metrics test coverage
> 
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12167
> Project: Cassandra
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Witschey
>Assignee: DS Test Eng
>  Labels: dtest
>
> I just deleted the dtest that was meant to smoke test JMX metrics:
> https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest/pull/1085
> The idea was that you'd read JMX metrics, run stress, then make sure the 
> metrics went up, down, or stayed the same, as appropriate. This kind of 
> coverage would be good to have.
> I don't think we have it anywhere in the dtests, and it probably isn't 
> appropriate in unit tests. We should check there's no coverage in the unit 
> tests, and add some coverage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-12167) Review JMX metrics test coverage

2016-08-08 Thread Philip Thompson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411911#comment-15411911
 ] 

Philip Thompson commented on CASSANDRA-12167:
-

This was discussed, and we established it would be best for a dev to do this, 
somewhere far down the line, yeah?

> Review JMX metrics test coverage
> 
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12167
> Project: Cassandra
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Witschey
>Assignee: DS Test Eng
>  Labels: dtest
>
> I just deleted the dtest that was meant to smoke test JMX metrics:
> https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest/pull/1085
> The idea was that you'd read JMX metrics, run stress, then make sure the 
> metrics went up, down, or stayed the same, as appropriate. This kind of 
> coverage would be good to have.
> I don't think we have it anywhere in the dtests, and it probably isn't 
> appropriate in unit tests. We should check there's no coverage in the unit 
> tests, and add some coverage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)