Author: pkluegl
Date: Tue Dec 20 15:32:17 2011
New Revision: 1221318

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221318&view=rev
Log:
UIMA-2285
converted to maven project
added a proxy book and old (out-dated) introduction for testing the maven build 
process 

Added:
    uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/pom.xml
    
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/images/tools/tools.textmarker/symboltaxo.png
   (with props)
    
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/proxy-book.xml
Modified:
    
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/tools.textmarker.xml

Added: uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/pom.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/pom.xml?rev=1221318&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/pom.xml (added)
+++ uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/pom.xml Tue Dec 20 
15:32:17 2011
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";>
+  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
+  <artifactId>uima-docbook-textmarker</artifactId>
+  <version>2.4.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
+  <packaging>pom</packaging>
+  <parent>
+       <groupId>org.apache.uima</groupId>
+       <artifactId>uimaj-parent</artifactId>
+       <version>2.4.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
+       <relativePath>../uimaj-parent/pom.xml</relativePath>
+  </parent>
+  <name>Apache UIMA SDK Documentation - TextMarker</name>
+  <url>${uimaWebsiteUrl}</url>
+  <scm>
+       
<url>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker</url>
+       
<connection>scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker</connection>
+       
<developerConnection>scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker</developerConnection>
+  </scm>
+  <properties>
+       <uimaScmProject>${project.artifactId}</uimaScmProject>
+       <bookNameRoot>proxy-book</bookNameRoot>
+  </properties>
+</project>
\ No newline at end of file

Added: 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/images/tools/tools.textmarker/symboltaxo.png
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/images/tools/tools.textmarker/symboltaxo.png?rev=1221318&view=auto
==============================================================================
Binary file - no diff available.

Propchange: 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/images/tools/tools.textmarker/symboltaxo.png
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream

Added: 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/proxy-book.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/proxy-book.xml?rev=1221318&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/proxy-book.xml
 (added)
+++ 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/proxy-book.xml
 Tue Dec 20 15:32:17 2011
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
+"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd";>
+<!--
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+distributed with this work for additional information
+regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+specific language governing permissions and limitations
+under the License.
+-->
+<book lang="en">
+  <title>TextMarker Guide and Reference</title>
+  <xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; 
href="../../target/docbook-shared/common_book_info.xml"/>
+  <toc/>
+  <xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; 
href="tools.textmarker.xml"/>
+</book>

Modified: 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/tools.textmarker.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/tools.textmarker.xml?rev=1221318&r1=1221317&r2=1221318&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/tools.textmarker.xml
 (original)
+++ 
uima/sandbox/trunk/TextMarker/uima-docbook-textmarker/src/docbook/tools.textmarker.xml
 Tue Dec 20 15:32:17 2011
@@ -25,4 +25,227 @@ under the License.
 -->
 
