sunithabeeram commented on a change in pull request #3993: In TableConfig, add
checks for mandatory fields
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3993#discussion_r267479988
##
File path:
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/config/TableConfig.java
##
@@ -118,14 +118,24 @@ public static TableConfig fromJsonString(String
jsonString)
@Nonnull
public static TableConfig fromJSONConfig(@Nonnull JsonNode jsonConfig)
throws IOException {
+// Mandatory fields
+Preconditions.checkState(jsonConfig.has(TABLE_TYPE_KEY), "Table type is
missing");
TableType tableType =
TableType.valueOf(jsonConfig.get(TABLE_TYPE_KEY).asText().toUpperCase());
+Preconditions.checkState(jsonConfig.has(TABLE_NAME_KEY), "Table name is
missing");
String tableName =
TableNameBuilder.forType(tableType).tableNameWithType(jsonConfig.get(TABLE_NAME_KEY).asText());
-
+Preconditions
+.checkState(jsonConfig.has(VALIDATION_CONFIG_KEY), "Mandatory config
'%s' is missing", VALIDATION_CONFIG_KEY);
SegmentsValidationAndRetentionConfig validationConfig =
extractChildConfig(jsonConfig, VALIDATION_CONFIG_KEY,
SegmentsValidationAndRetentionConfig.class);
+Preconditions.checkState(jsonConfig.has(TENANT_CONFIG_KEY), "Mandatory
config '%s' is missing", TENANT_CONFIG_KEY);
TenantConfig tenantConfig = extractChildConfig(jsonConfig,
TENANT_CONFIG_KEY, TenantConfig.class);
+Preconditions
+.checkState(jsonConfig.has(INDEXING_CONFIG_KEY), "Mandatory config
'%s' is missing", INDEXING_CONFIG_KEY);
Review comment:
Are INDEXING and CUSTOM configs really mandatory?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org