 <chapter id="ugr.tools.tm">
+       <title>TextMarker User&apos;s Guide</title>
+       <titleabbrev>TextMarker User&apos;s Guide</titleabbrev>
+
+       <section id="ugr.tools.tm.introduction">
+               <title>TextMarker</title>
+               <para>The TextMarker system is a rule-based tool for information
+                       extraction and text processing tasks. The 
comprehensible rule
+                       language
+                       can be easily extended and supports several scripting
+                       functionalities.
+                       TextMarker provides a DLTK-based IDE, an integration
+                       and a build
+                       process for UIMA components.
+               </para>
+               <section id="ugr.tools.tm.introduction.metaphor">
+                       <title>Introduction</title>
+                       <para>
+                               In manual information extraction humans often 
apply a strategy
+                               according to a highlighter metaphor: First 
relevant headlines are
+                               considered and classified according to their 
content by coloring
+                               them
+                               with different highlighters. The paragraphs of 
the annotated
+                               headlines
+                               are then considered further. Relevant text 
fragments or
+                               single words
+                               in the context of that headline can then be 
colored. In
+                               this way, a
+                               top-down analysis and extraction strategy is 
implemented.
+                               Necessary
+                               additional information can then be added that 
either refers
+                               to other
+                               text segments or contains valuable domain 
specific
+                               information.
+                               Finally the colored text can be easily analyzed
+                               concerning the
+                               relevant information.
+
+                               The TextMarker system (textmarker
+                               is a common german word for a
+                               highlighter) tries to imitate this
+                               manual extraction method by
+                               formalizing the appropriate actions using
+                               matching rules: The rules
+                               mark sequences of words, extract text
+                               segments or modify the input
+                               document depending on textual
+                               features.The default input for the
+                               TextMarker system is
+                               semi-structured text, but it can also process
+                               structured or free
+                               text. Technically, HTML is often the input
+                               format,
+                               since most word
+                               processing documents can be converted to HTML.
+                               Additionally, the
+                               TextMarker systems offers the possibility to
+                               create
+                               a modified output
+                               document.
+                       </para>
+               </section>
+               <section id="ugr.tools.tm.introduction.concepts">
+                       <title>Core Concepts</title>
+                       <para>
+                               As a first step in the extraction process the 
TextMarker system uses
+                               a
+                               tokenizer (scanner) to tokenize the input 
document and to create a
+                               stream of basic symbols. The types and valid 
annotations of the
+                               possible tokens are predefined by a taxonomy of 
annotation types.
+                               Annotations simply refer to a section of the 
input document and
+                               assign a type or concept to the respective text 
fragment. The figure
+                               on the right shows an excerpt of a basic 
annotation taxonomy: CW
+                               describes all tokens, for example, that 
contains a single word
+                               starting with a capital letter, MARKUP 
corresponds to HTML or XML
+                               tags, and PM refers to all kinds of 
punctuations marks. Take a look
+                               at [basic annotations|BasicAnnotationList] for 
a complete list of
+                               initial annotations.
+
+
+                               <screenshot>
+                                       <mediaobject>
+                                               <imageobject>
+                                                       <imagedata scale="100" 
format="PNG" fileref="&imgroot;symboltaxo.png" />
+                                               </imageobject>
+                                               <textobject>
+                                                       <phrase>Part of a 
taxonomy for basic annotation types.</phrase>
+                                               </textobject>
+                                       </mediaobject>
+                               </screenshot>
+
+                               By using (and extending) the taxonomy, the 
knowledge engineer is
+                               able
+                               to choose the most adequate types and concepts 
when defining new
+                               matching rules, i.e., TextMarker rules for 
matching a text fragment
+                               given by a set of symbols to an annotation. If 
the capitalization of
+                               a word, for example, is of no importance, then 
the annotation type W
+                               that describes words of any kind can be used. 
The initial scanner
+                               creates a set of basic annotations that may be 
used by the matching
+                               rules of the TextMarker language. However, most 
information
+                               extraction applications require domain specific 
concepts and
+                               annotations. Therefore, the knowledge engineer 
is able to extend the
+                               set of annotations, and to define new 
annotation types tuned to the
+                               requirements of the given domain. These types 
can be flexibly
+                               integrated in the taxonomy of annotation types.
+
+                               One of the goals in
+                               developing a new information extraction language
+                               was
+                               to maintain an
+                               easily readable syntax while still providing a
+                               scalable
+                               expressiveness of the language. Basically, the 
TextMarker
+                               language
+                               contains expressions for the definition of new 
annotation
+                               types and
+                               for defining new matching rules. The rules are 
defined by a
+                               list of
+                               rule elements.
+                               Each rule element contains at least a basic 
matching
+                               condition referring
+                               to text fragments or already specified
+                               annotations. Additionally a
+                               list of conditions and actions may be
+                               specified for a rule element.
+                               Whereas the conditions describe
+                               necessary attributes of the matched
+                               text fragment, the actions point
+                               to operations and assignments on
+                               the
+                               current fragments. These actions
+                               will then only be executed if all
+                               basic conditions matched on a text
+                               fragment or the annotation and the
+                               related conditions are fulfilled.
+                       </para>
+               </section>
+               <section id="ugr.tools.tm.introduction.examples">
+                       <title>Examples</title>
+                       <para>
+                               The usage of the language and its readability 
can be demonstrated by
+                               simple examples:
+
+                               <programlisting>
+                                       CW{INLIST('animals.txt') -> 
MARK(Animal)};
+                                       Animal "and" Animal{-> MARK(Animalpair, 
1, 2, 3)};
+        </programlisting>
+
+                               The first rule looks at all capitalized words 
that are listed in an
+                               external document animals.txt and creates a new 
annotation of the
+                               type
+                               animal using the boundaries of the matched 
word. The second rule
+                               searches for an annotation of the type animal 
followed by the
+                               literal
+                               and and a second animal annotation. Then it 
will create a new
+                               annotation animalpair covering the text segment 
that matched the
+                               three
+                               rule elements (the digit parameters refer to 
the number of
+                               matched
+                               rule element).
+
+                               <programlisting>
+                                       Document{-> MARKFAST(Firstname, 
'firstnames.txt')};
+                                       Firstname CW{-> MARK(Lastname)};
+                                       Paragraph{VOTE(Firstname, Lastname) -> 
LOG("Found more Firstnames than Lastnames")};
+       </programlisting>  
+
+                               In this example, the first rule annotates all 
words that occur in
+                               the
+                               external document firstnames.txt with the type 
firstname. The
+                               second
+                               rule creates a lastname annotation for all 
capitalized word
+                               that
+                               follow a firstname annotation. The last rule 
finally processes
+                               all
+                               paragraph} annotations. If the VOTE condition 
counts more
+                               firstname
+                               than lastname annotations, then the rule writes 
a log entry
+                               with a
+                               predefined message.
+
+
+                               <programlisting>
+                                       ANY+{PARTOF(Paragraph), 
CONTAINS(Delete, 50, 100, true) -> MARK(Delete)};
+                                       Firstname{-> MARK(Delete,1 , 2)} 
Lastname;
+                                       Delete{-> DEL};
+                               </programlisting>
+
+                               Here, the first rule looks for sequences of any 
kind of tokens
+                               except
+                               markup and creates one annotation of the type 
delete for each
+                               sequence, if the tokens are part of a paragraph 
annotation and
+                               contains together already more than 50% of 
delete annoations. The +
+                               signs indicate this greedy processing. The 
second rule annotates
+                               first
+                               names followed by last names with the type 
delete and the third
+                               rule
+                               simply deletes all text segments that are 
associated with that
+                               delete
+                               annotation.
+
+                       </para>
+               </section>
+               <section id="ugr.tools.tm.introduction.features">
+                       <title>Special Features</title>
+                       <para>
+                               The TextMarker language features some special 
characteristics
+                               that are
+                               usually not found in other rule-based 
information extraction
+                               systems
+                               or even shift it towards scripting languages. 
The possibility
+                               of
+                               creating new annotation types and integrating 
them into the
+                               taxonomy
+                               facilitates an even more modular development of 
information
+                               extraction systems.
+
+                               Read more about robust extraction using
+                               filtering, complex control
+                               structures and heuristic extraction using
+                               scoring rules.
+                       </para>
+               </section>
+       </section>
 </chapter>
\ No newline at end of file


Reply via email to